Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News


Study: Promising New Neurocognitive Intervention for Preschoolers with ADHD (TEAMS)

Although med­ica­tion treat­ment and behav­ior ther­a­py pro­vide short-term symp­to­matic relief for chil­dren with ADHD, such gains rarely per­sist after treat­ment ends. Because these treat­ments are infre­quent­ly sus­tained over extend­ed peri­ods (most chil­dren on med­ica­tion do not even remain on it for a year), few indi­vid­u­als with ADHD receive effec­tive treat­ment over the long-term. This may explain why cur­rent treat­ments pro­vide only lim­it­ed long-term ben­e­fits and why many indi­vid­u­als with ADHD have poor ado­les­cent and young adult out­comes even if they were effec­tive­ly treat­ed in child­hood. Clear­ly, treat­ments that can pro­vide endur­ing ben­e­fits are need­ed.

As knowl­edge of the under­ly­ing neur­al and neu­rocog­ni­tive con­trib­u­tors to ADHD has grown, and knowl­edge that brain devel­op­ment is high­ly respon­sive to envi­ron­men­tal influ­ences has accu­mu­lat­ed, a com­pelling the­o­ret­i­cal frame­work for the devel­op­ment of more endur­ing ADHD inter­ven­tions has emerged. Specif­i­cal­ly, it has been hypoth­e­sized that par­tic­u­lar kinds of expe­ri­ence can ame­lio­rate — or at least dimin­ish — some of the under­ly­ing neur­al fac­tors that con­tribute to the devel­op­ment and expres­sion of ADHD.

In fact, this pos­si­bil­i­ty has already been demon­strat­ed in sev­er­al stud­ies. For exam­ple, work in the neu­ro­feed­back domain has demon­strat­ed changes in neur­al activ­i­ty in indi­vid­u­als with ADHD fol­low­ing treat­ment. Sim­i­lar­ly, sig­nif­i­cant changes in neur­al activ­i­ty have been shown to occur in indi­vid­u­als fol­low­ing work­ing mem­o­ry train­ing.

Neu­ro­feed­back, work­ing mem­o­ry train­ing, and oth­er forms of com­put­er­ized cog­ni­tive train­ing are dis­tinct­ly dif­fer­ent activ­i­ties from typ­i­cal dai­ly expe­ri­ence and are not par­tic­u­lar­ly social in nature. How­ev­er, it may also be pos­si­ble to pro­vide chil­dren with envi­ron­men­tal stim­u­la­tion that can enhance neur­al and cog­ni­tive func­tion­ing with­in the con­text of the par­ent-child rela­tion­ship. And, because such activ­i­ties can be inher­ent­ly enjoy­able, and pro­mote pos­i­tive rela­tions between par­ents and chil­dren, they may be sus­tained over time and thus pro­vide chil­dren with ongo­ing expe­ri­ence that can enhance their neur­al func­tion­ing. In the­o­ry, such an inter­ven­tion could pro­duce endur­ing treat­ment gains in chil­dren with ADHD, par­tic­u­lar­ly if intro­duced when chil­dren are young and neu­ro­plas­tic­i­ty may be great­est.

This was the premise under­ly­ing an extreme­ly inter­est­ing and impor­tant study recent­ly pub­lished online in the Jour­nal of Atten­tion Dis­or­ders [Halperin et al., (2012). Train­ing exec­u­tive atten­tion and motor skills: A proof-of-con­cept study in preschool chil­dren with ADHD. Jour­nal of Atten­tion Dis­or­ders, pub­lished online March 5, 2012. DOI: 10.1177/1087054711435681.]. To be can­did, I found this to be one of the most inter­est­ing stud­ies I have read dur­ing the past 10 years.

Par­tic­i­pants were 29 four- and five-year old eth­ni­cal­ly diverse chil­dren diag­nosed with ADHD and their par­ents. Chil­dren and par­ents par­tic­i­pat­ed in a nov­el inter­ven­tion called TEAMS — Train­ing Exec­u­tive, Atten­tion, and Motor Skills.’ As dis­cussed below, TEAMS was designed to “…apply fre­quent and endur­ing pos­i­tive envi­ron­men­tal stim­u­la­tion to under­ly­ing neu­rode­vel­op­men­tal process­es in chil­dren with ADHD.” Specif­i­cal­ly, par­ents learned to engage in spe­cif­ic game-like activ­i­ties with their child that placed increas­ing­ly chal­leng­ing demands on a vari­ety of neu­rocog­ni­tive and motor skills. The the­o­ry behind TEAMS was that this would pro­mote under­ly­ing changes in neur­al func­tion­ing that would lead to endur­ing improve­ments in ADHD symp­toms.

