Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News


The Best Memory Tests: Mini-Mental and Beyond (Alzheimer’s Action Plan)

(Edi­tor’s Note: I recent­ly came across an excel­lent book and resource, The Alzheimer’s Alzheimer's Disease Action PlanAction Plan: The Experts’ Guide to the Best Diag­no­sis and Treat­ment for Mem­o­ry Prob­lems, recent­ly released in paper­back. Dr. Murali Doraiswamy, one of the authors and lead­ing Alzheimer’s expert, kind­ly helped us cre­ate a 2‑part arti­cle series to share with Sharp­Brains read­ers advice on a very impor­tant ques­tion, “How can we help the pub­lic at large to dis­tin­guish Alzheimer’s Dis­ease from nor­mal aging — so that an inter­est in ear­ly iden­ti­fi­ca­tion does­n’t trans­late into unneed­ed wor­ries?” What fol­lows is an excerpt from the book, pages 72–78, dis­cussing the Pros and Cons of the most com­mon assess­ments).

While no sin­gle test (oth­er than a brain biop­sy, which is a very inva­sive and risky pro­ce­dure) can con­clu­sive­ly prove that a per­son has Alzheimer’s, many tests can give us a good idea. A list of all the tests that help us assess mem­o­ry and think­ing prob­lems appears at the end of this chap­ter. Mean­while, let’s take a good look at the whys and hows of a thor­ough mem­o­ry assess­ment.


To under­stand why get­ting test­ed (and retest­ed as symp­toms change and the dis­ease pro­gress­es) is impor­tant, check out the expe­ri­ence of Kather­ine, who went to the doc­tor com­plain­ing of a mem­o­ry slow­down. She took five of the most impor­tant neu­ropsy­cho­log­i­cal tests, which assess brain func­tion with­out actu­al­ly phys­i­cal­ly look­ing at the brain. Then she under­went brain scans, a car­dio­vas­cu­lar workup, and blood tests to see what else was going on that might be under­min­ing her men­tal func­tion.


Igno­rance can be cost­ly, yet so is infor­ma­tion. At the first vis­it, ask the doc­tor to spell out which tests he or she wants to run, then check that your insur­ance cov­ers those tests and whether there are any con­di­tions that are not cov­ered. At the end of this chap­ter you will find the approx­i­mate costs of dif­fer­ent tests.

Was it all worth it? Well, if she had stopped at just the two most com­mon tests, she could have walked away with a very inac­cu­rate diag­no­sis.

First, the doc­tor want­ed to know if she had a fam­i­ly his­to­ry of Alzheimer’s and, if so, at what age the rel­a­tive devel­oped Alzheimer’s. The doc­tor also need­ed to know her age. That’s not surprising—seems the old­er you get, the more peo­ple ask. But for an Alzheimer’s diag­no­sis, age real­ly mat­ters, because after age six­ty­five the risk of Alzheimer’s dou­bles every five years, and below age fifty the dis­ease is rel­a­tive­ly rare.Your edu­ca­tion lev­el is impor­tant, too. Peo­ple who didn’t com­plete high school have a greater risk of devel­op­ing Alzheimer’s than peo­ple with a high­er lev­el of edu­ca­tion. Final­ly, women are more like­ly to get Alzheimer’s than men.

Kather­ine was sev­en­ty-two, a col­lege grad, and had no fam­i­ly his­to­ry that she knew of.Her par­ents both died before their sev­en­ty-fifth birth­days, but they cer­tain­ly didn’t have ear­ly-onset Alzheimer’s.


The test that all doc­tors should give at the first mem­o­ry assess­ment, which Katherine’s doc­tor did, and at every fol­low-up vis­it is the Mini-Men­tal State Exam (MMSE), a short but very use­ful test that assess­es a lot of dif­fer­ent abil­i­ties.

