Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News


Learning with Video Games: A Revolution in Education and Training?

In recent years, we have wit­nessed the begin­nings of a rev­o­lu­tion in edu­ca­tion.  Tech­nol­o­gy has fun­da­men­tal­ly altered the way we do many things in dai­ly life, but it is just start­ing to make head­way in chang­ing the way we teach.  Just as tele­vi­sion shows like Sesame Street enhanced the pas­sive learn­ing of infor­ma­tion for kids by teach­ing in a fun for­mat, elec­tron­ic games offer to great­ly enhance the way kids and adults are taught by active­ly engag­ing them in the process.

The Enter­tain­ment Soft­ware Asso­ci­a­tion esti­mates that six­ty-sev­en per­cent of Amer­i­can house­holds play video or com­put­er games [1].  They are espe­cial­ly pop­u­lar among young males, with a recent study of teenagers by researchers at Yale report­ing that 76.3% of male (and 29.2% of female) teens play video games [2].  These num­bers do not take into account the larg­er audi­ence that has become hooked on oth­er types of elec­tron­ic games like the pop­u­lar Far­mville, which has more than 55 mil­lion month­ly play­ers, and Angry Birds, which has been down­loaded more than 50 mil­lion times.  Peo­ple are devot­ing larg­er and larg­er amounts of their time to these elec­tron­ic worlds.  Col­lec­tive­ly, we now spend three bil­lion hours a week gam­ing; the num­ber of hours that gamers world-wide have spent play­ing the game World of War­craft alone adds up to 5.93 mil­lion years.  It makes sense then that elec­tron­ic games are big busi­ness with spend­ing on games and equip­ment total­ing $18.6 bil­lion in 2010 alone [3].

This is an espe­cial­ly excit­ing time for the indus­try as rapid advances in tech­nol­o­gy and design are allow­ing for a new gen­er­a­tion of games.  These changes extend from advance­ments in the con­tent of the games, such as the devel­op­ment of smarter AI in order to pro­duce com­put­er-con­trolled non-play­er char­ac­ters (NPCs) that are more human-like in their behav­ior, to the way the games are played, such as the new group of games that have freed play­ers from tra­di­tion­al man­u­al con­trollers by allow­ing them to play using move­ments.  At the same time, game design­ers are work­ing hard to expand the mar­ket for games from the tra­di­tion­al young male audi­ence to much broad­er seg­ments of the pop­u­la­tion.  “I think we will find that the tra­di­tion­al demo­graph­ics will com­plete­ly change in five years,” says Harley Bald­win White-Wiedow, direc­tor of design at Nihilis­tic Soft­ware. “Sev­en-year-old kids and 77-year-old women? We’ll absolute­ly be think­ing of them when we make games” [4].

In con­trast with the enthu­si­asm of game play­ers and devel­op­ers are a num­ber of increas­ing­ly vocal crit­ics who are con­cerned about the neg­a­tive effects of play­ing elec­tron­ic games.  Many see video games as an escapist retreat from real­i­ty; at best they are a waste of time and at worst a cor­rupt­ing influ­ence.  Pres­i­dent Oba­ma has repeat­ed­ly sound­ed the alarm against elec­tron­ic games, such as in a 2009 speech to Con­gress in which he urged par­ents to “put away the video games.”  Oppo­nents cite recent stud­ies point­ing out a num­ber of ways in which video games have been shown to neg­a­tive­ly impact those who play them, with time spent play­ing video games cor­re­lat­ing with decreased health and sleep and inter­fer­ence with real-life social­iz­ing and aca­d­e­m­ic work [5].

Both video games’ crit­ics and defend­ers have recent­ly been point­ing to a grow­ing body of evi­dence that the games you play effect you in ways that last long after the game is over.  Recent research shows that video game play pro­duces both pos­i­tive and neg­a­tive cog­ni­tive effects.  Stud­ies have found a num­ber of ben­e­fits result­ing from video game play­ing, includ­ing improve­ments in visu­al atten­tion [6], speed of pro­cess­ing [7], and prob­a­bilis­tic infer­ence [8].  On the oth­er hand, many par­ents are trou­bled by reports that vio­lent video games increase aggres­sion in those who play them, although the research on this is still incon­clu­sive at the cur­rent time [9].

