Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News


Discouraging new findings about pediatric care for children with ADHD: Often, best-practice guidelines are not followed

Most chil­dren with ADHD receive their care from com­mu­ni­ty-based pedi­a­tri­cians. Giv­en the large num­ber of school-age chil­dren who require eval­u­a­tion and treat­ment ser­vices for ADHD, and the adverse impact that poor qual­i­ty care can have on chil­dren’s devel­op­ment, it is impor­tant for chil­dren to rou­tine­ly receive care in the com­mu­ni­ty that is con­sis­tent with best-prac­tice guide­lines.

The Amer­i­can Acad­e­my of Pedi­atrics has clear­ly rec­og­nized this and pub­lished guide­lines for the eval­u­a­tion of ADHD back in 2000; this was fol­lowed by a set of treat­ment guide­lines in 2001 (pre­sent­ed here). Based on data col­lect­ed since then, these guide­lines were mod­i­fied in 2011 (com­plete text here).

Below is a brief sum­ma­ry of the key ele­ments from these guide­lines.

Evaluation Recommendations for school-age children

- Youth ages 4 through 18 years who present to their pri­ma­ry care clin­i­cian with aca­d­e­m­ic or behav­ioral prob­lems and symp­toms of inat­ten­tion, hyper­ac­tiv­i­ty, or impul­siv­i­ty should be eval­u­at­ed for ADHD.

- Diag­nos­ing ADHD requires deter­min­ing that DSM cri­te­ria for the dis­or­der have been met. Mak­ing this deter­mi­na­tion requires infor­ma­tion to be obtained from par­ents or guardians, teach­ers, and oth­ers. Clin­i­cians should rule out any alter­na­tive cause of the child’s ADHD symp­toms.

- ADHD eval­u­a­tions should include assess­ment for oth­er con­di­tions that may co-occur with ADHD, includ­ing emo­tion­al or behav­ioral (eg, anx­i­ety, depres­sive, oppo­si­tion­al defi­ant, and con­duct dis­or­ders), devel­op­men­tal (eg, learn­ing and lan­guage dis­or­ders or oth­er neu­rode­vel­op­men­tal dis­or­ders), and phys­i­cal (eg, tics, sleep apnea) con­di­tions.

Treatment recommendations for school-age children

- Treat­ment and man­age­ment of ADHD should reflect that it is a chron­ic con­di­tion and may impact chil­dren’s devel­op­ment and func­tion­ing over many years. Par­ents need to be sup­port­ed in con­sis­tent­ly imple­ment­ing treat­ments for their child over an extend­ed peri­od.

Spe­cif­ic treat­ment rec­om­men­da­tions vary by the age of the child.

- For chil­dren ages 4–5, evi­dence-based par­ent- and/or teacher-admin­is­tered behav­ior ther­a­py should be the first line of treat­ment. Stim­u­lant med­ica­tion may be pre­scribed if improve­ment is not sig­nif­i­cant and there remain mod­er­ate-to-severe dis­tur­bances in the child’s func­tion.

- For 6–11 year old chil­dren, FDA-approved med­ica­tions for ADHD and/or evi­dence-based par­ent- and/or teacher-admin­is­tered behav­ior ther­a­py are the front line treat­ments for ADHD; ide­al­ly, these treat­ments would be com­bined. The school set­ting is an essen­tial con­text for any treat­ment plan.

- For ado­les­cents, FDA-approved med­ica­tions should be pre­scribed with the ado­les­cen­t’s assent. Behav­ior ther­a­py may also be pre­scribed and will ide­al­ly be com­bined with med­ica­tion.

Note that for all ages, fam­i­ly pref­er­ence is an essen­tial ele­ment in deter­min­ing the treat­ment plan. For old­er chil­dren and ado­les­cents, their pref­er­ence should also be tak­en into account.

- When pre­scrib­ing med­ica­tion, clin­i­cians should titrate dos­es of ADHD med­ica­tion to achieve the max­i­mum ben­e­fit with min­i­mum side effects. Clin­i­cians should inform par­ents and chil­dren that chang­ing med­ica­tion dose and/or med­ica­tion may be nec­es­sary to deter­mine the opti­mal medication/dose and that this can require sev­er­al months. — It is impor­tant for med­ica­tion effi­ca­cy to sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly mon­i­tored at reg­u­lar inter­vals so that adjust­ments can be made when indi­cat­ed.

How well are these recommendations being followed?

