Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News


Study: An innovative telehealth service to provide high quality ADHD treatment


An unfor­tu­nate real­i­ty is that many chil­dren with ADHD do not have access to high qual­i­ty, evi­dence-based treat­ment for ADHD. This is espe­cial­ly true in rur­al com­mu­ni­ties where chil­dren are gen­er­al­ly treat­ed by pri­ma­ry care providers who may have less ADHD-spe­cif­ic train­ing than child psy­chi­a­trists and where high qual­i­ty behav­ioral treat­ment may also be less read­i­ly avail­able. Increas­ing access to excel­lent ADHD treat­ment is thus an impor­tant pri­or­i­ty, even as efforts to devel­op new and poten­tial­ly more effec­tive ADHD treat­ments are ongo­ing.

The new study

A study pub­lished recent­ly in the Jour­nal of the Amer­i­can Acad­e­my of Child and Ado­les­cent Psy­chi­a­try, Effec­tive­ness of a tele­health ser­vice deliv­ery mod­el for treat­ing Atten­tion-Deficit/Hyper­ac­tiv­i­ty Dis­or­der: A com­mu­ni­ty-based ran­dom­ized con­trolled tri­al, describes an inno­v­a­tive method for increas­ing access to high qual­i­ty ADHD treat­ment for chil­dren and fam­i­lies using video con­fer­enc­ing meth­ods and web-based train­ing for pro­fes­sion­als in rur­al com­mu­ni­ties.

Par­tic­i­pants were 223 chil­dren ages 5.5 to 12 (near­ly 70% boys)referred by 88 pri­ma­ry care providers across 7 rur­al com­mu­ni­ties in Wash­ing­ton and Ore­gon — all were diag­nosed with the com­bined type of ADHD, i.e., they had both inat­ten­tive and hyper­ac­tive-impul­sive symp­toms. Chil­dren were ran­dom­ly assigned to one of two treat­ment con­di­tions — a tele­health deliv­ery mod­el or to aug­ment­ed pri­ma­ry care. These treat­ment modal­i­ties are described below.

Tele­health deliv­ery mod­el — This treat­ment arm com­bined med­ica­tion treat­ment with behav­ior train­ing for par­ents. Both ser­vices were pro­vid­ed at com­mu­ni­ty clin­ics.

Child psy­chi­a­trists were trained to deliv­er evi­dence-based med­ica­tion treat­ment for ADHD through video con­fer­enc­ing. This enabled youth to receive high qual­i­ty med­ica­tion treat­ment for ADHD deliv­ered by expe­ri­enced child psy­chi­a­trists. Six tele­con­fer­ence ses­sions were con­duct­ed at com­mu­ni­ty clin­ics with ade­quate video con­fer­enc­ing capa­bil­i­ties; dur­ing these ses­sions, par­ents were edu­cat­ed about the poten­tial role and val­ue of med­ica­tion in treat­ing their child. Med­ica­tion treat­ment for each child was pre­scribed by the ‘telepsy­chi­a­trists’ using evi­dence-based algo­rithms devel­oped in the Texas Children’s Med­ica­tion Algo­rithm for Project.

Fol­low­ing the med­ica­tion treat­ment con­fer­ences, fam­i­lies met with a master’s lev­el com­mu­ni­ty ther­a­pist who pro­vid­ed care­giv­er behav­ior train­ing. Com­mu­ni­ty clin­i­cians were trained to pro­vide the behav­ior man­age­ment pro­gram via an online cur­ricu­lum devel­oped by the study research psy­chol­o­gist and through dis­cussing train­ing cas­es with the psy­chol­o­gist. This enabled rur­al clin­i­cians to pro­vide evi­dence-based behav­ioral par­ent train­ing for ADHD to par­ents in their com­mu­ni­ty.

The 6-ses­sion cur­ricu­lum focused on key ele­ments of evi­dence-based par­ent train­ing pro­grams for ele­men­tary school chil­dren with ADHD. Par­ents acquired an under­stand­ing of ADHD based on cur­rent sci­en­tif­ic knowl­edge, learned to pro­vide clear instruc­tions and to use time-out and oth­er con­se­quences effec­tive­ly, devel­oped prais­ing and ignor­ing skills, learned to use time-out and oth­er con­se­quences effec­tive­ly, and learned how to advo­cate for their child at school.

Telepsy­chi­a­try ses­sions and the behav­ior man­age­ment pro­gram were spread over 22 weeks, with 3–4 weeks between ses­sions.

Aug­ment­ed pri­ma­ry care — Chil­dren in the con­trol con­di­tion were treat­ed by their pri­ma­ry care provider. This was con­sid­ered aug­ment­ed pri­ma­ry care because unlike in typ­i­cal prac­tice, each pri­ma­ry care physi­cian received an exten­sive video con­sul­ta­tion with a child psy­chi­a­trist. The ‘telepsy­chi­a­trists’ were instruct­ed to pro­vide a com­pre­hen­sive con­sul­ta­tion that includ­ed med­ica­tion rec­om­men­da­tions and rec­om­men­da­tions for men­tal health ser­vices and school pro­grams when con­sid­ered appro­pri­ate. Once the con­sul­ta­tion was pro­vid­ed, pri­ma­ry care physi­cians con­duct­ed treat­ment as they saw fit. Infor­ma­tion on the num­ber of chil­dren in this group who received any treat­ments oth­er than med­ica­tion was not pro­vid­ed.

