Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News


Improve Memory with Sleep, Practice, and Testing

There are whole mar­kets (think cross­words, herbal sup­ple­ments, drugs, brain fit­ness soft­ware) aimed at help­ing us improve our mem­o­ry.

Now, what is “mem­o­ry”? how does the process of mem­o­ry sleep and memorywork?

Dr. Bill Klemm, Pro­fes­sor of Neu­ro­science at Texas A&M Uni­ver­si­ty, explains a very impor­tant con­cept below.

- Alvaro


Get­ting from Here to There:
Mak­ing Mem­o­ry Con­sol­i­da­tion Work

By Bill Klemm,  Ph. D.

Until con­sol­i­da­tion has occurred, a short-term mem­o­ry is very vul­ner­a­ble, as all of us have expe­ri­enced from look­ing up a phone num­ber only to have some dis­trac­tion cause us to lose the num­ber before we can get it dialed.

What is “con­sol­i­da­tion”?

Brain researchers use the term “con­sol­i­da­tion” for the process where­by short-term mem­o­ry gets made more per­ma­nent.

Here, I would like to dis­cuss some aspects of con­sol­i­da­tion that many peo­ple may not know about: why sleep is so impor­tant, why mem­o­ry must be prac­ticed, and how test­ing pro­motes con­sol­i­da­tion.

1. Over-train­ing: You Can Learn Too Much

Exper­i­ments have shown that human mem­o­ry per­for­mance unex­pect­ed­ly dete­ri­o­rat­ed if learn­ing ses­sions were increased to four 60-minute ses­sions at reg­u­lar inter­vals on the same day. In oth­er words, the more the sub­jects were trained, the poor­er they per­formed. How­ev­er, this inter­fer­ence did not occur if sub­jects were allowed to nap for 30–60 min­utes between the sec­ond and third ses­sions.

It is hard to explain why over-train­ing dis­rupts per­for­mance, but I sus­pect that as train­ing tri­als are repeat­ed the infor­ma­tion starts to inter­fere with mem­o­ry con­sol­i­da­tion, per­haps because of bore­dom or fatigue in the neur­al cir­cuits that medi­ate the learn­ing. Nap­ping must have a restora­tive func­tion that com­pen­sates for the neg­a­tive effects of over-train­ing. What all this sug­gests is that mem­o­ry con­sol­i­da­tion would be opti­mized if learn­ing occurred in short ses­sions that are repeat­ed but only with inter­ven­ing naps and on dif­fer­ent days with reg­u­lar night-time sleep. In oth­er words, repeat­ing long study peri­ods in the same day on the same task can be counter-pro­duc­tive. This is yet anoth­er rea­son why stu­dents should not cram-study for exams. Learn­ing should be opti­mized by rehears­ing the same learn­ing mate­r­i­al on sep­a­rate days where nor­mal sleep occurred each night.


- Maquet, P. et al. 2002. Be caught nap­ping: you’re doing more than rest­ing your eyes.Nature Neu­ro­science. 5 (7); 618–619.

- Med­nick, Sara, et al. 2002. The restora­tive effect of naps on per­cep­tu­al deterioration.Nature Neu­ro­science. 5 (7): 677–681.

2. Los­ing Your Past

Do you remem­ber the names of your ele­men­tary-school teach­ers? How about the name of the bul­ly in mid­dle school? Or names of your friends when you were a kid? These are all things you remem­bered well at one time and remem­bered for a long time. But you may well have for­got­ten by now.

A recent study on rats sug­gests what it takes to sus­tain longer term mem­o­ries. Rats in the study learned a “bait shy­ness” task. Rats were giv­en a drink of sac­cha­rin-fla­vored water, and then short­ly after­wards inject­ed with lithi­um, which made them nau­se­at­ed. This was a typ­i­cal con­di­tioned learn­ing sit­u­a­tion, as with Pavlov’s dogs. In this case, rats typ­i­cal­ly remem­bered to avoid such water for many weeks. This is the basis for “bait shy­ness.” If rats sur­vive a poi­son­ing episode, they will avoid that bait in the future. In this exper­i­ment, one group of rats received an injec­tion direct­ly into the part of the brain that holds taste mem­o­ries. This injec­tion con­tained a drug that blocks a cer­tain enzyme, a pro­tein kinase. These rats lost their learned taste aver­sion. The bad mem­o­ry was lost irre­spec­tive of when the injec­tion was made dur­ing the 25 days after learn­ing occurred. Giv­ing the enzyme block­er before learn­ing had no effect on learn­ing to avoid the fla­vored water. The pro­tein kinase thus seems to be nec­es­sary for sus­tain­ing a long-term mem­o­ry. It is pos­si­ble that oth­er long-term mem­o­ries the rats may have had were also wiped out by the enzyme-block­ing drug.

So what is the prac­ti­cal impor­tance? I sug­gest that even “long-term” mem­o­ries have to get rehearsed or they may even­tu­al­ly for­got­ten. Or if you do remem­ber, there is a good chance that the mem­o­ry is cor­rupt­ed, that is, not total­ly cor­rect. The con­se­quence is that things that hap­pened long ago may be either for­got­ten, or mis­re­mem­bered.

What sus­tains the enzyme nec­es­sary for long-term mem­o­ry? I sus­pect it is rehearsal and peri­od­ic reac­ti­va­tion of the mem­o­ry. Some sci­en­tists are excit­ed about the pos­si­bil­i­ty of devel­op­ing a drug to manip­u­late lev­els of the enzyme. The prob­lem with that, how­ev­er, is that the drug could abol­ish old mem­o­ries that you might not want to for­get (like your name) or may cause you to remem­ber too much that is now irrel­e­vant.

