Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Icon

Train your brain to focus on positive experiences

(Editor’s Note: we are pleased to bring you this arti­cle thanks to our col­lab­o­ra­tion with Greater Good Mag­a­zine).

The Neuroscience of Happiness

Best-sell­ing author Rick Han­son explains how we can rewire
our brains for last­ing hap­pi­ness
By Michael Bergeisen

We’ve all been there: obsess­ing over a faux pas we com­mit­ted at a par­ty, infu­ri­at­ed by an unkind word from a col­league, rumi­nat­ing over a tough break-up with a spouse or friend. We suf­fer some misfortune—big or small, real or imagined—and the pain or humil­i­a­tion sticks with us for hours, days, or even years after­ward.

The mind is like Vel­cro for neg­a­tive expe­ri­ences,” psy­chol­o­gist Rick Han­son is fond of say­ing, “and Teflon for pos­i­tive ones.”

But it doesn’t have to be this way. Draw­ing on some of the lat­est find­ings from neu­ro­science, Han­son has spent years explor­ing how we can over­come our brain’s nat­ur­al “neg­a­tiv­i­ty bias” and learn to inter­nal­ize pos­i­tive expe­ri­ences more deeply—while min­i­miz­ing the harm­ful phys­i­cal and psy­cho­log­i­cal effects of dwelling on the neg­a­tive.

For years, research has shown that, over time, our expe­ri­ences lit­er­al­ly reshape our brains and can change our ner­vous sys­tems, for bet­ter or worse. Now, neu­ro­sci­en­tists and psy­chol­o­gists like Han­son are zero­ing in on how we can take advan­tage of this “plas­tic­i­ty” of the brain to cul­ti­vate and sus­tain pos­i­tive emo­tions.

In his recent book, the best-sell­ing Buddha’s Brain: The Prac­ti­cal Neu­ro­science of Hap­pi­ness, Love, and Wis­dom, Han­son describes spe­cif­ic prac­tices that can pro­mote last­ing joy, equa­nim­i­ty, and compassion—and backs it all up with sound sci­ence.

Han­son recent­ly spoke with host Michael Bergeisen about some of these very prac­ti­cal, research-based steps we can all take to rewire our brains for last­ing hap­pi­ness. Below we present a con­densed ver­sion of the dis­cus­sion.

Michael Bergeisen: Most of us think of the human brain as either unchang­ing or los­ing pow­er and strength as we get old­er, but the cen­tral theme of your new book is that we each have the capac­i­ty to change our brain for the bet­ter to make our­selves hap­pi­er, more peace­ful, and more kind. How can we do this exact­ly?

Rick Han­son: We’ve all known as we’ve gone through life that our minds have changed. In oth­er words, we’ve learned things as we go through life, we picked up new skills, we’ve had expe­ri­ences, we remem­ber them. All that men­tal activ­i­ty means that we’ve changed our brain. That’s not break­ing news. In oth­er words, it’s long been known that as the mind changes, the brain must be chang­ing as well.

What is break­ing news is that in the last 20 years, the sci­en­tif­ic under­stand­ing of the brain has lit­er­al­ly dou­bled. And that has giv­en us much more clar­i­ty about the link­ages between the mind and the brain, which then gives us this amaz­ing pos­si­bil­i­ty to change our brain to change our mind—so that we feel bet­ter, we’re hap­pi­er, we’re less prone to suf­fer­ing, we’re kinder, we’re bet­ter to peo­ple around us, we’re more effec­tive at home and work, and we have more sense of a kind of inner peace and con­nect­ed­ness with all things.

MB: Can you give us an exam­ple of a prac­tice that has this effect on the mind and hence the brain?

RH: When­ev­er you are aware of your own body sen­sa­tions. For exam­ple, when you pay atten­tion to your breath­ing, or if you golf, or if you’re a dancer, or if you do some­thing like yoga, or Tai Chi, or if you meditate—in all those cas­es, you’re pay­ing atten­tion to the inter­nal sen­sa­tions of your body. Well, as it turns out, a part of the brain called the insula—there are two of them actually—track the inter­nal state of the body, which means also that they’re inti­mate­ly involved in sens­ing your feel­ings.

