Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Icon

Reflections on Creativity: Interview with Daniel Tammet

(Editor’s Note: con­trib­u­tor Scott Bar­ry Kauf­manscott_kaufman_3 recent­ly inter­viewed Daniel Tam­met, one of the 100 known prodi­gious savants liv­ing at the present time. Their in-depth con­ver­sa­tion –sum­ma­ry and links fol­low Scott’s reflec­tions below– pro­voked a pow­er­ful reac­tion in Scott’s mind, as you are about to read).

Last night I was eat­ing din­ner with my par­ents back in my home­town in Philadel­phia. I was telling them about my inter­view with Daniel Tam­met, and how I was work­ing on a post about my reflec­tions on the inter­view. My father, who reads every­thing I write (which can be awk­ward some­times!), looked at me and said, plain­ly and sim­ply, “I see a lot of sim­i­lar­i­ties between you and Daniel, Scott.” Those words were a kind of crys­tal­liz­ing moment for me. I sup­pose I knew at an intu­itive lev­el that this inter­view was so mean­ing­ful to me, and I was aware that I had this great dri­ve to get the com­plete inter­view out there for peo­ple to read, but with that com­ment by my Dad, it real­ly hit me why the expe­ri­ence was so mean­ing­ful: this inter­view real­ly was per­son­al.

To the best of my knowl­edge, I don’t have Asperger’s syn­drome. But I did have an audi­to­ry learn­ing dis­abil­i­ty grow­ing up that made me feel like an out­sider most of my ear­ly child­hood, a feel­ing which remains to this day. My inter­view with Daniel was so pro­found to me because I think it real­ly made it crys­tal clear to me, at least clear­er than ever before, that what­ev­er the “dis­or­der”- learn­ing dis­abil­i­ty, per­son­al­i­ty dis­or­der, atten­tion deficit dis­or­der, mood dis­or­der, anx­i­ety dis­or­der, obses­sive com­pul­sive dis­or­der, etc. — or life cir­cum­stance, any­one whose mar­gin­al­i­ty put them on a dif­fer­ent path from the rest of the kids, from the rest of the adults, from the rest of soci­ety, are unit­ed in that feel­ing of being dif­fer­ent. Daniel Tammet’s feel­ing of a great lone­li­ness and iso­la­tion grow­ing up spoke to me, for sure. But I’m sure it also spoke to a great many peo­ple read­ing the inter­view.

There is a bit of Daniel Tam­met in all of us. I think all of us, at one time or anoth­er, have felt dif­fer­ent in a par­tic­u­lar con­text, and have felt the intense con­flict to simul­ta­ne­ous­ly want to fit in while also want­i­ng to just be accept­ed for being dif­fer­ent. Not all of us may be able to numberscal­cu­late pi to as many places as Daniel can, or can auto­mat­i­cal­ly asso­ciate num­bers with col­ors, or can write both prose and poet­ry as beau­ti­ful­ly as he does, or can paint as he does. But what my inter­view with Daniel taught me is that it doesn’t mat­ter if you can’t do every­thing he does. Life is not about delib­er­ate­ly prac­tic­ing your­self down some­one else’s path. It’s about stay­ing true to your­self at all times, and being ful­ly open to going down your own unique, unplanned, and unpre­dictable path.

Researchers have asked me whether, after my inter­view with Daniel, I think he is a “fraud”. I sup­pose they want to know whether he real­ly is “autis­tic” or whether he real­ly can tru­ly do all the mind tricks he appears to be capa­ble of. They saw his inter­view on Let­ter­man, where he was very charis­mat­ic and social­ly engag­ing and they won­der whether he still has Asperger’s syn­drome, since he didn’t seem to dis­play all of the symp­toms on the show.

