Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News


Will the Apple Tablet Support or Hinder Users Cognitive Fitness?

Rumor has it that Apple is going to announce a tablet com­put­er, which may well become a rev­o­lu­tion­ary new way for users to read and expe­ri­ence all kinds of edu­ca­tion­al con­tent.

Will it sup­port or hin­der our Cog­ni­tive  Fit­ness?

In this arti­cle, I describe the cri­te­riachecklist that a tablet com­put­er and its tech­no­log­i­cal ecosys­tem must meet in order for the solu­tion to make users more knowl­edge­able and smarter. To achieve these lofty goals, the tablet must be much more than an read­er. The offer­ing must be an inte­grat­ed learn­ing envi­ron­ment with which users trans­form the infor­ma­tion that they read, hear and view on the tablet into their own knowl­edge.

The key con­sid­er­a­tion in design­ing such a sys­tem is that pro­duc­tive read­ing is active read­ing. In oth­er words, learn­ing involves a lot of think­ing, writ­ing, draw­ing and com­mu­ni­cat­ing. Learn­ing involves antic­i­pat­ing what the author will say, set­ting learn­ing objec­tives, detect­ing knowl­edge gaps, writ­ing com­ments on the doc­u­ment, draw­ing dia­grams.

Unfor­tu­nate­ly, today’s com­put­ers do not make this an easy task. Most browsers, for exam­ple, do not inher­ent­ly allow you to anno­tate text (e.g., to make a note of what is impor­tant or you don’t under­stand). Anno­tat­ing requires an add-on, and the anno­ta­tions are usu­al­ly just text or high­lights that are trapped in soft­ware; they can­not be linked to oth­er doc­u­ments, email or dia­grams.

In order to be a suc­cess­ful learn­ing envi­ron­ment, the Apple tablet must match the incum­bent (paper) and also address the cri­te­ria list­ed below.

Beat The Incum­bent Com­peti­tor — Paper

First, Apple must take into account the major strengths of a tablet’s main com­peti­tor: paper. Despite its many draw­backs com­pared to com­put­ers, paper cur­rent­ly has many advan­tages. Spencer (2006), for exam­ple, has found that her dis­tance edu­ca­tion stu­dents find paper to be more depend­able, flex­i­ble, and ergonom­ic. Spencer’s stu­dents pre­ferred to print com­plex arti­cles than to read them online.

Paper has a pre­dictable struc­ture and lay­out. It is easy to use and it has a def­i­nite start and end point. Most read­ers can very rapid­ly access any page of a book, use the table of con­tents, index to quick­ly nav­i­gate. Read­ers don’t have to wait for a page to load, they can turn it. Also, paper is less busy and less dis­tract­ing: it does not beep while you are con­cen­trat­ing.

More­over, users can write on their own paper to their heart’s con­tent.

These fea­tures present chal­lenges to read­ing and learn­ing tech­nol­o­gy.

Check­list for a Tablet Com­put­er to Make us Smarter

In this sec­tion I focus on some of the fea­tures that can make a tablet a use­ful learn­ing envi­ron­ment. This goes beyond hard­ware, and deals with cog­ni­tive soft­ware and ser­vices.

