Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News


Meditation on the Brain: a Conversation with Andrew Newberg

Dr_Andrew_NewbergDr. Andrew New­berg is an Asso­ciate Pro­fes­sor in the Depart­ment of Radi­ol­o­gy and Psy­chi­a­try and Adjunct Assis­tant Pro­fes­sor in the Depart­ment of Reli­gious Stud­ies at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Penn­syl­va­nia. He has pub­lished a vari­ety of neu­roimag­ing stud­ies relat­ed to aging and demen­tia. He has also researched the neu­ro­phys­i­o­log­i­cal cor­re­lates of med­i­ta­tion, prayer, and how brain func­tion is asso­ci­at­ed with mys­ti­cal and reli­gious expe­ri­ences. Alvaro Fer­nan­dez inter­views him here as part of our research for the book The Sharp­Brains Guide to Brain Fit­ness: How to Opti­mize Brain Health and Per­for­mance at Any Age.

Dr. New­berg, thank you for being with us today. Can you please explain the source of your inter­ests at the inter­sec­tion of brain research and spir­i­tu­al­i­ty?

Since I was a kid, I had a keen inter­est in spir­i­tu­al prac­tice. I always won­dered how spir­i­tu­al­i­ty and reli­gion affect us, and over time I came to appre­ci­ate how sci­ence can help us explore and under­stand the world around us, includ­ing why we humans care about spir­i­tu­al prac­tices. This, of course, led me to be par­tic­u­lar­ly inter­est­ed in brain research.

Dur­ing med­ical school I was par­tic­u­lar­ly attract­ed by the prob­lem of con­scious­ness. I was for­tu­nate to meet researcher Dr. Eugene D’Aquili in the ear­ly 1990s, who had been doing much research on reli­gious prac­tices effect on brain since the 1970s. Through him I came to see that brain imag­ing can pro­vide a fas­ci­nat­ing win­dow into the brain.

Can we define reli­gion and spir­i­tu­al­i­ty ‑which sound to me as very dif­fer­ent brain processes‑, and why learn­ing about them may be help­ful from a pure­ly sec­u­lar, sci­en­tif­ic point of view?

Good point, def­i­n­i­tions mat­ter, since dif­fer­ent peo­ple may be search­ing for God in dif­fer­ent ways. I view being reli­gious as par­tic­i­pat­ing in orga­nized rit­u­als and shared beliefs, such as going to church. Being spir­i­tu­al, on the oth­er hand, is more of an indi­vid­ual prac­tice, whether we call it med­i­ta­tion, or relax­ation, or prayer, aimed at expand­ing the self, devel­op­ing a sense of one­ness with the uni­verse.

What is hap­pen­ing is that spe­cif­ic prac­tices that have tra­di­tion­al­ly been asso­ci­at­ed with reli­gious and spir­i­tu­al con­texts may also be very use­ful from a main­stream, sec­u­lar, health point of view, beyond those con­texts. Sci­en­tists are research­ing, for exam­ple, what ele­ments of med­i­ta­tion may help man­age stress and improve mem­o­ry. How breath­ing and med­i­ta­tion tech­niques can con­tribute to health and well­ness. For exam­ple, my lab is now con­duct­ing a study where 15 old­er adults with mem­o­ry prob­lems are prac­tic­ing Kir­tan Kriya med­i­ta­tion dur­ing 8 weeks, and we have found very promis­ing pre­lim­i­nary out­comes in terms of the impact on brain func­tion. This work is being fund­ed by the Alzheimer’s Research and Pre­ven­tion Foun­da­tion, but we have sub­mit­ted a grant request to the Nation­al Insti­tute of Health as well.

Can you give an overview of the ben­e­fits of med­i­ta­tion, includ­ing Richard David­son’s stud­ies on mind­ful­ness med­i­ta­tion?