I, too, saw the Let­ter­man inter­view. What I saw in that inter­view was a very smart per­son who was capa­ble of being social. There is no doubt that Daniel has gone through a great trans­for­ma­tion over the years, becom­ing more social­ly adept and out­go­ing. He has learned quite a bit about life, love, and rela­tion­ships. But still, talk­ing on the phone with him, there were moments when I could tell he was strug­gling a bit to under­stand some of my more ambigu­ous phras­es, that he still processed some of the things I said lit­er­al­ly. Whether he would still be labelled “Asperger’s” today though, is in many ways miss­ing the larg­er point.

The point is that there is some­thing it means to be Daniel. Daniel was born with a unique mind, wired in a cer­tain way, which con­tributed sig­nif­i­cant­ly to how he sees the world. He has been able to com­pen­sate quite a bit, but there still remains a core to him that makes him unique. And I saw absolute­ly no dis­hon­esty in my inter­view with him– in fact, what I had the hon­or of wit­ness­ing was one of the most truest indi­vid­u­als I’ve ever met in my entire life, a per­son who lives his life always try­ing to stay true to him­self in a soci­ety that labels him as dif­fer­ent. In a lot of ways, a lot of peo­ple in this world every day of their own lives are try­ing to do the very same thing.

Through­out the inter­view, Daniel was very crit­i­cal of IQ test­ing and the study of indi­vid­ual dif­fer­ences. I ful­ly appre­ci­ate where his cri­tiques were com­ing from. I agree with him that many things we do serve to reduce peo­ple to just one dimen­sion, and in the case of a poor­ly admin­is­tered IQ test, reduc­ing a per­son to just a num­ber. But as I’ve reviewed recent­ly, the field of IQ test­ing is rapid­ly evolv­ing. The major aim of most mod­ern day IQ test mak­ers I talk to is not to reduce, but to broad­en– to iden­ti­fy a par­tic­u­lar individual’s unique pat­tern of cog­ni­tive strengths and weak­ness­es and to cus­tom tai­lor an edu­ca­tion­al pro­gram for that per­son. This is a goal I think Daniel would agree with.

I think Daniel also under­es­ti­mat­ed the impor­tance of inves­ti­gat­ing indi­vid­ual dif­fer­ences more gen­er­al­ly. I study indi­vid­ual dif­fer­ences in my research pro­gram. The rea­son why I do so is because I ful­ly believe that’s where most of the inter­est­ing aspects of human nature lie. It’s so fas­ci­nat­ing to me how we can all vary so much from one anoth­er– on so many attrib­ut­es like phys­i­cal fea­tures, per­son­al­i­ty, intel­li­gence, cre­ativ­i­ty, style of think­ing, life expe­ri­ences, etc.– and yet at the end of the day we are all part of the same species. We all have sim­i­lar fears, desires, and foibles. I think the study of indi­vid­ual dif­fer­ences is impor­tant– not as a way of reduc­ing peo­ple– but as a way of broad­en­ing the spec­trum of ways peo­ple can dif­fer and the ways in which both innate dis­po­si­tions and cul­ture shapes who we are.

It is clear from my inter­view with Daniel that he real­ly was born with a unique brain wiring. It wasn’t sole­ly delib­er­ate prac­tice that got Daniel Tam­met to Daniel Tam­met. It was the unique con­stel­la­tion of poten­tials that the body named “Daniel Tam­met” was born with, and that, through a series of for­tu­nate oppor­tu­ni­ties, allowed him to more ful­ly express and real­ize his poten­tial than could have eas­i­ly been the case — unfor­tu­nate­ly, many peo­ple have life cir­cum­stances that hin­der them from real­iz­ing their poten­tial, and they erro­neous­ly think that their cur­rent life is all that is pos­si­ble for them­selves. If any­thing, I’d imag­ine most of Daniel’s delib­er­ate prac­tice went toward try­ing to learn things that come more nat­u­ral­ly to oth­ers (such as how to rec­og­nize faces), just so he could bet­ter fit in, than learn­ing things that already came more nat­u­ral­ly to him­self (such as danc­ing with num­bers).