These find­ings fit well with neu­ro­sci­en­tists’ increas­ing under­stand­ing of just how mal­leable the human brain is and its abil­i­ty to change as a result of one’s expe­ri­ence, a phe­nom­e­non known as neu­ro­plas­tic­i­ty.  While the pre­vi­ous belief amongst sci­en­tists was that the brain does not change much after child­hood, decades of research have found that the brain as a whole remains plas­tic through­out life.  The human brain con­sists of close to 100 bil­lion inter­con­nect­ed neu­rons, and learn­ing can hap­pen through a change in the strength of the con­nec­tions or by adding or remov­ing con­nec­tions [10].  Learn­ing and prac­tic­ing a chal­leng­ing task, of which play­ing games is an exam­ple, can actu­al­ly change your brain.

Now that we know that the brain can be mod­i­fied by activ­i­ties as sim­ple as play­ing a video game, and since it has been obvi­ous for a while that peo­ple find these games engag­ing and fun, the obvi­ous next step is to start active­ly using games as a teach­ing medi­um instead of try­ing to fight against them. “There’s still a ten­den­cy to think of video games as a big wad of time-wast­ing con­tent,’’ said Cheryl Olson, co-direc­tor of the Cen­ter for Men­tal Health and Media at Mass­a­chu­setts Gen­er­al Hos­pi­tal. “You would nev­er hear a par­ent say we don’t allow books in our home, but you’ll still hear par­ents say we don’t allow video games in our home.  Games are a medi­um. They’re not inher­ent­ly good or bad.’’ [11]  If games are going to be affect­ing kids any­way, it makes sense to start active­ly design­ing games with this teach­ing as the goal, rather than an unin­tend­ed result.

Video games pro­vide a great teach­ing tool for a vari­ety of impor­tant rea­sons.  They are hard, and peo­ple enjoy being chal­lenged.  Cru­cial­ly, since as play­ers improve and score more points they move up to more demand­ing lev­els of play, these games are not just hard but adap­tive­ly hard, tend­ing to chal­lenge peo­ple right at the edge of their abil­i­ties which is a pow­er­ful com­po­nent of learn­ing.  Along with this sense of chal­lenge nec­es­sar­i­ly comes a sense of opti­mism and con­fi­dence.  Research shows that gamers spend on aver­age 80% of their time fail­ing, but instead of giv­ing up they stick with the dif­fi­cult chal­lenge and use the feed­back of the game to get bet­ter.  In a good game, we have clear goals and feel­ings of pro­duc­tiv­i­ty, and this sense of con­fi­dence and accom­plish­ment can trans­fer over into the real world.  One recent study found, for exam­ple, that play­ers of “Gui­tar Hero” are more like­ly to pick up a real gui­tar and learn how to play it.  At the same time, today’s games, with com­pelling sto­ries, high-qual­i­ty graph­ics, and mul­ti­play­er envi­ron­ments, are ever improv­ing in their abil­i­ty to engage the play­er.

Among the most impor­tant issues with the use of video games for learn­ing is the extent to which the spe­cif­ic cog­ni­tive effects linked to games gen­er­al­ize to non-game tasks, known as trans­fer effects.  For exam­ple, prac­tic­ing a rac­ing game could improve your dri­ving abil­i­ty, or it could just make you bet­ter at that spe­cif­ic game.  This is of spe­cial con­cern to games that are mar­ket­ed as ways to improve very gen­er­al func­tions, such as mem­o­ry and atten­tion.  A num­ber of com­pa­nies already exist, for instance, that pro­duce soft­ware designed to keep the brain in good health as we age.  There is evi­dence that there is some sub­stance to their claims, such as a promis­ing 2008 study in which senior cit­i­zens who played Rise of Nations, a strate­gic video game devot­ed to acquir­ing ter­ri­to­ry and nation build­ing, showed improve­ments in a wide range of cog­ni­tive abil­i­ties, includ­ing mem­o­ry, rea­son­ing, and mul­ti­task­ing [12].

