Reading science fiction can help children build critical thinking and resilience

Young peo­ple who are hooked on watch­ing fan­ta­sy or read­ing sci­ence fic­tion may be on to some­thing. Con­trary to a com­mon mis­per­cep­tion that read­ing this genre is an unwor­thy prac­tice, read­ing sci­ence fic­tion and fan­ta­sy may help young peo­ple cope, espe­cial­ly with the stress and anx­i­ety of liv­ing through the COVID-19 pandemic.

I am a pro­fes­sor with research inter­ests in the social, eth­i­cal and polit­i­cal mes­sages in sci­ence fic­tion. In my book Med­i­cine and Ethics in Black Women’s Spec­u­la­tive Fic­tion, I explore the ways sci­ence fic­tion pro­motes under­stand­ing of human dif­fer­ences and eth­i­cal thinking.

While many peo­ple may not con­sid­er sci­ence fic­tion, fan­ta­sy, or spec­u­la­tive fic­tion to be “lit­er­ary,” research shows that all fic­tion can gen­er­ate crit­i­cal think­ing skills and emo­tion­al intel­li­gence for young read­ers. Sci­ence fic­tion may have a pow­er all its own.

Literature as a moral mirror

His­tor­i­cal­ly, par­ents have con­sid­ered lit­er­a­ture “good” for young peo­ple if it pro­vides moral guid­ance that reflects their own val­ues. This belief has been the cat­a­lyst for many move­ments to cen­sor par­tic­u­lar books for near­ly as long as books have been published.

The Adven­tures of Huck­le­ber­ry Finn, pub­lished in 1885, was the first book to be banned in the U.S. It was thought to cor­rupt youth by teach­ing boys to swear, smoke and run away from home.

In the lat­ter part of the 20th cen­tu­ry, the book has come under fire for the Mark Twain’s pro­lif­ic use of the N‑word. Many peo­ple are con­cerned that the orig­i­nal ver­sion of the book nor­mal­izes an unac­cept­able racial slur. Who can say the N‑word and in what con­text is an ongo­ing social and polit­i­cal debate, reflect­ing wounds in Amer­i­can soci­ety that have yet to heal.

The ques­tion is, how does lit­er­a­ture of any genre—whether pop­u­lar­ly per­ceived as “seri­ous lit­er­a­ture” or “escapist nonsense”—perform its edu­ca­tion­al func­tion. This is cen­tral to the con­flict between par­ents and edu­ca­tors about what kids should read, espe­cial­ly as it per­tains to “escapist” fiction.

Why science fiction gets a bad rap

His­tor­i­cal­ly, those who read sci­ence fic­tion have been stig­ma­tized as geeks who can’t cope with real­i­ty. This per­cep­tion per­sists, par­tic­u­lar­ly for those who are unaware of the changes to this genre in the past sev­er­al decades. A 2016 arti­cle in Social and Per­son­al­i­ty Psy­chol­o­gy Com­pass, argues that “con­nect­ing to sto­ry worlds involves a process of ‘dual empa­thy,’ simul­ta­ne­ous­ly engag­ing in intense per­son­al pro­cess­ing of chal­leng­ing issues, while ‘feel­ing through’ char­ac­ters, both of which pro­duce benefits.”

While sci­ence fic­tion has become more main­stream, one study claimed that sci­ence fic­tion makes read­ers stu­pid. A sub­se­quent study by the same authors lat­er refut­ed this claim when the qual­i­ty of writ­ing was tak­en into account.

This ongo­ing ambiva­lence towards the genre con­tributes to the stereo­type that such works are of lit­tle val­ue because they pre­sum­ably don’t engage real human dilem­mas. In actu­al­i­ty, they do. Such stereo­types assume that young peo­ple can only learn to cope with human dilem­mas by engag­ing in mir­ror-image reflec­tions of real­i­ty includ­ing what they read or watch.

The mental health of reading

Read­ing sci­ence fic­tion and fan­ta­sy can help read­ers make sense of the world. Rather than lim­it­ing read­ers’ capac­i­ty to deal with real­i­ty, expo­sure to out­side-the-box cre­ative sto­ries may expand their abil­i­ty to engage real­i­ty based on science.

