Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News


10% Students may have working memory problems: Why does it matter?

Work­ing mem­o­ry is our abil­i­ty to store and manip­u­late infor­ma­tion for a brief time. It is typ­i­cal­ly mea­sured by dual-tasks, where the indi­vid­ual has to remem­ber an item while simul­ta­ne­ous­ly pro­cess­ing a some­times unre­lat­ed piece of infor­ma­tion. A wide­ly used work­ing mem­o­ry task is the read­ing span task where the indi­vid­ual reads a sen­tence, ver­i­fies it, and then recalls the final word. Indi­vid­ual dif­fer­ences in work­ing mem­o­ry per­for­mance are close­ly relat­ed to a range of aca­d­e­m­ic skills such as read­ing, spelling, com­pre­hen­sion, and math­e­mat­ics. Cru­cial­ly, there is emerg­ing research that work­ing mem­o­ry pre­dicts learn­ing out­comes inde­pen­dent­ly of IQ. One expla­na­tion for the impor­tance of work­ing mem­o­ry in aca­d­e­m­ic attain­ment is that because it appears to be rel­a­tive­ly unaf­fect­ed by envi­ron­men­tal influ­ences, such as parental edu­ca­tion­al lev­el and finan­cial back­ground, it mea­sures a student’s capac­i­ty to acquire knowl­edge rather than what they have already learned.

How­ev­er lit­tle is known about the con­se­quences of low work­ing mem­o­ry capac­i­ty per se, inde­pen­dent of oth­er asso­ci­at­ed learn­ing dif­fi­cul­ties. In par­tic­u­lar, it is not known either what pro­por­tion of stu­dents with low work­ing mem­o­ry capac­i­ties has sig­nif­i­cant learn­ing dif­fi­cul­ties or what their behav­ioral char­ac­ter­is­tics are. The aim of a recent study pub­lished in Child Devel­op­ment (ref­er­ence below) was to pro­vide the first sys­tem­at­ic large-scale exam­i­na­tion of the cog­ni­tive and behav­ioral char­ac­ter­is­tics of school-aged stu­dents who have been iden­ti­fied sole­ly on the basis of very low work­ing mem­o­ry scores.

In screen­ing of over 3000 school-aged stu­dents in main­stream schools, 1 in 10 was iden­ti­fied as hav­ing work­ing mem­o­ry dif­fi­cul­ties. There were sev­er­al key find­ings regard­ing their cog­ni­tive skills. The first is that the major­i­ty of them per­formed below age-expect­ed lev­els in read­ing and math­e­mat­ics. This sug­gests that low work­ing mem­o­ry skills con­sti­tute a high risk fac­tor for edu­ca­tion­al under­achieve­ment for stu­dents. This cor­re­sponds with evi­dence that work­ing mem­o­ry impacts all areas of learn­ing from kinder­garten to col­lege. It is a basic cog­ni­tive skill that we need to per­form a vari­ety of activ­i­ties, and we use it in core sub­jects like read­ing and maths, as well as gen­er­al top­ics like Art and Music. Cru­cial­ly, this pat­tern of poor per­for­mance in learn­ing out­comes remains even when stu­dents’ IQ is sta­tis­ti­cal­ly account­ed.

This fits well with evi­dence sug­gest­ing that work­ing mem­o­ry is even more impor­tant to learn­ing than oth­er cog­ni­tive skills such as IQ. For exam­ple, in typ­i­cal­ly devel­op­ing stu­dents, I found that their work­ing mem­o­ry skills, rather than IQ, at 5 years old were the best pre­dic­tor of pre­dic­tor of read­ing, spelling, and math out­comes six years lat­er.

The next major find­ing from the stud­ies of stu­dents with work­ing mem­o­ry dif­fi­cul­ties is that teach­ers typ­i­cal­ly judged the stu­dents to be high­ly inat­ten­tive, and have short poor atten­tion spans and high lev­els of dis­tractibil­i­ty. They were also com­mon­ly described as for­get­ting what they are cur­rent­ly doing and things they have learned, fail­ing to remem­ber instruc­tions, and fail­ing to com­plete tasks. In every­day class­room activ­i­ties, they often made care­less mis­takes, par­tic­u­lar­ly in writ­ing, and had dif­fi­cul­ty in solv­ing prob­lems. In con­trast, rel­a­tive­ly few of the stu­dents were judged to exhib­it the high lev­els of hyper­ac­tive and impul­sive behav­iors.

The final key find­ing is that stu­dents with work­ing mem­o­ry dif­fi­cul­ties take a much longer time to process infor­ma­tion. They are unable to cope with timed activ­i­ties and fast pre­sen­ta­tion of infor­ma­tion. As a result, they often end up aban­don­ing the activ­i­ties all togeth­er out of frus­tra­tion. One way to over­come this dif­fi­cul­ty is to pro­vide them with a short­er activ­i­ty and to allow for more time dur­ing tests.

Stud­ies such as these demon­strate that stu­dents with work­ing mem­o­ry dif­fi­cul­ties have an extreme­ly high risk of mak­ing poor aca­d­e­m­ic progress and are rel­a­tive­ly com­mon in the class­room — they rep­re­sent approx­i­mate­ly 10% of their age group in main­stream school­ing. With­out ear­ly inter­ven­tion, work­ing mem­o­ry deficits can­not be made up over time and will con­tin­ue to com­pro­mise a child’s like­li­hood of aca­d­e­m­ic suc­cess.