The best data on this ques­tion comes from this study pub­lished in Pedi­atrics: Vari­abil­i­ty in ADHD care in com­mu­ni­ty-based pedi­atric prac­tices. The authors recruit­ed 184 pedi­a­tri­cians across 50 pedi­atric prac­tices in Cen­tral and North­ern Ohio for a study focused on improv­ing com­mu­ni­ty-based care for chil­dren with ADHD. For each pedi­a­tri­cian, 10 charts for patients with an ADHD diag­no­sis code were ran­dom­ly select­ed so that the assess­ment and treat­ment pro­ce­dures received by those patients could be reviewed.

For each chart reviewed, the researchers doc­u­ment­ed the fol­low­ing:

1. Pres­ence of par­ent and teacher rat­ings of ADHD symp­toms dur­ing the assess­ment.
2. Doc­u­men­ta­tion that the child met DSM cri­te­ria for ADHD.
3. Doc­u­men­ta­tion of whether ADHD med­ica­tion was pre­scribed.
4. Doc­u­men­ta­tion that behav­ior ther­a­py was sug­gest­ed.
5. Date of ini­tial ADHD med­ica­tion pre­scrip­tion.
6. Dates of ADHD-relat­ed treat­ment vis­its or oth­er con­tacts, e.g., phone, email.
7. Dates of col­lec­tion for par­ent and teacher ADHD rat­ing scales.


- Evi­dence that DSM cri­te­ria for ADHD were met was doc­u­ment­ed in approx­i­mate­ly 70% of patients’ charts. Thus, for near­ly one-third of chil­dren diag­nosed with ADHD, evi­dence that DSM cri­te­ria were met was miss­ing.

- ADHD rat­ing scales were col­lect­ed from par­ents and teach­ers for rough­ly 56% of youth with an ADHD diag­no­sis. Pre­sum­ably, pedi­a­tri­cians would have obtained infor­ma­tion about ADHD symp­toms from par­ents via oth­er means, i.e., clin­i­cal inter­view. For teach­ers, how­ev­er, the absence of rat­ing scales in over 40% of the cas­es sug­gests obtain­ing infor­ma­tion direct­ly from teach­ers is fre­quent­ly not done, as speak­ing with teach­ers on the phone is unlike­ly to have occurred.

- Pedi­a­tri­cians pre­scribed ADHD med­ica­tion to rough­ly 93% of youth diag­nosed with ADHD. Doc­u­men­ta­tion that behav­ioral treat­ment was rec­om­mend­ed, how­ev­er, was present in only 13% of the charts.

- Fol­low-up con­tact (vis­it, phone call, or email with­in 30 days of pre­scrib­ing med­ica­tion was doc­u­ment­ed in few­er than 50% of charts. Thus, for over half of youth pre­scribed med­ica­tion, there is no indi­ca­tion that any infor­ma­tion on the child’s response to med­ica­tion was obtained dur­ing the 1st month.

- For youth on med­ica­tion for at least one year, an aver­age of 5.7 con­tacts occurred dur­ing the year; the major­i­ty of these were office vis­its, some were phone calls, and email was vir­tu­al­ly nev­er used. Con­tacts declined dur­ing the 2nd and 3rd year of treat­ment.

- With respect to mon­i­tor­ing treat­ment response with stan­dard­ized rat­ings, this rarely occurred. Only 11% of charts had any evi­dence of par­ent rat­ings to mon­i­tor treat­ment response and less than 8% had teacher rat­ings with­in the 1st year of treat­ment. In addi­tion, the aver­age time between ini­ti­at­ing med­ica­tion treat­ment and col­lect­ing par­ent or teacher rat­ings was quite long — 396 days for par­ents and 362 days for teach­ers.

Summary and Implications

Results from this study are unfor­tu­nate­ly clear and dis­cour­ag­ing in that guide­lines from the Amer­i­can Acad­e­my of Pedi­atrics on the eval­u­a­tion and treat­ment of ADHD are fre­quent­ly not fol­lowed. The data indi­cate that many chil­dren are diag­nosed with ADHD in the absence of clear­ly meet­ing DSM diag­nos­tic cri­te­ria and that behav­ioral treat­ment is rarely rec­om­mend­ed.

Although pedi­a­tri­cians are fre­quent­ly ini­ti­at­ing med­ica­tion treat­ment — which has a strong evi­dence base — gath­er­ing data ear­ly in treat­ment to deter­mine the child’s response is often neglect­ed and sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly mon­i­tor­ing treat­ment response over time hard­ly ever occurs. As a result, many chil­dren are like­ly to be deriv­ing sig­nif­i­cant­ly less ben­e­fit from such treat­ment than they would if the guide­lines were rou­tine­ly fol­lowed. This is because care­ful mon­i­tor­ing often reveals the need to adjust a child’s dose, and some­times med­ica­tion, to main­tain opti­mal ben­e­fits.

