Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News


Memory Problems? Perhaps you are Multi-tasking

Today’s kids are into mul­ti-task­ing. This is the gen­er­a­tion hooked on iPods, IM’ing, video games — not to men­tion TV! Many peo­ple in my gen­er­a­tion think it is won­der­ful that kids can do all these things simul­ta­ne­ous­ly and are impressed with their com­pe­tence.

Well, as a teacher of such kids when they reach col­lege, I am not impressed. Col­lege stu­dents these days have short atten­tion spans and have trou­ble con­cen­trat­ing. They got this way in sec­ondary school. I see this in the mid­dle-school out­reach pro­gram I help run. At this age kids are real­ly wrapped up in mul­ti-task­ing at the expense of focus.

Accord­ing to a Kaiser Fam­i­ly Foun­da­tion study last year, school kids in all grades beyond the sec­ond grade com­mit­ted, on aver­age, more than six hours per day to TV or videos, music, video games, and com­put­ers. Almost one-third report­ed that “most of the time” they did their home­work while chat­ting on the phone, surf­ing the Web, send­ing instant mes­sages, watch­ing TV, or lis­ten­ing to music.

Kids think that this enter­tain­ment while study­ing helps their learn­ing. It prob­a­bly does make learn­ing less tedious, but it clear­ly makes learn­ing less effi­cient and less effec­tive. Mul­ti-task­ing vio­lates every­thing we know about how mem­o­ry works. Now we have objec­tive sci­en­tif­ic evi­dence that mul­ti-task­ing impairs learn­ing. A recent Nation­al Acad­e­my of Sci­ences study with col­lege-age stu­dents (Ref­er­ence #1 below) did an exper­i­ment where the sub­jects were to learn a task under two con­di­tions, one with no dis­trac­tions and the oth­er while lis­ten­ing to high- and low-tone beeps, attend­ing to the high ones. The total amount of learn­ing was the super­fi­cial­ly the same in both con­di­tions, but with dis­trac­tions, the learn­ing was stereo­typed and learn­ers had dif­fi­cul­ty in apply­ing what they learned to oth­er con­texts and sit­u­a­tions. The study also used func­tion­al MRI (fMRI) to assess brain activ­i­ty under test con­di­tions. The imag­ing data indi­cat­ed that the mem­o­ry task and the dis­trac­tion stim­uli engage dif­fer­ent parts of the brain and that these regions prob­a­bly com­pete with each oth­er.

The study did not address the issue of pas­sive dis­trac­tion, such as lis­ten­ing to music while study­ing. I think that music can also be a major dis­trac­tion, except for cer­tain kinds of music played under mut­ed con­di­tions (see my book Thank You, Brain, For All You Remem­ber. What You For­got Was My Fault, pages 47, 165, and 197, Ref­er­ence #2 below) .

One rea­son that mul­ti-task­ing inter­feres with mem­o­ry is that the brain real­ly does not mul­ti-task. It just fools you into think­ing so, and the way the brain does han­dle mul­ti­ple tasks makes it hard to remem­ber any­thing.

Brains Can’t Real Mul­ti-task

Our brain works hard to fool us into think­ing it can do more than one thing at a time. It can’t. Recent MRI stud­ies at Van­der­bilt (#3) prove that the brain is not built for good mul­ti-task­ing. When try­ing to do two things at once, the brain tem­porar­i­ly shuts down one task while try­ing to do the oth­er. In the study, even doing some­thing as sim­ple as press­ing a but­ton when an image is flashed caused a delay in brain oper­a­tion. MRI images showed that a cen­tral bot­tle­neck occurred when sub­jects were try­ing to do two things at once, such as press­ing the appro­pri­ate com­put­er key in response to hear­ing one of eight pos­si­ble sounds and utter­ing an appro­pri­ate ver­bal response when see­ing images. Activ­i­ty in the brain that was asso­ci­at­ed with each task was pri­or­i­tized, show­ing up first in one brain area and then in the oth­er  not in both areas simul­ta­ne­ous­ly. In oth­er words, the brain only worked on one task at a time, post­pon­ing the sec­ond task and deceiv­ing the sub­jects into think­ing they were work­ing on both tasks simul­ta­ne­ous­ly. The delay between switch­ing func­tions was as long as a sec­ond. It is high­ly like­ly, though not yet stud­ied, that the delays and con­fu­sion mag­ni­fy with increas­es in the num­ber of dif­fer­ent things one tries to do simul­ta­ne­ous­ly.

