Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Icon

A Course Correction for Positive Psychology: A Review of Martin Seligman’s Latest Book

(Editor’s Note: we are pleased to bring you this arti­cle thanks to our col­lab­o­ra­tion with Greater Good Sci­ence Cen­ter).

A Course Cor­rec­tion for Pos­i­tive Psy­chol­o­gy

A review of Mar­tin Seligman’s lat­est book, Flour­ish: A Vision­ary New Under­stand­ing of Hap­pi­ness and Well-Being.

- By Jill Sut­tie

As pres­i­dent of the Amer­i­can Psy­cho­log­i­cal Asso­ci­a­tion in 1998, Mar­tin Selig­man chal­lenged the psy­cho­log­i­cal com­mu­ni­ty to rad­i­cal­ly change its approach. For too long, he charged, psy­chol­o­gy had been pre­oc­cu­pied sole­ly with reliev­ing symp­toms of men­tal ill­ness; instead, he believed it should explore how to thrive in life, not just sur­vive it. He called for a psy­chol­o­gy that would uncov­er what makes peo­ple cre­ative, resilient, opti­mistic, and, ulti­mate­ly, hap­py. The “pos­i­tive psy­chol­o­gy” move­ment was born.

Yet in his lat­est book, Flour­ish, Selig­man tries to pro­vide some­thing of a course cor­rec­tion for pos­i­tive psy­chol­o­gy. Selig­man, the Zeller­bach Fam­i­ly Pro­fes­sor of Psy­chol­o­gy at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Penn­syl­va­nia, where he also directs the university’s Pos­i­tive Psy­chol­o­gy Cen­ter, argues that pos­i­tive psy­chol­o­gy has been too focused on the goal of pro­mot­ing hap­pi­ness alone. He pro­pos­es a shift, both to increase over­all per­son­al well-being—what he calls “flour­ish­ing,” which is not as depen­dent on one’s mood or momen­tary feel­ings as happiness—and to improve one’s com­mu­ni­ty, not just one’s self.

While Selig­man still con­sid­ers hap­pi­ness to be impor­tant, in Flour­ish he offers a more holis­tic take on well-being, which he sum­ma­rizes with the acronym PERMA: Pos­i­tive emo­tion, Engage­ment, Rela­tion­ships, Mean­ing, and Accom­plish­ment. Each of these ele­ments, he argues, is cru­cial to a full, well-lived life, even if it some­times involves strug­gle and leads, in the short term, to unhap­pi­ness.

For exam­ple, rela­tion­ships can be a source of joy, but they can also involve con­flict and sac­ri­fice. Yet hav­ing close rela­tion­ships is an impor­tant life goal for most peo­ple and con­tributes to one’s over­all well-being. Indeed, research shows that peo­ple with close rela­tion­ships enjoy all kinds of phys­i­cal and men­tal health ben­e­fits, includ­ing greater longevi­ty.

Selig­man believes that psy­chol­o­gists should focus on increas­ing these aspects of well-being using pos­i­tive psy­chol­o­gy interventions—like keep­ing a grat­i­tude jour­nal to increase pos­i­tive emotion—rather than pre­scrib­ing psy­chotrop­ic med­ica­tions, which he claims fail to cure peo­ple. He is crit­i­cal of social sci­en­tists who empha­size the study of envi­ron­men­tal influences—like pover­ty and upbringing—on behav­ior and don’t pay enough atten­tion to the study of indi­vid­ual char­ac­ter. This breeds a vic­tim men­tal­i­ty, he claims, which ham­pers the individual’s oppor­tu­ni­ty to grow.

Human beings are often, per­haps more often, drawn by the future than they are dri­ven by the past,” he writes, “and so a sci­ence that mea­sures and builds expec­ta­tions, plan­ning, and con­scious choice will be more potent than a sci­ence of habits, dri­ves, and cir­cum­stances.”

