• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Tracking Health and Wellness Applications of Brain Science

Spanish
sb-logo-with-brain
  • Resources
    • Monthly eNewsletter
    • Solving the Brain Fitness Puzzle
    • The SharpBrains Guide to Brain Fitness
    • How to evaluate brain training claims
    • Resources at a Glance
  • Brain Teasers
    • Top 25 Brain Teasers & Games for Teens and Adults
    • Brain Teasers for each Cognitive Ability
    • More Mind Teasers & Games for Adults of any Age
  • Virtual Summits
    • 2019 SharpBrains Virtual Summit
    • Speaker Roster
    • Brainnovations Pitch Contest
    • 2017 SharpBrains Virtual Summit
    • 2016 SharpBrains Virtual Summit
    • 2015 SharpBrains Virtual Summit
    • 2014 SharpBrains Virtual Summit
  • Report: Pervasive Neurotechnology
  • Report: Digital Brain Health
  • About
    • Mission & Team
    • Endorsements
    • Public Speaking
    • In the News
    • Contact Us

On the value and the limits of cognitive screening, as seen in President Trump’s examination

January 17, 2018 by SharpBrains

Exam­ple clocks, cour­tesy of William Souil­lard-Man­dar et al (2015)

In the News:

Why you may be mis­un­der­stand­ing the men­tal test that Trump passed with fly­ing col­ors (The Wash­ing­ton Post):

“On its sur­face, the Mon­tre­al Cog­ni­tive Assess­ment (MoCA) test seems pret­ty easy. Can you draw a three-dimen­sion­al cube? Can you iden­ti­fy these var­i­ous ani­mals? Can you draw a clock? Can you repeat back the phrase, “The cat always hid under the couch when dogs were in the room”?…The point is not that the test is easy. The point is that an inabil­i­ty to com­plete aspects of the test reveals dif­fer­ent types of men­tal decline. The clock test is about exec­u­tive brain func­tion: mem­o­ry, plan­ning ahead. The dif­fer­ent parts of the MoCA are labeled accord­ing to what they test, with the clock test falling under “visuospatial/executive.” Ques­tions about the cur­rent year and date are under “ori­en­ta­tion.” The request to iden­ti­fy a draw­ing of a camel is under “nam­ing.” In the test’s scor­ing instruc­tions, it explains what is cov­ered: “atten­tion and con­cen­tra­tion, exec­u­tive func­tions, mem­o­ry, lan­guage, visuo­con­struc­tion­al skills, con­cep­tu­al think­ing, cal­cu­la­tions and orientation.”

It is, as Trump’s doc­tor not­ed, a tool for iden­ti­fy­ing ear­ly signs of men­tal dete­ri­o­ra­tion, like the men­tal ver­sion of a blood sam­ple on which your doc­tor runs a bat­tery of tests. It’s not the SAT; it’s a screen­ing device…

Yes, Trump passed with fly­ing col­ors, as any adult with nor­mal cog­ni­tive func­tion prob­a­bly would. And that’s the point…You’re sup­posed to get 30 out of 30 — and when you don’t, that’s when the doc­tors learn something.”

In clinical practice: Comparing 2 common cognitive screening tools

TESTING FOR DEMENTIA: THE MONTREAL COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT (MOCA) (Dai­ly­Car­ing):

“How are the MoCA and MMSE different?

The MoCA looks sim­i­lar to the MMSE, but the MoCA tests a vari­ety of dif­fer­ent cog­ni­tive func­tions and the MMSE focus­es most­ly on mem­o­ry and recall.

The MoCA is gen­er­al­ly bet­ter at detect­ing mild impair­ment and ear­ly Alzheimer’s dis­ease because it’s a more sen­si­tive test and is more dif­fi­cult. So, if a doc­tor sees a patient who is ques­tion­ing their men­tal func­tion­ing, they might give the MoCA. But if a patient comes in and is clear­ly cog­ni­tive­ly impaired, a very sen­si­tive test wouldn’t be as nec­es­sary since the issues are more obvious.

The MoCA has also been shown to be a bet­ter screen­ing tool for con­di­tions like:

  • Parkinson’s dis­ease
  • Vas­cu­lar dementia
  • Trau­mat­ic brain injury (often from falls)
  • Huntington’s dis­ease
  • Brain tumors
  • Mul­ti­ple sclerosis

How are the MoCA and MMSE similar?

Even though these are good screen­ing tools for cog­ni­tive impair­ments, nei­ther test was designed to diag­nose cog­ni­tive conditions.

They also can’t be used to dis­tin­guish between con­di­tions. For exam­ple, you couldn’t use either test to diag­nose some­one with Alzheimer’s ver­sus fron­totem­po­ral demen­tia. After the ini­tial screen­ing, more test­ing would be needed.”