The authors describe this as a ‘proof of con­cept’ study. Thus the goals were to learn whether par­ents would have pos­i­tive feel­ings about the treat­ment expe­ri­ence, whether they would engage reg­u­lar­ly with their child in the pre­scribed activ­i­ties, and whether there was any pre­lim­i­nary evi­dence of pos­i­tive effects. As such, there was no con­trol group and no ran­dom­iza­tion to con­di­tion. Thus, even were favor­able results to be found, this was a pre­lim­i­nary study that could not estab­lish the effi­ca­cy of the new treat­ment.

TEAMS Inter­ven­tion Specifics

The TEAMS inter­ven­tion was con­duct­ed in a 90-minute group for­mat (between 5 and 10 group meet­ings were held) that includ­ed 3–5 fam­i­lies per group. In each group, chil­dren and par­ents were intro­duced to a pre­de­ter­mined set of games cho­sen to tar­get an array of neu­rocog­ni­tive skills. For exam­ple, to tar­get inhibito­ry con­trol, i.e., the abil­i­ty to refrain from respond­ing impul­sive­ly, games would include vari­a­tions of “Simon Says” and ‘freeze dance’. To devel­op work­ing mem­o­ry skills, games would include things like remem­ber­ing shop­ping lists or the loca­tions of ‘hid­den trea­sures’ under cups. Oth­er tar­get­ed cog­ni­tive skills were visu­al-spa­tial abil­i­ties, plan­ning and orga­ni­za­tion, and sus­tained atten­tion. Games to devel­op motor skills were also includ­ed as was an aer­o­bic exer­cise com­po­nent.

Between group meet­ings, par­ents were instruct­ed to spend at 30–45 min­utes each day play­ing these games with their child. The goal was to pro­vide suf­fi­cient stim­u­la­tion of the under­ly­ing neur­al process­es tar­get­ed by the games so that these process­es were repeat­ed­ly exer­cised and strength­ened.

A focus in group meet­ings was work­ing with par­ents to iden­ti­fy and over­come dif­fi­cul­ties they had expe­ri­enced con­sis­tent­ly imple­ment­ing the games with their child dur­ing the pri­or week. Par­ents also learned new games, dis­cussed the cog­ni­tive skills being tar­get­ed, and were taught how to grad­u­al­ly increase the dif­fi­cul­ty lev­el so that chil­dren’s cog­ni­tive skills were con­tin­u­al­ly chal­lenged. The impor­tance of reg­u­lar aer­o­bic exer­cise was also stressed as there is emerg­ing evi­dence that this can improve cog­ni­tive func­tion­ing.


To assess the impact of the TEAMS pro­gram, rat­ings of core ADHD symp­toms and of chil­dren’s impair­ment from symp­toms were col­lect­ed from par­ents and teach­ers. Rat­ings were obtained before treat­ment began, imme­di­ate­ly after the groups end­ed, and at a 1- and 3‑month fol­low-up. These lat­ter mea­sure­ment points enabled the researchers to learn whether any gains that were ini­tial­ly evi­dent endured.

In addi­tion, par­ents com­plet­ed rat­ings of how often they engaged in the pre­scribed games each week and how long they engaged in these games with their child.


Parental accep­tance — Only one of the 29 fam­i­lies with­drew dur­ing the active treat­ment phase and this was because of trans­porta­tion issues. Over­all, par­ents attend­ed 93% of sched­uled ses­sions and near­ly 70% attend­ed all ses­sions. Sat­is­fac­tion with the inter­ven­tion was rat­ed very high­ly.

Engage­ment in TEAMS activ­i­ties — For TEAMS to be effec­tive, chil­dren must engage in the pre­scribed games with con­sid­er­able fre­quen­cy. Through­out the inter­ven­tion peri­od, par­ents indi­cat­ed that they engaged in the games near­ly every day for an aver­age of 35 min­utes. One month after treat­ment end­ed they were still play­ing the games near­ly 3 times a week for 30 min­utes. At the 3‑month fol­lowup, this had declined to an aver­age of 20 minutes/day two days per week. Thus, despite the drop-off from the active treat­ment peri­od, par­ents and chil­dren con­tin­ued to reg­u­lar­ly engage in the games for at least 3 months after treat­ment end­ed.

ADHD symp­tom sever­i­ty — Sig­nif­i­cant reduc­tions in par­ent and teacher rat­ings of ADHD symp­toms were evi­dent from pre- to post-treat­ment. Fur­ther­more, these reduc­tions remained evi­dent at the 1- and 3‑month fol­lowups. Equiv­a­lent reduc­tions were found for inat­ten­tive and hyper­ac­tive-impul­sive symp­toms. The mag­ni­tude of the reduc­tions were in a range that would be con­sid­ered large for par­ents and mod­er­ate for teach­ers.

Impair­ment from symp­toms — Rat­ings of impair­ment from symp­toms declined sig­nif­i­cant­ly for both par­ents and teach­ers. Inter­est­ing­ly, these declines were not sig­nif­i­cant imme­di­ate­ly fol­low­ing treat­ment, but became evi­dent at the 1‑month fol­low-up for par­ents and at the 3‑month fol­low-up for teach­ers. The mag­ni­tude of the decline was in a range that would be con­sid­ered mod­er­ate.