Out­comes mea­sures — Care­givers and teach­ers com­plet­ed the Van­der­bilt ADHD Rat­ing Scale at base­line and 4 sub­se­quent times; the final time point occurred 3 weeks after the last ses­sion for the tele­health deliv­ery group. All behav­ior rat­ings were pro­vid­ed via the inter­net. The Van­der­bilt includes items that assess the DSM-V symp­toms of ADHD, oppo­si­tion­al-defi­ant behav­ior, and children’s aca­d­e­m­ic, behav­ioral, and social func­tion­ing.

The results

Although chil­dren in both study arms improved over time, chil­dren in the tele­health deliv­ery arm showed sig­nif­i­cant­ly greater ben­e­fits accord­ing to par­ents. This was evi­dent in the fol­low­ing key find­ings:

- At base­line, approx­i­mate­ly 83% of chil­dren in both groups were rat­ed as show­ing at least 6 inat­ten­tive symp­toms by their par­ents. At week 25, this was report­ed by only 23% of tele­health par­ents and 48% of con­trol par­ents. Six or more hyper­ac­tive-impul­sive symp­toms were report­ed by rough­ly 60% of par­ents in each group; at week 25 this had dropped to 16% for tele­health par­ents and 31% for con­trol par­ents. Greater improve­ments for the tele­health group were evi­dent by week 10 for hyper­ac­tiv­i­ty and by week 19 for inat­ten­tion.

- Par­ents’ rat­ings also indi­cat­ed that sig­nif­i­cant­ly greater reduc­tions in oppo­si­tion­al-defi­ant behav­ior and sig­nif­i­cant­ly greater improve­ment in aca­d­e­m­ic, behav­ioral, and social func­tion­ing. The mag­ni­tude of the dif­fer­ences between the treat­ment groups would be con­sid­ered to fall in the small to mod­er­ate range.

Dif­fer­ences between the 2 treat­ment approach­es were less evi­dent in the teacher rat­ings, but in the direc­tion of favor­ing the tele­health mod­el.

Summary and Implications

Results from this study demon­strate the effec­tive­ness of a tele­health ser­vice deliv­ery mod­el for treat­ing ADHD in com­mu­ni­ties with lim­it­ed access to spe­cial­ty men­tal health ser­vices. Par­ents of chil­dren assigned to the tele­health group report­ed sig­nif­i­cant­ly greater improve­ment in their child’s ADHD symp­toms and func­tion­ing com­pared to par­ents of chil­dren who received aug­ment­ed pri­ma­ry care. Results based on teacher report — although not gen­er­al­ly sta­tis­ti­cal­ly sig­nif­i­cant — were in the same direc­tion. Thus, this deliv­ery mod­el may be a cost-effec­tive and viable way to increase the num­ber of chil­dren with ADHD who have access to high qual­i­ty, evi­dence-based care.

There are lim­i­ta­tions to this study that are impor­tant to note. First, it is dis­ap­point­ing that results were not more robust for teach­ers, giv­en the impor­tance of improv­ing school func­tion­ing in chil­dren with ADHD. This may reflect the fact that the con­trol con­di­tion in this study, i.e., aug­ment­ed pri­ma­ry care, includ­ed expert psy­chi­atric con­sul­ta­tion that is rarely obtained in rou­tine pri­ma­ry care. Thus, the out­comes for chil­dren in the aug­ment­ed pri­ma­ry care group may have already been bet­ter than what is typ­i­cal for chil­dren treat­ed by pri­ma­ry care providers alone.

It is also the case that behav­ioral train­ing was pro­vid­ed only to par­ents, and the tele­health mod­el did not include any direct training/consultation with teach­ers. Behav­ioral treat­ments gen­er­al­ly yield the largest effects in the set­ting in which they are imple­ment­ed. Thus, although the care­giv­er train­ing may have had a sub­stan­tial impact on children’s behav­ior at home, the impact on their school behav­ior would not be as pro­nounced. Thus, this inter­ven­tion may have ben­e­fit­ed by the addi­tion of a school com­po­nent in which teach­ers received con­sul­ta­tion regard­ing class­room behav­ior man­age­ment via tele­con­fer­enc­ing.

Final­ly, the last out­come assess­ment occurred only 3 weeks after the tele­health inter­ven­tion end­ed. Thus, although it would be impor­tant to know whether the more exten­sive treat­ment received by tele­health chil­dren and fam­i­lies result­ed in sus­tained ben­e­fits, the cur­rent study does not allow for this. Address­ing this ques­tion require more exten­sive fol­low up data than was report­ed, e.g., 3 months, 6 months, 1 year. Per­haps such data will be forth­com­ing short­ly.

These lim­i­ta­tions aside, this study pro­vides an excel­lent mod­el for how high qual­i­ty, evi­dence-based treat­ment for ADHD can be pro­vid­ed to a greater num­ber of chil­dren and fam­i­lies. Whether this ser­vice deliv­ery mod­el gains trac­tion in the years ahead remains to be seen.

Rabiner_David– Dr. David Rabin­er is a child clin­i­cal psy­chol­o­gist and Direc­tor of Under­grad­u­ate Stud­ies in the Depart­ment of Psy­chol­ogy and Neu­ro­science at Duke Uni­ver­sity. He pub­lishes the Atten­tion Research Update and is teach­ing the upcom­ing online course  How to Nav­i­gate Con­ven­tional and Com­ple­men­tary ADHD Treat­ments for Healthy Brain Devel­op­ment (May 2015; reg­is­tra­tion open).

Learn more:

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

Leave a Reply

Categories: Attention and ADD/ADHD, Cognitive Neuroscience, Health & Wellness

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Watch All Recordings Now (40+ Speakers, 12+ Hours)

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters and more, SharpBrains is an independent market research firm tracking health and performance applications of brain science.

Follow us and Engage via…

RSS Feed

Search for anything brain-related in our article archives