Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News


Study: To help children with ADHD improve academic performance, combine medication AND behavioral treatment

Students academic performance.

Aca­d­e­m­ic prob­lems are extreme­ly com­mon in chil­dren with ADHD and often the issue that leads to refer­ral for an ADHD eval­u­a­tion. Unfor­tu­nate­ly, the sig­nif­i­cant aca­d­e­m­ic strug­gles that many chil­dren with ADHD expe­ri­ence can under­mine their long-term suc­cess in areas that extend far beyond for­mal school­ing.

Giv­en these facts, an impor­tant ques­tion is whether long-term aca­d­e­m­ic func­tion­ing in youth with ADHD improves with treat­ment? Because this is such a fun­da­men­tal­ly impor­tant ques­tion, and ADHD is the most well-researched men­tal health con­di­tion in chil­dren, one might think that the answer is clear­ly estab­lished. For a vari­ety of rea­sons — per­haps the most impor­tant of which is the inher­ent dif­fi­cul­ty of con­duct­ing long-term treat­ment stud­ies — this is not the case.

Pri­or stud­ies have looked at aca­d­e­m­ic out­comes in 2 dif­fer­ent ways — aca­d­e­m­ic achieve­ment and aca­d­e­m­ic per­for­mance. Achieve­ment refers to the infor­ma­tion and skills that chil­dren acquire and is typ­i­cal­ly mea­sured by stan­dard­ized aca­d­e­m­ic achieve­ment tests. Aca­d­e­m­ic per­for­mance focus­es on direct mea­sures of suc­cess at school such as grades, grade reten­tion, high school grad­u­a­tion, and col­lege enroll­ment. Thus, achieve­ment mea­sures focus on what chil­dren demon­strate they have learned on a one-time test. Per­for­mance mea­sures, in con­trast, reflect how chil­dren actu­al­ly per­form in school over an extend­ed peri­od. Both types of out­comes are com­pro­mised in chil­dren with ADHD.

The impact of ADHD treat­ment on achieve­ment and per­for­mance out­comes remains con­tro­ver­sial. Some stud­ies have found that while ADHD treat­ment clear­ly improves class­room behav­ior, the impact on aca­d­e­m­ic func­tion­ing is less evi­dent. In oth­er stud­ies, there is evi­dence that treat­ment improves some aspects of aca­d­e­m­ic per­for­mance but not achieve­ment. Oth­er researchers have ques­tioned whether med­ica­tion or behav­ioral treat­ment has pos­i­tive long-term effects on either type of aca­d­e­m­ic out­come.

The Study

A new study pub­lished recent­ly online in the Jour­nal of Atten­tion Dis­or­ders [Long-term out­comes of ADHD: Aca­d­e­m­ic achieve­ment and per­for­mance] rep­re­sents a valu­able effort to orga­nize rel­e­vant stud­ies on this issue so that broad con­clu­sions about how ADHD treat­ment affects long-term aca­d­e­m­ic out­comes can be made.

The authors began by con­duct­ing a sys­tem­at­ic lit­er­a­ture search to iden­ti­fy all poten­tial­ly rel­e­vant stud­ies. Specif­i­cal­ly, they looked for all stud­ies pub­lished in peer reviewed jour­nals between 1980 and 2012 that exam­ined aca­d­e­m­ic out­comes asso­ci­at­ed with treat­ment over at least a 2‑year peri­od. Some of these stud­ies com­pared aca­d­e­m­ic out­comes in treat­ed and non-treat­ed chil­dren, oth­ers had no com­par­i­son group but looked at achieve­ment and/or per­for­mance mea­sures before and after treat­ment, while oth­ers com­pared out­comes between treat­ed youth and youth with­out ADHD.

Ulti­mate­ly, the authors iden­ti­fied 14 stud­ies that looked at aca­d­e­m­ic achieve­ment out­comes and 12 that assessed per­for­mance out­comes were com­pared — there was some over­lap in these stud­ies. To cre­ate a com­mon out­come met­ric across mul­ti­ple stud­ies that used vary­ing meth­ods, stud­ies were grouped into those that showed treat­ment ben­e­fits and those that did not. They then sim­ply count­ed the num­ber of stud­ies where evi­dence of treat­ment ben­e­fits were found.