  1. The tablet should have a per­son­al task man­ag­er. Peo­ple are most pro­duc­tive when they set goals for them­selves that are SMART (spe­cif­ic, mea­sur­able, achiev­able, real­is­tic and time­ly). Learn­ing is an activ­i­ty like any oth­er, and would ben­e­fit from such a sys­tem so that when learn­ers approach a chap­ter, for exam­ple, they can set their learn­ing objec­tives.
  2. The tablet should have a detailed user-activ­i­ty mon­i­tor. The sys­tem should be able to quan­ti­ta­tive­ly mon­i­tor the amount of time the user spends on each learn­ing resource (each book, each chap­ter, each page) and each type of activ­i­ty. It should be able to report such facts as: how much time have I spent surf­ing the web as opposed to read­ing? How much time have I spent read­ing active­ly (tak­ing notes, etc.) vs. read­ing pas­sive­ly (skim­ming)? How much time have I spent draw­ing dia­grams vs. watch­ing youtube? What is my read­ing rate? This can allow the user to set new goals to be more pro­duc­tive in how they learn and use their tablet.
  3. The tablet should have an exten­sive anno­ta­tion sys­tem. This would enable active read­ing. Users should be able to make notes about all kinds of infor­ma­tion: e.g., to select some text in the brows­er doc­u­ment and then make a com­ment about it. The notes should be attached to the con­tent. Users should also be able to anno­tate PDFs, edi­tor doc­u­ments, dic­tio­nary def­i­n­i­tions, dia­grams basi­cal­ly any­thing. Would­n’t it be use­ful to be able to pause a movie and make a note that is anchored to a spe­cif­ic frame or seg­ment? One could then jump to the parts of the movie or pod­cast describ­ing impor­tant mate­r­i­al, and skip the rest. Or make a note in a spe­cif­ic part of a physics dia­gram to indi­cate what you don’t under­stand some­thing that can be done on paper. Users should be able to tag not only entire web pages, but any item (such as part of a sen­tence), and they should be able to re-use com­mon tags (e.g., Don’t under­stand, Impor­tant), and eas­i­ly link items to new or exist­ing tasks (Review this). Users should even be able to over­lay their own links from exist­ing con­tent to exist­ing con­tent.
  4. The tablet should con­tain a rich graph­ic orga­niz­er, so that users can cre­ate con­cepts maps, doo­dles or struc­tured draw­ings. This will allow users to lever­age their visu­al motor capa­bil­i­ties as they learn. The read­er could sum­ma­rize a page with a draw­ing linked to that page.
  5. The tablet should con­tain a pow­er­ful out­lin­er. An out­lin­er allows users to orga­nize their thoughts in a hier­ar­chi­cal fash­ion. Users can col­lapse, pro­mote, demote and move entire sec­tions of a doc­u­ment very eas­i­ly. An out­lin­er sup­ports think­ing, writ­ing and cre­at­ing sum­maries of lec­tures, books and videos. The anno­ta­tion sys­tem should also embed the out­lin­er, and allow out­lines to be linked to any con­tent.
  6. The tablet should con­tain a spaced learn­ing (self-test­ing) sys­tem. We remem­ber much bet­ter when we prac­tice recall­ing from mem­o­ry. Beyond rote recall, ques­tions can require com­pre­hen­sion. Users (and con­tent providers) should be able to asso­ciate ques­tions with each chap­ter (or page). And users should be able to gauge for each resource what their degree of learn­ing is as mea­sured by the space learn­ing sys­tem (com­bined with the oth­er mon­i­tors men­tioned above). Ques­tions should be link­able to exact­ly where the answers are found in text, mul­ti­me­dia, etc. And why not allow users to direct­ly add dic­tio­nary entries to their self-test­ing data­base, so that they nev­er have to look up the same word twice? After cre­at­ing ques­tions, users should be able to enter a review mode to inter­act with their ques­tions and link back to the appro­pri­ate con­tent when desired.
  7. The tablet should be part of a larg­er sys­tem beyond the tablet. Apple should pro­vide sync­ing ser­vices to allow users to move back and forth between the tablet, an iPod and a note­book or desk­top. Nei­ther the con­tent one pur­chas­es nor the anno­ta­tions and con­tent one cre­ates should be trapped on the tablet. The dig­i­tal rights man­age­ment should allow for the same book pur­chase (license) to be avail­able on a num­ber (e.g., 3) of dif­fer­ent devices. If one’s tablet is lost or bro­ken, one can still pre­pare for that pre­sen­ta­tion or exam by switch­ing to anoth­er machine, with­out los­ing a beat. Sim­i­lar­ly, the sta­tus of the tasks one sets on the tablet should be updat­ed when one moves back to one’s tra­di­tion­al com­put­er. This could lever­age MobileMe and iTunes.
  8. The larg­er sys­tem should also sup­port col­lab­o­ra­tion. For exam­ple, users should be able to share their anno­ta­tions and oth­er con­tent they devel­op, so that they can review doc­u­ments and oth­er resources togeth­er and learn from each oth­er.
  9. Con­tent should be very afford­able, easy to obtain, and served with an intel­li­gent rat­ing sys­tem so that qual­i­ty con­tent can dis­tin­guish itself from the rest.
  10. There needs to be a mute func­tion, so that with one action, all dis­tract­ing noti­fi­ca­tions can be silenced, allow­ing one to con­cen­trate on one’s cur­rent task.

The impor­tance of a com­plete solu­tion can­not be under­stat­ed. It is essen­tial that users should be able to seam­less­ly move from their tablets to their lap­tops with all their con­tent intact. This way they will be able to flex­i­bly lever­age the strengths of each plat­form.