Sum­ma­ry and Impli­ca­tions

The premise of TEAMS is that con­sis­tent­ly engag­ing chil­dren with ADHD in activ­i­ties that chal­lenge and exer­cise par­tic­u­lar neu­rocog­ni­tive func­tions can strength­en the under­ly­ing neur­al activ­i­ty that sup­port these func­tions and there­by dimin­ish ADHD symp­toms. This premise is con­sis­tent with the ratio­nale under­ly­ing neu­ro­feed­back treat­ment, work­ing mem­o­ry train­ing, and oth­er approach­es to com­put­er­ized cog­ni­tive train­ing. What is unique about the TEAMS approach, how­ev­er, is the idea that such stim­u­la­tion can occur in the con­text game like activ­i­ties between par­ents and chil­dren that are inher­ent­ly enjoy­able and that also pro­mote pos­i­tive par­ent-child inter­ac­tions.

In my view, this is a very excit­ing study and the kind of work the field real­ly needs. For years, evi­dence that ADHD is strong­ly influ­enced by genet­ic fac­tors may have under­mined efforts to exam­ine whether expe­ri­en­tial fac­tors — par­tic­u­lar­ly the ways that par­ents inter­act with their child — could play an impor­tant role in address­ing core ADHD symp­toms. What these researchers have sug­gest­ed, and pro­vid­ed pre­lim­i­nary evi­dence of, is that this may be pos­si­ble.

Note that their approach is very dif­fer­ent from using behav­ioral prin­ci­ples to man­age ADHD symp­toms and encour­age desired behav­ior. While behav­ioral man­age­ment approach­es are impor­tant and help­ful, the focus is on symp­tom man­age­ment and not on chang­ing chil­dren’s under­ly­ing capac­i­ties. Here, in con­trast, the idea is that par­ents can pro­vide ongo­ing oppor­tu­ni­ties to help chil­dren exer­cise neu­rocog­ni­tive func­tions that can lead to endur­ing ben­e­fits.

Also note that the TEAMS approach in no way implies that par­ents are some­how respon­si­ble for their child’s devel­op­ment of ADHD. Instead, TEAMS strives to teach par­ents how to pro­vide chil­dren with expe­ri­ences that may lead to endur­ing reduc­tions in ADHD symp­toms over time.

While I found this to be an excit­ing study, it is impor­tant to empha­size that this is only an ini­tial ‘proof of con­cept’ of the approach. As the authors note, the absence of any con­trol group makes it impos­si­ble to deter­mine why chil­dren seemed to improve. Although the the­o­ry under­ly­ing TEAMS is that the chil­dren’s ongo­ing involve­ment in the pre­scribed games and exer­cise pro­gram alters their under­ly­ing neur­al func­tion­ing, no such assess­ments were con­duct­ed. The sam­ple size was also rel­a­tive­ly small.

These lim­i­ta­tions not with­stand­ing, this ini­tial effort demon­strat­ed that TEAMS was expe­ri­enced pos­i­tive­ly by par­ents who con­tin­ued to engage reg­u­lar­ly in the treat­ment exer­cis­es up to 3 months after treat­ment end­ed. And, ben­e­fi­cial effects as rat­ed by par­ents and teach­ers remained evi­dent after 3 months. The authors con­clude by not­ing that a larg­er ran­dom­ized tri­al is planned so that the poten­tial ben­e­fits of TEAMS can be bet­ter under­stood. This is impor­tant work and I look for­ward to review­ing it for you Atten­tion Research Update when it becomes avail­able.
Rabiner_David– Dr. David Rabin­er is a child clin­i­cal psy­chol­o­gist and Direc­tor of Under­grad­u­ate Stud­ies in the Depart­ment of Psy­chol­ogy and Neu­ro­science at Duke Uni­ver­sity. He pub­lishes Atten­tion Research Update, an online newslet­ter that helps par­ents, pro­fes­sion­als, and edu­ca­tors keep up with the lat­est research on ADHD, and teach­es the online course  How to Nav­i­gate Con­ven­tion­al and Com­ple­men­tary ADHD Treat­ments for Healthy Brain Devel­op­ment.

Pre­vi­ous arti­cles by Dr. Rabin­er:

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

One Response

  1. Bergan says:

    the major prob­lem with this study is that the mea­sure­ments are being tak­en by the teach­ers and par­ent whose eval­u­a­tions are as accu­rate as a coin toss, which has been proven. Add on the fact that these are the same peo­ple “treat­ing” these kids and the whole study goes to hell in a hand­bas­ket.

Leave a Reply

Categories: Attention and ADD/ADHD, Cognitive Neuroscience

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters,  SharpBrains is an independent market research firm tracking how brain science can improve our health and our lives.

Search in our archives

Follow us and Engage via…

RSS Feed

Watch All Recordings Now (40+ Speakers, 12+ Hours)