A 2015 sur­vey of sci­ence fic­tion and fan­ta­sy read­ers found that these read­ers were also major con­sumers of a wide range of oth­er types of books and media. In fact, the study not­ed a con­nec­tion between respon­dents’ con­sump­tion of var­ied lit­er­ary forms and an abil­i­ty to under­stand science.

With increas­ing rates of anx­i­ety, depres­sion, and men­tal health issues for youth in the past two decades, it may be the case that young peo­ple, no dif­fer­ent from Amer­i­can soci­ety gen­er­al­ly, are suf­fer­ing from real­i­ty over­load. Young peo­ple today have unprece­dent­ed access to infor­ma­tion about which they may have lit­tle pow­er to influ­ence or change.

The powerful world of science fiction

Sci­ence fic­tion and fan­ta­sy do not need to pro­vide a mir­ror image of real­i­ty in order to offer com­pelling sto­ries about seri­ous social and polit­i­cal issues. The fact that the set­ting or char­ac­ters are extra­or­di­nary may be pre­cise­ly why they are pow­er­ful and where their val­ue lies.

My con­tri­bu­tion in the forth­com­ing essay col­lec­tion, Raced Bod­ies, Erased Lives: Race in Young Adult Spec­u­la­tive Fic­tion, dis­cuss­es how race, gen­der and men­tal health for black girls is por­trayed in spec­u­la­tive fic­tion and fan­ta­sy. My essay describes how con­tem­po­rary writ­ers take an aspect of what is famil­iar and make it “odd” or “strange” enough to give the read­er psy­chic and emo­tion­al dis­tance to under­stand men­tal health issues with fresh eyes.

From the Har­ry Pot­ter and Hunger Games series to nov­els like Octavia Butler’s Para­ble of the Sow­er and Para­ble of the Tal­ents and Nan­cy Kress’ Beg­gars in Spain, youths see exam­ples of young peo­ple grap­pling with seri­ous social, eco­nom­ic, and polit­i­cal issues that are time­ly and rel­e­vant, but in set­tings or times that offer crit­i­cal distance.

This dis­tance gives read­ers an avenue to grap­ple with com­plex­i­ty and use their imag­i­na­tion to con­sid­er dif­fer­ent ways of man­ag­ing social chal­lenges. What bet­ter way to deal with the uncer­tain­ty of this time than with forms of fic­tion that make us com­fort­able with being uncom­fort­able, that explore uncer­tain­ty and ambi­gu­i­ty, and depict young peo­ple as active agents, sur­vivors and shapers of their own destinies?

Let them read sci­ence fic­tion. In it, young peo­ple can see themselves—coping, sur­viv­ing and learn­ing lessons—that may enable them to cre­ate their own strate­gies for resilience. In this time of COVID-19 and phys­i­cal dis­tanc­ing, we may be reluc­tant for kids to embrace cre­ative forms that seem to sep­a­rate them psy­cho­log­i­cal­ly from reality.

But the crit­i­cal think­ing and agile habits of mind prompt­ed by this type of lit­er­a­ture may actu­al­ly pro­duce resilience and cre­ativ­i­ty that every­day life and real­i­ty typ­i­cal­ly do not.

Esther L. Jones, Ph.D., is Asso­ciate Provost and Dean of the Fac­ul­ty at Clark Uni­ver­si­ty, where she is a tenured pro­fes­sor in the depart­ment of Eng­lish and the E. Franklin Fra­zier Chair of African Amer­i­can Lit­er­a­ture, The­o­ry and Cul­ture. Her research and teach­ing spe­cial­iza­tions include race, gen­der, health and med­ical ethics as rep­re­sent­ed in lit­er­a­ture, espe­cial­ly sci­ence fic­tion and fan­ta­sy. She is the author of Med­i­cine and Ethics in Black Women’s Spec­u­la­tive Fic­tion (2015). This arti­cle was orig­i­nal­ly pub­lished by The Con­ver­sa­tion.

Article in Context:

About SharpBrains

SHARPBRAINS is an independent think-tank and consulting firm providing services at the frontier of applied neuroscience, health, leadership and innovation.
SHARPBRAINS es un think-tank y consultoría independiente proporcionando servicios para la neurociencia aplicada, salud, liderazgo e innovación.

Top Articles on Brain Health and Neuroplasticity

Top 10 Brain Teasers and Illusions

Newsletter

Subscribe to our e-newsletter

* indicates required

Got the book?