Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Icon

Transcript: David DiSalvo on How Cultural Evolution Outpaces Natural Evolution and Old Brain Metaphors

Below you can find the full tran­script of our engag­ing Q&A ses­sion today with David DiS­al­vo, author of What makes your brain hap­py and why you should do the oppo­site, mod­er­at­ed by Alvaro Fer­nan­dez. You vis­it pre­vi­ous Q&A Ses­sions Here.

Full Tran­script (Light­ly edit­ed) of Live Q&A held on Decem­ber 9th, 2–3pm ET

2:00
AlvaroF: Hel­lo every­one! We are hon­ored to have David DiS­al­vo here with us today.

2:01
AlvaroF: For the next hour, he’ll answer as many of your good ques­tions as pos­si­ble.

2:02
AlvaroF: David is a pro­lif­ic blog­ger and sci­ence writer, and has just released a great new book. David, can you tell us why you titled your about in such a thought-pro­vok­ing way?

2:03
AlvaroF: Let me clar­i­fy that this is a chat-only Q&A: there is no audio. Every­one can ask ques­tions by typ­ing and send­ing them, and David will type his answers.

2:07
Com­ment From David DiS­al­vo
Hi every­one, it’s a plea­sure to be online with you. The title of the book cap­tured the main idea that fre­quent­ly our brain leans in direc­tions that are not ull­ti­mate­ly in our best inter­ests.

2:07
AlvaroF: Let me ask the first obvi­ous ques­tion — why is that so?

2:08
David DiS­al­vo: The under­ly­ing rea­son is that our brain didn’t evolve to meet the needs of a com­plex, infor­ma­tion dri­ven cul­ture

2:08
David DiS­al­vo: Cul­tur­al evo­lu­tion has out­paced nat­ur­al evo­lu­tion, and we are in a per­pet­u­al state of “catch up”

2:09
Com­ment From MsJulie
David, what do you make of Kahneman’s new book: Think­ing Fast and Slow? How does his book square with your think­ing — it seems to me you both are think­ing along the same lines. (Great minds, I guess.)

2:10
David DiS­al­vo: I must admit I am not fin­ished with Kahneman’s book just yet, but I love it. His work has been very influ­en­tial for me and, I imag­ine, most writ­ers in this area.

2:10
Com­ment From Guest
Do you think work­ing mem­o­ry con­straints are part of the prob­lem?

2:11
David DiS­al­vo: Work­ing mem­o­ry con­straints are doubt­less part of the issue. Most of the research sug­gests that we can only hold 7 items or con­cepts in work­ing mem­o­ry at on time. That’s often less than what an aver­age office job requires us to main­tain on any giv­en day!

2:12
AlvaroF: Back to your first com­ment: how are the brain demands of today, after cul­tur­al evo­lu­tion, dif­fer­ent from yesterday’s? work­ing mem­o­ry may be a good exam­ple, what are oth­ers?

2:13
David DiS­al­vo: One of the things I focus on in the book is that we have adopt­ed inac­cu­rate metaphors for how the brain works, and this has led us to some odd con­clu­sions, such as the alleged abil­i­ty to “mul­ti task”

2:13
David DiS­al­vo: Truth is, none of us are capa­ble of mul­ti­task­ing in the term’s orig­i­nal sense (doing mul­ti­ple things at one time)

2:14
David DiS­al­vo: At least not at the con­scious lev­el

2:14
AlvaroF: What are bet­ter metaphors than, I guess, computing/ mul­ti­task­ing?

2:15
David DiS­al­vo: But fast paced infor­ma­tion cul­tures demand that we do this thing we call mul­ti­task­ing, though it’s con­trary to how our brains are struc­tured to process infor­ma­tion

2:15
David DiS­al­vo: The com­put­ing metaphor is prob­lem­at­ic because it is essen­tial­ly lin­ear

2:16
AlvaroF: I hope none of you are check­ing email now 🙂

2:16
Com­ment From Elyse
Could you elab­o­rate on sub­con­scious mul­ti-task­ing?

2:17
David DiS­al­vo: Com­put­ers are pro­grammed to accom­plish mul­ti­ple tasks at once, giv­en cer­tain para­me­ters and inputs.

2:17
David DiS­al­vo: Para­me­ters WE define and inputs WE define

2:18
David DiS­al­vo: Truth is, we have very lit­tle idea what those pro­cess­ing para­me­ters are for the brain, if the term “para­me­ters” even applies

2:18
AlvaroF: What’s a bet­ter metaphor?

2:19
AlvaroF: Also, please see Elyse’s ques­tion above on “sub­con­scious mul­ti-task­ing”

2:19
Com­ment From Cathy
A com­put­er is only as good as the pro­gram­mer, etc.

2:19
David DiS­al­vo: I think the best, though still ter­ri­bly inad­e­quate metaphor, would be some­thing more akin to the Inter­net

2:20
David DiS­al­vo: At least with the Net metaphor, you have a sense that pro­cess­ing occurs across bound­aries and infor­ma­tion is inputted anda accessed in a mul­ti­tude of ways (places)

2:20
David DiS­al­vo: To Elyse’s ques­tions…

2:21
David DiS­al­vo: What I meant by con­scious vs suib­con­cious mul­ti­task­ing is that we have pret­ty good research based evi­dence that we process in “default” mode. While we are sleep­ing, for exam­ple, or day­dream­ing.