In this new year, this new decade, and well into the future of human­i­ty, let’s all try a lit­tle bit hard­er to appre­ci­ate each other’s dif­fer­ences. And by doing so, let’s also remind our­selves to remain true to our­selves, despite soci­ety. Like Daniel Tam­met.

(Editor’s Note: what fol­lows is a sum­ma­ry of the in-depth con­ver­sa­tion between Daniel Tam­met and Scott Bar­ry Kauf­man. Links to whole series below).

Inter­view Cor­ner: Daniel Tam­met
An autis­tic savant joins the wider world.

PROFESSION: Writer

CLAIM TO FAME: Vivid­ly describes autis­tic savan­tism from the inside

Although their unusu­al abil­i­ties Daniel Tammet_0com­pel con­sid­er­able atten­tion, there are few­er than 50 autis­tic savants world­wide. Daniel Tam­met is one of them. Over 30 years, the Lon­don-born math­e­mat­i­cal and lan­guage whiz has trans­formed from an awk­ward, reclu­sive boy into a con­fi­dent adult. His qui­et, pri­vate life of strict rou­tines gave way in 2006, when his mem­oir Born on a Blue Day became a best-sell­er, neces­si­tat­ing trav­el, self-pro­mo­tion, and talk show appear­ances. His lat­est book, Embrac­ing the Wide Sky, is a sci­en­tif­ic explo­ration of his extra­or­di­nary abil­i­ties (recit­ing pi to 22,514 places, learn­ing to speak Ice­landic in a week) and a tour of autism.

Scott: How have you com­pen­sat­ed for the chal­lenges of Asperger’s?

Daniel: Grow­ing up, I would have to watch the oth­er chil­dren and learn from my mis­takes. I would have to push myself to over­come the things most peo­ple don’t have to think about. Brush­ing my teeth was very dif­fi­cult because of the noise of the brush. Today I use an elec­tric tooth­brush; the sound is repet­i­tive and isn’t irri­tat­ing. And mak­ing friends as well was very dif­fi­cult. Per­haps that’s part of the rea­son I felt very close to num­bers. Those were the things I under­stood very well. I also have synes­the­sia. While oth­er chil­dren were play­ing with each oth­er, I was play­ing with num­bers in my head: visu­al­iz­ing the shapes and the col­ors I saw and see­ing how they change and how they inter­act, doing sums and enjoy­ing the rhythms and the col­ors and the kind of dance.

Scott: Do your ear­li­est mem­o­ries relate to num­bers?

Daniel: My very ear­li­est mem­o­ry is of falling down the stairs and see­ing col­ors as I fell. And not cry­ing out loud, not real­iz­ing that I should cry in order to bring my par­ents out to look after me.

Can peo­ple change their per­son­al­i­ties?

Yes, my own sto­ry illus­trates that. In the last few years, I’ve seen a very big change in my own life. I’m now work­ing on my third book, which will be a nov­el. Until sev­er­al years ago, fic­tion didn’t inter­est me very much. Today I’m read­ing Dos­toyevsky. I find the way he describes var­i­ous emo­tions, char­ac­ters, and events very dra­mat­ic. This appeals to me and helps me under­stand emo­tions.

How else have you changed?

I’m cer­tain­ly much more con­fi­dent in my social inter­ac­tions. I trav­el much more. I live in the south of France in the beau­ti­ful city of Avi­gnon. Peo­ple with Asperger’s often grow up feel­ing like for­eign­ers, and I feel today more com­fort­able in many respects speak­ing in French than in my native tongue. That’s anoth­er exam­ple of tak­ing a plunge. I have trav­eled before and I have lived over­seas before, but always on a tem­po­rary basis. I feel trav­el­ing does broad­en the mind. It gives me a new per­spec­tive on the world. The life I describe in Born on a Blue Day was much more lim­it­ed. I cer­tain­ly have rou­tines in my day-to-day life that are impor­tant to me and still give me feel­ings of secu­ri­ty and con­trol, but the capac­i­ty to break out of them every so often as I trav­el has giv­en me a sec­ond wind.