Research has shown that as peo­ple acti­vate their insu­la more, such as through med­i­ta­tion, the insu­la actu­al­ly gets thick­er. In oth­er words, neu­rons make more and more con­nec­tions with each oth­er, which actu­al­ly mea­sur­ably thick­ens your insu­la.

MB: And what is the ben­e­fit of that?

RH: It’s a demon­stra­tion that they are mak­ing more con­nec­tions with each oth­er. So as a result, peo­ple then become more in touch with them­selves, which is good. But even beyond that, research has shown that the insu­la is also cru­cial for empa­thy. Because when we get a sense of the emo­tions of oth­er peo­ple, we actu­al­ly light up the same neur­al cir­cuits in our own brain—they light up as if we’re access­ing those feel­ings our­selves.

So the point is, that if you can strength­en the insu­la, that will both make you more able to be aware of your­self and also help you be more empath­ic toward oth­ers.

The clas­sic line in neur­al psy­chol­o­gy is, “As neu­rons fire togeth­er they wire togeth­er.” The seem­ing­ly imma­te­r­i­al and ephemer­al flow of the thoughts and feel­ings through your mind leaves behind traces in your brain. So the take­away point is to be very thought­ful about what you think about all day long. A lot of us think about crud all day long. We’re wor­ry­ing about this, we’re plan­ning that, we’re obsess­ing over some­thing bad that might hap­pen that hasn’t even hap­pened, what­ev­er. Or we’re think­ing about what a los­er we are, how we just nev­er get any­where in life, or peo­ple don’t love us, or we get mistreated—and there’s a place for that if it’s pro­duc­tive.

But much of the time, we’re just run­ning those movies in the men­tal sim­u­la­tor. The prob­lem is, as we run those movies, they’re leav­ing behind traces of neur­al struc­ture that are neg­a­tivis­tic, depres­sive, pes­simistic, and very self-crit­i­cal.

MB: So we ini­tial­ly talked about the more pos­i­tive aspects of the brain. Now you’ve start­ed iden­ti­fy­ing parts of the brain that have a more neg­a­tive slant. And in your book, you do talk about this neg­a­tiv­i­ty bias in our brains. Can you describe that a bit more?

RH: Our ances­tors, the ones who lived to pass on their genes, got bet­ter and bet­ter and bet­ter at mak­ing a cru­cial deci­sion many times a day about whether to approach some­thing or avoid it. Approach the pleas­ant, avoid the unpleas­ant. Approach the car­rot, duck the stick.

Alright, now the prob­lem is that sticks are much more impor­tant to pay atten­tion to in the wild than car­rots because if you miss a car­rot today, you’ll get anoth­er chance at one tomor­row, but if you don’t avoid a stick today—Wham!—you’re not gonna get a crack at a car­rot tomor­row.

So we’ve devel­oped what’s called in sci­ence a “neg­a­tiv­i­ty bias,” which means that the brain, to help us sur­vive, pref­er­en­tial­ly looks for, reacts to, stores, and then recalls neg­a­tive infor­ma­tion over pos­i­tive infor­ma­tion. For exam­ple, there’s a pret­ty famous find­ing in the realm of rela­tion­ship psy­chol­o­gy from John Gottman, of the Uni­ver­si­ty of Wash­ing­ton, that it takes at least five pos­i­tive inter­ac­tions to make up for just one neg­a­tive one. In oth­er words, in effect, a neg­a­tive inter­ac­tion in an impor­tant rela­tion­ship is five times more pow­er­ful than a pos­i­tive inter­ac­tion. That’s an exam­ple of the neg­a­tiv­i­ty bias at work.

So then the real­ly inter­est­ing ques­tion becomes: How can you over­come it? That’s why, for me, tak­ing in the good is an absolute­ly cru­cial skill to devel­op, and a won­der­ful way to bal­ance this unfair tilt embed­ded in your own ner­vous sys­tem.

MB: What do you mean by “tak­ing in the good”?

RH: The brain is like Vel­cro for neg­a­tive expe­ri­ences but Teflon for pos­i­tive expe­ri­ences.

