Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Icon

When Empathy moves us to Action-By Daniel Goleman

Daniel Gole­man requires no intro­duc­tion. Per­son­al­ly, of all his books I have read, the one I found most stim­u­lat­ing was Destruc­tive Emo­tions: A Sci­en­tif­ic Dia­logue With the Dalai Lama, a superb overview of what emo­tions are and how we can put them to good use. He is now con­duct­ing a great series of audio inter­views includ­ing one with George Lucas on Edu­cat­ing Hearts and Minds: Rethink­ing Edu­ca­tion.

We are hon­ored to bring you a guest post by Daniel Gole­man, thanks to our col­lab­o­ra­tion with Greater Good Mag­a­zine, a UC-Berke­ley-based quar­ter­ly mag­a­zine that high­lights ground break­ing sci­en­tif­ic research into the roots of com­pas­sion and altru­ism. Enjoy!

- Alvaro

——————–

Hot To Help: When can empa­thy move us to action?

By Daniel Gole­man

We often empha­size the impor­tance of keep­ing cool in a cri­sis. But some­times cool­ness can give way to detach­ment and apa­thy.

We saw a per­fect exam­ple of this in the response to Hur­ri­cane Kat­ri­na, whose dev­as­ta­tion was ampli­fied enor­mous­ly by the lack­adaisi­cal response from the agen­cies charged with man­ag­ing the emer­gency. As we all wit­nessed, lead­ers at the high­est lev­els were weird­ly detached, despite the abun­dant evi­dence on our TV screens that they need­ed to snap to action. The vic­tims’ pain was exac­er­bat­ed by such indif­fer­ence to their suf­fer­ing. So as we pre­pare for the next Kat­ri­na-like dis­as­ter, what can the sci­ence of social intel­li­gence espe­cial­ly research into empa­thy teach pol­i­cy mak­ers and first respon­ders about the best way to han­dle them­selves dur­ing such a cri­sis?

This brings me to psy­chol­o­gist Paul Ekman, an expert on our abil­i­ty to read and respond to oth­ers’ emo­tions. When I recent­ly spoke with Ekman, he dis­cussed three main ways we can empathize with oth­ers, under­stand­ing their emo­tions as our own. The dif­fer­ences between these forms of empa­thy high­light the chal­lenges we face in respond­ing to oth­er people’s pain. But they also make clear how the right approach can move us to com­pas­sion­ate action.

The first form is “cog­ni­tive empa­thy,” sim­ply know­ing how the oth­er per­son feels and what they might be think­ing. Some­times called per­spec­tive-tak­ing, this kind of empa­thy can help in, say, a nego­ti­a­tion or in moti­vat­ing peo­ple. A study at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Birm­ing­ham found, for exam­ple, that man­agers who are good at per­spec­tive-tak­ing were able to move work­ers to give their best efforts.

But cog­ni­tive empa­thy can illus­trate the “too cold to care” phe­nom­e­non: When peo­ple try to under­stand anoth­er person’s point of view with­out inter­nal­iz­ing his or her emo­tions, they can be so detached that they’re not moti­vat­ed to do any­thing to actu­al­ly help that per­son.

In fact, those who fall with­in psychology’s “Dark Tri­ad” nar­cis­sists, Machi­avel­lians, and sociopaths can actu­al­ly put cog­ni­tive empa­thy to use in hurt­ing peo­ple. As Ekman told me, a tor­tur­er needs this abil­i­ty, if only to bet­ter cal­i­brate his cru­el­ty. Tal­ent­ed polit­i­cal oper­a­tives can read people’s emo­tions to their own advan­tage, with­out nec­es­sar­i­ly car­ing about those peo­ple very much.

And so cog­ni­tive empa­thy alone is not enough. We also need what Ekman calls “emo­tion­al empa­thy” when you phys­i­cal­ly feel what oth­er peo­ple feel, as though their emo­tions were con­ta­gious. This emo­tion­al con­ta­gion depends in large part on cells in the brain called mir­ror neu­rons, which fire when we sense another’s emo­tion­al state, cre­at­ing an echo of that state inside our own minds. Emo­tion­al empa­thy attunes us to anoth­er person’s inner emo­tion­al world, a plus for a wide range of pro­fes­sions, from sales to nurs­ing not to men­tion for any par­ent or lover.

But wait: Emo­tion­al empa­thy has a down­side, too, espe­cial­ly for first respon­ders. In a state of emo­tion­al empa­thy, peo­ple some­times lack the abil­i­ty to man­age their own dis­tress­ing emo­tions, which can lead to paral­y­sis and psy­cho­log­i­cal exhaus­tion. Med­ical pro­fes­sion­als often inoc­u­late them­selves against this kind of burnout by devel­op­ing a sense of detach­ment from their patients.

Cul­ti­vat­ed detach­ment in res­cue, med­ical, and social work­ers can actu­al­ly help the vic­tims of dis­as­ter. Ekman told me about his daugh­ter, a social work­er at a large city hos­pi­tal. In her sit­u­a­tion, he said, she can’t afford to let emo­tion­al empa­thy over­whelm her. “My daughter’s clients don’t want her to cry when they’re cry­ing,” he says.