Source: She­ma, R., Sack­tor, T. C., and Dudai, Y. 2007. Rapid era­sure of long-term mem­o­ry asso­ci­a­tions in the cor­tex by an inhibitor of PKM. Sci­ence. 317:951–953.

3. Test­ing Pro­motes Con­sol­i­da­tion

Tests do more than just mea­sure learn­ing. Tests are learn­ing events. That is, test­ing forces retrieval of incom­plete­ly learned mate­r­i­al and that very act of retrieval is a rehearsal process that helps to make the learn­ing more per­ma­nent. Test­ing, and not actu­al study­ing, is the key fac­tor on whether or not learn­ing is con­sol­i­dat­ed into longer term mem­o­ry.

A recent report from Wash­ing­ton Uni­ver­si­ty in St. Louis, exam­ined the role that retrieval had on the abil­i­ty to recall that same mate­r­i­al after a delay of a week. In the exper­i­ment, col­lege stu­dents were to learn a list of 40 for­eign lan­guage vocab­u­lary word pairs that were manip­u­lat­ed so that the pairs either remained in the list (were repeat­ed­ly stud­ied) or were dropped from the list once they were recalled. It was like study­ing flash cards: one way is to keep study­ing all the cards over and over again; the oth­er way is to drop out a card from the stack every time you cor­rect­ly recalled what was on the oth­er side of the card. After a fixed study peri­od, stu­dents were test­ed over either the entire list or a par­tial list of only the pairs that had not been dropped dur­ing study. Four study and test peri­ods alter­nat­ed back-to-back. Stu­dents were also asked to pre­dict how many pairs they would be able to remem­ber a week lat­er, and their pre­dic­tions were com­pared with actu­al results on a final test a week lat­er.

The ini­tial learn­ing took about 3–4 tri­als to mas­ter the list, and was not sig­nif­i­cant­ly affect­ed by the strat­e­gy used (rehears­ing the entire list or drop­ping items out as they were recalled). On aver­age, the stu­dents pre­dict­ed that they would be able to remem­ber about half of the list on a test that was to be giv­en a week lat­er. How­ev­er, actu­al recall a week lat­er var­ied con­sid­er­ably depend­ing on learn­ing con­di­tions. On the final test, stu­dents remem­bered about 80% of the word pairs if they had been test­ed on all the word pairs, no mat­ter whether they had been stud­ied mul­ti­ple times with all of them in the list or if they dropped cor­rect­ly recalled words from the list in lat­er study tri­als. How­ev­er, recall was only about 30% cor­rect when cor­rect­ly iden­ti­fied words were dropped from sub­se­quent tests, even though all words were stud­ied repeat­ed­ly. In oth­er words, it was the repeat­ed test­ing, not the study­ing, that was the key fac­tor in suc­cess­ful longer-term mem­o­ry.

So, what is the prac­ti­cal appli­ca­tion? When using flash cards, for exam­ple, you need to fol­low each study ses­sion (whether or not you drop cards from the stack because you know them), with a for­mal test over all the cards. Then, repeat the process sev­er­al times, with study and test epochs back-to-back. Can we extend this prin­ci­ple of fre­quent test­ing to oth­er kinds of learn­ing strate­gies? I would guess so.

Why does forced recall, as dur­ing test­ing, pro­mote con­sol­i­da­tion? It prob­a­bly relates to oth­er recent dis­cov­er­ies show­ing that each time some­thing is recalled the mem­o­ry is re-con­sol­i­dat­ed. If the same infor­ma­tion is con­sol­i­dat­ed again and again, the mem­o­ry is pre­sum­ably rein­forced.

This study also showed that the sub­jects could not pre­dict how well they would remem­ber, which is con­sis­tent with my 45 years expe­ri­ence as a pro­fes­sor. Stu­dents are fre­quent­ly sur­prised to dis­cov­er after an exam­i­na­tion that they did not know the mate­r­i­al as well as they thought they did. Tests not only reveal what they know and don’t know, but serve to increase how much they even­tu­al­ly learn. If I were still teach­ing, I would give more tests. And I would encour­age stu­dents to use self-test­ing as a rou­tine learn­ing strat­e­gy, some­thing that one study revealed to be a sel­dom-used strat­e­gy. The repeat­ed self-tests should include all the study mate­r­i­al and not drop out the mate­r­i­al that the stu­dent thinks is already mas­tered.

Source: Karpicke, Jef­frey D., and Roedinger, Hen­ry L. III. 2008. The crit­i­cal impor­tance of retrieval for learn­ing. Sci­ence. 319: 966–968.

Bill Klemm— W. R. (Bill) Klemm, D.V.M., Ph.D. Sci­en­tist, pro­fes­sor, author, speak­er As a pro­fes­sor of Neu­ro­science at Texas A&M Uni­ver­si­ty, Bill has taught about the brain and behav­ior at all lev­els, from fresh­men, to seniors, to grad­u­ate stu­dents to post-docs. His recent books include Thank You Brain For All You Remem­ber and Core Ideas in Neu­ro­science.

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

One Response

  1. trevor says:

    Fan­tas­tic sum­ma­ry of mem­o­ry con­sol­i­da­tion!

Leave a Reply

Categories: Cognitive Neuroscience, Health & Wellness

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters,  SharpBrains is an independent market research firm tracking how brain science can improve our health and our lives.

Search in our archives

Follow us and Engage via…

RSS Feed

Watch All Recordings Now (40+ Speakers, 12+ Hours)