Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Icon

The Business and Ethics of the Brain Fitness Boom — Part 2: The Ethics

The ter­mi­nol­o­gy “fun­da­men­tal attri­bu­tion error” describes the ten­den­cy to over­val­ue per­son­al­i­ty-based expla­na­tions for observed human behav­iors, while under­valu­ing sit­u­a­tion­al expla­na­tions for those behav­iors.  I believe that a pri­ma­ry rea­son behind many per­ceived and real eth­i­cal chal­lenges in the brain fit­ness field is due not so much to cer­tain stake­hold­ers’ lack of per­son­al or pro­fes­sion­al ethics, but derives from the flawed soci­etal con­struct that under­pins cur­rent, rel­e­vant inno­va­tions. To improve the ethics of the brain fit­ness busi­ness and its appli­ca­tion (and empow­er con­sumers’ informed deci­sion mak­ing), there must first be agree­ment about a mean­ing­ful, appro­pri­ate way to ana­lyze and guide inno­va­tion. This is the crux of the prob­lem. The cur­rent med­ical mod­el is not up to the task at hand, since it is heav­i­ly skewed toward inva­sive drugs and devices dri­ven by dis­ease-based mod­els, and fails to lever­age cog­ni­tive reserve find­ings and the pro­tec­tive role of phys­i­cal exer­cise, cog­ni­tive engage­ment, and cog­ni­tive train­ing (Valen­zuela, 2009; AHRQ, 2010).

Sure­ly there are oth­er meth­ods bet­ter suit­ed to the oppor­tu­ni­ty at hand oth­er than the pure­ly enter­tain­ment-dri­ven “brain age” inven­tion. The fol­low­ing quote from a recent paper in Glob­al Pol­i­cy invites all stake­hold­ers to shift per­cep­tions of aging from bur­den to human cap­i­tal: “We con­tend that ear­ly and repeat­ed pre­ven­tive care ‘inter­ven­tions’ (espe­cial­ly in health behav­iors and geri­atric med­i­cine) and ‘pre­ven­tive’ mea­sures (such as social inte­gra­tion, design of cities and life­long learn­ing so that work­ers can upgrade skills) will delay the onset of late-life dif­fi­cul­ties” (Olshan­sky et al., 2011).

If we are to trans­form the con­ver­sa­tion that cur­rent­ly focus­es on the med­ical mod­el of diag­no­sis and treat­ment of a col­lec­tion of dis­or­ders toward dia­logue that cen­ters upon a cost-ben­e­fits scal­able mod­el of life-course invest­ments in brain health and fit­ness, what strate­gies could inform this new con­ver­sa­tion?

Build­ing men­tal cap­i­tal and well-being

The Fore­sight Project on Men­tal Cap­i­tal and Well-being (The Gov­ern­ment Office for Sci­ence, 2008), a major research and pol­i­cy ini­tia­tive launched in 2008 by the gov­ern­ment of the Unit­ed King­dom, was intend­ed to “pro­mote opti­mal men­tal cap­i­tal tra­jec­to­ries through life for the gen­er­al pop­u­la­tion [by] influ­enc­ing indi­vid­u­als’ men­tal devel­op­ment and well­be­ing from con­cep­tion until death, ana­lyz­ing pos­si­ble inter­ven­tions to address chal­lenges, draw­ing upon con­sid­er­a­tions such as sci­en­tif­ic effi­ca­cy, eco­nom­ics, gov­er­nance and ethics.”

A grow­ing por­tion of the 78 mil­lion baby boomers in the Unit­ed States is  invest­ing time and effort into retain­ing their men­tal sharp­ness.

The Project, a mas­sive endeav­or mar­shal­ing hun­dreds of neu­ro­sci­en­tists, result­ed in dozens of detailed reports and put for­ward a new frame­work to guide pub­lic pol­i­cy, with focus on the fol­low­ing two key con­cepts:

Men­tal cap­i­tal. “This encom­pass­es a person’s cog­ni­tive and emo­tion­al resources. It includes their cog­ni­tive abil­i­ty, how flex­i­ble and effi­cient they are at learn­ing, and their ‘emo­tion­al intel­li­gence,’ such as their social skills and resilience in the face of stress. It there­fore con­di­tions how well an indi­vid­ual is able to con­tribute effec­tive­ly to soci­ety, and also to expe­ri­ence a high per­son­al qual­i­ty of life. The idea of ‘cap­i­tal’ nat­u­ral­ly sparks asso­ci­a­tion with ideas of finan­cial cap­i­tal and it is both chal­leng­ing and nat­ur­al to think of the mind in this way.”