In this idea are echoes of Seligman’s sem­i­nal work on “learned help­less­ness,” where repeat­ed expe­ri­ences lead a per­son to believe that he or she is pow­er­less to avoid emo­tion­al suf­fer­ing, and so stops try­ing. To pre­vent this, Selig­man sug­gests teach­ing patients cop­ing skills, which they can use to bet­ter con­trol their emo­tion­al respons­es to dif­fi­cult sit­u­a­tions and help avert depres­sion and anx­i­ety. These same skills, he argues, can be taught in our pub­lic institutions—including schools, hos­pi­tals, and the military—in order to inoc­u­late whole com­mu­ni­ties against emo­tion­al dis­tress.

In the book, he high­lights the work of social sci­en­tists who have tried to do just that, includ­ing Karen Reivich and Jane Gill­ham, who study char­ac­ter-build­ing. Reivich and Gill­ham have devel­oped a class­room inter­ven­tion that helps chil­dren increase their opti­mism, flex­i­bil­i­ty, and assertive­ness in order to pre­vent them from devel­op­ing depres­sion lat­er on. In addi­tion, they’ve cre­at­ed a pro­gram that helps stu­dents iden­ti­fy their char­ac­ter strengths (e.g., cre­ativ­i­ty, self-con­trol) and use them more effec­tive­ly. When applied to schools, these pro­grams have been shown to decrease depres­sion, anx­i­ety, and con­duct prob­lems among stu­dents, and to increase pos­i­tive social skills, like empa­thy and coop­er­a­tion.

In anoth­er exam­ple, Selig­man worked with the mil­i­tary to cre­ate a char­ac­ter-based pro­gram that com­bats PTSD in vet­er­ans. Before sol­diers are deployed, they are taught resilien­cy, or the abil­i­ty to adapt to dif­fer­ent cir­cum­stances, there­by reduc­ing their chances of return­ing home with post-bat­tle men­tal ill­ness. Though some crit­ics have accused Selig­man of brain­wash­ing sol­diers to accept intol­er­a­ble con­di­tions, he coun­ters with data show­ing his pro­gram reduces lat­er suf­fer­ing.

Seligman’s work is inven­tive, but his writ­ing can some­times ram­ble. The begin­ning of the book is near­ly unread­able, with a con­vo­lut­ed com­par­i­son between his the­o­ries of “authen­tic hap­pi­ness” and “flour­ish­ing.” Still, for those who can get past its faults, Flour­ish is a thought-pro­vok­ing read, filled with insights into Seligman’s think­ing and per­son­al­i­ty, as well as inside sto­ries of pos­i­tive psychology’s ear­ly begin­nings, its occa­sion­al detrac­tors, and its many suc­cess­es.

Jill Suttie Greater Good— Jill Sut­tie, Psy.D., is Greater Good’s book review edi­tor and a free­lance writer. Copy­right Greater Good. Greater Good, based at UC-Berke­ley, is an online mag­a­zine that high­lights ground break­ing sci­en­tific research into the roots of com­pas­sion and altru­ism.

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

One Response

  1. It is refresh­ing to see Mar­tin Selig­man turn his research on the depres­sive out­look, to focus more on what makes peo­ple opti­misits.

    AS an under­grad social psych major, Selig­man and Shel­ley Tay­lor were the pio­neers of this research. So glad they got past the “depres­sive real­ist” notion and the “illu­sion of con­trol.” We need the healthy defense of opti­misim to get us through these uncer­tain times. One needs to pick an illu­sion that fits ones per­son­ait­ly and tem­per­me­nt and live out of that if one is to acheive true hap­pi­ness. Thanks for the review! Can’t wait to read Seligman’s lat­est!

Leave a Reply

Categories: Education & Lifelong Learning, Health & Wellness

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

All Slidedecks & Recordings Available — click image below

Search for anything brain-related in our article archives

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters, and more, SharpBrains is an independent market research firm and think tank tracking health and performance applications of brain science.