What the MMSE Asks and Why
  • To demon­strate orientation:The patient tries to answer, “What is today’s date?” and “What coun­ty are we in?”
  • To demon­strate mem­o­ry skills: The patient tries to repeat the names of three objects imme­di­ate­ly and again after five min­utes.
  • To demon­strate con­cen­tra­tion: The patient tries to count back­ward or to spell back­ward.
  • To demon­strate lan­guage abil­i­ties: The patient tries to name objects in the room, repeat a tongue twister, or fol­low sim­ple direc­tions such as to take, fold, and put a piece of paper on the desk.
  • To demon­strate motor skills: The patient tries to copy a pic­ture that includes inter­sect­ing shapes.
What the MMSE Does
  • Serves as a quick screen for demen­tia of any kind
  • Pro­vides a gen­er­al mea­sure of brain func­tion
  • Helps deter­mine if the patient is in the ear­ly, mid­dle, or late stage of Alzheimer’s
  • Mon­i­tors changes in men­tal func­tion­ing over time, includ­ing the effects of treat­ment
  • Pro­vides a com­mon lan­guage. Every­one from a gen­er­al prac­ti­tion­er to a mem­o­ry spe­cial­ist under­stands the test results, so they serve as a com­mon lan­guage spo­ken across dif­fer­ent spe­cial­ties.

What the MMSE Doesn’t Do

The MMSE doesn’t do sub­tle. It was devel­oped thir­ty years ago to help doc­tors screen hos­pi­tal patients for prob­lems with their men­tal func­tion­ing. Now peo­ple are dri­ving them­selves to the doc­tor for a mem­o­ry test, and the MMSE is not sen­si­tive enough to pick up on sub­tle prob­lems in think­ing and mem­o­ry. Nor does it probe any one aspect of men­tal func­tion­ing in depth or dis­tin­guish among mem­o­ry dis­or­ders.

Some indi­vid­u­als with a very high IQ or those who are real­ly good test tak­ers appear mere­ly “nor­mal” on the MMSE when in fact they have an Alzheimer’s‑induced mem­o­ry slow­down. Doc­tors should, though not all do, con­sid­er IQ, gen­der, occu­pa­tion, edu­ca­tion lev­el, and an individual’s age when scor­ing the MMSE. An assess­ment may not include a for­mal IQ test, but the doc­tor should find out about the person’s per­son­al­i­ty, capa­bil­i­ties, and occu­pa­tion pri­or to devel­op­ing mem­o­ry prob­lems, because Alzheimer’s is about a decline or change in mem­o­ry and think­ing. For exam­ple, the MMSE score of 26 is nor­mal for a man in his ear­ly six­ties who has an eighth-grade edu­ca­tion, but it would be below nor­mal if he had gone to col­lege. (A chart show­ing what MMSE score is nor­mal for a person’s age and edu­ca­tion is avail­able at psych/mmse.asp.)

Kather­ine did okay on her MMSE. She scored a respectable 26 out of a pos­si­ble 30. No big red flag there for most doc­tors, who don’t wor­ry until they see a total score below 24. But the score actu­al­ly con­cerned her doc­tor, who hap­pened to know that for her years of edu­ca­tion and age, nor­mal for Kather­ine would be clos­er to a 28.

Doc­tors some­times neglect to home in on how the test tak­er did on each set of ques­tions. For exam­ple, for­get­ting today’s date is less impor­tant than miss­ing oth­er assess­ment ques­tions. Before leav­ing the doctor’s office, find out your (or your relative’s) total MMSE score and what items were missed.

Kather­ine end­ed up tak­ing the MMSE many times over the years. Her scores declined slow­ly because, as the tests revealed, she had MCI (mild cog­ni­tive impair­ment). But after three years, she, too,was diag­nosed with Alzheimer’s and her decline accel­er­at­ed.

It’s Time …

Prob­a­bly the sec­ond most pop­u­lar test to screen for demen­tia is the clock-draw­ing test, which requires patients to draw a clock show­ing a spe­cif­ic time. The test is a good way to screen for over­all men­tal abil­i­ties, and it can reveal prob­lems that the patient has been able to hide dur­ing day-to-day activ­i­ties. Kather­ine did great on the test, which was lucky for her daugh­ter, whose own lit­tle girl was just mas­ter­ing the skill of telling time. It’s upset­ting for fam­i­ly mem­bers to see a par­ent or spouse fail at a task most kids mas­ter in grade school.

Most gen­er­al prac­ti­tion­ers con­sid­er talk­ing with the patient, order­ing some blood tests and a brain scan, and giv­ing the MMSE and clock-draw­ing test suf­fi­cient for diag­nos­ing demen­tia. It might be suf­fi­cient for some­one with obvi­ous signs of Alzheimer’s. But it could miss the ear­ly-stage Alzheimer’s or MCI. For­tu­nate­ly for Kather­ine and her fam­i­ly, her doc­tor did more.


