Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News


ADHD Study: Reducing the Need for High Medication Doses with Behavior Therapy

Human-brain-pillsMed­ica­tion treat­ment and behav­ior ther­a­py are both con­sid­ered effec­tive treat­ments for ADHD; the com­bi­na­tion of these treat­ments is gen­er­al­ly regard­ed as an ide­al approach for many chil­dren. How­ev­er, in the Mul­ti­modal Treat­ment Study of ADHD (MTA Study), the largest ADHD treat­ment study ever con­duct­ed, the ben­e­fit of com­bined treat­ment rel­a­tive to med­ica­tion treat­ment alone — while sig­nif­i­cant for some out­come mea­sures — was not espe­cial­ly robust. This has led some pro­fes­sion­als to ques­tion whether behav­ior ther­a­py is nec­es­sary when a child is being effec­tive­ly treat­ed with med­ica­tion, i.e., will behav­ior ther­a­py make a suf­fi­cient dif­fer­ent to be worth­while? (For a review of the ini­tial set of find­ings from the MTA study.

One lim­i­ta­tion of most pri­or stud­ies exam­in­ing com­bined treat­ment — MTA includ­ed — is that the incre­men­tal ben­e­fits of behav­ior ther­a­py have been exam­ined in the con­text of an opti­mized med­ica­tion dose. For exam­ple, each child in the MTA Study began med­ica­tion treat­ment with an inten­sive place­bo-con­trolled tri­al to deter­mine his or her most effec­tive dose. Thus, the ben­e­fits of adding behav­ioral treat­ment to med­ica­tion was eval­u­at­ed in the con­text of an opti­mized med­ica­tion regime. Gen­er­al­ly speak­ing, the incre­men­tal ben­e­fits of behav­ior treat­ment when eval­u­at­ed in this con­text are mod­est at best.

How­ev­er, med­ica­tion treat­ment in com­mu­ni­ty set­tings is rarely deliv­ered in ways to opti­mize ben­e­fits. And, an entire­ly dif­fer­ent but impor­tant ques­tion is whether com­bin­ing behav­ior ther­a­py and med­ica­tion can sig­nif­i­cant­ly reduce the dose of med­ica­tion required to attain effec­tive symp­tom man­age­ment. This would be an impor­tant result because sus­tained stim­u­lant med­ica­tion treat­ment may be asso­ci­at­ed with growth sup­pres­sion. Low­er dos­es may reduce growth sup­pres­sion effects, be asso­ci­at­ed with reduced side effects over­all, and be more palat­able to fam­i­lies con­cerned about med­icat­ing their child.

A study recent­ly pub­lished online in the Jour­nal of Abnor­mal Child Psy­chol­o­gy [Pel­ham et al., (2014). A dose-rang­ing study of behav­ioral and phar­ma­co­log­i­cal treat­ment in social set­tings for chil­dren with ADHD, DOI 10,1007/s10802-013‑9843‑8 ] takes a care­ful look at this impor­tant issue. Par­tic­i­pants were 48 5–12 year-old chil­dren with ADHD who were par­tic­i­pat­ing in an inten­sive sum­mer treat­ment pro­gram (STP). The STP ran for 9 hours/day and last­ed 9 weeks. Chil­dren spent 2 hours each day in aca­d­e­m­ic activ­i­ties and the rest of each day in group recre­ation­al activ­i­ties sim­i­lar to a reg­u­lar sum­mer day camp.


Med­ica­tion — Dur­ing the STP, chil­dren received 3 dif­fer­ent dose of stim­u­lant med­ica­tion, i.e., low, medi­um and high, along with a place­bo. The med­ica­tion was a short-act­ing methylphenidate (the gener­ic form of rital­in) and was admin­is­tered 3 times each day. Med­ica­tion dose was switched dai­ly and STP staff were blind to what the child received each day.

Behav­ior Ther­a­py — Behav­ior ther­a­py was pro­vid­ed in low inten­si­ty and high inten­si­ty vari­ants. In both cas­es, treat­ment includ­ed a point sys­tem to pro­mote desired behav­ior, clear­ly stat­ed rules and expec­ta­tions, social skills and social prob­lem solv­ing train­ing, social praise and rein­force­ment, ath­let­ic skills train­ing, and the use of dai­ly and week­ly rewards.