There are many types of med­i­ta­tion — and we each are research­ing dif­fer­ent prac­tices. Which of course share some com­mon ele­ments, but are dif­fer­ent in nature. Dr. David­son has access to the Dalai Lama and many Bud­dhist prac­ti­tion­ers, so much of his research cen­ters on mind­ful­ness med­i­ta­tion. We have eas­i­er access to Fran­cis­can monks and to prac­ti­tion­ers of Kir­tan Kriya med­i­ta­tion.

At its core, med­i­ta­tion is an active process that requires alert­ness and atten­tion, which explains why we often find increased brain activ­i­ty in frontal lobes dur­ing prac­tice. Usu­al­ly you need to focus on some­thing — a mantra, a visu­al or ver­bal prompt- while you mon­i­tor breath­ing.

A vari­ety of stud­ies have already shown the stress man­age­ment ben­e­fits of med­i­ta­tion, result­ing in what is often called Mind­ful­ness Based Stress Reduc­tion. What we are research­ing now is what are the cog­ni­tive — atten­tion, mem­o­ry- ben­e­fits? It is clear that mem­o­ry depends on atten­tion and the abil­i­ty to screen out dis­trac­tions — so we want to mea­sure the effect of med­i­ta­tion on the brain, both struc­tural­ly and func­tion­al­ly.

To mea­sure the brain acti­va­tion pat­terns we have been using SPECT imag­ing, which involves inject­ing small amounts of radioac­tive trac­ers in vol­un­teers, and helps us get a more view of what hap­pens dur­ing prac­tice (fMRI is much more noisy).

To mea­sure func­tion­al ben­e­fits we use the typ­i­cal bat­ter­ies of neu­ropsy­chol­o­gy test­ing.

If there is a grow­ing body of evi­dence behind the health and cog­ni­tive ben­e­fits of med­i­ta­tion — what is pre­vent­ing a more wide­spread adop­tion of the prac­tice, per­haps in ways sim­i­lar to yoga, which is now pret­ty much a main­stream activ­i­ty?

Well, the real­i­ty is that med­i­ta­tion requires prac­tice and ded­i­ca­tion. It is not an easy fix. And some of the best-researched med­i­ta­tion tech­niques, such as mind­ful­ness med­i­ta­tion, are very inten­sive. You need a trained facil­i­ta­tor. You need to stick to the prac­tice.

In fact, that’s why our ongo­ing research focused on a much eas­i­er to teach and prac­tice tech­nique. We want to see if peo­ple can prac­tice on their own, at home, a few min­utes a day for a few weeks.

The oth­er prob­lem is that this is not a stan­dard­ized prac­tice, so there is a lot of con­fu­sion: many dif­fer­ent med­i­ta­tion tech­niques, with dif­fer­ent sets of pri­or­i­ties and styles.

My advice for inter­est­ed peo­ple would be to look for some­thing sim­ple, easy to try first, ensur­ing the prac­tice is com­pat­i­ble with one’s beliefs and goals. You need to match prac­tice with need: under­stand the spe­cif­ic goals you have in mind, your sched­ule and lifestyle, and find some­thing prac­ti­cal. Oth­er­wise, you will not stick to it (sim­i­lar to peo­ple who nev­er show up at the health club despite pay­ing fees).

New York Times colum­nist David Brooks recent­ly wrote two very thought-pro­vok­ing arti­cles, one on the Cog­ni­tive Age we are liv­ing in, anoth­er on the Neur­al Bud­dhists, where he quotes your work. What is the big pic­ture, the main impli­ca­tions for soci­ety from your research?

I believe Phi­los­o­phy com­ple­ments Sci­ence, and all of us human beings would ben­e­fit from spir­i­tu­al prac­tices to achieve high­er state of being, devel­op com­pas­sion, increase aware­ness, in ways com­pat­i­ble with any reli­gious or sec­u­lar beliefs. This is the main theme of my upcom­ing book, How God Changes Brain (to be pub­lished on March 2009): how we devel­op a shared knowl­edge of our com­mon biol­o­gy, and cel­e­brate the dif­fer­ences which are based on our spe­cif­ic con­texts. We are spir­i­tu­al and social beings.

