Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News


Research: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Helps Adults with ADHD

Many adults with ADHD do not obtain their diag­no­sis until adult­hood and have strug­gled with dif­fi­cul­ties relat­ed to undi­ag­nosed ADHD for their entire lives. As doc­u­ment­ed in recent stud­ies, this includes ele­vat­ed rates of depres­sion, anx­i­ety dis­or­ders, sub­stance use, work dif­fi­cul­ties and inter­per­son­al prob­lems.

As with chil­dren and ado­les­cents, med­ica­tion treat­ment for adults with ADHD can be quite help­ful, espe­cial­ly for reduc­ing core ADHD symp­toms of inat­ten­tion and hyperactivity/impulsivity.  How­ev­er, as is true for chil­dren and ado­les­cents, many adults with ADHD con­tin­ue to strug­gle despite ben­e­fits pro­vid­ed by med­ica­tion.  In addi­tion, some derive lit­tle if any ben­e­fit and even when core ADHD symp­toms dimin­ish, dif­fi­cul­ties in oth­er impor­tant areas often remain. Thus, med­ica­tion alone is fre­quent­ly an insuf­fi­cient treat­ment treat­ment guide­lines devel­oped in the US and over­seas rec­om­mend mul­ti­modal treat­ment for ADHD in adults. This would include psy­choe­d­u­ca­tion, phar­ma­cother­a­py, and cog­ni­tive behav­ior ther­a­py (CBT).

Cog­ni­tive behav­ior ther­a­py was orig­i­nal­ly devel­oped for the treat­ment of depres­sion and anx­i­ety dis­or­ders and is focused on iden­ti­fy­ing prob­lem­at­ic ways of think­ing, i.e., cog­ni­tions, that con­tribute to prob­lem­at­ic behav­iors. Once prob­lem­at­ic ways of think­ing are iden­ti­fied, the client is encour­aged to eval­u­ate whether their cog­ni­tions are accu­rate and to con­sid­er alter­na­tive ways for think­ing about their sit­u­a­tion. As faulty think­ing pat­terns are altered, more adap­tive ways of behav­ing can begin to take shape.

For exam­ple, an adult who strug­gled through­out their school­ing because of undi­ag­nosed ADHD might think of them­selves as stu­pid and unable to learn. One can imag­ine how these thoughts could lead to poor self-esteem, depres­sive symp­toms, and avoid­ance of sit­u­a­tions that are linked to school­ing and edu­ca­tion. In CBT, the clin­i­cian would work with the client to devel­op a more real­is­tic expla­na­tion for their aca­d­e­m­ic strug­gles, e.g., you are actu­al­ly quite capa­ble intel­lec­tu­al­ly but per­formed poor­ly because your ADHD was nev­er diag­nosed and treat­ed. In con­junc­tion with help­ing the client embrace this more rea­son­able way to think about their aca­d­e­m­ic his­to­ry, the clin­i­cian would help the client devel­op new and more adap­tive behav­ior pat­terns. For a very nice dis­cus­sion of CBT for adult ADHD see

There have been a hand­ful of CBT tri­als for adults with ADHD. In gen­er­al, these stud­ies indi­cate that CBT can help with core ADHD symp­toms in addi­tion to ben­e­fits pro­vid­ed by med­ica­tion. How­ev­er, the ben­e­fits of CBT on co-occur­ring dif­fi­cul­ties that adults with ADHD often have, e.g., depres­sion, anx­i­ety, rela­tion­ship prob­lems, etc., have not been clear­ly demon­strat­ed. This is dis­cour­ag­ing and some­what sur­pris­ing giv­en that CBT is an effec­tive treat­ment for depres­sion and anx­i­ety in adults who do not have ADHD.