In the scientific literature:

Tra­jec­to­ry and vari­abil­i­ty char­ac­ter­i­za­tion of the Mon­tre­al cog­ni­tive assess­ment in old­er adults. (Aging Clin­i­cal and Exper­i­men­tal Research). From the abstract:

  • BACKGROUND: The Mon­tre­al cog­ni­tive assess­ment (MoCA) has become one of the most wide­ly used cog­ni­tive screen­ing instru­ments since its ini­tial pub­li­ca­tion. To date, only a hand­ful of stud­ies have explored lon­gi­tu­di­nal char­ac­ter­is­tics of the MoCA.
  • AIM: The aim of this study is to char­ac­ter­ize the tra­jec­to­ry of MoCA per­for­mance across a broad age con­tin­u­um of old­er adults.
  • METHODS: Data from 467 cog­ni­tive­ly nor­mal par­tic­i­pants were used in this analy­sis. The sam­ple was grouped into four stra­ta based on the par­tic­i­pants’ age at base­line (60–69, 70–79, 80–89, and 90–99). Mixed mod­el repeat­ed mea­sures (MMRM) analy­sis and mixed-effects spline mod­els were used to char­ac­ter­ize the tra­jec­to­ry of MoCA scores in each age stra­tum and in the entire sam­ple. Intra­sub­ject stan­dard devi­a­tion (ISD) was used to char­ac­ter­ize the nat­ur­al vari­abil­i­ty of indi­vid­ual MoCA per­for­mance over time.
  • RESULTS: The ISD (Note: Intra­sub­ject Stan­dard Devi­a­tion) val­ues for each of the age stra­ta indi­cat­ed that year-to-year indi­vid­ual vari­a­tion on the MoCA ranged from zero to three points. MMRM analy­sis showed that the 60–69 stra­tum remained rel­a­tive­ly sta­ble over time while the 70–79 and 80–89 stra­ta both showed notable decline rel­a­tive to base­line per­for­mance. The mixed-effects spline mod­el showed that MoCA per­for­mance declines lin­ear­ly across the old­er adult age span.
  • DISCUSSION: Among cog­ni­tive­ly nor­mal old­er adults MoCA per­for­mance remains rel­a­tive­ly sta­ble over time, how­ev­er across the old­er adult age-span MoCA per­for­mance declines in a lin­ear fash­ion. These results will help clin­i­cians bet­ter under­stand the nor­mal course of MoCA change in old­er adults while researchers may use these results to inform sam­ple size esti­mates for inter­ven­tion studies.

Cognitive monitoring and testing in the near future:

  • The FDA clears two com­put­er­ized cog­ni­tive tests to assist in med­ical eval­u­a­tions fol­low­ing brain injury or concussion
  • Bio­phar­ma embraces dig­i­tal cog­ni­tive assess­ments to iden­ti­fy behav­ioral health biomarkers
  • Five rea­sons the future of brain enhance­ment is dig­i­tal, per­va­sive and (hope­ful­ly) bright
  • 10 neu­rotech­nolo­gies about to trans­form brain enhance­ment and brain health
  • Jan Samzelius, CEO of Brain­no­va­tions Win­ner Neu­raMetrix, encour­ages pio­neers to focus on “sim­ple, ele­gant solu­tions to big problems”

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
  • More
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pock­et

Filed Under: Brain/ Mental Health Tagged With: Age-associated, Alzheimer’s Disease, cognition, Cognitive variability, cognitive-decline, cognitive-function, cognitive-screening, executive brain function, Intraindividual change, memory impairment, mental test, mental-decline, MMSE, MOCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Trump

Primary Sidebar

Top Articles on Brain Health and Neuroplasticity

  1. Can you grow your hippocampus? Yes. Here’s how, and why it matters
  2. How learning changes your brain
  3. To harness neuroplasticity, start with enthusiasm
  4. Three ways to protect your mental health during –and after– COVID-19
  5. Why you turn down the radio when you're lost
  6. Solving the Brain Fitness Puzzle Is the Key to Self-Empowered Aging
  7. Ten neu­rotech­nolo­gies about to trans­form brain enhance­ment & health
  8. Five reasons the future of brain enhancement is digital, pervasive and (hopefully) bright
  9. What Educators and Parents Should Know About Neuroplasticity and Dance
  10. The Ten Habits of Highly Effective Brains
  11. Six tips to build resilience and prevent brain-damaging stress
  12. Can brain training work? Yes, if it meets these 5 conditions
  13. What are cognitive abilities and how to boost them?
  14. Eight Tips To Remember What You Read
  15. Twenty Must-Know Facts to Harness Neuroplasticity and Improve Brain Health

Top 10 Brain Teasers and Illusions

  1. You think you know the colors? Try the Stroop Test
  2. Check out this brief attention experiment
  3. Test your stress level
  4. Guess: Are there more brain connections or leaves in the Amazon?
  5. Quick brain teasers to flex two key men­tal mus­cles
  6. Count the Fs in this sentence
  7. Can you iden­tify Apple’s logo?
  8. Ten classic optical illu­sions to trick your mind
  9. What do you see?
  10. Fun Mental Rotation challenge
  • Check our Top 25 Brain Teasers, Games and Illusions

Join 12,513 readers exploring, at no cost, the latest in neuroplasticity and brain health.

By subscribing you agree to receive our free, monthly eNewsletter. We don't rent or sell emails collected, and you may unsubscribe at any time.

IMPORTANT: Please check your inbox or spam folder in a couple minutes and confirm your subscription.

Get In Touch!

Contact Us

660 4th Street, Suite 205,
San Francisco, CA 94107 USA

About Us

SharpBrains is an independent market research firm tracking health and performance applications of brain science. We prepare general and tailored market reports, publish consumer guides, produce an annual global and virtual conference, and provide strategic advisory services.

© 2023 SharpBrains. All Rights Reserved - Privacy Policy