Men­tal well-being. “This is a dynam­ic state, in which the indi­vid­ual is able to devel­op their poten­tial, work pro­duc­tive­ly and cre­ative­ly, build strong and pos­i­tive rela­tion­ships with oth­ers, and con­tribute to their com­mu­ni­ty. It is enhanced when an indi­vid­ual is able to ful­fill their per­son­al and social goals and achieve a sense of pur­pose in soci­ety.”

The Project issued a num­ber of life-course rec­om­men­da­tions, includ­ing the need to address the “mas­sive under-uti­liza­tion of the men­tal cap­i­tal of old­er adults” and to “act deci­sive­ly to estab­lish pro­tec­tive lifestyles for those in mid­dle age in areas where the sit­u­a­tion is set to wors­en, such as the grow­ing num­ber of old­er peo­ple at risk of demen­tia.”

Ulti­mate­ly, the pri­ma­ry rec­om­men­da­tion culled from all the reports was to pro­mote opti­mal men­tal cap­i­tal tra­jec­to­ries through life for the gen­er­al pop­u­la­tion since “…achiev­ing a small change in the aver­age lev­el of well-being across the pop­u­la­tion would pro­duce a large decrease in the per­cent­age with men­tal dis­or­der, and also in the per­cent­age who have sub-clin­i­cal dis­or­der.”

Trans­lat­ing this to prac­tice, the U.K.’s Nation­al Health Ser­vice has start­ed to adopt a care mod­el that relies heav­i­ly on self-care and auto­mat­ed ser­vice mod­els ear­ly on in the care con­tin­u­um. Com­put­er­ized Cog­ni­tive Behav­ioral Ther­a­py (CBT) has become the first stan­dard of care for patients pre­sent­ing with mild or mod­er­ate depres­sion, rather than imme­di­ate­ly opt­ing for anti­de­pres­sant med­ica­tion. Giv­en the mis­match between the num­ber of avail­able, trained ther­a­pists and peo­ple who would ben­e­fit from this form of brain train­ing, com­put­er-assist­ed CBT can make a sig­nif­i­cant dif­fer­ence as a com­ple­ment or alter­na­tive to ther­a­pist-deliv­ered CBT.

To Be Con­tin­ued…

  • Next Mon­day, Jan­u­ary 9th: Part 3 — The Real Need
  • Next Tues­day, Jan­u­ary 10th: Part 4 — The Future

You can track and dis­cuss each part as it becomes avail­able via my Twit­ter account, our Face­book pageLinkedIn group, and RSS feed. Enjoy, and please add your 2 cents!

Note: This is an excerpt from the Gen­er­a­tions arti­cle  The Busi­ness and Ethics of the Brain Fit­ness Boom, by Alvaro Fer­nan­dez. Copy­right © 2011 Amer­i­can Soci­ety on Aging; all rights reserved. This arti­cle may not be dupli­cat­ed, reprint­ed or dis­trib­uted in any form with­out writ­ten per­mis­sion from the pub­lish­er: Amer­i­can Soci­ety on Aging, 71 Steven­son St., Suite 1450, San Francisco,CA 94105–2938; e‑mail: info@asaging.org.

Read Pre­vi­ous Series here:

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

2 Responses

  1. James Foley says:

    If you decide to flesh out this arti­cle, I sug­gest that under the head­ing of “Ethics” should be a dis­cus­sion of how the devel­op­ment brain fit­ness can be more close­ly tied to neu­ro­science and to the needs of con­sumers, rather than dri­ven too much by prof­it, so we don’t con­tribute to anoth­er Mozart Effect fias­co, plop­ping babies in front of videos to stim­u­late their brains, depriv­ing them of the nat­u­ral­is­tic inter­ac­tions and play that would have built their brains so much bet­ter.

  2. Alvaro says:

    That’s what we dis­cuss in the last two parts of the series, first based on con­sumer sur­veys then as sug­gest­ed “rules of the road” for the future. You can read whole arti­cle here:
    http://www.sharpbrains.com/article-the-business-and-ethics-of-the-brain-fitness-boom/

Leave a Reply

Categories: Attention and ADD/ADHD, Author Speaks Series, Education & Lifelong Learning, Health & Wellness

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters,  SharpBrains is an independent market research firm tracking how brain science can improve our health and our lives.

Search in our archives

Follow us and Engage via…

twitter_logo_header
RSS Feed

Watch All Recordings Now (40+ Speakers, 12+ Hours)