A study pub­lished recent­ly in Bio­Med Cen­tral Psy­chi­a­try [Cog­ni­tive behav­iour ther­a­py in med­ica­tion-treat­ed adults with ADHD and per­sis­tent symp­toms: A ran­dom­ized con­trolled tri­al. Emill­son et al., (2011). Bio­Med Cen­tral Psy­chi­a­try, 11:116] presents new find­ings on CBT deliv­ered in a group for­mat to adults with ADHD. (Note — This is a peer reviewed open access jour­nal and you can review the entire study online at–244X-11–116.pdf). The goal of this study was to test whether a cog­ni­tive behav­iour­al group treat­ment pro­gram called Rea­son­ing and Reha­bil­i­ta­tion for ADHD Youths and Adults, i.e., R&R2, alle­vi­at­ed core ADHD symp­toms and comor­bid prob­lems in adults with ADHD who were receiv­ing med­ica­tion.

The study was con­duct­ed in Ice­land and involved 54 adults with ADHD (34 women, mean age 34.1), all of whom were receiv­ing ADHD med­ica­tion. In addi­tion to their ADHD diag­no­sis, 35 report­ed depres­sion, 20 report­ed some form of anx­i­ety dis­or­der, 12 report­ed a his­to­ry of drug/alcohol abuse, and 9 report­ed some oth­er psy­chi­atric prob­lem; only 8 report­ed no comor­bid dif­fi­cul­ties.

Par­tic­i­pants were ran­dom­ly assigned to cog­ni­tive ther­a­py or to the treat­ment as usu­al con­di­tion; the lat­ter involved med­ica­tion only, although par­tic­i­pants were free to pur­sue what­ev­er addi­tion­al treat­ments they wished. Adults assigned to CBT remained on med­ica­tion. Thus, the researchers could learn whether CBT added to any ben­e­fits already being pro­vid­ed by med­ica­tion treat­ment.

R&R2 ADHD Group Cog­ni­tive Behav­iour­al Ther­a­py

The treat­ment is a 15 ses­sion struc­tured CBT inter­ven­tion that aims to decrease core ADHD symp­toms and improve social func­tion­ing, prob­lem solv­ing, and orga­ni­za­tion­al skills. It tar­gets the fol­low­ing 5 areas:

  1. Neu­rocog­ni­tive func­tion­ing — Learn­ing strate­gies to improve atten­tion­al con­trol, mem­o­ry, impulse con­trol and plan­ning.
  2. Prob­lem solv­ing — Devel­op­ing adap­tive prob­lem solv­ing strate­gies, antic­i­pat­ing con­se­quences, and man­ag­ing con­flict.
  3. Emo­tion­al Con­trol — Learn­ing to man­age feel­ings of anger and anx­i­ety.
  4. Pro-social skills — Learn­ing to rec­og­nize the thoughts and feel­ings of oth­ers, nego­ti­a­tion skills, and con­flict res­o­lu­tions skills.
  5. Crit­i­cal rea­son­ing — Learn­ing to eval­u­ate options and devel­op behav­ioral skills to pur­sue goals appro­pri­ate­ly.

These areas were cov­ered in twice week­ly small group ses­sions that last­ed for 90 min­utes. In addi­tion to the group meet­ings, coach­es met indi­vid­u­al­ly with par­tic­i­pants each week for 30 min­utes to review ses­sion mate­r­i­al and assist with assigned home­work. Thus, dur­ing the 15-week treat­ment, par­tic­i­pants devot­ed 3.5 hours week­ly to the pro­gram, not count­ing trav­el time; it was thus a fair­ly time-inten­sive treat­ment.


The researchers employed a wide range of mea­sures to eval­u­ate core ADHD symp­toms and comor­bid dif­fi­cul­ties. Adults report­ed on their ADHD symp­toms using the Barkley ADHD Cur­rent Symp­toms Scale. They also report­ed on depres­sive and anx­i­ety symp­toms using the Beck Depres­sion Inven­to­ry and the Beck Anx­i­ety Inven­to­ry; both are wide­ly used mea­sures that have been shown to pro­vide reli­able and valid infor­ma­tion. Final­ly, par­tic­i­pants com­plet­ed a mea­sure devel­oped specif­i­cal­ly for the study that assessed emo­tion­al con­trol, anti­so­cial behav­ior, and social func­tion­ing.