Do you think any­one with autism can learn to lead a rel­a­tive­ly nor­mal social life?

It would depend on the extent of the autism and how we define a social life. If some­one is very shy but isn’t autis­tic, is he more or less nor­mal than some­one who is very out­go­ing? One of the things that fas­ci­nates peo­ple about autism is that it makes them ques­tion what soci­ety teach­es us about what nor­mal is. I don’t know that there is any one-size-fits-all way of behav­ing.

Do you have any advice for peo­ple with Asperger’s who want to more ful­ly engage with the social world?

How any per­son decides to empha­size strengths and mit­i­gate weak­ness­es is some­thing peo­ple have to fig­ure out for them­selves. I’m wary of the self-help lit­er­a­ture that sug­gests there are cer­tain rules. I’m very hap­py for peo­ple to look at my sto­ry and say it’s pos­si­ble to achieve many things. One of the biggest chal­lenges is to keep push­ing back against the mis­con­cep­tions about what autism is and show­ing the poten­tial for peo­ple with autism to have a hap­py life or to have a suc­cess­ful career.

Has Asperger’s giv­en you a win­dow onto cre­ativ­i­ty?

I see many exam­ples of cre­ativ­i­ty with­in the autism spec­trum. This intrigues me because I read that until recent­ly sci­en­tists believed autism and cre­ativ­i­ty was kind of an oxy­moron. And that isn’t the case. What we see in very young chil­dren, where the brain in essence overde­vel­ops the con­nec­tions between cells and then rad­i­cal­ly prunes them back to pre­vent infor­ma­tion over­load, per­haps doesn’t take place in the same way for those on the autism spec­trum. That hyper­con­nec­tiv­i­ty is what dri­ves cre­ativ­i­ty, because it allows the per­son to draw simul­ta­ne­ous­ly from dif­fer­ent parts of the brain. Being able to make unusu­al leaps is char­ac­ter­is­tic of cre­ativ­i­ty.

You have report­ed a high IQ—about 150. How much do you think your IQ has con­tributed to your extra­or­di­nary tal­ents?

The num­ber itself tells me almost noth­ing about myself and the things I’ve been able to achieve. The test is very banal and so bizarre. Answers more inter­est­ing and cre­ative than the expect­ed response get zero marks. My own expe­ri­ence going through it for the book was eye-open­ing, and it per­suad­ed me that IQ as this pre­cise fig­ure is very sil­ly.

Would you still be diag­nosed with Asperger’s today?

I don’t know. Obvi­ous­ly it would depend on the per­son who was mak­ing the diag­no­sis. The per­son I am today bears very lit­tle resem­blance to the per­son I was 10 years ago and even less resem­blance to the child I was 20 years ago.

scott_kaufman_3Scott Bar­ry Kauf­man has pub­lished mul­ti­ple jour­nal arti­cles and book chap­ters relat­ing to intel­li­gence and cre­ativ­i­ty and is the edi­tor of two forth­com­ing books. Inter­view © 2009 by Scott Bar­ry Kauf­man. His lat­est Sharp­Brains arti­cle was Learn­ing About Learn­ing: an Inter­view with Joshua Wait­zkin. Pho­to Cred­it for pic­ture of Daniel Tam­met: Rex USA.

You can read the 6-part inter­view series here:

Part I, Embrac­ing the Wide Sky

Part II, How a Prodi­gious Savant’s Mind Works

Part III, Nature and Nur­ture

Part IV, IQ and Human Intel­li­gence

Part V, Cre­ativ­i­ty, Mind, and the Brain

Part VI, Per­son­al Trans­for­ma­tion

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

Leave a Reply

Categories: Cognitive Neuroscience, Education & Lifelong Learning

Tags: ,

All Slidedecks & Recordings Available — click image below

Search for anything brain-related in our article archives

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters, and more, SharpBrains is an independent market research firm and think tank tracking health and performance applications of brain science.