Although I don’t like to be pes­simistic, it is worth not­ing that these find­ings may under­es­ti­mate the degree to which AAP eval­u­a­tion and treat­ment guide­lines are fail­ing to be fol­lowed. Thus, this study pro­vid­ed no data on whether pedi­a­tri­cians’ eval­u­a­tions includ­ed the assess­ment of oth­er con­di­tions that often co-occur with ADHD so that a com­pre­hen­sive treat­ment plan could be devel­oped. Giv­en that such co-occur­ring prob­lems are unlike­ly to be addressed by ADHD med­ica­tion alone, and that behav­ioral or oth­er psy­choso­cial treat­ments were so infre­quent­ly rec­om­mend­ed, it seems like­ly that co-occur­ring prob­lems were often not addressed. In the rel­a­tive­ly small per­cent­age of chil­dren for whom refer­rals for such treat­ment was made, no infor­ma­tion on the qual­i­ty of such treat­ment was avail­able.

I think it is impor­tant not to inter­pret these find­ings as an oppor­tu­ni­ty to blame pedi­a­tri­cians for pro­vid­ing poor qual­i­ty care to many chil­dren with ADHD. Cer­tain­ly, the data indi­cate that there is ample room for improve­ment in terms of pedi­a­tri­cians fol­low­ing the AAP guide­lines more con­sis­tent­ly. How­ev­er, pedi­a­tri­cians often have dozens (or in some cas­es, hun­dreds) of youth with ADHD in their prac­tice and pro­vid­ing sys­tem­at­ic fol­low up care and treat­ment mon­i­tor­ing in the con­text of a busy com­mu­ni­ty-based prac­tice can be extra­or­di­nar­i­ly dif­fi­cult. Even when rat­ing scales are pro­vid­ed to par­ents and teach­ers so that a child’s treat­ment can be mon­i­tored, they are often not returned in a time­ly man­ner. Thus, the behav­ior of par­ents and teach­ers can under­mine a physi­cian’s efforts to pro­vide care con­sis­tent with AAP guide­lines despite his or her best efforts.

One thing that can and should facil­i­tate physi­cians obtain­ing the infor­ma­tion they need for both ini­tial assess­ments and ongo­ing treat­ment mon­i­tor­ing is use of the inter­net. There are now sev­er­al sites that enable par­ent and teacher behav­ior rat­ing forms to be com­plet­ed online and trans­mit­ted secure­ly to physi­cians involved in a child’s care. I have been con­sult­ing with one such com­pa­ny that offers this ser­vice for the past year, and am per­plexed that more pro­fes­sion­als are not tak­ing advan­tage of this type of ser­vice.

There are lim­its, of course, in what can be con­clud­ed from this study. In par­tic­u­lar, all pedi­a­tri­cians were recruit­ed from a spe­cif­ic geo­graph­ic area, and gen­er­al­iza­tions to the care pro­vid­ed in oth­er regions can’t be made with cer­tain­ty.

The authors, who are involved in efforts to help pedi­a­tri­cians deliv­er high­er qual­i­ty ADHD care, con­clude by not­ing that “Although guide­lines are an impor­tant first step, addi­tion­al efforts, like­ly ini­ti­at­ed or incen­tivized out­side the prac­tice, are required to improve the qual­i­ty of care deliv­ered in pedi­atric set­tings. Such efforts may take the form of qual­i­ty improve­ment, clin­i­cal deci­sion sup­port tools, using pay-for-per­for­mance incentives,and/or part­ner­ing with men­tal health pro­fes­sion­als.”

Rabiner_David– Dr. David Rabin­er is a child clin­i­cal psy­chol­o­gist and Direc­tor of Under­grad­u­ate Stud­ies in the Depart­ment of Psy­chol­ogy and Neu­ro­science at Duke Uni­ver­sity. He pub­lishes the Atten­tion Research Update, an online newslet­ter that helps par­ents, pro­fes­sion­als, and edu­ca­tors keep up with the lat­est research on ADHD, and helped pre­pare the online course How to Nav­i­gate Con­ven­tion­al and Com­ple­men­tary ADHD Treat­ments for Healthy Brain Devel­op­ment.

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

Leave a Reply

Categories: Attention and ADD/ADHD, Cognitive Neuroscience, Health & Wellness

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters,  SharpBrains is an independent market research firm tracking how brain science can improve our health and our lives.

Search in our archives

Follow us and Engage via…

RSS Feed

Watch All Recordings Now (40+ Speakers, 12+ Hours)