An impor­tant strength of the study was that in addi­tion to the self-report mea­sures not­ed above, par­tic­i­pants were eval­u­at­ed by clin­i­cians who did not know whether they had received CBT treat­ment or were in the con­trol con­di­tion. These clin­i­cians pro­vid­ed an inde­pen­dent assess­ment of adults’ ADHD symp­toms and over­all lev­el of func­tion­ing.

These mea­sures were col­lect­ed on both groups of par­tic­i­pants before treat­ment began, imme­di­ate­ly fol­low­ing the CBT pro­gram, and again 3 months lat­er. Although base­line assess­ments were obtained on near­ly all par­tic­i­pants, the post-treat­ment assess­ment was col­lect­ed on only 17 adults in each group. At the 3‑month fol­low-up, self-report mea­sures were col­lect­ed on a sim­i­lar num­ber but the inde­pen­dent eval­u­a­tion was only con­duct­ed with 8 adults from the CBT group and 13 from the treat­ment as usu­al group. This reflect­ed dif­fi­cul­ty get­ting par­tic­i­pants back to the study site for the inter­views to be col­lect­ed, a com­mon dif­fi­cul­ty in such stud­ies. (Pre­sum­ably, the self-report mea­sures could be returned via mail.)


Twen­ty of 27 par­tic­i­pants (74%) who began CBT treat­ment com­plet­ed it. This was com­pa­ra­ble to the treat­ment as usu­al con­di­tion.

Post-treat­ment find­ings

Inde­pen­dent raters — After con­trol­ling for base­line rat­ings of ADHD symp­toms, CBT par­tic­i­pants received sig­nif­i­cant­ly low­er symp­tom rat­ings from inde­pen­dent eval­u­a­tors imme­di­ate­ly after treat­ment. The mag­ni­tude of the treat­ment vs. con­trol dif­fer­ences would be con­sid­ered large. Inde­pen­dent clin­i­cians raters also tend­ed to rate CBT par­tic­i­pants as func­tion­ing bet­ter over­all.

Self-reports — Con­trol­ling for base­line rat­ings, CBT par­tic­i­pants report­ed sig­nif­i­cant­ly few­er prob­lems with atten­tion and with hyper­ac­tiv­i­ty-impul­siv­i­ty. The mag­ni­tude of the dif­fer­ences were large for atten­tion prob­lems and small­er for hyper­ac­tiv­i­ty-impul­siv­i­ty. How­ev­er, no post-treat­ment dif­fer­ences were evi­dent in par­tic­i­pants’ reports of anx­i­ety or depres­sion. There were also no dif­fer­ences found for emo­tion­al con­trol or social func­tion­ing. CBT par­tic­i­pants did report greater reduc­tions in anti­so­cial behav­ior.

Three-month fol­low-up

Inde­pen­dent raters — Dif­fer­ences in rat­ings of ADHD symp­toms made by inde­pen­dent raters remained sig­nif­i­cant and of large mag­ni­tude. In addi­tion, rat­ings of over­all adjust­ment also sig­nif­i­cant­ly favored CBT par­tic­i­pants at fol­low-up.

Self-reports — Group dif­fer­ences in self-report­ed ADHD symp­toms remained sig­nif­i­cant at fol­low-up. In addi­tion, group dif­fer­ences were also evi­dent in par­tic­i­pants’ reports of depres­sion, anx­i­ety, emo­tion­al con­trol, anti­so­cial behav­ior, and social func­tion­ing. In all cas­es, the dif­fer­ences were of a mag­ni­tude that would be con­sid­ered large.

Sum­ma­ry and Impli­ca­tions

The key find­ings from this study are that group CBT improved core ADHD symp­toms at the end of treat­ment accord­ing to blind, inde­pen­dent observers and par­tic­i­pants them­selves. And, three months after treat­ment end­ed, evi­dence emerged that CBT was asso­ci­at­ed with sig­nif­i­cant reduc­tions in a range of comor­bid dif­fi­cul­ties that many adults with ADHD strug­gle with. Because all par­tic­i­pants were receiv­ing med­ica­tion, these find­ings sug­gest that the CBT pro­gram yield­ed ben­e­fits beyond those pro­vid­ed by med­ica­tion.