For most of us, as we go through the day, most of the moments in life are either neu­tral or pos­i­tive. The prob­lem is that neu­tral or pos­i­tive moments get remem­bered with stan­dard mem­o­ry sys­tems, which is to say they’re most­ly in-and-out. But neg­a­tive expe­ri­ences are instant­ly reg­is­tered and intense­ly focused on, based on the neg­a­tiv­i­ty bias of the brain. Then they get stored in what’s called “implic­it memory”—not so much mem­o­ry for events, like what I did on my sum­mer vaca­tion, but rather the feel­ing of being alive. And that implic­it mem­o­ry bank gets shad­ed in a dark­er and dark­er way by the slow­ly accu­mu­lat­ing residue of neg­a­tive expe­ri­ences.

To coun­ter­act that, we need to active­ly build up pos­i­tive implic­it mem­o­ries to bal­ance this unfair accu­mu­la­tion of neg­a­tive implic­it mem­o­ries. And the way to do that is three steps for sure with an option­al fourth step.

The first step is to turn pos­i­tive events into pos­i­tive expe­ri­ences. All kinds of good things hap­pen in our dai­ly life that we hard­ly notice at all, and if we do, we don’t feel it. Some­one pays us a com­pli­ment, we hard­ly pay atten­tion to it, or we deflect it. So instead of thatm you turn pos­i­tive events into pos­i­tive expe­ri­ences.

Sec­ond, real­ly savor it. In oth­er words, the way to remem­ber some­thing is to make it intense, felt in the body, and last­ing. That’s how we give those neu­rons lots and lots time to fire togeth­er so they start wiring togeth­er. So rather than notic­ing it and feel­ing good for a cou­ple of sec­onds, stay with it. Rel­ish it, enjoy it, for 10, 20, or 30 sec­onds, so it real­ly starts devel­op­ing neur­al struc­ture.

The third step is to sense and intend that this pos­i­tive expe­ri­ence is sink­ing into you and becom­ing a part of you. In oth­er words, it’s becom­ing woven into the fab­ric of your brain and your­self.

For bonus points, if you’re so inclined, it’s often very pow­er­ful to take a cur­rent pos­i­tive expe­ri­ence and have it kind of go down inside to an old place of pain. Do not do this if you have a trau­ma his­to­ry and you get flood­ed if you think about old pain. The method is to have the old painful mate­r­i­al be in the back­ground of aware­ness while the cur­rent pos­i­tive expe­ri­ence that is its anti­dote is promi­nent and strong in a fore­ground of aware­ness, and hold both those things in mind for 10 or 20 or 30 sec­onds straight. If you can’t do that, don’t wor­ry about this fourth step. But if you can do that, wow, this fourth step is real­ly pow­er­ful. Hon­est­ly over many years, it’s how I filled my own hole in the heart.

MB: Your book is filled with prac­tices that peo­ple can try to boost their feel­ings of love and hap­pi­ness and equa­nim­i­ty. Do you use any of these prac­tices on a reg­u­lar basis?

RH: Oh yeah. My wife wish­es I used more, but any­way.

MB: Can you iden­ti­fy one and per­haps describe the effect that you’ve seen it have on your mind and brain?

RH: Yeah, I’ll men­tion two, actu­al­ly.

One is the impor­tance of focus­ing on pos­i­tive expe­ri­ences, because of the neg­a­tiv­i­ty bias of the brain, and also because pos­i­tive expe­ri­ence has so many ben­e­fits. It’s so good for the immune sys­tem. It’s so good for con­cen­tra­tion. Pos­i­tive emo­tion­al states help steady the mind for a com­plex rea­son involv­ing dopamine. So in dai­ly life, I look for pos­i­tive emo­tion and I real­ly try to allow it to be there and to kind of sink into it, to wel­come it.

Sec­ond, I’ve real­ly come to appre­ci­ate how extreme­ly sen­si­tive we are to threat. If you think about it, in life there are two big mis­takes you can make: You can either think there is a tiger there when there is not. Or you can think there is no tiger, but there real­ly is one. Of those two mis­takes, which one do most peo­ple make most the time? It’s the first one. We think there’s a tiger there when there real­ly is no tiger. Or it’s a baby tiger, or it’s a paper tiger, or it’s a tiger in chains. And we go through life feel­ing threat­ened all the time.

