Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Icon

Initial study finds promise and limitations in using virtual reality (VR) to treat ADHD

___

Giv­en the lim­i­ta­tions of exist­ing evi­dence-based ADHD treat­ments, i.e., stim­u­lant med­ica­tion and behav­ior ther­a­py — research on nov­el inter­ven­tion approach­es con­tin­ues to be impor­tant.

Cog­ni­tive train­ing is one such approach that has been sug­gest­ed as a poten­tial adjunct or even replace­ment for med­ica­tion treat­ment. While cog­ni­tive train­ing takes dif­fer­ent forms, e.g., com­put­er­ized atten­tion train­ing, work­ing mem­o­ry train­ing, the basic idea is that by repeat­ed­ly prac­tic­ing cog­ni­tive tasks relat­ed to atten­tion, one’s abil­i­ty to focus and attend will improve. In oth­er words, atten­tion will improve with prac­tice, just as many oth­er skills do. In my view, the evi­dence sup­port­ing this hypoth­e­sis is lim­it­ed in that although gains are gen­er­al­ly found on tasks sim­i­lar to those used in train­ing, gen­er­al­iza­tion of gains to real-world tasks where sus­tain­ing atten­tion is impor­tant, e.g., while read­ing, doing home­work, etc., have been more dif­fi­cult to doc­u­ment.

In recent years, vir­tu­al real­i­ty (VR) has been intro­duced as a treat­ment for sev­er­al psy­chi­atric dis­or­ders, par­tic­u­lar­ly anx­i­ety dis­or­ders; pos­i­tive find­ings have been report­ed. In VR treat­ment for anx­i­ety dis­or­ders, the client is ‘exposed’ to sources of anx­i­ety in the vir­tu­al envi­ron­ment, allow­ing for grad­ual expo­sure in a con­trolled set­ting. For exam­ple, in the treat­ment of PTSD, VR allows a per­son to expe­ri­ence the trau­ma sce­nario again in a safe, con­trolled way through the use of inter­ac­tive com­put­er-gen­er­at­ed envi­ron­ments that can be mod­i­fied to resem­ble the trau­ma­tiz­ing event. Using VR for ADHD has nev­er been test­ed, how­ev­er. A recent study thus rep­re­sents an ini­tial effort to exam­ine this approach.

The New Study

In this study, Vir­tu­al Reme­di­a­tion Ver­sus Methylphenidate to Improve Dis­tractibil­i­ty in Chil­dren With ADHD: A Con­trolled Ran­dom­ized Clin­i­cal Tri­al Study, 51 7- to 11-year old chil­dren diag­nosed with ADHD were ran­dom­ly assigned to a vir­tu­al real­i­ty inter­ven­tion, med­ica­tion treat­ment, or sup­port­ive psy­chother­a­py. Before and after treat­ment, which last­ed 6 weeks, ADHD symp­toms were assessed via a par­ent rat­ing scale, a com­put­er­ized atten­tion test, and a vir­tu­al class­room assess­ment task.

In the lat­ter, par­tic­i­pants wore VR head­sets that placed them ‘inside’ a vir­tu­al class­room. A vir­tu­al ‘teacher’ instruct­ed them to view a series of let­ters on a black­board and to click the mouse when a par­tic­u­lar com­bi­na­tion of let­ters appeared on the board. To make the task more dif­fi­cult, mul­ti­ple dis­trac­tors, e.g., pen­cils drop­ping, paper air­plane fly­ing across the class, etc., were pre­sent­ed dur­ing the task. Cor­rect respons­es were defined by click­ing the mouse after the des­ig­nat­ed let­ters appeared; click­ing to any oth­er com­bi­na­tion of let­ters were con­sid­ered errors.

Treat­ment last­ed 6 weeks. Chil­dren in the med­ica­tion group were treat­ed with a long act­ing form of methylphenidate with dose titrat­ed every 2 weeks based on a par­ent inter­view. The psy­chother­a­py con­di­tion was pri­mar­i­ly focused on pro­vid­ing emo­tion­al sup­port and address­ing the impact of ADHD on children’s every­day lives; it was includ­ed pri­mar­i­ly to con­trol for ther­a­pist atten­tion.

In the Vir­tu­al Real­i­ty con­di­tion, chil­dren wore VR head­sets that sim­u­lat­ed a reg­u­lar class­room. Dur­ing 12 30-minute train­ing ses­sions, chil­dren per­formed a let­ter detec­tion task (details not pro­vid­ed) while inhibit­ing atten­tion to var­i­ous class­room dis­trac­tions. As train­ing pro­gressed, the dis­trac­tors increased to make the task more dif­fi­cult. You may note that the train­ing task sounds very sim­i­lar to the assess­ment task described above; from the descrip­tion pro­vid­ed in the paper, it is not evi­dent how they dif­fered.

