Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Icon

Study: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy helps treat depression–especially among women–but benefits are declining steadily

CBT

.

Researchers have found that CBT is rough­ly half as effec­tive in treat­ing depres­sion as it used to be (The Guardian):

Every­body loves cog­ni­tive behav­iour­al ther­a­py. It’s the no-non­sense, quick and rel­a­tive­ly cheap approach to men­tal suffering…So it was unset­tling to learn, from a paper in the jour­nal Psy­cho­log­i­cal Bul­letin, that it seems to be get­ting less effec­tive over time. After analysing 70 stud­ies con­duct­ed between 1977 and 2014, researchers Tom Johnsen and Odd­geir Fri­borg con­clud­ed that CBT is rough­ly half as effec­tive in treat­ing depres­sion as it used to be.

What’s going on? One the­o­ry is that, as any ther­a­py grows more pop­u­lar, the pro­por­tion of inex­pe­ri­enced or incom­pe­tent ther­a­pists grows big­ger. But the paper rais­es a more intrigu­ing idea: the place­bo effect. The ear­ly pub­lic­i­ty around CBT made it seem a mir­a­cle cure, so maybe it func­tioned like one for a while. These days, by con­trast, the chances are you know some­one who’s tried CBT and didn’t mirac­u­lous­ly become per­fect­ly hap­py for ever. Our expec­ta­tions have become more real­is­tic, so effec­tive­ness has fall­en, too.”

Study: The Effects of Cog­ni­tive Behav­ioral Ther­a­py as an Anti-Depres­sive Treat­ment is Falling: A Meta-Analy­sis (Psy­cho­log­i­cal Bul­letin)

  • Abstract: A meta-analy­sis exam­in­ing tem­po­ral changes (time trends) in the effects of cog­ni­tive behav­ioral ther­a­py (CBT) as a treat­ment for unipo­lar depres­sion was con­duct­ed. A com­pre­hen­sive search of psy­chother­a­py tri­als yield­ed 70 eli­gi­ble stud­ies from 1977 to 2014. Effect sizes (ES) were quan­ti­fied …Rates of remis­sion were also reg­is­tered. The pub­li­ca­tion year of each study was examined…Subgroup analy­ses revealed that women prof­it­ed more from ther­a­py than did men (p .05). Expe­ri­enced psy­chol­o­gists (g  1.55) achieved bet­ter results (p .01) than less expe­ri­enced stu­dent ther­a­pists (g  0.98). The metare­gres­sions exam­in­ing the tem­po­ral trends indi­cat­ed that the effects of CBT have declined lin­ear­ly and steadi­ly since its intro­duc­tion, as mea­sured by patients’ self-reports (the BDI, p .001), clin­i­cians’ rat­ings (the HRSD, p .01) and rates of remis­sion (p .01)…Thus, mod­ern CBT clin­i­cal tri­als seem­ing­ly pro­vid­ed less relief from depres­sive symp­toms as com­pared with the sem­i­nal tri­als. Poten­tial caus­es and pos­si­ble impli­ca­tions for future stud­ies are dis­cussed.

Learn more:

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

Leave a Reply

Categories: Cognitive Neuroscience, Education & Lifelong Learning

Tags: , , , , ,

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters,  SharpBrains is an independent market research firm tracking how brain science can improve our health and our lives.

Search in our archives

Follow us and Engage via…

twitter_logo_header
RSS Feed

Watch All Recordings Now (40+ Speakers, 12+ Hours)