So I’ve become very alert to need­less threat. I don’t want to make the sec­ond mistake—in oth­er words, I want to see clear­ly and be dis­cern­ing about what is tru­ly a threat over there. But I don’t want to be bam­boo­zled or mis­guid­ed either by my own men­tal process­es or by exter­nal mes­sages into think­ing that there’s a threat there when there real­ly isn’t one.

And relat­ed to that, I’ve also become much more thought­ful about not being threat­en­ing to oth­er peo­ple need­less­ly. I don’t mean walk­ing on egg shells, avoid­ing telling the truth when it’s appro­pri­ate and use­ful and all the rest of that. But what I do mean is being thought­ful about how I give peo­ple an alarm sig­nal some­times when I don’t real­ly mean to.

MB: Let me come back to anoth­er very con­crete aspect of your book, and that’s some­thing that you call “the two darts of suf­fer­ing.” Can you talk a lit­tle bit about what those two darts are and whether they’re tied to our ner­vous sys­tem in any way?

RH: Sure. Well, the metaphor is the Bud­dha. He said that things hap­pen in life that are painful and dif­fi­cult. At a phys­i­cal lev­el, we’re all exposed to aging and dis­ease and death, and because we’re intense­ly social ani­mals who love, we’re also exposed to sor­row when peo­ple we love die or are threat­ened or are in pain. Those are the first darts of life; you can’t escape them.

Then the Bud­dha point­ed out that we com­pound the pain through self-inflict­ed wounds, in oth­er words, that we throw “sec­ond darts” at our­selves. For exam­ple, we get upset that we’re in pain or some­body says some­thing cru­el to us, which is a first dart, and it pierces us and hurts, but then we brood over it for the rest of the day, inflict­ing all kinds of sec­ond darts upon our­selves.

When a first dart lands, it’s real­ly impor­tant to try to auto­mat­i­cal­ly start acti­vat­ing the parasym­pa­thet­ic wing of the ner­vous sys­tem, because first darts trig­ger the stress response—the “fight or flight” wing of the ner­vous sys­tem. So as much as you can, start try­ing to get auto­mat­ic around tak­ing deep breaths, calm­ing your­self down, imag­in­ing that you’re safe, or as safe as pos­si­ble, bring­ing to mind oth­er resources, remind­ing your­self you’ve got­ten through these sit­u­a­tions in the past, call­ing to mind pos­i­tive emo­tions that are the anti­dote to what­ev­er has hap­pened right then and there—whatever works for you.

It’s decep­tive­ly sim­ple, but if one takes in the good a hand­ful of times every­day, relat­ed to real­ly small things, that’s going to make a per­ma­nent change in your ner­vous sys­tem, prob­a­bly in a mat­ter of days.

–  Michael Bergeisen is the host of “The Greater Good Pod­cast.” The Greater Good Mag­a­zine, based at UC-Berke­ley, is a quar­terly mag­a­zine that high­lights ground break­ing sci­en­tific research into the roots of com­pas­sion and altru­ism.

Relat­ed arti­cles:
Enhance Hap­pi­ness and Health by Cul­ti­vat­ing Grat­i­tude: Inter­view with Robert Emmons
The Ten Habits of High­ly Effec­tive Brains

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

3 Responses

  1. I agree with this post. We should focus on pos­i­tive expe­ri­ences because it real­ly help us a lot. Think­ing of neg­a­tive expe­ri­ences will only drain our ener­gy and our hopes to strive on some­thing more.

  2. shane doyle says:

    Excel­lent, i am going to try and suc­ceed!

  3. David Dickinson says:

    Great arti­cle. Cog­ni­tive aware­ness tech­niques are much bet­ter than block­ing stress and anx­i­ety with psy­chotrop­ic drugs, in my view. Unfor­tu­nate­ly, we have a long ways to go before this is accept­ed by the med­ical com­mu­ni­ty in Cana­da.

Leave a Reply

Categories: Cognitive Neuroscience, Health & Wellness

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

All Slidedecks & Recordings Available — click image below

Search for anything brain-related in our article archives

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters, and more, SharpBrains is an independent market research firm and think tank tracking health and performance applications of brain science.