Results 

On the vir­tu­al class­room assess­ment, youth who com­plet­ed cog­ni­tive train­ing in the VR envi­ron­ment showed improved per­for­mance that exceed­ed stu­dents in the psy­chother­a­py con­di­tion and that matched that found for stu­dents receiv­ing med­ica­tion. Fur­ther­more, they actu­al­ly made sig­nif­i­cant­ly few­er errors than stu­dents in the med­ica­tion group (it was not clear, how­ev­er, whether stu­dents were on med­ica­tion at the sec­ond assess­ment).

When it came to par­ent rat­ings of ADHD symp­toms, how­ev­er, there was no evi­dence that the VR train­ing had any pos­i­tive impact. In con­trast, as has been demon­strat­ed in numer­ous stud­ies, youth treat­ed with med­ica­tion had sig­nif­i­cant and sub­stan­tial reduc­tions in both inat­ten­tive and hyper­ac­tive symp­toms.

Summary and Implications

This study is an inter­est­ing ini­tial effort to exam­ine VR in the treat­ment of ADHD. How­ev­er, although the VR inter­ven­tion showed pos­i­tive effects on the VR assess­ment task, this is not sur­pris­ing giv­en how sim­i­lar the assess­ment was to the actu­al inter­ven­tion. Because of this sim­i­lar­i­ty, it is not clear that the VR com­po­nent was essen­tial as prac­tic­ing a sim­i­lar com­put­er-based task out­side of the VR envi­ron­ment could have yield­ed sim­i­lar results. In that regard, a stronger con­trol would have been a com­put­er-based atten­tion train­ing task that did not include VR. Anoth­er lim­i­ta­tion, as not­ed above, is that the VR inter­ven­tion had no dis­cernible impact on par­ents’ behav­ior rat­ings.

While the results of this study are lim­it­ed, they high­light some impor­tant prin­ci­ples in eval­u­at­ing nov­el ADHD treat­ments. For exam­ple, when train­ing stud­ies report treat­ment effects, it is not uncom­mon to find that ben­e­fits were obtained on some par­tic­u­lar mea­sure. In the study above, the pos­i­tive impact on per­for­mance in the VR assess­ment could be high­light­ed.

It is impor­tant, how­ev­er, to ask whether the out­come affect­ed is a mean­ing­ful one. Most pro­fes­sion­als and par­ents would be more inter­est­ed in how a treat­ment impacts core ADHD symp­toms than on how it may affect per­for­mance on a spe­cif­ic lab-based test. Thus, in my opin­ion, the fail­ure to observe reduc­tions in par­ents’ reports of ADHD symp­toms sub­stan­tial­ly under­mines the val­ue of the inter­ven­tion test­ed here.

Anoth­er issue to con­sid­er is how close­ly the mea­sures used to eval­u­ate an intervention’s impact match the inter­ven­tion itself. In this study, the VR assess­ment mea­sure was high­ly sim­i­lar to what occurred in the VR train­ing; this alone could explain why chil­dren got bet­ter on the task. Ide­al­ly, the inter­ven­tion effects should gen­er­al­ize to ‘real world’ tasks and/or set­tings that are dif­fer from the train­ing itself.

For exam­ple, while it is nice to show that a com­put­er-based atten­tion train­ing inter­ven­tion leads to bet­ter scores on a com­put­er­ized atten­tion mea­sure, it is more impor­tant to doc­u­ment that atten­tion also improves in set­tings that real­ly mat­ter, e.g., while the child is doing home­work or in the class­room.

In con­clu­sion, while I com­mend the authors for this ini­tial effort to exam­ine the use of VR in ADHD treat­ment, there is much work remain­ing to estab­lish whether this a viable approach. Tak­ing a cue from the VR treat­ments devel­oped for anx­i­ety dis­or­ders, where VR is used to expose clients to ‘envi­ron­ments’ that elic­it anx­i­ety, it may be fruit­ful to use a vir­tu­al class­room envi­ron­ment to train atten­tion dur­ing more mean­ing­ful aca­d­e­m­ic tasks. For exam­ple, it may be pos­si­ble to com­bine neu­ro­feed­back with a vir­tu­al class­room to pro­vide feed­back to chil­dren on their atten­tion lev­el as the ‘teacher’ presents an actu­al les­son.

This seems as though it could be an inter­est­ing approach to try.

– Dr. David Rabin­er is a child clin­i­cal psy­chol­o­gist and Direc­tor of Under­grad­u­ate Stud­ies in the Depart­ment of Psy­chol­o­gy and Neu­ro­science at Duke Uni­ver­si­ty. He pub­lish­es the Atten­tion Research Update, an online newslet­ter that helps par­ents, pro­fes­sion­als, and edu­ca­tors keep up with the lat­est research on ADHD.

Related articles:

 

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

Leave a Reply

Categories: Attention and ADD/ADHD, Education & Lifelong Learning, Health & Wellness, Technology

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Watch All Recordings Now (40+ Speakers, 12+ Hours)

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters and more, SharpBrains is an independent market research firm tracking health and performance applications of brain science.

Follow us and Engage via…

twitter_logo_header
RSS Feed

Search for anything brain-related in our article archives