Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News


Distracted in the Workplace? Meet Maggie Jackson’s Book

Today we’ll dis­cuss some of the cog­ni­tive impli­ca­tions of “always on” work­places and lifestyles via a fas­ci­nat­ing inter­view with Mag­gie Jack­son, an award-win­ning author and jour­nal­ist. Her lat­est book, Dis­tract­ed: The Ero­sion of Atten­tion and the Com­ing Dark Age, describes Distracted by Maggie Jacksonthe impli­ca­tions of our busy work and life envi­ron­ments and offers impor­tant reflec­tions to help us thrive in them.

This is a 2-part inter­view con­duct­ed via e-mail: we will pub­lish the con­tin­u­a­tion on Thurs­day March 12th.

Alvaro Fer­nan­dez: New York Times colum­nist David Brooks said last year that we live in a Cog­ni­tive Age, and encour­aged read­ers to be aware of this change and try and adapt to the new real­i­ty. Can you explain the cog­ni­tive demands of today’s work­places that weren’t there 30–40 years ago?

Mag­gie Jack­son: Our work­places have changed enor­mous­ly in recent decades, and it’s easy to point to the Black­ber­ry or the lap­top as the sources of our cul­ture of speed and over­load and dis­trac­tion. But it’s impor­tant to note first that our 24/7, frag­ment­ed work cul­ture has deep­er roots. With the first high-tech inven­tions, such as the cin­e­ma, phono­graph, tele­graph, rail, and car, came rad­i­cal changes in human expe­ri­ence of time and space. Dis­tance was shat­tered  long before email and red-eye flights. Tele­graph oper­a­tors  not online daters  expe­ri­enced the first vir­tu­al love affairs, as evi­denced by the 1890s nov­el Wired Love. Now, we wres­tle with the effects of changes seed­ed long ago.

Today, the cog­ni­tive and phys­i­cal demands on work­ers are steep. Con­sid­er 24/7 liv­ing. At great cost to our health, we oper­ate in a sleep­less, hur­ried world, ignor­ing cues of sun and sea­son, the Indus­tri­al Age inven­tions of the week­end and vaca­tion, and the rhythms of biol­o­gy. We try to break the fet­ters of time and live like per­pet­u­al motion machines. That’s one rea­son why we feel over­loaded and stressed con­di­tions that are cor­ro­sive to prob­lem-solv­ing and clear think­ing.

At the same time, our tech­nolo­gies allow us access to mil­lions of infor­ma­tion bites pro­duc­ing an abun­dance of data that is both won­drous and dan­ger­ous. Unless we have the will, dis­ci­pline and frame­works for turn­ing this infor­ma­tion into wis­dom, we remain stuck on the sur­face of the knowl­edge econ­o­my. Today, half of col­lege stu­dents can’t judge the objec­tiv­i­ty of a web­site, and just 30 per­cent of col­lege grad­u­ates can read a doc­u­ment as sim­ple as a food label pro­fi­cient­ly. A third of work­ers say they are often so busy and inter­rupt­ed that they don’t have time to reflect on the work they do. I wor­ry that we are cre­at­ing new forms of igno­rance, based not on a lack of infor­ma­tion but on a lack of will or abil­i­ty to wrest knowl­edge from the oceans of infor­ma­tion sur­round­ing us. Google isn’t mak­ing us stu­pid. And yet, are we using Google wise­ly?

Final­ly, we have devel­oped a high­ly frag­ment­ed work­style, thanks in part to the enor­mous influ­ence of Fred­er­ick W. Tay­lor. Tay­lor was an effi­cien­cy guru who taught work­ers to chop up tasks so that each part of a project could be made to go faster. His the­o­ries, accord­ing to man­age­ment guru Peter Druck­er, have influ­enced the world as much as those of Marx or Freud. Today, the aver­age office work­er switch­es tasks every three min­utes all day long, and near­ly half of such inter­rup­tions both exter­nal and inter­nal are self-imposed. Such a work­style is cor­re­lat­ed with stress, frus­tra­tion and even low­er cre­ativ­i­ty.

In this new world, we can rev­el in our abil­i­ty to move freely across the globe, con­nect with mil­lions of oth­ers instant­ly and tap new­found sources of poten­tial knowl­edge. Yet too often, our new ways of work­ing under­mine our pow­ers of atten­tion, a tri­par­tite set of skills relat­ed to aware­ness or wake­ful­ness; focus or the spot­light of the mind; and exec­u­tive atten­tion, a pack­age of high­er-order skills relat­ed to judg­ment and plan­ning. Our split-focus, fre­net­ic, dif­fused lives under­mine our pow­ers of atten­tion, leav­ing us detached, unfo­cused and scat­tered.

Q — What may the role of spend­ing hours per day in front of a TV?