From an edu­ca­tion point of view, I believe schools will need to rec­og­nize that rote learn­ing is not enough, and add to the mix prac­tices to improve cog­ni­tion, and man­age stress and rela­tion­ships.

That spir­i­tu­al angle may prove con­tro­ver­sial in a num­ber of sci­en­tif­ic quar­ters. What would, for exam­ple, say to biol­o­gist Richard Dawkins?

I’d tell him that we all view the world through the lens of our brains, reflect­ing our cul­tur­al, social, and per­son­al back­ground. His view is based on his lens. Same as mine. All of us have a belief sys­tem. His is not par­tic­u­lar­ly more accu­rate than every­body else’s.

We should­n’t throw out the baby with bath­wa­ter. I don’t think reli­gion is a black & white mat­ter: yes, fun­da­men­tal­ism is a prob­lem, as is reject­ing data and ignor­ing sci­en­tif­ic find­ings. But there are also good ele­ments: the moti­va­tion to care about human beings, to devel­op com­pas­sion, to per­fect our­selves and our world.

Dr. New­berg, thank you for your time today.

My plea­sure.


You may enjoy more inter­views and insights by check­ing out The Sharp­Brains Guide to Brain Fit­ness book.

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

9 Responses

  1. Alvaro and Dr. New­berg,

    Thank you so much for bring­ing anoth­er per­spec­tive to the brain/mind dis­cus­sion of med­i­ta­tion, mys­ti­cism and spir­i­tu­al­i­ty. Dur­ing the 1970’s, when Indi­an yogis, Zen monks and South Amer­i­can shamans were being shut­tled into uni­ver­si­ty brain research labs up and down the West Coast (of the U.S.), I had the extra­or­di­nary chance to work in Dr. Val Hunt’s UCLA lab that looked into shaman­is­tic mod­els using elec­tromyo­g­ra­phy. I sus­pect had we used the kind of test­ing equip­ment now avail­able to neu­ro­sci­en­tists, we would have found some fas­ci­nat­ing cor­re­lates to the mus­cle move­ments we were record­ing.

    Today, the field of reli­gious and spir­i­tu­al stud­ies is spread­ing open to encom­pass new hori­zons, ones priv­i­lege both the neu­ro­sci­en­tif­ic and the ethno­graph­ic par­a­digms that define the “med­i­ta­tive” expe­ri­ence.

    For those of us work­ing in the brain research and fit­ness fields, we have a chance to trans­late the insights of ancient tra­di­tions into clear pic­tures and acces­si­ble prac­tices of how to achieve peace­ful and wise hearts, brains, bod­ies and minds.

    Gtate­ful­ly yours,

    Dr. G.

    M. A. Green­stein, Ph.D., R.Y.T.

  2. Mark Waldman says:

    I work close­ly with Dr. New­berg, and when you look at all of the brain-scan med­i­ta­tion stud­ies (includ­ing David­son’s), an emer­gent con­sis­ten­cy appears: the dif­fer­ent prac­tices (includ­ing yoga) tend to strength­en a spe­cif­ic neur­al cir­cuit that enhances cog­ni­tion, self aware­ness, and social empa­thy. This cir­cuit, which appears to be both func­tion­al­ly and struc­tural­ly altered by con­tem­pla­tive spir­i­tu­al prac­tices also sup­press­es areas in the lim­bic sys­tem that gen­er­ate anx­i­ety, depres­sion, and stress. Thus we feel it is safe to say that med­i­ta­tion-along with exer­cise, intense social inter­ac­tion, and intense intel­lec­tu­al pur­suits-are three of the most impor­tant activ­i­ties for main­tain­ing a healthy brain.

    Mark Wald­man
    Asso­ciate Fel­low
    Cen­ter for Spir­i­tu­al­i­ty and the Mind,
    Uni­ver­si­ty of Penn­syl­va­nia

  3. Rob says:

    I can’t speak for Richard Dawkins, but I sus­pect he would have no prob­lem with the kind of spir­i­tu­al­i­ty dis­cussed in this inter­view.

