Should heads of state and candidates to high office pass a cognitive/ mental fitness test?

Shut­ter­stock

Is it fair to ques­tion a pres­i­den­tial candidate’s men­tal fit­ness? (Salon):

My heart sank as he floun­dered his way through his respons­es, fum­bling with his notes, unchar­ac­ter­is­ti­cal­ly lost for words. He looked tired and bewil­dered,” Ron Rea­gan, the son of Pres­i­dent Ronald Rea­gan, wrote of his father’s per­for­mance dur­ing the first 1984 pres­i­den­tial debate.

At the time, there had long been rumors that Rea­gan was suf­fer­ing from cog­ni­tive impair­ment — per­haps Alzheimer’s Dis­ease — and as he strug­gled dur­ing the first debate against his Demo­c­ra­t­ic oppo­nent, for­mer Vice Pres­i­dent Wal­ter Mon­dale, those con­cerns threat­ened his reelec­tion cam­paign. He recov­ered dur­ing the sec­ond debate with a mem­o­rable quip, jok­ing that he would not allow age to become an issue in the cam­paign because “I am not going to exploit, for polit­i­cal pur­pos­es, my oppo­nen­t’s youth and inex­pe­ri­ence.” The audi­ence laughed, the nation moved on… and, a decade lat­er, Rea­gan announced to the world that he had been diag­nosed with Alzheimer’s

I must add that I am not try­ing to add to the stig­ma that sur­rounds men­tal health issues. I have writ­ten before about how men­tal ill­ness is stig­ma­tized in dan­ger­ous and unjust ways, how as an autis­tic per­son I am espe­cial­ly sen­si­tive to men­tal health-based dis­crim­i­na­tion and how I have been per­son­al­ly impact­ed by it.

At the same time: Whether one likes it or not, there is a dif­fer­ence between a pres­i­dent sim­ply hav­ing a men­tal health issue like anx­i­ety, depres­sion, bipo­lar dis­or­der or alco­holism (one 2006 study found that just under half of Amer­i­ca’s pres­i­dents had at least one of those con­di­tions, includ­ing our great­est pres­i­dent — Abra­ham Lin­coln) and a pres­i­dent being inca­pable of doing the job because of men­tal health issues.

News in Context:

2 Comments

  1. Jim BrownT on June 1, 2020 at 8:44

    Any one of the above cit­ed dis­or­ders are like­ly to impair any­one’s judge­ment. All the coun­tries, provinces, states, and cities of the world might be bet­ter served if such vet­ting were con­duct­ed by a non-gov­ern­men­tal agency. Per­haps even more crit­i­cal, would be assess­ment for Per­son­al­i­ty Dis­or­ders in indi­vid­u­als seek­ing office, since they by nature, have much more impact on judge­ments made relat­ed to oth­ers they would serve. Cur­rent vet­ting process­es are con­duct­ed by the var­i­ous polit­i­cal par­ties whose vest­ed inter­ests may have more to do with polit­i­cal agen­das (left or right) than find­ing can­di­dates who will serve us for the greater best inter­ests of all peo­ple. If I am not mis­tak­en, those are prin­ci­ples upon which this coun­try was found­ed, and to my mind, the ones to which we should find our way back.
    James F G Brown, Ph.D.



    • Alvaro Fernandez on June 29, 2020 at 4:15

      Thank you for the very thought­ful com­ment, Jim!



About SharpBrains

SHARPBRAINS is an independent think-tank and consulting firm providing services at the frontier of applied neuroscience, health, leadership and innovation.
SHARPBRAINS es un think-tank y consultoría independiente proporcionando servicios para la neurociencia aplicada, salud, liderazgo e innovación.

Top Articles on Brain Health and Neuroplasticity

Top 10 Brain Teasers and Illusions

Newsletter

Subscribe to our e-newsletter

* indicates required

Got the book?