Teams of researchers are hard at work learn­ing more about how to opti­mize a gam­ing expe­ri­ence to max­i­mize learn­ing.  For exam­ple, Anne McLaugh­lin, a psy­chol­o­gist who co-directs the Gains Through Gam­ing lab at North Car­oli­na State Uni­ver­si­ty, is assess­ing whether games that are nov­el, include social inter­ac­tion, and require intense focus are bet­ter at boost­ing cog­ni­tive skills. McLaugh­lin and her col­leagues will use the find­ings to design games geared toward improv­ing men­tal func­tion among the elder­ly.  At M.I.T., Eric Klopfer is research­ing the devel­op­ment and use of com­put­er games and sim­u­la­tions for build­ing under­stand­ing of sci­ence and com­plex sys­tems.  This area of research also involves crosstalk with researchers in tra­di­tion­al areas of neu­ro­science and psy­chol­o­gy because as we learn more about the spe­cif­ic neur­al process­es and areas involved in var­i­ous tasks, we can bet­ter design games which hone in on the spe­cif­ic skills and mech­a­nisms in need of improve­ment.

Even as sci­en­tists in the lab study the process by which video games have these cog­ni­tive effects, oth­ers are busy active­ly imple­ment­ing this knowl­edge and cre­at­ing games.  More than 19,000 play­ers of EVOKE, an online game cre­at­ed for the World Bank Insti­tute, under­took real-world mis­sions to improve food secu­ri­ty, increase access to clean ener­gy and end pover­ty in more than 130 coun­tries. The game focused on build­ing up play­ers’ abil­i­ties to design and launch their own social enter­pris­es.  After 10 weeks they had found­ed more than 50 real com­pa­nies.

Games offer more than just the abil­i­ty to teach, they can also be of ther­a­peu­tic val­ue.  A vir­tu­al envi­ron­ment can poten­tial­ly be use­ful for treat­ing peo­ple with addic­tions.  For exam­ple, a 2008 study found that a vir­tu­al real­i­ty envi­ron­ment can pro­vide the cli­mate nec­es­sary to spark an alco­hol crav­ing so that patients can prac­tice how to say “no” in a real­is­tic and safe set­ting [13].  New research by Eryn Grant shows that the vir­tu­al real­i­ty game Sec­ond Life can be use­ful in boost­ing people’s abil­i­ty to social­ly inter­act [14].  Michael Merzenich, a lead­ing researcher in the field of neu­ro­plas­tic­i­ty, devel­oped a series of “plas­tic­i­ty-based com­put­er pro­grams” known as Fast For­Word.  The pro­gram offers sev­en brain exer­cis­es to help with the lan­guage and learn­ing deficits of dyslex­ia.

These advances are espe­cial­ly wel­come in the class­room, com­ing at a time when improve­ments in the Amer­i­can edu­ca­tion­al sys­tem are bad­ly need­ed. On the a recent nation­wide test, known as the Nation­al Assess­ment of Edu­ca­tion Progress, which includ­ed over 300,000 stu­dents, about a third of fourth graders and a fifth of high school seniors scored at or above the pro­fi­cien­cy lev­el [15].  On an inter­na­tion­al test PISA (Pro­gram for Inter­na­tion­al Stu­dent Assess­ment) giv­en to 15-year-old stu­dents around the world by the OECD, the U.S. ranked 14th in read­ing, 17th in sci­ence and 25th in math out of 34 coun­tries.  In a recent speech, Pres­i­dent Oba­ma recalled how the Sovi­et Union’s 1957 launch­ing of Sput­nik pro­voked the Unit­ed States to increase invest­ment in math and sci­ence edu­ca­tion, help­ing Amer­i­ca win the space race.  “Fifty years lat­er, our generation’s Sput­nik moment is back […] As it stands right now, Amer­i­ca is in dan­ger of falling behind.”

Video games fit into a larg­er effort to incor­po­rate new tech­nol­o­gy into the class­room, a process known as tech­nol­o­gy inte­gra­tion.  Exam­ples include elec­tron­ic stu­dent response sys­tems, vir­tu­al field trips, and inter­ac­tive white­boards which pro­vide a way to allow stu­dents to inter­act with mate­r­i­al on the com­put­er and can accom­mo­date dif­fer­ent learn­ing styles.  Some schools are already inte­grat­ing games into their cur­ricu­lum; in the just opened Quest to Learn school in Man­hat­tan, the stu­dents learn almost entire­ly through videogame-inspired activ­i­ties, an edu­ca­tion­al strat­e­gy geared to keep kids engaged and pre­pare them for high-tech careers.