For stud­ies that com­pared treat­ed vs. untreat­ed youth, or aca­d­e­m­ic func­tion­ing before and after treat­ment, ben­e­fit was defined as a sta­tis­ti­cal­ly sig­nif­i­cant gain asso­ci­at­ed with treat­ment. Where treat­ed youth were com­pared to youth with­out ADHD, ben­e­fit was assumed when aca­d­e­m­ic out­comes for youth with ADHD were not sig­nif­i­cant­ly worse than for non-ADHD con­trols.


For achieve­ment test scores, treat­ment yield­ed improve­ment in 7 of 9 stud­ies (78%) when the com­par­i­son was with pre-treat­ment base­line and in 4 of 5 stud­ies (80%) when treat­ed and untreat­ed youth were com­pared.

For aca­d­e­m­ic per­for­mance out­comes, improve­ment was found in 1 of 2 stud­ies that used pre- vs. post-treat­ment com­par­isons and in 4 of 10 stud­ies com­par­ing treat­ed and non-treat­ed youth.

Over­all, there­fore, there was greater evi­dence of treat­ment ben­e­fits on achieve­ment out­comes than on per­for­mance out­comes.

The authors also exam­ined how treat­ment out­comes var­ied for med­ical, non-med­ical, and treat­ments that com­bined both approach­es, i.e., mul­ti­modal treat­ment. Although the num­ber of stud­ies on which these com­par­isons were based is small, avail­able evi­dence sup­port­ed the val­ue of mul­ti­modal treat­ment. Such treat­ment yield­ed ben­e­fits in 100% of stud­ies exam­in­ing achieve­ment out­comes and 67% of those exam­in­ing per­for­mance out­comes. For med­ica­tion treat­ment only the per­cent­ages were 75% and 33% respec­tive­ly; for non-med­ical treat­ments, the fig­ures were 75% and 50%.

Final­ly, there were 5 stud­ies where achieve­ment and per­for­mance out­comes were com­pared between chil­dren treat­ed for ADHD and youth with­out ADHD. Even with treat­ment, out­comes were sig­nif­i­cant­ly worse for ADHD youth 4 of 5 stud­ies that looked at achieve­ment out­comes and 3 of 5 that looked at per­for­mance out­comes.

Summary and Implications

The over­all mes­sage from this sum­ma­ry of research exam­in­ing how treat­ment affects long-term aca­d­e­m­ic out­comes in youth with ADHD is pos­i­tive. Many stud­ies found improve­ment with ADHD treat­ment for both achieve­ment and per­for­mance out­comes, with evi­dence sug­gest­ing that treat­ment has more con­sis­tent­ly pos­i­tive impacts on achieve­ment than on per­for­mance. As the study notes, More achieve­ment test and aca­d­e­m­ic per­for­mance out­comes improved with mul­ti­modal (100% and 67%, respec­tive­ly) than phar­ma­co­log­i­cal (75% and 33%) or non-phar­ma­co­log­i­cal (75% and 50%) treat­ment alone.”

One inter­est­ing find­ing — although based on a lim­it­ed num­ber of stud­ies — was the indi­ca­tion that bet­ter aca­d­e­m­ic out­comes were more like­ly when med­ical and non-med­ical approach­es were com­bined. This is con­sis­tent with the gen­er­al­ly held view that most youth for ADHD should receive mul­ti-modal treat­ment as opposed to med­ical or non-med­ical approach­es alone. How­ev­er, as I recent­ly not­ed (Study finds large gaps between research and prac­tice in ADHD diag­no­sis and treat­ment) a study that exam­ined treat­ment prac­tices in a large num­ber of pedi­a­tri­cians found that while med­ica­tion treat­ment was rec­om­mend­ed for over 90% of youth diag­nosed with ADHD, behav­ioral treat­ment was rec­om­mend­ed few­er than 15% of the time. Thus, many chil­dren may not be receiv­ing mul­ti­modal treat­ment in com­mu­ni­ty care.