    As a non-believ­ing, non-reli­gious per­son, I real­ly enjoy and ben­e­fit from med­i­ta­tion, and I am inter­est­ed in spir­i­tu­al­i­ty. A human spir­it need not be a lit­er­al tran­scen­dent soul in order to be a rec­og­niz­able con­cept worth expe­ri­enc­ing and talk­ing about.

  4. GaryD says:

    Very inter­est­ing post!

    Quot­ing from the post”

    prac­tices that have tra­di­tion­al­ly been asso­ci­at­ed with reli­gious and spir­i­tu­al con­texts may also be very use­ful from a main­stream, sec­u­lar, health point of view”

    This is not sur­prist­ing to me. In fact, many of the “reli­gious” prac­tices found in the Old Tes­ta­ment were health relat­ed (ie. dietary rules, clean­li­ness rules,etc).

    It does not sur­prise me at all that “reli­gious” and “spir­i­tu­al” prac­tices would be use­ful from a main­stream, sec­u­lar, health point of view. From a believ­ing per­sons view point, I believe such prac­tices were giv­en to use for our pro­vi­sion in the first place.

    It is in fact inter­est­ing to see that sci­ence has dis­cov­ered that spir­i­tu­al prac­tices such as prayer (likened to med­i­ta­tion) and even music and singing have ben­e­fi­cial affects on our brains.

    Again, thanks for the post.


  5. Alvaro says:

    All, thank you for your excel­lent com­ments!

    Gary: it is impor­tant to note that research is show­ing that pray­ing can be ben­e­fi­cial for the one pray­ing (not for any­one being prayed for). A nat­ur­al effect, yes. A super­nat­ur­al effect, no.

    Rob: I agree with you. In fact, Dawkins’ The Self­ish Gene includes these two amaz­ing para­graphs:

    When we die there are two things we can leave behind us: genes and memes…But if you con­tribute to the world’s cul­ture, if you have a good idea, com­pose a tune, invent a spark­ing plug, write a poem, it may live on, intact, long after your genes have dis­solved in the com­mon pool.”

    … We have at least the men­tal equip­ment to fos­ter our long-term self­ish inter­ests rather than mere­ly our short-term ones…We have the pow­er to defy the self­ish genes of our birth and, if nec­es­sary, the self­ish memes of our indoc­tri­na­tion. We can even dis­cuss ways of delib­er­ate­ly cul­ti­vat­ing and nur­tur­ing pure, dis­in­ter­est­ed altru­ism-some­thing that has no place in nature, some­thing that has nev­er exist­ed before in the whole his­to­ry of the world. We are built as gene machine and cul­tured as meme machines, but we have the pow­er to turn against our cre­ators. We, alone on earth, can rebel against the tyran­ny of the self­ish repli­ca­tors.”

    I would love Dawkins to build on con­tent like this, build­ing bridges with peo­ple who may dis­agree with us in order to “rebel against the tyran­ny of the self­ish repli­ca­tors”