2:21
AlvaroF: but the Inter­net does not self-reg­u­late/ plan

2:22
Com­ment From Cathy
Why the need for a metaphor? Keep­ing busy with sev­er­al tasks sim­ply means we move quick­ly from one to anoth­er and back until they are done or we’re dis­tract­ed by more. As we age, if brain health is not there, the quick­ness and focus slows lead­ing us to think we can’t “mul­ti­task” any more.

2:23
David DiS­al­vo: Exact­ly — and that’s why it is still not ade­quate, but it’s like­ly a close to a decent metaphor as we can reach.

2:23
Com­ment From MsJulie
Could you speak a lit­tle more about the default mode?

2:24
David DiS­al­vo: Peter Singer at Yale has for many years con­duct­ed research into a neur­al net­work that, more recent­ly, has come to be called the default net­work. It appears to take cen­ter stage in our brain when we are not focused on any giv­en thing(s), but are “drift­ing” so to speak.

2:25
David DiS­al­vo: This drift­ing use to be con­sid­ered point­less, but we now under­stand that our brain is accom­plish­ing quite alot in those spans of time

2:25
Com­ment From MsJulie
I’ve also just read the book on Willpow­er by Baumeis­ter and Tier­ney. Where do you think that willpow­er plays into Kahneman’s slow think­ing notion, and your notion of spend­ing the ener­gy work­ing against what makes the brain hap­py?

2:27
David DiS­al­vo: I have not read Roy Baumeister’s new book (though I saw a cou­ple sting­ing reviews), so I am a bit hand­i­capped to com­ment on it

2:27
David DiS­al­vo: I am not sure if his notion of Willpow­er is con­sis­tent with the con­ven­tial notions

2:28
Com­ment From Cathy
What are your thoughts on pro­grams such as Posit Science’s “Audi­to­ry” and “Insight” as well as Advanced Brain Tech­nolo­gies “The Lis­ten­ing Pro­gram”?

2:30
David DiS­al­vo: I am intrigued by brain stim­u­la­tion pro­grams. I must admit that I have not researched their effec­tive­ness, but at an intu­tive lev­el I think they mer­it inves­ti­ga­tion and exper­i­ment,

2:30
David DiS­al­vo: At least anec­do­tal­ly, there is alot of feed­back that some of them are effec­tive.

2:31
David DiS­al­vo: One thing to men­tion on that top­ic…

2:31
Com­ment From Natal­ie
I have just bought the book thru ama­zon, so I haven’t read your book yet. But what is the main the­sis? Whay are we doing now that is mak­ing us hap­py but is detri­men­tal in the long run? Is this a too lit­er­al ques­tion?

2:33
David DiS­al­vo: …I am not sure any­one can “prove” brain stimulation’s effec­tiv­ness just yet, but that is also true of many many oth­er brain-relat­ed tech­nolo­gies.

2:33
David DiS­al­vo: Answer­ing Natalie’s ques­tion.…

2:35
David DiS­al­vo: The cen­tral the­sis is that our brain’s are pre­dic­tion and pat­tern-detec­tion machines that evolved to sur­vive. As a result, there are mul­ti­ple mis­match­es between our brains’ native ten­den­cies and our cul­tur­al envi­ron­ments.

2:35
David DiS­al­vo: (my typ­ing skills leave much to be desired!)

2:35
Com­ment From MsJulie
Could you also talk a lit­tle more about why aware­ness is so cru­cial to chang­ing behav­ior?

2:36
AlvaroF: Good ques­tion! It seems David is aware of his need to update typ­ing skills…

2:37
David DiS­al­vo: Aware­ness forces us to self exam­ine (per­haps very quick­ly, depend­ing on the sce­nario) — and that places a “wedge” between what we may be first inclined to do, and what we ulti­mate­ly do.

2:38
Com­ment From Cathy
My under­stand­ing of “evolve” is sim­ply adap­ta­tion and not nec­es­sar­i­ly improve­ment.

2:38
David DiS­al­vo: It’s this “wedge” that could, as one exam­ple, pre­vent most road rage inci­dents.

2:39
David DiS­al­vo: “Improve­ment” is a rel­a­tive term. How does one “improve” as a per­son? For you that means one thing, for me prob­a­bly anoth­er (with points of sim­i­lar­i­ty of course). Adap­ta­tion is still the piv­otal term.

2:40
AlvaroF: Can we “evolve” our­selves? if there is a new envi­ron­ment to adapt to, and we have plas­tic brains, why not? do you talk about epi­ge­net­ics and neu­ro­plas­tic­i­ty in the book? any tips?

2:40
David DiS­al­vo: But, we can­not expect nat­ur­al evo­lu­tion to jump into hyper­speed for our brains to “adapt” to infor­ma­tion sat­u­rat­ed, con­sumerist soci­eties.

2:41
Com­ment From Cathy
Excel­lent point about improve­ment. Agreed.