How can we sup­port stu­dents’ learn­ing? The first cru­cial step in sup­port­ing stu­dents with work­ing mem­o­ry impair­ments is prop­er diag­no­sis, which can be con­duct­ed by a school psy­chol­o­gist. How­ev­er, at present work­ing mem­o­ry prob­lems often go unde­tect­ed in stu­dents or are mis­di­ag­nosed as atten­tion­al prob­lems. There are sev­er­al test bat­ter­ies that can be used to assess work­ing mem­o­ry, includ­ing the Work­ing Mem­o­ry Index in the WISC. How­ev­er, most assess­ment instru­ments that are cur­rent­ly avail­able require con­sid­er­able expe­ri­ence in the admin­is­tra­tion, scor­ing and inter­pre­ta­tion of cog­ni­tive tests. One use­ful tool to iden­ti­fy and sup­port stu­dents with work­ing mem­o­ry impair­ments is the Auto­mat­ed Work­ing Mem­o­ry Assess­ment (AWMA; Alloway, 2007 pub­lished by Pear­son). The ben­e­fit of the AWMA is that it is designed to pro­vide a prac­ti­cal and con­ve­nient way for non-expert asses­sors such as teach­ers to screen their pupils for sig­nif­i­cant work­ing mem­o­ry prob­lems, with a user-friend­ly inter­face. The auto­mat­ed pre­sen­ta­tion and scor­ing of tasks pro­vide con­sis­ten­cy in pre­sen­ta­tion of stim­uli across par­tic­i­pants, thus reduc­ing exper­i­menter error. The AWMA was used in the study described here, as well as in numer­ous peer-reviewed jour­nal arti­cles on the role of work­ing mem­o­ry in learn­ing, anx­i­ety, and devel­op­ment in typ­i­cal and clin­i­cal pop­u­la­tions.

The main goal of this arti­cle was to explore the link between work­ing mem­o­ry and aca­d­e­m­ic per­for­mance. On the basis of a large-scale screen­ing study of over 3000 stu­dent, 10% were found to have work­ing mem­o­ry impair­ments that jeop­ar­dize their chance of aca­d­e­m­ic suc­cess. The major­i­ty per­form below age-expect­ed lev­els in all areas of learn­ing and strug­gle to fol­low sim­ple instruc­tions in the class­room. These dif­fi­cul­ties high­light the need for ear­ly assess­ment to iden­ti­fy those at risk. In a future arti­cle, I will dis­cuss ways to help stu­dents with work­ing mem­o­ry prob­lems, includ­ing clin­i­cal tri­als demon­strat­ing suc­cess­ful trans­fer of cog­ni­tive train­ing to aca­d­e­m­ic attain­ments.

Ref­er­ence: Alloway et al. (2009). The cog­ni­tive and behav­iour­al char­ac­ter­is­tics of chil­dren with low work­ing mem­o­ry. Child Devel­op­ment, 80, 606–621.

Tracy Alloway working memory learningTra­cy Pack­i­am Alloway, PhD, is the Direc­tor of the Cen­ter for Mem­o­ry and Learn­ing in the Lifes­pan at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Stir­ling, UK. She was recent­ly award­ed the pres­ti­gious Joseph Lis­ter Award by the British Sci­ence Asso­ci­a­tion for her con­tri­bu­tion to sci­ence and has devel­oped the world’s first stan­dard­ized work­ing-mem­o­ry tests for edu­ca­tors pub­lished by Pear­son. To date, it has been trans­lat­ed into 15 lan­guages and used to screen for work­ing mem­o­ry prob­lems in stu­dents with dyslex­ia, motor dys­prax­ia (Devel­op­men­tal Coor­di­na­tion Dis­or­der), ADHD and Autis­tic Spec­trum Dis­or­der. She pro­vides con­sul­tan­cy to the World Bank and her research has received wide­spread inter­na­tion­al cov­er­age in hun­dreds of media out­lets, includ­ing Sci­en­tif­ic Amer­i­can, the BBC, and Reuters.

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

4 Responses

  1. victoria says:

    My daugh­ter has prob­lems with work­ing mem­o­ry. The school psy­chol­o­gist reviewed her test results today with me and this is one of her main prob­lems. What soft­ware pro­grams are best to help her and where can I pur­chase them? She is 16 and we can’t lose any­more time!

  2. Anonymous says:


    The best way to improve work­ing mem­o­ry is to train it. And you are in luck. There are a few pro­grams avail­able through the web that train WM.


    These two pro­vide vari­a­tions of the J-B dual n-back tasks that was instru­men­tal in show­ing WM can be improved along with flu­id intel­li­gence.

    I hope you see this.

  3. Moebius says:

    This post has been select­ed for Sci­en­tia Pro Pub­li­ca. Please adver­tise the car­ni­val on your blog and we hope to see your posts includ­ed in the future. Con­grat­u­la­tions!

Leave a Reply

Categories: Attention and ADD/ADHD, Cognitive Neuroscience, Education & Lifelong Learning

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

All Slidedecks & Recordings Available — click image below

Search for anything brain-related in our article archives

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters, and more, SharpBrains is an independent market research firm and think tank tracking health and performance applications of brain science.