  6. Dylan Payne says:

    I am a six­teen year old athe­ist, and the son of two biol­o­gists. While I have no inter­est in learn­ing about the super­nat­ur­al, I have become quite inter­est­ed in the psy­chol­o­gy behind reli­gion, and spir­i­tu­al­i­ty, specif­i­cal­ly med­i­ta­tion. Most of my research on the sub­ject has been done through spec­u­la­tion, read­ing, and con­ver­sa­tion with friends and fam­i­ly, so I was fas­ci­nat­ed to read about the psy­chol­o­gy of reli­gion from a sci­en­tif­ic stand­point. I have sev­er­al ideas and ques­tions on the sub­ject that I would love to get feed­back on.
    I have read quite a bit about brain scans per­formed on monks dur­ing med­i­ta­tion. It seems that dif­fer­ent areas of the brain, or “neural circuits”, as Mark Wald­man put it, become very active dur­ing med­i­ta­tion. I don’t know much about neur­al sci­ence but I imag­ine that if sci­en­tists could pin­point these areas, a machine could be cre­at­ed that could help peo­ple learn to med­i­tate. The mech­a­nism is sim­ple: a per­son is attached to an fMRI machine which is pro­grammed to emit a sound when cer­tain areas of the brain asso­ci­at­ed with med­i­ta­tion light up. The stu­dent may then be able to rec­og­nize the right thought process­es by the sound and learn to med­i­tate much faster than con­ven­tion­al meth­ods allow. The same machine may work to rein­force any oth­er cir­cuits in the brain, like doing mus­cle iso­la­tion exer­cis­es.
    Anoth­er less real­is­tic, but per­haps more impor­tant ques­tion that I have is the ques­tion of enlight­en­ment. Reli­gious ideas such as spir­i­tu­al­i­ty and med­i­ta­tion seem to have cap­tured the inter­est of a num­ber of neu­ro­sci­en­tists today. Med­i­ta­tion is an impor­tant part of Bud­dhism but it is thought of by most Bud­dhists as a means to an end. An equal or greater amount of Bud­dhist lit­er­a­ture has been devot­ed to the sub­ject of enlight­en­ment than the sub­ject of med­i­ta­tion. I can’t deny that enlight­en­ment may be as false as any oth­er reli­gious myth, but I believe that enlight­en­ment is a legit­i­mate men­tal state, explain­able in sci­en­tif­ic terms. I think that enlight­en­ment is sim­ply let­ting go of one’s inse­cu­ri­ties and emo­tion­al con­nec­tions to the world. Every­thing that we see in the world is warped by our own per­cep­tions. When you let go of your emo­tions, you can see the world through a clear lens, for what it real­ly is. I think that this is the wis­dom gained from enlight­en­ment. Tech­niques for gain­ing enlight­en­ment have been cre­at­ed and refined by monks for hun­dreds of years. Unfor­tu­nate­ly these tech­niques are based around super­nat­ur­al Bud­dhist beliefs. I think that enlight­en­ment, and the process of achiev­ing it should be ana­lyzed sci­en­tif­i­cal­ly for the ben­e­fit of any non-Bud­dhist who wish­es to achieve men­tal peace. Per­haps a new and more effec­tive method for achiev­ing enlight­en­ment could be cre­at­ed based on stud­ies of ancient Bud­dhist meth­ods, much like pills derived from Chi­nese herbal med­i­cines.
    My last idea was the idea that got me inter­est­ed in reli­gious psy­chol­o­gy. It is sim­ply this: a new reli­gion for athe­ists with­out any super­nat­ur­al beliefs; a reli­gion based on human psy­chol­o­gy. As New­berg said “…all of us human beings would ben­e­fit from spir­i­tu­al prac­tices to achieve high­er state of being, devel­op com­pas­sion, increase aware­ness, in ways com­pat­i­ble with any reli­gious or sec­u­lar beliefs…From an edu­ca­tion point of view, I believe schools will need to rec­og­nize that rote learn­ing is not enough, and add to the mix prac­tices to improve cog­ni­tion, and man­age stress and relationships.” This is all good to talk about, but how many athe­ists are going to pick up reli­gious prac­tices such as med­i­ta­tion or prayer with­out any encour­age­ment or guid­ance? If these age-old tech­niques for men­tal improve­ment aren’t going to reach any­one non-reli­gious but a small group of most­ly mid­dle-aged, most­ly white peo­ple how impor­tant is it to research them? Across the world, reli­gions are falling out of favor with peo­ple due to unde­ni­able con­tra­dic­tions with sci­en­tif­ic obser­va­tions and the imprac­ti­cal­i­ty of prac­tic­ing a reli­gion in a mod­ern life. A reli­gion formed to fit mod­ern lifestyles, with clear­er tenets and a focus on com­mu­ni­ty could help fill the spir­i­tu­al void left by reli­gions based on the super­nat­ur­al. Cre­at­ing a new reli­gion for athe­ists is a chance to make a reli­gion that is bet­ter thought out; to keep what was good from the old (com­mu­ni­ty, spir­i­tu­al­i­ty, char­i­ty etc.), and throw out the bad (unclear teach­ings, wide­spread cor­rup­tion, jus­ti­fi­ca­tion of vio­lence). Per­haps a new reli­gious insti­tu­tion cre­at­ed by athe­ists with no oth­er motive than to help peo­ple live hap­pi­ly togeth­er could be the first major instru­ment in our bat­tle against “the tyran­ny of our self­ish genes”. Please reply if you have any thoughts or crit­i­cisms of my ideas!