A.  Today, we are exposed to far more than tele­vi­sion every­day. YouTube, movies, ani­mat­ed bill­boards, lap­tops, Muzak, iPods and oth­er devices envel­op us by choice and by default in streams of visu­al and aur­al dis­trac­tions, infor­ma­tion and ads. The aver­age Amer­i­can child is exposed to near­ly six hours of non-print media a day. So deter­min­ing the spe­cif­ic impact of just one type of media is dif­fi­cult in this new medi­at­ed world. Still, it’s cer­tain that this envi­ron­ment shapes us, and molds our incred­i­bly plas­tic brains, in ways we can only begin to fath­om. Accord­ing to work by Daniel Ander­son at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Massachusetts/Amherst, tod­dlers exposed to back­ground tele­vi­sion tv run­ning in the back­ground of fam­i­ly life are more like­ly to show atten­tion defi­cien­cies. They play more briefly with toys, show less focus with their play, and inter­act less with par­ents.

As humans, we are born inter­rupt-dri­ven. In order to sur­vive, we need to focus on new stim­uli in our envi­ron­ment and stay vig­i­lant to changes around us. This is why we are prey to and delight­ed by quick-mov­ing, entic­ing, com­plex media at home and at work. In the office espe­cial­ly, if we’re con­stant­ly react­ing to the new, new thing, we wind up doing noth­ing more than putting out fires and keep­ing our email inbox emp­ty. We are less inclined to wres­tle with the big­ger, messy, prob­lems of the day. Today, we must place our­selves back in the driver’s seat of our atten­tion. We need to take charge of our envi­ron­ment and our atten­tion­al skills, and recap­ture time for reflec­tion, deep prob­lem-solv­ing and cre­ativ­i­ty. As one top exec­u­tive once told me, think­ing can’t be done in sound bites.

Q — In your Har­vard Man­age­ment Update inter­view, you said that “When what we pay atten­tion to is dri­ven by the last email we received, the triv­ial and the cru­cial occu­py the same plane.” As well, it seems to be that a prob­lem is our culture’s over-ide­al­iza­tion of “always on” and “road war­rior” habits, which dis­tract from the impor­tance of exec­u­tive func­tions such as pay­ing atten­tion to one’s envi­ron­ment, set­ting up goals and plans, exe­cut­ing on them, mea­sur­ing results, and inter­nal­iz­ing learn­ing. How can com­pa­nies bet­ter equip their employ­ees for future suc­cess? Can you offer some exam­ples of com­pa­nies who have pos­i­tive cul­tures that encour­age and reward employ­ees ful­ly put their frontal lobes into good use?

A.  As I men­tioned above, we are work­ing and liv­ing in ways that under­mine our abil­i­ty to strate­gize, focus, reflect, inno­vate. Skim­ming, mul­ti­task­ing and speed all have a place in 21st-cen­tu­ry life. But we can’t let go of deep­er skills of focus and think­ing and relat­ing, or we’ll cre­ate a soci­ety of mis­un­der­stand­ing and shal­low think­ing.

To cre­ate work­places that fos­ter strate­gic think­ing, deep social con­nec­tion and inno­va­tion, we need to take three steps:

First, ques­tion the val­ues that ven­er­ate McThink­ing and under­mine atten­tion. Recent­ly, my morn­ing paper car­ried a front-page sto­ry about efforts in an age of impa­tience to cre­ate a quick-boot com­put­er. It’s ridicu­lous to ask peo­ple to wait a cou­ple of min­utes to start up their com­put­er, explained one tech exec­u­tive. The first hand up in the class­room, the hyper busi­ness-man or woman who can’t sit still, much less lis­ten these are icons of suc­cess in Amer­i­can soci­ety. Still, many of us are begin­ning to ques­tion our ado­ra­tion of instant grat­i­fi­ca­tion and hyper-mobil­i­ty.

To Be Con­tin­ued…
Distracted by Maggie Jackson

Please remem­ber: we will pub­lish the con­tin­u­a­tion of this inter­view on Thurs­day March 12th. (yes, you can con­sid­er this a test of your exec­u­tive func­tions and/ or your mem­o­ry).

Book: Dis­tract­ed: The Ero­sion of Atten­tion and the Com­ing Dark Age.

Relat­ed arti­cles and resources:

- The Over­flow­ing Brain: Most Impor­tant Book of 2008

- Top 10 Brain Fit­ness Books

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

Leave a Reply

Categories: Attention and ADD/ADHD, Author Speaks Series, Cognitive Neuroscience, Education & Lifelong Learning, Peak Performance, Professional Development

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Watch All Recordings Now (40+ Speakers, 12+ Hours)

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters and more, SharpBrains is an independent market research firm tracking health and performance applications of brain science.

Follow us and Engage via…

RSS Feed

Search for anything brain-related in our article archives