Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News


Can brain training work? Yes, if it meets these 5 conditions

brain exerciseIn a mod­ern soci­ety we are con­front­ed with a wide range of increas­ing­ly abstract and inter­con­nect­ed prob­lems. Suc­cess­ful­ly deal­ing with such an envi­ron­ment requires a high­ly fit brain, capa­ble of adapt­ing to new sit­u­a­tions and chal­lenges through­out life. Con­se­quent­ly, we expect cross-train­ing the brain to soon become as main­stream as cross-train­ing the body is today, going beyond unstruc­tured men­tal activ­i­ty and aim­ing at max­i­miz­ing a vari­ety of brain func­tions. The goal of our new book is to help read­ers nav­i­gate the grow­ing land­scape of lifestyle and brain train­ing options to enhance brain health and per­for­mance across the lifes­pan.

 How is brain train­ing dif­fer­ent from men­tal stim­u­la­tion?

Any­thing we do involv­ing nov­el­ty, vari­ety, and chal­lenge stim­u­lates the brain and can con­tribute to build­ing capac­i­ty and brain reserve. For instance, learn­ing how to play the piano acti­vates a num­ber of brain func­tions (atten­tion, mem­o­ry, motor skills, etc.), which trig­gers changes in the under­ly­ing neu­ronal net­works. Indeed, musi­cians have larg­er brain vol­ume in areas that are impor­tant for play­ing an instru­ment: motor, audi­to­ry and visu­ospa­tial regions. How­ev­er, we need to rec­og­nize that such an activ­i­ty may take thou­sands of hours before pay­ing off in terms of brain fit­ness. It con­sti­tutes a great and plea­sur­able men­tal effort, and helps build cog­ni­tive reserve, but it is dif­fer­ent by nature from more tar­get­ed, effi­cient, and com­ple­men­tary brain train­ing inter­ven­tions. To take an anal­o­gy from the world of phys­i­cal fit­ness, it makes sense to stay fit by play­ing pick­up soc­cer games AND also by train­ing spe­cif­ic mus­cle groups and capac­i­ties such as car­dio endurance, abdom­i­nal mus­cles, and thigh mus­cle. It is not one or the oth­er.

Under what con­di­tions can brain train­ing work?

This is the mil­lion dol­lar ques­tion. Evi­dence is grow­ing that some forms of brain train­ing can work, espe­cial­ly when based on cog­ni­tive train­ing, cog­ni­tive behav­ioral ther­a­py, med­i­ta­tion and/ or biofeed­back. The ques­tion remains, how­ev­er, how to max­i­mize the like­li­hood of trans­fer from train­ing to dai­ly life.

Why do we still often hear that brain train­ing does not work? Because of the dif­fer­ent under­stand­ings of what “brain train­ing” and “work” mean. A machine to train abdom­i­nal mus­cles prob­a­bly won’t “work” if what we mea­sure is blood pres­sure. A “plane” won’t fly if it wasn’t a plane to start with, but a don­key.

The most crit­i­cal fac­tor in deter­min­ing whether a brain train­ing method or pro­gram works is the extent to which the train­ing effects “trans­fer” to ben­e­fits in dai­ly life. We know from com­mon expe­ri­ence that prac­tice usu­al­ly trig­gers improve­ment in the prac­ticed task. Based on our analy­sis of dozens of doc­u­ment­ed exam­ples of brain train­ing tech­niques that “work” or “trans­fer,” we pro­pose that these five con­di­tions must be met for any kind of brain train­ing, from med­i­ta­tion to tech­nol­o­gy-based pro­grams, to trans­late into mean­ing­ful real world improve­ments:

  1. It must engage and exer­cise a core brain-based capac­i­ty or neur­al cir­cuit iden­ti­fied to be rel­e­vant to real-life out­comes, such as exec­u­tive atten­tion, work­ing mem­o­ry, speed of pro­cess­ing and emo­tion­al reg­u­la­tion, as well as oth­ers dis­cussed through­out the inter­views with sci­en­tists in this book. Many sup­posed “brain train­ing” games fail to pro­vide any actu­al “brain train­ing” because they were nev­er real­ly designed to tar­get spe­cif­ic and rel­e­vant brain func­tions.
  2. It must tar­get a per­for­mance bot­tle­neck – oth­er­wise it is an exer­cise in van­i­ty sim­i­lar to build­ing the largest biceps in town while neglect­ing the rest of the body. A crit­i­cal ques­tion to ask is: Which brain func­tion do I need to opti­mize? With phys­i­cal fit­ness, effec­tive train­ing begins with a tar­get in mind: Is the goal to train abdom­i­nal mus­cles? Biceps? Car­dio capac­i­ty? So it goes for brain fit­ness, where the ques­tion becomes: Is the goal to opti­mize dri­ving-relat­ed cog­ni­tive skills? Con­cen­tra­tion? Mem­o­ry? Reg­u­lat­ing stress and emo­tions? The choice of a tech­nique or tech­nol­o­gy should be dri­ven by your goal. For instance, if you need to train your exec­u­tive func­tions but use a pro­gram designed to enhance speed of pro­cess­ing, you may well con­clude that this pro­gram does not “work.” But this pro­gram may work for some­body whose bot­tle­neck is speed of pro­cess­ing (as often hap­pens in old­er adults).
  3. A min­i­mum “dose” of 15 hours total per tar­get­ed brain func­tion, per­formed over 8 weeks or less, is nec­es­sary for real improve­ment. Train­ing only a few hours across a wide vari­ety of brain func­tions, such as in the “BBC brain train­ing” exper­i­ment, should not be expect­ed to trig­ger real-world ben­e­fits, in the same way that going to the gym a cou­ple times per month and doing an assort­ment of undi­rect­ed exer­cis­es can­not be expect­ed to result in increased mus­cle strength and phys­i­cal fit­ness.
  4. Train­ing must adapt to per­for­mance, require effort­ful atten­tion, and increase in dif­fi­cul­ty. This is a key advan­tage of com­put­er­ized “brain train­ing” over pen-and-paper-based activ­i­ties. Think about the num­ber of hours you have spent doing cross­word or Sudoku puz­zles, or mas­ter­ing any new sub­ject for that mat­ter, in a way that was either too easy for you and became bor­ing or way too dif­fi­cult and became frus­trat­ing. Inter­ac­tive train­ing has the capac­i­ty to con­stant­ly mon­i­tor your lev­el of per­for­mance and adapt accord­ing­ly.
  5. Con­tin­ued prac­tice is required for con­tin­ued ben­e­fits. Just as you wouldn’t expect to derive life­long ben­e­fits from run­ning a few hours this month, and then not exer­cis­ing ever again, you shouldn’t expect life­long ben­e­fits from a one-time brain train­ing activ­i­ty. Remem­ber that “cells that SharpBrainsGuide_3D_compressedfire togeth­er wire togeth­er” – while the min­i­mum dose described above may act as a thresh­old to start see­ing some ben­e­fits, con­tin­ued prac­tice, either at a reduced num­ber of hours or as a peri­od­ic “boost­er,” is a final con­di­tion for trans­fer to real-world ben­e­fits over time.

–This is an adapt­ed excerpt from the new book “The Sharp­Brains Guide to Brain Fit­ness: How to Opti­mize Brain Health and Per­for­mance at Any Age” (April 2013; 284 pages). This user-friend­ly and thought-pro­vok­ing how-to guide cuts through the clut­ter of media hype about the lat­est “mag­ic pill” for bet­ter brain health, offer­ing proven, prac­ti­cal tips and tech­niques that any­one can use to main­tain and enhance brain func­tion through­out life and even ward off cog­ni­tive decline.

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

3 Responses

  1. John Kennedy says:

    I’m sor­ry but I dis­agree with sev­er­al of these cri­te­ria. Com­bat Brain Train­ing is the only pro­gram of its kind vet­ted and approved by US Spe­cial Oper­a­tions Com­mand and has pro­duced real world improve­ments in cog­ni­tive per­for­mance in as lit­tle as 3 hrs. That’s how long it took for a sur­geon to reduce the required time for a surgery from 6 hours to less than 2, and a young girl with LD to remem­ber her math for­mu­las and raise her grades sig­nif­i­cant­ly. The key is not to iso­late a spe­cif­ic issue, but tar­get all areas of the brain. This way weak­er men­tal process­es are improved but so are stronger ones that no longer have to com­pen­sate for the weak ones.

    • Hel­lo John, frankly it’s not a mat­ter of agree­ing or dis­agree­ing, but of tak­ing a deep look at the avail­able evi­dence. We ana­lyzed hun­dreds of well-pub­lished ran­dom­ized con­trolled tri­als, try­ing to find key dif­fer­ences between those which showed trans­fer from train­ing to real-world out­comes vs. those which didn’t, and those 5 key “con­di­tions” rep­re­sent what we found. I’m sure we’ll refine them as more rig­or­ous stud­ies are con­duct­ed — I invite you to share spe­cif­ic ref­er­ences so we can add them to our analy­sis, and to conduct/ finance/ par­tic­i­pate in inde­pen­dent and high-qual­i­ty tri­als so we can bet­ter under­stand what’s going on and how more peo­ple can ben­e­fit. Regards

  2. This is great; thank you for post­ing. Par­tic­u­lar­ly inter­est­ing was the fact that train­ing must involve focused atten­tion and pro­longed hours of train­ing. How­ev­er, wouldn’t long ses­sions of train­ing result in tem­po­rary reduc­tion of cog­ni­tive per­for­mance and out­put? Thanks

Leave a Reply

Categories: Cognitive Neuroscience, Health & Wellness

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,