The main dif­fer­ence was that in the low inten­si­ty con­di­tion, each ele­ment was mod­i­fied so that it required less effort to pro­vide. For exam­ple, in the high inten­si­ty con­di­tion, chil­dren earned and lost points through­out the day based on their behav­ior. In the low inten­si­ty con­di­tion, chil­dren received feed­back on their behav­ior but did not gain or lose points. Sim­i­lar­ly, although the con­tent of social skills lessons was sim­i­lar, in the low inten­si­ty con­di­tion, social skills feed­back was not incor­po­rat­ed into dai­ly activ­i­ties and social prob­lem solv­ing train­ing was not pro­vid­ed. Rewards for good behav­ior were pro­vid­ed on a week­ly rather than dai­ly basis.

Study Design

The basic design of the study var­ied med­ica­tion dose — place­bo, low, medi­um, high — with behav­ioral treat­ment — none, low inten­si­ty, high inten­si­ty — so that chil­dren’s behav­ior in each treat­ment com­bi­na­tion could be assessed. Thus, each child was eval­u­at­ed dur­ing all pos­si­ble com­bi­na­tions of med­ica­tion dose and behav­ior ther­a­py. This enabled the researchers to deter­mine, for exam­ple, how a low dose of med­ica­tion com­bined with low inten­si­ty behav­ior ther­a­py com­pared to a high dose of med­ica­tion alone.

Out­come mea­sures

Assess­ments of chil­dren’s behav­ior dur­ing each com­bi­na­tion of med­ica­tion and behav­ior ther­a­py was pro­vid­ed by coun­selors. Coun­selors were blind to med­ica­tion sta­tus but, because they deliv­ered the behav­ioral treat­ment, were aware of which behav­ioral con­di­tion the child was in, i.e., no, low inten­si­ty, high inten­si­ty.

The main out­come rat­ing was derived from the dai­ly point sys­tem employed in the STP. Through this sys­tem, dai­ly mea­sures were derived for each child’s lev­el of rule vio­la­tions, non­com­pli­ance, inter­rupt­ing, seri­ous con­duct prob­lems, and neg­a­tive ver­bal­iza­tions. In addi­tion, coun­selors com­plet­ed a dai­ly rat­ing of ADHD symp­toms, over­all degree of impair­ment, and med­ica­tion side effects.


As expect­ed, med­ica­tion treat­ment in the absence of behav­ior mod­i­fi­ca­tion was asso­ci­at­ed with sig­nif­i­cant improve­ments in chil­dren’s behav­ior. And, as dose increased, so did the ben­e­fits — on aver­age — to chil­dren’s behav­ior.

Behav­ior ther­a­py in the absence of med­ica­tion treat­ment was also asso­ci­at­ed with sig­nif­i­cant behav­ioral improve­ment across a wise range of mea­sures. In gen­er­al, high inten­si­ty behav­ior man­age­ment was asso­ci­at­ed with greater behav­ioral improve­ments and ADHD symp­tom reduc­tions than low inten­si­ty behav­ior man­age­ment.

The real­ly inter­est­ing find­ings from this study con­cern the com­bi­na­tion of med­ica­tion and behav­ioral treat­ment. On vir­tu­al­ly all mea­sures, adding high inten­si­ty behav­ior man­age­ment to the low­est med­ica­tion dose of med­ica­tion yield­ed com­pa­ra­ble improve­ments to those pro­duced by the high dose med­ica­tion alone. For a num­ber of mea­sures, even low inten­si­ty behav­ior man­age­ment com­bined with the low­est med­ica­tion dose was as effec­tive as high dose med­ica­tion.

To be con­crete, results sug­gest­ed that a typ­i­cal child with ADHD could be treat­ed with the equiv­a­lent of 5 mg of methylphenidate 2X/day if he/she con­cur­renl­ty received mod­er­ate to high inten­si­ty behav­ior ther­a­py. With­out behav­ior ther­a­py, the same child would require a 20 mg dose 2X/day to attain com­pa­ra­ble ben­e­fits. Thus, the dai­ly reduc­tion in methylphenidate would be 30 mg/day. One rea­son this may be impor­tant is that the appetite sup­pres­sion effects observed in the cur­rent study increased sub­stan­tial­ly with increas­ing dose — the per­cent­age of their lunch that chil­dren ate was 81%, 73%, 59%, and 45% on place­bo, low, medi­um, and high med­ica­tion dos­es respec­tive­ly.