A diag­no­sis of Alzheimer’s requires being impaired in mem­o­ry and one oth­er men­tal func­tion, such as lan­guage or atten­tion. Lan­guage prob­lems usu­al­ly indi­cate that Alzheimer’s is some­what pro­gressed or that the prob­lem is anoth­er type of demen­tia that strikes the lan­guage cen­ters of the brain first.

To assess lan­guage, beyond just lis­ten­ing to how the per­son for­mu­lates and under­stands words, a doc­tor will ask the patient to name com­mon objects, such as chair, shoe, or elbow. More sen­si­tive tests of lan­guage skills involve ask­ing the patient to name, for exam­ple, all the four-legged ani­mals he or she can think of as quick­ly as pos­si­ble, or to repeat com­plex phras­es, such as “Nel­son Rock­e­feller had a Lin­coln Con­ti­nen­tal.” Kather­ine took one sec­tion of a lan­guage test called the Boston Nam­ing Test that required her to name uncom­mon objects depict­ed in line draw­ings. She got only twen­tysix out of thir­ty right, which is slight­ly wor­ri­some.

The Delayed Recall Test

One of the most sen­si­tive tests to dis­tin­guish nor­mal aging from Alzheimer’s is the delayed recall test, which tests a person’s mem­o­ry for a sto­ry or list of ten to six­teen words heard thir­ty min­utes ear­li­er. It’s usu­al­ly giv­en as part of a larg­er mem­o­ry test that also assess­es imme­di­ate recall. Katherine’s MCI came out of the shad­ows here. She was in the bot­tom nine­teenth per­centile on these recall tests.

One delayed recall test, called the Buscke Selec­tive Remind­ing test, helps dis­tin­guish Alzheimer’s from nor­mal aging, because the tester is allowed to give clues to jog the test taker’s mem­o­ry. A prompt usu­al­ly does not help if Alzheimer’s is at the wheel, but it does help if the mem­o­ry mal­func­tion is due to depres­sion or atten­tion grab­bers.

There are oth­er tests, too. To assess atten­tion, doc­tors see how well the patient can fol­low direc­tions. They also ask the patient to spell words for­ward and back­ward or to sub­tract num­bers for­ward and back­ward (for exam­ple, sub­tract by 7s start­ing at 100). There are com­put­er­ized tests of atten­tion as well, which are becom­ing increas­ing­ly pop­u­lar in pri­vate prac­tices and research cen­ters.

Dai­ly Liv­ing

The activ­i­ties once tak­en for grant­ed, from using the phone to fix­ing din­ner, go from rou­tine to frus­trat­ing to impos­si­ble as Alzheimer’s storms the brain. Katherine’s doc­tor used a Func­tion­al Activ­i­ties Ques­tion­naire (FAQ) to rate her abil­i­ty to per­form sev­er­al com­mon dai­ly activ­i­ties. The ques­tion­naire assigns one point if a per­son has trou­ble with the activ­i­ty but can do it alone, two points if he or she needs assis­tance, and three points if he or she is depen­dent on some­one else to do it. The high­est score, 30, indi­cates impair­ment in all activ­i­ties; a score below 9 is nor­mal. Kather­ine scored a 5, because she needs some help bal­anc­ing her check­book and assem­bling tax records.


Depres­sion is a must-check con­di­tion for every per­son com­plain­ing of impaired think­ing. Depres­sion and Alzheimer’s have an insid­i­ous rela­tion­ship: Depres­sion masks Alzheimer’s, is mis­tak­en for Alzheimer’s, wors­ens Alzheimer’s, may pre­cede the onset of Alzheimer’s, and can be caused by Alzheimer’s. To screen for depres­sion, the doc­tor may start by just ask­ing a few impor­tant ques­tions:

1. Are you able to have fun or expe­ri­ence plea­sure dur­ing a nor­mal day?
2. Are you sleep­ing well?
3. Are you in pain?
4. Is every­thing okay with home and fam­i­ly life?
5. Have you lost weight unin­ten­tion­al­ly? Are you overeat­ing?
Katherine’s answers were: 1. not real­ly; 2. not real­ly; 3. not real­ly; 4. I don’t have much of a home life;
5. I wish.