While the over­all mes­sage from this study is basi­cal­ly pos­i­tive, results from stud­ies that com­pare youth treat­ed for ADHD with non-ADHD con­trols indi­cate that treat­ment gen­er­al­ly does not ‘nor­mal­ize’ aca­d­e­m­ic out­comes in ADHD youth. Thus, while treat­ed youth may gen­er­al­ly be doing bet­ter than they would have with­out treat­ment, treat­ment often does not bring them up to the lev­el of their peers.

It is impor­tant to place these find­ings in the con­text of the lim­it­ed data base on which they were drawn. First, despite sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly search­ing the rel­e­vant research over a 32-year peri­od, the authors iden­ti­fied only 5 stud­ies that specif­i­cal­ly com­pared long-term aca­d­e­m­ic out­comes in treat­ed vs. non-treat­ed youth. And, these stud­ies were not nec­es­sar­i­ly ran­dom­ized-con­trolled tri­als which makes it impos­si­ble to con­clude that pos­i­tive out­comes asso­ci­at­ed with treat­ment can be attrib­uted specif­i­cal­ly to treat­ment itself. This will be an ongo­ing lim­i­ta­tion in the research base as con­duct­ing long-term ran­dom­ized-con­trolled tri­als in which treat­ment is denied to a group of ADHD youth for a sus­tained peri­od is not some­thing that could be eth­i­cal­ly done.

It is also the case that the authors’ analy­sis only indi­cates that treat­ed youth gen­er­al­ly have bet­ter long-term aca­d­e­m­ic out­comes. How­ev­er, the mag­ni­tude of treat­ment ben­e­fits was not dis­cussed. There is an impor­tant dif­fer­ence between sta­tis­ti­cal sig­nif­i­cance and clin­i­cal sig­nif­i­cance, and whether treat­ment tend­ed to pro­duce gains that par­ents and edu­ca­tors would con­sid­er edu­ca­tion­al­ly mean­ing­ful is not known. It is unclear to me why the authors did not incor­po­rate such analy­sis into their paper and this issue was not addressed in their dis­cus­sion.

Thus, while this study makes a nice con­tri­bu­tion by sum­ma­riz­ing the rel­e­vant lit­er­a­ture in a way that enables at least broad con­clu­sions about the impact of ADHD treat­ment on long-term aca­d­e­m­ic out­comes, it also high­lights that a num­ber of sig­nif­i­cant ques­tions on this impor­tant issue remain. The authors con­clude by not­ing that despite the num­ber of stud­ies that have been con­duct­ed, there remains a lack of data to guide “…(a) edu­ca­tors as to how to best man­age indi­vid­ual chil­dren, (b) man­age­ment at the school sys­tem lev­el, and, © the for­ma­tion of pol­i­cy at the nation­al lev­el. To this I would add that data-based deci­sions about the course of action most like­ly to improve long-term aca­d­e­m­ic out­comes for indi­vid­ual chil­dren are also dif­fi­cult to make based on the avail­able research base.

In the years ahead, one hopes that the research need­ed to bet­ter address these impor­tant issues will become more avail­able.

Rabiner_David– Dr. David Rabin­er is a child clin­i­cal psy­chol­o­gist and Direc­tor of Under­grad­u­ate Stud­ies in the Depart­ment of Psy­chol­ogy and Neu­ro­science at Duke Uni­ver­sity. He pub­lishes Atten­tion Research Update, an online newslet­ter that helps par­ents, pro­fes­sion­als, and edu­ca­tors keep up with the lat­est research on ADHD, and teach­es the online course  How to Nav­i­gate Con­ven­tion­al and Com­ple­men­tary ADHD Treat­ments for Healthy Brain Devel­op­ment.

To learn more:

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

Leave a Reply

Categories: Attention and ADD/ADHD, Cognitive Neuroscience, Education & Lifelong Learning

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Search in our archives

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters,  SharpBrains is an independent market research firm tracking how brain science can improve our health and our lives.

Follow us and Engage via…

RSS Feed

Watch All Recordings Now (40+ Speakers, 12+ Hours)