Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News


Executive Function Workout

Here is new brain teas­er from puz­zle mas­ter Wes Car­roll.

The Fork in the Road

fork in the road number puzzles

Start at the cen­ter num­ber and col­lect anoth­er four num­bers by fol­low­ing the paths shown (and not going back­wards). Add the five num­bers togeth­er. What is the low­est num­ber you can score?

This puz­zle works your exec­u­tive func­tions in your frontal lobes by using your plan­ning skills, hypoth­e­sis test­ing, and log­ic.





More brain teas­er games:

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

28 Responses

  1. Jonathan says:

    I got a bit low­er than the solu­tion. I am assum­ing that the rules are meant to not allow end­ing up in anoth­er cor­ner?

  2. Foo says:

    Er… going from the bot­tom-left cor­ner to top-right gives 4+6+8+6+4 = 28, low­er than the num­ber giv­en. Do you mean start in the CENTER? Then the lim­it applies. (7+6+7+6+4)

  3. Frank Shearar says:

    If you’re allowed to revis­it nodes (I had assumed that way the case until I read Foo), why not 4+6+4+6+4 = 24?

  4. Bill LaLonde says:

    Yeah, the direc­tions here need to be clar­i­fied, because as they stand (as sev­er­al oth­er com­menters have not­ed), there are solu­tions low­er than that giv­en (that answer depends on whether revis­it­ing num­bers is allowed or not, but either way it is low­er than the giv­en answer).

  5. Caroline says:

    Let me check. But yes, fol­low­ing Foo’s plan, and not repeat­ing any num­bers, I get 28. Foo’s solu­tion goes from the bot­tom left 4 to the neigh­bor­ing 6, up to the 8, right to the 6, and right to the 4. But let me see if I can find any­thing about not end­ing up in anoth­er cor­ner. Good work all! Obvi­ous­ly your frontal lobes are doing okay! If I can’t find a lim­it, then Foo’s answer stands!

  6. Wes Carroll says:

    Well, that’s a dis­ap­point­ing turn of events, isn’t it? Insuf­fi­cient­ly clear instruc­tions plus a ques­tion­able answer makes for unhap­py puz­zle-solvers, and right­ly so.

    The offi­cial word, if I may be so bold, is as fol­lows:

    * The prob­lem state­ment includes the phrase “with­out going back­wards.” This is intend­ed to mean “with­out revis­it­ing nodes.” Thank you, Frank, for the excel­lent out­side-the-box obser­va­tion that that is not clear­ly spec­i­fied in the prob­lem state­ment.

    * The prob­lem state­ment also says “start at THE CORNER.” Clear­ly this should either read “start at ANY CORNER” or “start at THE CENTER.” I believe that the sec­ond of these cor­rec­tions is the one the problem’s cre­ator intend­ed. Nonethe­less, Foo’s solu­tion of 28 is cor­rect assum­ing the first cor­rec­tion instead.

    My apolo­gies for insuf­fi­cient proof­read­ing, and apolo­gies on behalf of the book in which this prob­lem appears as cred­it­ed above. Con­grat­u­la­tions to Foo and to all who thought this through more clear­ly than the so-called “experts.”

    I’ll be all the more care­ful in the future!

  7. Caroline says:

    To clar­i­fy the prob­lem for future puz­zle solvers, I have updat­ed the text to require you to start at the cen­ter num­ber and not repeat any num­bers.

    Thanks for the great brain work­out every­one! Nice work! 🙂

  8. Chad W Smith says:

    It’s 30 — start at the cen­ter num­ber — it says that. So, you start at 7. 7–6-7–6-4

    that’s 30.

    What does it mean that this took me like 30 sec­onds to fig­ure out? Can I join Men­sa now?

  9. For some rea­son the 7–8-7–6-4 Path jumped out at me as being the pos­si­ble low­est (32). I was hasty and ignored the 6 to the low­er right

  10. Caio says:

    It took me about 15 secs to find the answer and some 30 secs to check it… But nice puz­zle.

  11. Alvaro says:

    Chad: yes, you should con­tact Men­sa and let them know you solved this in 30 secs 🙂

    Jesse: good try.

    Caio: think of the extra ben­e­fits. You were train­ing your impulse con­trol and emo­tion­al self-reg­u­la­tion by wait­ing those extra 30 sec­onds in peace…

    Every­one, glad you enjoy this!

  12. kam says:

    There is still a bit of ambi­gu­i­ty in the ques­tion. My answer was 29 and it’s because the ques­tion says ‘col­lect anoth­er four.’ Mak­ing it sound like I can choose the num­bers I want to pick up as I go along the path not going back­wards. So I start­ed at the cen­ter picked up the 7, then 6, up to 9 ( didn’t col­lect this one), then 6, down to 9, then 6 and final­ly 4. So I only col­lect­ed 7+6+6+6+4 which is 29.

  13. Mark says:

    7, 6, 7, 6, 4 = 30

  14. Mitch says:

    When i start­ed at the cen­ter (as per the instruc­tions) best i could get was 30, 7 + 6 + 7 + 6 + 4. I also did this in about 30seconds. Btw to all the poe­ple who did­nt start at the cen­ter, i dont think you’ll be going any­where near men­sa, fail­ure to even com­pre­hend sim­ple instructions…dream on.

  15. Amanda says:

    I got 30, start­ing with the 7 in the mid­dle, then down to the 6, then 7,6,4=30

  16. Aaron says:

    I got 30 as being the low­est, I may be wrong but it wasn’t that hard, I just had to check over to see if I missed any com­bi­na­tions, didn’t take me long though.

  17. SammyP says:

    As Yogi Berra once said: when you come to the fork in the road…take it!

    He’s also cred­it­ed with say­ing: no won­der nobody comes here any­more — it’s too crowd­ed!

  18. anthonette says:

    i got 30 😉

  19. fat tt says:


  20. Egon_Freeman says:

    The solu­tion can be very um, “method­i­cal” ^^

    First, observe the cor­ners — that’s where the low­est num­bers are, so it’s more than like­ly to end your trav­el there.

    Then, look at the four squares sur­round­ing the cen­ter square — 8 9 7 6. Out of those, only a com­bi­na­tion of 7 and 6 looks promis­ing.

    From there, the eas­i­est path is down-left, with the extra turn to account for the 5th square. 🙂

  21. T BIGS says:


Leave a Reply

Categories: Brain Teasers

Tags: , , ,