Her doc­tor decid­ed to give her the Geri­atric Depres­sion Scale— Short Form, which asks fif­teen ques­tions to probe for depres­sion. A score greater than 5 war­rants fur­ther assess­ment and a score greater than 10 indi­cates clin­i­cal depres­sion. Kather­ine scored 11.After ask­ing a few more ques­tions and review­ing her med­ical record, the doc­tor pre­scribed an anti­de­pres­sant. He also rec­om­mend­ed that her fam­i­ly get her more involved in phys­i­cal and social activ­i­ties, includ­ing walk­ing. Three months lat­er, her depres­sion eased. Her mem­o­ry prob­lems per­sist­ed, but she was think­ing more clear­ly and her atten­tion and con­cen­tra­tion improved. Also, she regained a good por­tion of her for­mer desire to see her friends.

Doc­tors often give the rel­a­tive of the per­son with Alzheimer’s the brief Neu­ropsy­chi­atric Inven­to­ry (NPI) to assess changes in the patient’s sleep­ing and eat­ing habits, appetite, depres­sion, eupho­ria, irri­tabil­i­ty, hal­lu­ci­na­tions, para­noia, impul­siv­i­ty, and night­time behav­iors.

The fam­i­ly mem­ber also describes how much each of these behav­iors is dis­rupt­ing the family.To fill out the sur­vey, fam­i­ly mem­bers can rely on their mem­o­ry or keep a week­ly diary of changes they notice in the per­son with Alzheimer’s.The NPI can help a doc­tor:

  • Be more thor­ough. Unusu­al symp­toms, such as extreme eupho­ria or impul­siv­i­ty, may point to frontal lobe demen­tia, for exam­ple.
  • Deter­mine if the per­son needs psy­chi­atric drugs, such as anti­de­pres­sants
  • Iden­ti­fy the stage of Alzheimer’s—more severe behav­ior prob­lems usu­al­ly indi­cate more advanced demen­tia
  • Mon­i­tor improve­ments fol­low­ing the start of new med­ica­tions (such as Ari­cept or Namen­da)

This scale is par­tic­u­lar­ly use­ful if one is being treat­ed by a non­spe­cial­ist, since most gen­er­al prac­ti­tion­ers often lack the time or expe­ri­ence to assess behav­ioral prob­lems in detail. Doc­tors use the NPI when first assess­ing a patient and again at sub­se­quent appoint­ments to mon­i­tor change. Rough­ly one-third of peo­ple with MCI and two thirds of peo­ple with mild to mod­er­ate Alzheimer’s have a behav­ioral change.

Com­put­er­ized Neu­ropsy­cho­log­i­cal Tests

For peo­ple with mild mem­o­ry loss, com­put­er­ized tests of all aspects of men­tal func­tion­ing, includ­ing mem­o­ry, are par­tic­u­lar­ly use­ful though not wide­ly used. Unlike paper-and-pen­cil tests, com­put­er­ized assess­ments can eas­i­ly be made more dif­fi­cult to chal­lenge patients who are only slight­ly impaired or who are high­ly able test tak­ers. Com­put­er­ized tests are becom­ing very fea­si­ble to admin­is­ter, as more patients (though not all) are becom­ing more tech­nol­o­gy savvy and com­fort­able with a key­board. You prob­a­bly have to go to a spe­cial­ist to take them, how­ev­er, as they are not read­i­ly avail­able else­where.

…(to con­tin­ue read­ing, check out  The Alzheimer’s Action Plan: The Experts’ Guide to the Best Diag­no­sis and Treat­ment for Mem­o­ry Prob­lems).

Murali Doraiswamy Dr. Murali Doraiswamy is the Head of the Divi­sion of Bio­log­i­cal Psy­chi­a­try at Duke Alzheimer's Disease Action PlanUni­ver­si­ty’s School of Med­i­cine, and co-author of The Alzheimer’s Action Plan: The Experts’ Guide to the Best Diag­no­sis and Treat­ment for Mem­o­ry Prob­lems, just released in paper­back. The first arti­cle in this 2‑part series focused on Alzheimer’s Ear­ly and Accu­rate Diag­no­sis: Nor­mal Aging vs. Alzheimer’s Dis­ease.

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

Leave a Reply

Categories: Author Speaks Series, Cognitive Neuroscience, Health & Wellness

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Search in our archives

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters,  SharpBrains is an independent market research firm tracking how brain science can improve our health and our lives.

Follow us and Engage via…

RSS Feed

Watch All Recordings Now (40+ Speakers, 12+ Hours)