Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Icon

Understanding, and Nurturing, Resilience and Adaptability

Over and over again—in nat­ur­al dis­as­ters, after the SARS epi­dem­ic, fol­low­ing the loss of a child or spouse—Bonanno’s lon­gi­tu­di­nal stud­ies on loss and trau­ma revealed the exact same pat­tern at the pop­u­la­tion lev­el. No mat­ter how bad the trau­ma, rates of PTSD nev­er exceed­ed one-third, and rates of resilience were always found in at least one-third and nev­er more than two-thirds of the pop­u­la­tion.

This pat­tern of response is so ubiq­ui­tous, and so con­sis­tent, it begs the ques­tion: Why are we, as a species, designed this way?” asks Bonan­no.

One pos­si­ble answer is that the design ensures that there is always at least a siz­able minor­i­ty, or even a major­i­ty, to take care of those deeply affect­ed by a trau­ma.

Per­son­al resilience has a dizzy­ing­ly long list of cor­re­lates. Although it would be impos­si­ble for us to give ade­quate treat­ment to all of them here, it is worth tak­ing some time to go over a few of the more salient ones. Among these, innate per­son­al­i­ty traits like opti­mism and con­fi­dence have emerged as some of the most pro­tec­tive assets against life’s stres­sors. Think of Bel­la and Jack at Ling­field orphan­age: Accord­ing to Moskovitz’s study, they were able to charm the adults and func­tion with self-agency at the orphan­age, cre­at­ing a pos­i­tive feed­back loop with the staff and their fam­i­lies that result­ed in bet­ter and bet­ter care. This ego-resiliency—defined as the capac­i­ty to over­come, steer through, or bounce back from adversity—was first not­ed by devel­op­men­tal psy­chol­o­gists Jack and Jeanne Block in 1968, in a high­ly regard­ed lon­gi­tu­di­nal study doc­u­ment­ing the lives of one hun­dred young adults over more than thir­ty years. In addi­tion to ego-resilien­cy, the Block study mea­sured a char­ac­ter­is­tic they called ego-con­trol, or the degree to which an indi­vid­ual has the abil­i­ty to delay grat­i­fi­ca­tion in ser­vice of future goals. Sub­jects exhibit­ing the com­bi­na­tion of ego-resilien­cy and ego-con­trol were bet­ter able to adapt flex­i­bly to dif­fer­ent cir­cum­stances and suc­ceed in the midst of chal­lenges.

Such per­son­al­i­ty traits are root­ed in belief sys­tems that allow one to cog­ni­tive­ly reap­praise sit­u­a­tions and reg­u­late emo­tions, turn­ing life’s prover­bial lemons into lemon­ade. Social psy­chol­o­gists refer to this as har­di­ness, a sys­tem of thought based, broad­ly, on three main tenets: (1) the belief that one can find a mean­ing­ful pur­pose in life, (2) the belief that one can influ­ence one’s sur­round­ings and the out­come of events, and (3) the belief that pos­i­tive and neg­a­tive expe­ri­ences will lead to learn­ing and growth. Con­sid­er­ing this, it should come as no sur­prise that peo­ple of faith also report greater degrees of resilience.

Psy­chol­o­gist Ken­neth Parga­ment has spent the lion’s share of his aca­d­e­m­ic career inves­ti­gat­ing the links between reli­gion and resilience. In addi­tion to offer­ing all of the ben­e­fits of a community—including sup­port groups and cop­ing meth­ods for peo­ple finan­cial­ly or social­ly disenfranchised—Pargament attrib­ut­es the pow­er of reli­gion to its invo­ca­tion of the sacred. His work specif­i­cal­ly dis­tin­guish­es between sec­u­lar cop­ing mech­a­nisms and sacred ones, those that work in direct col­lab­o­ra­tion with a god by either cre­at­ing a part­ner­ship or rely­ing on the utter relin­quish­ment of con­trol. As anthro­pol­o­gist Clif­ford Geertz wrote in his sem­i­nal essay “Reli­gion as a Cul­tur­al Sys­tem”:

The strange opac­i­ty of cer­tain empir­i­cal events, the dumb sense­less­ness of intense or inex­orable pain, and the enig­mat­ic unac­count­abil­i­ty of gross iniq­ui­ty all raise the uncom­fort­able sus­pi­cion that per­haps the world, and hence man’s life in the world, has no gen­uine order at all—no empir­i­cal reg­u­lar­i­ty, no emo­tion­al form, no moral coher­ence. And the reli­gious response to this sus­pi­cion is in each case the same: the for­mu­la­tion, by means of sym­bols, of an image of such a gen­uine order of the world which will account for, and even cel­e­brate, the per­ceived ambi­gu­i­ties, puz­zles, and para­dox­es in human expe­ri­ence. The effort is not to deny the -undeniable—that there are unex­plained events, that life hurts, or that rain falls upon the just—but to deny that there are inex­plic­a­ble events, that life is unen­durable, and that jus­tice is a mirage.

This con­nec­tion between reli­gious faith (or, more broad­ly, a per­son­al spir­i­tu­al cos­mol­o­gy) and resilience presents an intrigu­ing rejoin­der to athe­ist crit­ics of reli­gious beliefs. While such beliefs may or may not be true, they may nonethe­less be adap­tive. That is, reli­gious belief per­sists and thrives, in part, not because it nec­es­sar­i­ly guar­an­tees per­sis­tence of one’s soul in the next life, but pre­cise­ly because it con­fers a mea­sure of psy­cho­log­i­cal resilience upon its pos­ses­sors.

Of course, reli­gious prac­ti­tion­ers are not the only group that exhibits a high degree of resilience. Cul­tur­al iden­ti­ty also plays a role. For exam­ple, researchers found that His­pan­ics deemed at high risk by all the stan­dard indi­ca­tors appeared health­i­er as a group when they expressed a strong attach­ment to their His­pan­ic her­itage. Such a find­ing sug­gests that mem­bers of a cul­ture affirm­ing strong in-group loy­al­ties will exhib­it greater per­son­al resilience, a point we will revis­it in greater depth in our com­ing dis­cus­sion of coop­er­a­tion.

– Excerpt­ed from RESILIENCE: Why Things Bounce Back by Andrew Zol­li and Ann Marie Healy. Copy­right © 2012 by Andrew Zol­li. Reprint­ed with per­mis­sion from Free Press, a Divi­sion of Simon & Schus­ter, Inc.

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

Leave a Reply

Categories: Cognitive Neuroscience, Health & Wellness

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

All Slidedecks & Recordings Available — click image below

Search for anything brain-related in our article archives

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters, and more, SharpBrains is an independent market research firm and think tank tracking health and performance applications of brain science.