There are oppos­ing opin­ions to abun­dant usage of video games in the class­room and in gen­er­al.  Some crit­ics protest that rely­ing too much on tech­nol­o­gy detracts from oth­er impor­tant skills [16].  Oth­ers argue that, while it is good that games can teach chil­dren in a fun and engag­ing way, it is also impor­tant that they retain the abil­i­ty to learn in a tra­di­tion­al set­ting and to be pro­duc­tive in a con­text which is not nec­es­sar­i­ly designed to enter­tain them.  While these points are impor­tant, they will like­ly serve to mod­er­ate, rather than elim­i­nate, the use of games for teach­ing pur­pos­es because the poten­tial ben­e­fits are so abun­dant.

– Mar­shall Wein­stein is a senior at Johns Hop­kins Uni­ver­si­ty, major­ing in Neu­ro­science with a minor in Entre­pre­neur­ship and Man­age­ment. Fas­ci­nat­ed  by the emerg­ing appli­ca­tions of neu­rotech­nol­o­gy, he’ll be an Intern at Sharp­Brains dur­ing the Fall.



[2] Desai, R.A., Krish­nan-Sarin, S., Cav­al­lo, D.,  Poten­za, M.N. “Video-Gam­ing Among High School Stu­dents: Health Cor­re­lates, Gen­der Dif­fer­ences, and Prob­lem­at­ic Gam­ing.” Pedi­atrics 126.6 (2010): 1414



[5] For exam­ples, see Padil­la-Walk­er, L.M., Nel­son, L.J., Car­roll, J.S., Jensen, A.C. “More Than a Just a Game: Video Game and Inter­net Use Dur­ing Emerg­ing Adult­hood.” Jour­nal of Youth and Ado­les­cence 39.2 (2000): 103–113, and Smyth, J.M. “Beyond Self-Selec­tion in Video Game Play: An Exper­i­men­tal Exam­i­na­tion of the Con­se­quences of Mas­sive­ly Mul­ti­play­er Online Role-Play­ing Game Play” Cyber­Pyschol­o­gy & Behav­ior 10.5 (2007): 717–721

[6] Green, C.C., Bave­li­er, D. “Action Video Game Mod­i­fies Visu­al Selec­tive Atten­tion.” Nature 423 (2003): 534–537

[7] Matthew, W.G., Dye, C., Green, S., Bave­li­er, D. “Increas­ing Speed of Pro­cess­ing With Action Video Games : Pro­cess­ing Speed and Video Games.” Cur­rent Direc­tions in Psy­cho­log­i­cal Sci­ence 18.6 (2009): 321

[8] Green, C.S., Pouget, A., Bave­li­er. D. “Improved Prob­a­bilis­tic Infer­ence as a Gen­er­al Learn­ing Mech­a­nism with Action Video Games”. Cur­rent Biol­o­gy 20.17 (2010): 1573–1579

[9] See for a col­lec­tion of recent papers on the top­ic

[10] For a detailed overview of recent devel­op­ments in our under­stand­ing of neu­ro­plas­tic­i­ty, see The Brain That Changes Itself: Sto­ries of Per­son­al Tri­umph from the Fron­tiers of Brain Sci­ence by Nor­man Doidge.


[12] Basak, C., Boot, W., Voss, M., & Kramer, A. F. “Can train­ing in a real-time strat­e­gy videogame atten­u­ate cog­ni­tive decline in old­er adults?” Psy­chol­o­gy and Aging 23 (2008): 765–777

[13] Bor­d­nic­ka, P., Tray­lorb, A., Cop­pc, H.L., Graapd, K.M.,  Carterb, B., Fer­rerd, M., Wal­tone, A.P. “Assess­ing reac­tiv­i­ty to vir­tu­al real­i­ty alco­hol based cues.” Addic­tive Behav­iors 33.6 (2008): 743–756



[16] See Mark Bauer­lein’s book The Dumb­est Gen­er­a­tion for a much more in depth look at this.

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

2 Responses

  1. Sounds like an excuse for me to game. Let’s see if my wife is on board.

  2. Matt says:

    A very inter­est­ing arti­cle, I hope games and learn­ing will be more inte­grat­ed in the future.

Leave a Reply

Categories: Education & Lifelong Learning

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Search in our Archives

Follow us and Engage via…

RSS Feed

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters,  SharpBrains is an independent market research firm tracking how brain science can improve our health and our lives.

Watch All Recordings Now (40+ Speakers, 12+ Hours)