  7. Anirudh says:

    Yoga (Appli­ca­tion) which was based on the con­trol of the body phys­i­cal­ly and implied that a per­fect con­trol over the body and the sens­es led to knowl­edge of the ulti­mate real­i­ty. A detailed anatom­i­cal knowl­edge of the human body was nec­es­sary to the advance­ment of yoga and there­fore those prac­tis­ing yoga had to keep in touch with med­ical knowl­edge. (Romi­la Tha­par, A His­to­ry of India, vol­ume one).

    I sug­gest : Mind and brain are two dis­tinct things. Brain is anatom­i­cal enti­ty where­as mind is func­tion­al enti­ty. Mind can be defined as the func­tion of auto­nom­ic ner­vous sys­tem (ANS). It is claimed that mind can be brought under con­scious con­trol through the prac­tice of med­i­ta­tion. But how? ANS is large­ly under hypo­thal­a­m­ic con­trol which is sit­u­at­ed very close to optic chi­as­ma (sixth chakra or ajna chakra). Pro­tract­ed prac­tice of con­cen­tra­tion to med­i­tate at this region brings func­tions of ANS say mind under one’s con­scious con­trol.

    ANS is fur­ther divid­ed into parasym­pa­thet­ic ner­vous sys­tem (PSNS) and sym­pa­thet­ic ner­vous sys­tem (SNS). On the basis of these facts I have dis­cov­ered a math­e­mat­i­cal rela­tion­ship for spir­i­tu­al quo­tient (S.Q.). Spir­i­tu­al Quo­tient can be expressed math­e­mat­i­cal­ly as the ratio of Parasym­pa­thet­ic dom­i­nance to Sym­pa­thet­ic dom­i­nance. PSNS dom­i­nates dur­ing med­i­ta­tive calm and SNS dom­i­nates dur­ing stress. In this for­mu­la we assign numer­i­cal val­ues to the phys­i­o­log­i­cal para­me­ters acti­vat­ed or sup­pressed dur­ing auto­nom­ic mobi­liza­tion and put in the for­mu­la to describe the state of mind of an indi­vid­ual and also infer his/her lev­el of con­scious­ness.

    Med­i­ta­tion is the art of look­ing with­in and sci­ence of doing noth­ing. We don’t use any­thing in med­i­ta­tion. We just try to con­cen­trate to med­i­tate at some point in human anato­my known as ‘chakra’ in Indi­an Sys­tem of Yoga. The cur­rent of mind is flow­ing out­ward through the sens­es and uncon­scious­ly. The mind comes at rest grad­u­al­ly through reg­u­lar prac­tice of med­i­ta­tion. Then comes self real­iza­tion and enlight­en­ment. Pro­tract­ed prac­tice of med­i­ta­tion under qual­i­fied guid­ance will help to man­age all sort of psy­cho­log­i­cal prob­lems.

    Emo­tion­al Quo­tient can also be expressed math­e­mat­i­cal­ly as the prod­uct of I.Q. and Wis­dom Fac­tor. E.Q. stands for Emo­tion­al Quo­tient. An intel­li­gent per­son may not be wise. But a wise man will always be intel­li­gent. An intel­li­gent per­son hav­ing cer­tain lev­el of pos­i­tive emo­tions can be said as wise. An intel­li­gent per­son lack­ing wis­dom will turn auto­crat. A wise man will always be a demo­c­rat who respects oth­ers exis­tence.