2:42
David DiS­al­vo: I talk about neu­ro­plas­tic­i­ty quite alot in the book. IMO it’s the most impor­tant dis­cov­ery in brain sci­ence of the last cen­tu­ry.

2:42
David DiS­al­vo: because it under­lies so many oth­er new under­stand­ings.…

2:43
David DiS­al­vo: Before, we worked under the assump­tion that after a brief peri­od in child­hood, our brains became sta­t­ic hunks of tis­sue

2:43
Com­ment From Cathy
I think there have always been mis­match­es between what our brain accepts as viable infor­ma­tion and what it rejects and that would be based on the pre­dic­tion, pat­tern detec­tion you men­tioned. The brain is also plas­tic and change­able and adapt­able so isn’t this rou­tine?

2:43
David DiS­al­vo: …now the sta­t­ic tis­sue mis­un­der­stand­ing has giv­en way to a new are­na of research find­ings

2:44
David DiS­al­vo: Answer­ing Cathy…

2:45
David DiS­al­vo: yes, I agree, those mis­match­es have always been there to vary­ing degrees. My con­tention is that in the infor­ma­tion age they hap­pen with expo­nen­tial fre­quen­cy and we are, all of us, try­ing to keep up

2:45
Com­ment From Cathy
It was under­stood a very very long time ago but went against the “norm” of that time and was swept under the sci­en­tif­ic com­mu­ni­ty car­pet.

2:45
David DiS­al­vo: We are con­stant­ly adapt­ing in the prag­mat­ic sense (not evo­lu­tion­ary sense)

2:47
David DiS­al­vo: I think one of the rea­sons that Ray Kurzweil’s work is com­pelling is because of this expo­nen­tial move­ment

2:47
AlvaroF: What are the impli­ca­tions for edu­ca­tion, train­ing, health­care? how are/ will neu­ro­sci­en­tif­ic dis­cov­er­ies such as neu­ro­plas­tic­i­ty impact those domains?

2:47
David DiS­al­vo: Answer­ing Alvaro.…

2:49
David DiS­al­vo: The impli­ca­tions are already being seen par­tic­u­lar­ly in edu­ca­tion. Under the old mod­el of brain devel­op­ment (the ‘sta­t­ic’ mod­el), it’s hard to imag­ine why we’d think adult edu­ca­tion could do very much for the aver­age per­son

2:49
AlvaroF: We have ten min­utes left — please sub­mit your remain­ing ques­tions.

2:50
Com­ment From MsJulie
Thank you, David, very much for your time, all the best on your book. I’m look­ing for­ward to read­ing it. P.S. is your pub­lish­er going to release a ver­sion on the Kin­dle?

2:50
David DiS­al­vo: No one want­ed to admit that, of course, but if your work­ing assump­tion was that the brain was more or less cement­ed after it’s ear­ly prun­ing peri­od, then why expend resource to change that?

2:50
David DiS­al­vo: Thank­ful­ly, we now know that isn’t true.

2:51
David DiS­al­vo: Yes, a Kin­dle and Nook ver­sion should be out very soon.

2:51
David DiS­al­vo: It’s iron­ic that it takes so much time to get an ebook pro­duced.

2:51
AlvaroF: why not at the same time (we have been think­ing options with our own book, we released both at same time)

2:52
David DiS­al­vo: I’m real­ly not sure why. I’m glad­ly leav­ing those details up to the pub­lish­er 🙂

2:53
David DiS­al­vo: More ques­tions?

2:53
AlvaroF: Any main themes from the book we haven’t touched on?

2:54
David DiS­al­vo: Some themes from the book: the imper­fec­tion of mem­o­ry; why we dis­count the future; psy­choso­cial con­ta­gions, the pow­er of metaphor.…

2:54
David DiS­al­vo: .…and many oth­ers 🙂

2:55
AlvaroF: OK, thank you very much for your time, David!

2:55
AlvaroF: We wish you the best with the book and with every­thing else you do

2:56
Com­ment From Elyse
Thanks very much — quite inter­est­ing.

2:56
David DiS­al­vo: Thanks every­one. You can email me at dis­alvowrites at gmail.com

2:57
David DiS­al­vo: twit­ter: @neuronarrative

2:57
AlvaroF: Bye every­one

2:57
AlvaroF: And you can vis­it David’s great web­site, can you remind us of best URL?

2:58
David DiS­al­vo: www.whatmakesyourbrainhappy.com

It has links to both of my blogs at Psych Today and Forbes

2:58
Com­ment From Cathy
Thank you, David. Love the term “prag­mat­ic” adap­ta­tion

2:59
AlvaroF: Have a nice week­end, every­one. The tran­script will be avail­able at sharpbrains.com by end of the day.

Tran­scripts of pre­vi­ous Live Q&As with Book Authors:

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

Leave a Reply

Categories: Author Speaks Series, Cognitive Neuroscience, Education & Lifelong Learning

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Watch All Recordings Now (40+ Speakers, 12+ Hours)

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters and more, SharpBrains is an independent market research firm tracking health and performance applications of brain science.

Follow us and Engage via…

twitter_logo_header
RSS Feed

Search for anything brain-related in our article archives