The dan­ger aris­es when detach­ment leads to indif­fer­ence, rather than to well-cal­i­brat­ed car­ing. Today, we face this prob­lem on a glob­al lev­el. “One of the prob­lems of liv­ing in a tele­vi­sion soci­ety is that every bit of suf­fer­ing and mis­ery that occurs any­where in the world is shown to us,” says Ekman and gen­er­al­ly, we can’t do any­thing about it, at least not direct­ly.

This can make emo­tion­al empa­thy seem futile and hin­der the growth of the third kind of empa­thy, which Ekman calls “com­pas­sion­ate empa­thy.” With this kind of empa­thy we not only under­stand a person’s predica­ment and feel with them, but are spon­ta­neous­ly moved to help, if need­ed.

Com­pas­sion­ate empa­thy was the vital ingre­di­ent miss­ing from the top-lev­el response to Hur­ri­cane Kat­ri­na and in respons­es to many oth­er dis­as­ters around the world, includ­ing the slow-burn­ing dis­as­ter of glob­al warm­ing. Ekman calls com­pas­sion­ate empa­thy a skill, the acquired knowl­edge “that we’re all con­nect­ed.”

This can lead to out­bursts of what he calls “con­struc­tive anger.” In oth­er words, react­ing neg­a­tive­ly to injus­tice or suf­fer­ing can moti­vate us to work with oth­ers to make the world a bet­ter place. Just as empa­thy has its down­sides, neg­a­tive emo­tions like anger can have upsides. Stay­ing cool in a cri­sis might bring some ben­e­fits. But some­times we must let our­selves get hot in order to help.

– Daniel Gole­man, Ph.D., is the author of the best­sellers Emo­tion­al Intel­li­gence and Social Intel­li­gence. His web­site is www.danielgoleman.info. Goleman’s full con­ver­sa­tion with Daniel Siegel can be heard as part of the audio series Wired to Con­nect: Dia­logues on Social Intel­li­gence, avail­able through More than Sound Pro­duc­tions.

We bring you this post thanks to our col­lab­o­ra­tion with Greater Good Mag­a­zine, a UC-Berke­ley-based quar­ter­ly mag­a­zine that high­lights ground break­ing sci­en­tif­ic research into the roots of com­pas­sion and altru­ism.

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

6 Responses

  1. I have been think­ing of the ben­e­fits of anger for quite some time. Many ther­a­pists in the field of Psy­chol­o­gy encour­age get­ting in touch with anger with many patients. How­ev­er, it gets con­fus­ing when we read many east­ern tra­di­tions judg­ing anger as a neg­a­tive thing. . “.…. It is anger — “anger” …all con­sum­ing and most evil. Know this to be the ene­my here on earth.” –Bha­gavad Gita (chap­ter 3, verse 37).

    I think there is a con­fu­sion here between Anger and Aggres­sion or hos­til­i­ty. One is sim­ply an emo­tion that comes and goes, the oth­er seems more like a behav­ioral or emo­tion­al attack.

    I think Gole­man is cor­rect, Anger can be held mind­ful­ly, and used to help us be aware when some­thing is being wronged and action needs to be tak­en to stand up for its sur­vival.

    There is a way to express assertive­ness when feel­ing anger. But, first we need to be aware of the anger so we can choose to be less reac­tive and more respon­sive in the most skill­ful and com­pas­sion­ate way.

    Thich Nhat Hanh does a beau­ti­ful job in his book “Anger” describ­ing how to cul­ti­vate com­pas­sion­ate empa­thy in the face of anger.

  2. Mike Kirkeberg says:

    I agree with Elisha. The body of my work is with peo­ple whose angry mind gets the bet­ter of them. When I tell them that anger is not the prob­lem, they are often aghast for a few ses­sions. For most peo­ple (in gen­er­al), I think anger and aggres­sion or hos­til­i­ty are syn­onomous. We some­times live in a hos­tile soci­ety, and if we are wait­ing for the anger to go away so that peo­ple will be less hos­tile, we are going to have a long wait.

  3. Alvaro says:

    Elisha, I haven´t read that book but that´s a beau­ti­ful point. The prob­lem is not Anger itself but let­ting it build inside us and lead us to neg­a­tive mind­sets and actions. We can learn to take it into account and let it go.

    Mike: how do you facil­i­tate that learn­ing in your clients?

  4. Laurie says:

    Fas­ci­nat­ing arti­cle. I agree that it takes a stronger emo­tion like anger to move us to act, but I believe that, gen­er­al­ly, the major­i­ty of us weren’t taught what is “con­struc­tive anger” and how to use our anger in a ben­e­fi­cial way. We’re taught not to be angry and how to sub­due it, not how to align it with empa­thy for the ben­e­fit of oth­ers. What a dif­fer­ent world we would live in if this were the case.

  5. Ken Abrahams says:

    Per­haps it is more about work­ing “in the trans­fer­ence”. Show­ing ones feel­ings with clients has very good results in some sit­u­a­tions. Trau­ma debrief­ing may not be one of those sit­u­a­tions. Longer term styles of coun­selling work can uti­lize “com­pas­sion­ate empa­thy” for very good results.

    Ken

Leave a Reply

Categories: Author Speaks Series, Cognitive Neuroscience, Health & Wellness

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

All Slidedecks & Recordings Available — click image below

Search for anything brain-related in our article archives

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters, and more, SharpBrains is an independent market research firm and think tank tracking health and performance applications of brain science.