Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News


Study: Training law-enforcement “itchy brains” can reduce shooting-related civilian casualties



Brain Train­ing May Help Avoid Civil­ian Casu­al­ties (Duke Today):

Although fir­ing a gun seems like one action, it is made up of many small­er deci­sions and move­ments that require coor­di­na­tion between mul­ti­ple brain areas.

The sud­den deci­sion to not shoot, called ‘response inhi­bi­tion,’ is crit­i­cal when some­one inno­cent comes into the line of fire. That is what sol­diers in war expe­ri­ence when they’re about to pull the trig­ger and then real­ize that their tar­get is a civil­ian or an ally. Or when a law enforce­ment offi­cer real­izes that a per­son they thought was armed and dan­ger­ous is actu­al­ly an inno­cent bystander.

A new Duke study explor­ing the caus­es of civil­ian shoot­ing casu­al­ties sug­gests that mis­takes arise from prob­lems with atten­tion — an “itchy brain,” the authors say — rather than an “itchy trig­ger fin­ger.”

The find­ings, pub­lished online in Psy­cho­log­i­cal Sci­ence, imply that the ten­den­cy to squeeze the trig­ger in error can not only be pre­dict­ed with cog­ni­tive tests but can also be over­come by train­ing in response inhi­bi­tion…

The researchers now hope to deter­mine which aspect of the response inhi­bi­tion train­ing made the dif­fer­ence. They will also try to see how long the train­ing might last.”

Study: Cog­ni­tive train­ing can reduce civil­ian casu­al­ties in a sim­u­lat­ed shoot­ing envi­ron­ment (Psy­cho­log­i­cal Sci­ence)

  • Abstract: Shoot­ing a firearm involves a com­plex series of cog­ni­tive abil­i­ties. For exam­ple, locat­ing an item or a per­son of inter­est requires visu­al search, and fir­ing the weapon (or with­hold­ing a trig­ger squeeze) involves response exe­cu­tion (or inhi­bi­tion). The present study used a sim­u­lat­ed shoot­ing envi­ron­ment to estab­lish a rela­tion­ship between a par­tic­u­lar cog­ni­tive abil­i­ty and a crit­i­cal shoot­ing error—response inhi­bi­tion and fir­ing on civil­ians, respec­tive­ly. Indi­vid­ual-dif­fer­ence mea­sures demon­strat­ed, per­haps coun­ter­in­tu­itive­ly, that sim­u­lat­ed civil­ian casu­al­ties were not relat­ed to motor impul­siv­i­ty (i.e., an itchy trig­ger fin­ger) but rather to an individual’s cog­ni­tive abil­i­ty to with­hold an already ini­ti­at­ed response (i.e., an itchy brain). Fur­ther­more, active-response-inhi­bi­tion train­ing reduced sim­u­lat­ed civil­ian casu­al­ties, which revealed a causal rela­tion­ship. This study there­fore illus­trates the poten­tial of using cog­ni­tive train­ing to pos­si­bly improve shoot­ing per­for­mance, which might ulti­mate­ly pro­vide insight for mil­i­tary and law-enforce­ment per­son­nel.

Learn more:

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

Leave a Reply

Categories: Cognitive Neuroscience, Peak Performance, Professional Development, Technology

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters,  SharpBrains is an independent market research firm tracking how brain science can improve our health and our lives.

Search in our archives

Follow us and Engage via…

RSS Feed

Watch All Recordings Now (40+ Speakers, 12+ Hours)