It is also impor­tant to note that for sev­er­al of the out­comes, adding either low or high inten­si­ty behav­ior ther­a­py yield­ed incre­men­tal improve­ments at every dose of med­ica­tion; the effect size for these incre­men­tal gains were fre­quent­ly large. Sim­i­lar­ly, adding med­ica­tion to either vari­ant of behav­ior ther­a­py was asso­ci­at­ed with sig­nif­i­cant incre­men­tal gains at each dose.

Sum­ma­ry and Impli­ca­tions

Results from this study pro­vide a com­pelling demon­stra­tion that adding behav­ior ther­a­py to med­ica­tion treat­ment could enable most chil­dren to be main­tained on sig­nif­i­cant­ly low­er dos­es of med­ica­tion than would oth­er­wise be the case. This could poten­tial­ly reduce the appetite reduc­tion and per­haps growth sup­pres­sion that can be asso­ci­at­ed with pro­longed stim­u­lant treat­ment; it could also be more com­fort­able for many par­ents who have con­cerns about med­ica­tion treat­ment for their child.

While this study high­lights the via­bil­i­ty of this approach, it is worth not­ing that cur­rent prac­tice is gen­er­al­ly not ori­ent­ed in this way. Typ­i­cal­ly, when chil­dren begin med­ica­tion treat­ment for ADHD, the clin­i­cian’s goal is to find a dose that yields the great­est ben­e­fits. The ques­tion of whether sim­i­lar ben­e­fits could be attained through a com­bi­na­tion of less med­ica­tion and behav­ior ther­a­py is not typ­i­cal­ly addressed.

There are lim­i­ta­tions to this study that should be not­ed. First, even the ‘low inten­si­ty’ behav­ior treat­ment pro­vid­ed had mul­ti­ple com­po­nents and could be chal­leng­ing for fam­i­lies to sus­tain over time. Sec­ond, the study occurred in the con­text of an inten­sive sum­mer treat­ment pro­gram, a very dif­fer­ent con­text from where chil­dren spend their dai­ly lives. And, treat­ment results were eval­u­at­ed over only a 9‑week peri­od, with the dif­fer­ent com­bi­na­tion of med­ica­tion dose and behav­ioral treat­ment inten­si­ty last­ing for much short­er times. Thus, the sus­tain­abil­i­ty of the effects, and the gen­er­al­iza­tion to more typ­i­cal envi­ron­ments remains to be demon­strat­ed.

These lim­i­ta­tions not with­stand­ing, a basic point demon­strat­ed by this study is clear and straight for­ward — med­ica­tion dos­es can be decreased when such treat­ment is com­bined with well exe­cut­ed behav­ior ther­a­py. This may be par­tic­u­lar­ly valu­able when chil­dren are unable to tol­er­ate high­er med­ica­tion dos­es and where there are con­cerns relat­ed to appetite reduc­tion and growth sup­pres­sion. By the same token, low­er dos­es of med­ica­tion can reduce the inten­si­ty of behav­ioral treat­ment required to obtain good effects. Such com­ple­men­tary find­ings speak to the val­ue of com­bined treat­ment for many chil­dren with ADHD.

Rabiner_David– Dr. David Rabin­er is a child clin­i­cal psy­chol­o­gist and Direc­tor of Under­grad­u­ate Stud­ies in the Depart­ment of Psy­chol­ogy and Neu­ro­science at Duke Uni­ver­sity. He pub­lishes Atten­tion Research Update, an online newslet­ter that helps par­ents, pro­fes­sion­als, and edu­ca­tors keep up with the lat­est research on ADHD, and teach­es the online course  How to Nav­i­gate Con­ven­tion­al and Com­ple­men­tary ADHD Treat­ments for Healthy Brain Devel­op­ment.

Pre­vi­ous arti­cles by Dr. Rabin­er:

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

Leave a Reply

Categories: Attention and ADD/ADHD, Cognitive Neuroscience

Tags: , ,

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters,  SharpBrains is an independent market research firm tracking how brain science can improve our health and our lives.

Search in our archives

Follow us and Engage via…

RSS Feed

Watch All Recordings Now (40+ Speakers, 12+ Hours)