    Some may raise doubt that how could be the Wis­dom quan­ti­fied? The answer is sim­ple ‑if Men­tal Age of I.Q. can be quan­ti­fied then Wis­dom can also be quan­ti­fied, of course, com­par­a­tive­ly with more efforts. Wil­helm Stern had giv­en the for­mu­la of I.Q.. It is, Men­tal Age/ Chrono­log­i­cal Age x 100. Spir­i­tu­al Quo­tient (S.Q.) lever­ages both E.Q. and I.Q.
    Rad­ha Soa­mi Faith is a branch of Reli­gion of Saints like Kabir, Nanak, Pal­tu, Soami­ji Maharaj and oth­ers. You may call It a New Wine in Old Bot­tle. We should not expect any mir­a­cle overnight.

    In this dis­cus­sion, it appears, that experts from var­i­ous dis­ci­plines are par­tic­i­pat­ing some­one of course from psy­chol­o­gy. He /she can under­stand my views more clear­ly.

    Maslow has giv­en Hier­ar­chy of Needs. At the top of it is need for self-actu­al­iza­tion or self-real­iza­tion.

    In our soci­ety we should learn To Live and Let Live and help to sat­is­fy oth­ers need. When the low­er order needs, phys­i­o­log­i­cal and soci­o­log­i­cal both, are sat­is­fied then only a per­son think to sat­is­fy need for self-real­iza­tion in true sense. Else he/she may spend all his/her life to sat­is­fy at the most the for self-expres­sion instead of self-real­iza­tion.

    It is, there­fore, the duty of every respon­si­ble per­son, at the least, of our soci­ety to give seri­ous thought over it.

    For the sat­is­fac­tion of need for self-real­iza­tion i.e. estab­lish­ment of har­mo­ny of indi­vid­ual con­scious­ness with that of uni­ver­sal con­scious­ness we need fol­low­ing three things:

    1. Mater or Guru (A Self-Real­ized Soul)
    2. Secret of Lev­els of Uni­ver­sal Con­scious­ness
    3. Method for tra­vers­ing the path.

    Anirudh Kumar Sat­san­gi

  8. Dylan: thank you for your thought­ful, and I’d say, mind­ful, com­ment. On your 2 points:

    1- “I don’t know much about neur­al sci­ence but I imag­ine that if sci­en­tists could pin­point these areas, a machine could be cre­at­ed that could help peo­ple learn to med­i­tate”: well, sim­i­lar approach­es are already under way, so what you sug­gest is like­ly to hap­pen once 1) sci­en­tists have a more defined under­stand­ing of the brain-basis of a vari­ety of men­tal states, 2) neu­roimag­ing is not as expen­sive as it is today. Sim­i­lar approach­es today for emo­tion­al self-reg­u­la­tion rely on biofeed­back, which is pret­ty inex­pen­sive, and there is a start-up, called Omneu­ron, builds on fMRI and cog­ni­tive ther­a­py (more estab­lished than med­i­ta­tion to help patients with depres­sion) to accel­er­ate the devel­op­ment of skills. You can learn more at

    2- In my view, the reli­gious vs. athe­ist dis­cus­sion adds very lit­tle to the “enlight­en­ment” agen­da you pro­pose, which is attrac­tive to many peo­ple no mat­ter religious/ sec­u­lar incli­na­tions. I am not sure about launch a new “reli­gion” but indeed I encour­age you to social­ize with like-mind­ed peo­ple and encour­age each oth­er into a path of life­long learn­ing and pos­i­tive con­tri­bu­tions to the world.

Leave a Reply

Categories: Cognitive Neuroscience, Health & Wellness, Neuroscience Interview Series, Peak Performance

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters,  SharpBrains is an independent market research firm tracking how brain science can improve our health and our lives.

Search in our archives

Follow us and Engage via…

RSS Feed

Watch All Recordings Now (40+ Speakers, 12+ Hours)