Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Icon

What is the combined effect of physical and mental training?

exercisePhys­i­cal exer­cise and men­tal exer­cise are both ben­e­fi­cial for the brain. Each can improve brain func­tions and decrease risks of cog­ni­tive decline over time. This rais­es the ques­tion of their com­par­a­tive and com­bined effects: Is one bet­ter than the oth­er? Are their ben­e­fits addi­tive (1 + 1 =2) or per­haps even syn­er­gis­tic (1 + 1 =3)?

A recent study sug­gests that the ben­e­fits of each are sig­nif­i­cant and rough­ly equiv­a­lent but nei­ther clear­ly addi­tive not syn­er­gis­tic (mean­ing, that aer­o­bic exer­cise didn’t make men­tal exer­cise more effec­tive, or vice ver­sa). The study involved 126 old­er adults (mean age of 73.4) with cog­ni­tive com­plaints, that is who felt their mem­o­ry and think­ing skills had declined in the recent past. Par­tic­i­pants were divid­ed onto 4 groups:

  1. Com­put­er­ized brain train­ing (to enhance visu­al and audi­to­ry pro­cess­ing speed) + aer­o­bic exer­cise
  2. Watch­ing edu­ca­tion­al DVD + aer­o­bic exer­cise
  3. Com­put­er­ized brain train­ing + stretch­ing and ton­ing
  4. Watch­ing edu­ca­tion­al DVD + stretch­ing and ton­ing

As you can see all groups par­tic­i­pat­ed in a men­tal activ­i­ty (1 hour three times a week) and a phys­i­cal activ­i­ty (1 hour three times a week). What dif­fered between them was the type of activ­i­ty per­formed: Watch­ing edu­ca­tion­al DVD was a con­trol group for brain train­ing, that is it was not expect­ed to bring ben­e­fits (or much less). In the same way, stretch­ing and ton­ing was a con­trol for aer­o­bic exer­cise.

A glob­al cog­ni­tive score was obtained before and after the inter­ven­tion for all par­tic­i­pants, using tests of ver­bal learn­ing and mem­o­ry, ver­bal flu­en­cy, pro­cess­ing speed, exec­u­tive and visu­ospa­tial func­tions and men­tal flex­i­bil­i­ty. The four groups had sim­i­lar scores to start with.

Results showed that all 4 groups glob­al cog­ni­tive func­tion­ing improved after the 12 weeks inter­ven­tion. The com­par­isons between groups 1 and 3 and between groups 2 and 4 showed that both men­tal exer­cise and phys­i­cal exer­cise brought sig­nif­i­cant and rough­ly equiv­a­lent cog­ni­tive ben­e­fits.

Sur­pris­ing­ly the com­par­isons between groups 1 and 2 and between groups 3 and 4 (actu­al inter­ven­tions ver­sus con­trol groups) showed that the con­trol activ­i­ties (watch­ing DVD and stretch­ing and ton­ing) trig­gered sim­i­lar ben­e­fits as the inter­ven­tion activ­i­ties (brain train­ing and aer­o­bic). This is not what pre­vi­ous stud­ies have shown: often, brain train­ing or aer­o­bic train­ing bring larg­er ben­e­fits com­pared to mere­ly watch­ing edu­ca­tion­al DVD or stretch­ing and ton­ing. Fur­ther analy­sis on a small sub­group of par­tic­i­pants who had the most mem­o­ry dif­fi­cul­ties showed the usu­al extra ben­e­fit of brain train­ing over edu­ca­tion­al videos.

The authors offer two pos­si­ble expla­na­tions for the results. One is that all the par­tic­i­pants got bet­ter at the cog­ni­tive tests because of a prac­tice effect (remem­ber that they were test­ed before and after the study). Anoth­er expla­na­tion is that for this pop­u­la­tion, that is for old­er adults with mem­o­ry com­plaints, it is not so much the type of activ­i­ty that mat­ters but the mere fact of being active.

A few oth­er stud­ies have also tried to com­pare the ben­e­fits of phys­i­cal and men­tal activ­i­ty.

A 2006 study con­duct­ed with 375 healthy old­er adults between the ages of 75 and 93 com­pared the effects of men­tal, phys­i­cal and com­bined train­ing. The brain train­ing was done using paper and pen­cil tasks. The phys­i­cal train­ing tar­get­ed bal­ance, flex­i­bil­i­ty and motor coor­di­na­tion. Results showed cog­ni­tive gains only fol­low­ing men­tal and com­bined train­ing.

A small­er 2013 study with 122 healthy adults over 80 com­pared 4 groups: brain train­ing (using Cog­niFit com­put­er­ized exer­cis­es 3 times a week for 16 weeks), phys­i­cal train­ing (aer­o­bic exer­cise 3 times a week for 16 weeks), com­bined train­ing, and con­trol (book read­ing at home and 1 hour dis­cus­sions once a week). Cog­ni­tive gains were observed only fol­low­ing men­tal and com­bined train­ing. The author con­cludes that either the phys­i­cal train­ing inter­ven­tion was not long enough or too mild to yield ben­e­fits or that cog­ni­tive train­ing is the main agent for cog­ni­tive changes.

In con­clu­sion, it is too ear­ly to tell how to best com­bine brain train­ing and phys­i­cal train­ing, but the bulk of the research so far strong­ly sug­gests that they both have mea­sur­able pos­i­tive effects on cog­ni­tion and brain health. Aer­o­bic phys­i­cal exer­cise can improve atten­tion and exec­u­tive func­tions as well as reverse brain vol­ume loss. It usu­al­ly takes 6 months or so to see such ben­e­fits. Brain train­ing can bring steady and sus­tained cog­ni­tive gains after 10 to 15 hours of train­ing, although the gains do not gen­er­al­ly trans­fer to many untrained tasks. And let’s remem­ber that pop­u­la­tion stud­ies have also repeat­ed­ly shown that peo­ple who par­tic­i­pate in men­tal­ly stim­u­lat­ing leisure activ­i­ties through­out their life have health­i­er brains, high­er cog­ni­tive func­tion­ing and low­er risks of demen­tia over the long run.

Sim­ply put, the more we exer­cise our bod­ies and our minds, the bet­ter.

Ref­er­ences:

pascale michelon— This arti­cle was writ­ten by Pas­cale Mich­e­lon, PhD. Dr. Mich­e­lon was a Research Sci­en­tist at Wash­ing­ton Uni­ver­sity in Saint Louis, where she is now an Adjunct Fac­ulty. She teach­es mem­ory work­shops in the St Louis area, and con­tributes to SharpBrains.com as the Research Man­ager for The Sharp­Brains Guide to Brain Fit­ness.

Relat­ed arti­cles:

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

Leave a Reply

Categories: Cognitive Neuroscience, Health & Wellness

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Watch All Recordings Now (40+ Speakers, 12+ Hours)

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters and more, SharpBrains is an independent market research firm tracking health and performance applications of brain science.

Follow us and Engage via…

twitter_logo_header
RSS Feed

Search for anything brain-related in our article archives