A key strength of the study was the use of ‘blind’ clin­i­cians to assess out­comes for core ADHD symp­toms. Because these clin­i­cians did not know the treat­ment of the adults they were eval­u­at­ing, their rat­ings would not be influ­enced by this knowl­edge. A lim­i­ta­tion, how­ev­er, is that these clin­i­cians only rat­ed core ADHD symp­toms and over­all func­tion­ing, rather than each of the domains cov­ered in par­tic­i­pants’ self-reports. Had these clin­i­cians eval­u­at­ed par­tic­i­pants on depres­sion, anx­i­ety, etc., and reached con­clu­sion con­sis­tent with the self-report find­ings, the results from this study would be even stronger.

A sec­ond lim­i­ta­tion is that few­er than half the par­tic­i­pants were eval­u­at­ed by the inde­pen­dent clin­i­cians at the 3‑month fol­low-up. The adults who com­plet­ed the 3‑month inde­pen­dent eval­u­a­tion may have been a more moti­vat­ed group than those who did not, per­haps because they had attained greater ben­e­fits. How­ev­er, the same argu­ment would apply to those in the con­trol group who returned for the 3‑month fol­low-up. It was also the case that the sub­set of adults who com­plet­ed the fol­low-up eval­u­a­tion did not dif­fer from oth­er par­tic­i­pants at base­line on any of the study mea­sures. These fac­tors serve to mit­i­gate con­cerns about the valid­i­ty of the fol­low-up data. How­ev­er, the fact remains that only a small num­ber of par­tic­i­pants ful­ly com­plet­ed the fol­low-up assess­ment which high­lights the need for repli­cat­ing these find­ings with a larg­er sam­ple.

Two oth­er caveats are worth not­ing. First, the study was con­duct­ed in Ice­land and whether sim­i­lar find­ings would be attained with adults from oth­er coun­tries is unknown. There is no rea­son to assume that spe­cial char­ac­ter­is­tics of Ice­landic adults with ADHD would explain the find­ings, how­ev­er. Sec­ond, those in the CBT group received sub­stan­tial amounts of atten­tion and time from clin­i­cians rel­a­tive to those in the treat­ment as usu­al group. Thus, it is pos­si­ble that it was the extra atten­tion alone and not the spe­cif­ic nature of the CBT pro­gram that accounts for the more pos­i­tive out­comes in the CBT group. It would be dif­fi­cult to con­clu­sive­ly rule out this pos­si­bil­i­ty in future stud­ies, how­ev­er, as it would be eth­i­cal­ly prob­lem­at­ic to involve adults with ADHD in a time con­sum­ing inter­ven­tion that was not intend­ed to pro­duce tan­gi­ble ben­e­fits, but sim­ply to func­tion as a con­trol for the amount of atten­tion that CBT treat­ed par­tic­i­pants received.

In sum­ma­ry, results from this study high­light that although med­ica­tion treat­ment pro­vides impor­tant ben­e­fits to many adults with ADHD, the addi­tion of a well-con­ceived and struc­tured group CBT treat­ment can yield sig­nif­i­cant incre­men­tal improve­ments. These gains appear to extend beyond alle­vi­at­ing core ADHD symp­toms to include many of the impor­tant comor­bid prob­lems that adults with ADHD often strug­gle with. Mak­ing such treat­ment more wide­ly avail­able to adults in the com­mu­ni­ty, in addi­tion to con­duct­ing addi­tion­al research on treat­ments for adults with ADHD, should thus be an impor­tant pri­or­i­ty.