I believe such an inte­grat­ed learn­ing envi­ron­ment can ulti­mate­ly make users smarter and more cog­ni­tive­ly pro­duc­tive. Once Apple releas­es more infor­ma­tion on its new tablet, I will eval­u­ate it accord­ing to these cri­te­ria to help answer the key ques­tion, Will the Apple Tablet Sup­port or Hin­der Users Cog­ni­tive Fit­ness?

LucPBeaudoinDr. Luc P. Beau­doin is Adjunct Pro­fes­sor of Edu­ca­tion at Simon Fras­er Uni­ver­si­ty. He spe­cial­izes in the­o­ret­i­cal and applied cog­ni­tive sci­ence. He has been doing research and devel­op­ment on inte­grat­ed learn­ing envi­ron­ments since 2001. He is also doing research and devel­op­ment in the areas of cog­ni­tive fit­ness and pro­duc­tiv­i­ty. He was amongst the first employ­ees of two of Canada’s most suc­cess­ful high tech star­tups (as soft­ware devel­op­er and writer). He has also been Assis­tant Pro­fes­sor of Mil­i­tary Psy­chol­o­gy and Lead­er­ship.


Adler, M. J. (1927) How to read a book. New York: Touch­stone.

Ban­dura, A. (1997). Self-effi­ca­cy: The exer­cise of con­trol. New York, NY: W.H. Free­man.

Ban­dura, A. (2001). Social cog­ni­tive the­o­ry: An agen­tic per­spec­tive. Annu­al Review of Psy­chol­o­gy, 52(1), 1–26. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

Beau­doin, L., & Winne, P. (2009). nStudy: An Inter­net tool to sup­port learn­ing, col­lab­o­ra­tion and research­ing learn­ing strate­gies. Pre­sent­ed at the CELC-2009 Cana­di­an e‑Learning Con­fer­ence, Van­cou­ver, BC.

Eric­s­son, K., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term work­ing mem­o­ry, 102(2), 211–245.

Nes­bit, J. C., & Ades­ope, O. O. (2006). Learn­ing with con­cept and knowl­edge maps: A meta-analy­sis. Review of Edu­ca­tion­al Research, 76(3), 413–448. doi: 10.3102/00346543076003413

Nis­bett, R. E. (2009). Intel­li­gence and how to get it: Why schools and cul­tures count. New York, NY: W. W. Nor­ton & Com­pa­ny.

Perkins, D. (1995). Out­smart­ing IQ: The emerg­ing sci­ence of learn­able intel­li­gence. New York, NY: Free Press.

Ren­ear, A., DeRose, S., Mylonas, E., & van Dam, A. (1999). An out­line for a func­tion­al tax­on­o­my of anno­ta­tion (p. 30). Prov­i­dence, RI: Brown Uni­ver­si­ty Schol­ar­ly Tech­nol­o­gy Group.

Roedi­ger III, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). The pow­er of test­ing mem­o­ry. Per­spec­tives on Psy­cho­log­i­cal Sci­ence, 1(3), 181–210.

Simp­son, M. L., & Nist, S. L. (1990). Text­book anno­ta­tion: An effec­tive and effi­cient study strat­e­gy for col­lege stu­dents. Jour­nal of Read­ing, 34(2), 122–129.

Spencer, C. (2006). Research on learn­ers pref­er­ences for read­ing from a print­ed text or from a com­put­er screen. Jour­nal of Dis­tance Edu­ca­tion, 22(1), 33–50.

Van­Lehn, K. (1996). Cog­ni­tive skill acqui­si­tion. Annu­al Review of Psy­chol­o­gy, 47(1), 513–539. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.513

Winne, P. (2006). How soft­ware tech­nolo­gies can improve research on learn­ing and bol­ster school reform. Edu­ca­tion­al Psy­chol­o­gist, 41(1), 5–17.

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

One Response

  1. Very inter­est­ing pre-analy­sis. I think I remem­ber see­ing some­thing on TV about the Tablet explain­ing some of these fea­tures (exten­sive anno­ta­tion sys­tem, graph­ic orga­niz­er). Per­son­al­ly, I think the thing is too darn expen­sive. My lap­top does just fine orga­niz­ing all my read­ing and writ­ing.

Leave a Reply

Categories: Technology

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Search in our archives

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters,  SharpBrains is an independent market research firm tracking how brain science can improve our health and our lives.

Follow us and Engage via…

RSS Feed

Watch All Recordings Now (40+ Speakers, 12+ Hours)