(Note - If you are inter­est­ed in learn­ing more about cog­ni­tive behav­ioral treat­ment for adults with ADHD, an excel­lent book you can con­sult is titled “Cog­ni­tive-Behav­ioral Ther­a­py for Adult ADHD: An Inte­gra­tive Psy­choso­cial and Med­ical Approach” by Drs. Rus­sell Ram­say and Antho­ny Ros­tain. It is avail­able on Ama­zon and else­where.)

Rabiner_David– Dr. David Rabin­er is a child clin­i­cal psy­chol­o­gist and Direc­tor of Under­grad­u­ate Stud­ies in the Depart­ment of Psy­chol­ogy and Neu­ro­science at Duke Uni­ver­sity. He pub­lishes Atten­tion Research Update, an online newslet­ter that helps par­ents, pro­fes­sion­als, and edu­ca­tors keep up with the lat­est research on ADHD, and teach­es the online course  How to Nav­i­gate Con­ven­tion­al and Com­ple­men­tary ADHD Treat­ments for Healthy Brain Devel­op­ment.

–> For relat­ed arti­cles by Dr. David Rabin­er on atten­tion deficits, click Here.

(Pic source: Big­Stock­Pho­to)

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

6 Responses

  1. James Foley says:

    Thank you for this arti­cle. The most help­ful part the list of five areas tar­get­ed by CBT treat­ment in the study, show­ing a much broad­er view of Adult ADHD than I usu­al­ly see.
    My clients often come in not only with ADHD symp­toms, depres­sion and anx­i­ety, and wor­ries about ear­ly-onset Alzheimer’s, but also with the issues below, espe­cial­ly prob­lems man­ag­ing advo­cat­ing for them­selves care­ful­ly with­out explo­sions of anger, and prob­lems plan­ning a career.
    What­ev­er treat­ment mod­el you use, those were great goals to keep in mind.

    • Glad you enjoyed it, James, and thank you for your great com­ment. What is inter­est­ing about cog­ni­tive ther­a­py and train­ing is that it helps devel­op capac­i­ties which cross beyond tra­di­tion­al “dis­or­der” bound­aries, such as “man­ag­ing for them­selves care­fully with­out explo­sions of anger” and “plan­ning a career”.

  2. After recent­ly meet­ing Dr. Antho­ny Ros­tain in Toron­to, I am aware of how few prac­ti­tion­ers are offer­ing CBT to this adult pop­u­la­tion. More research is need­ed!

    • Hel­lo Mary Lynn, I’d say the kind of research we actu­al­ly need is on the rel­a­tive effec­tive­ness and scal­a­bil­i­ty of CBT (in-per­son and/ or com­put­er­ized options) vs. drug-based options, such as what the UK gov­ern­ment is doing to help deal with anx­i­ety and depres­sion. There’s more than enough research on CBT to be con­sid­ered a first-line inter­ven­tion in a vari­ety of areas, the chal­lenge is to trans­late that into solu­tions. Have a great 2012!

  3. James Foley says:

    It’s strik­ing to read your vision of the UK gov­ern­ment doing some­thing about anx­i­ety and depres­sion. Here in the US, where the polit­i­cal par­a­digm is to cut any gov­ern­ment fund­ing, it would not have occurred to me to think of gov­ern­ment involve­ment; in fact, when it comes to ADHD, my strug­gle is with insur­ance com­pa­nies, who see this and Autism Spec­trum Dis­or­ders as “edu­ca­tion­al” or “med­ical” con­di­tions not amenable to CBT or any form of psy­chother­a­py. Frus­trat­ing.

  4. Alvaro says:

    Dif­fer­ent coun­tries present dif­fer­ent oppor­tu­ni­ties and challenges…in the US we see much more inter­est among con­sumers them­selves, as par­ents, boomers, professionals…hopefully that will attract oth­er play­ers, we start to see signs, but insti­tu­tion­al change is slow.

Leave a Reply

Categories: Attention and ADD/ADHD

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters,  SharpBrains is an independent market research firm tracking how brain science can improve our health and our lives.

Search in our archives

Follow us and Engage via…

RSS Feed

Watch All Recordings Now (40+ Speakers, 12+ Hours)