So what has this got to do with mem­o­ry? Well, if you try to mem­o­rize the first task and the brain imme­di­ate­ly switch­es to the sec­ond task, per­for­mance of the sec­ond task inter­feres with con­sol­i­da­tion of the mem­o­ry of the first task. In my ear­li­er arti­cle on mem­o­ry con­sol­i­da­tion, I explained how ear­ly mem­o­ry is vul­ner­a­ble to inter­fer­ence and must be pro­tect­ed from dis­trac­tions and new infor­ma­tion in order for the mem­o­ry to be made per­ma­nent. Like­wise, there are proac­tive effects where­in what you learn on the first task can inter­fere with learn­ing on the sec­ond. All these prob­lems are com­pound­ed if there are three or more tasks in a “mul­ti-task­ing” expe­ri­ence.

Mul­ti-task­ing and School Per­for­mance

A study of 517 Cal­i­for­nia high-school stu­dents found that grades were low­er in those who social­ly inter­act­ed via MySpace, instant mes­sag­ing (IM) accounts, or who used cell phones. In the study (4), stu­dents answered a ques­tion­naire on what social net­work­ing devices they used and when they used them. The answers were paired with the grades (from the pre­vi­ous year and the most recent report card).

In this study, 72% of the stu­dents had a My Space account, 76% had a cell phone, and 68% had an IM address. Those who had a MySpace account had sig­nif­i­cant­ly low­er grades than those with­out an account. The same was true for those that used IM, com­pared with those who did not. Cell phone use was also asso­ci­at­ed with low­er grades and the effect was mag­ni­fied if text mes­sag­ing was used on cell phones. Not sur­pris­ing­ly, if these devices were used dur­ing home­work, the grades were even low­er than for stu­dents who used these tech­nolo­gies out­side of home­work. Almost half report­ed text mes­sag­ing dur­ing class time, and their grades were low­er than the stu­dents who only used IM out­side of class.

These are cor­re­la­tion­al data and do not prove that using these devices caus­es low­er grades. But it is a good bet. Mul­ti-task­ing, as when using the com­mu­ni­ca­tion devices while try­ing to do home­work or learn in class, can be expect­ed to inter­fere with mem­o­ry. Poor mem­o­ry yields low­er grades.

Bill KlemmW. R. (Bill) Klemm, D.V.M., Ph.D. Sci­en­tist, pro­fes­sor, author, speak­er As a pro­fes­sor of Neu­ro­science at Texas A&M Uni­ver­si­ty, Bill has taught about the brain and behav­ior at all lev­els, from fresh­men, to seniors, to grad­u­ate stu­dents to post-docs. His recent books include Thank You, Brain, For All You Remem­ber. What You For­got Was My Fault and Core Ideas in Neu­ro­science.



- #1 Foerde, K., Knowl­ton, Bar­bara J., and Pol­drack, Rus­sell A. 2006. Mod­u­la­tion of com­pet­ing mem­o­ry sys­tems by dis­trac­tion. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 103: 11778–11783.
— #2 Klemm, W. R. 2004. Thank You Brain for All You Remem­ber. What You For­got Was My Fault. Benec­ton Press. 312 pages.
— #3 Dux, P. E., Ivanoff, J., Asplund, C. LO., and Marois, R. 2007. Iso­la­tion of a Cen­tral Bot­tle­neck of Infor­ma­tion Pro­cess­ing with Time-Resolved fMRI. Neu­ron. 52 (6): 1109–1120
— #4 Pierce, Tamyra, and Vaca, Rober­to. 2007. Dis­tract­ed: aca­d­e­m­ic per­for­mance dif­fer­ences between teen users of MySpace and oth­er com­mu­ni­ca­tion tech­nolo­gies. Pro­ceed­ings EISTA. Orlan­do, FL. July.

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

3 Responses

  1. Thanks for sub­mit­ting this post to our blog car­ni­val. We just pub­lished the 41st edi­tion of Brain Blog­ging and your arti­cle was fea­tured!

    Thank you.


  2. Seth says:

    that seems very true when i do more then one thing i cant remem­ber every thing i was doing

Leave a Reply

Categories: Cognitive Neuroscience, Education & Lifelong Learning, Health & Wellness

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

All Slidedecks & Recordings Available — click image below

Search for anything brain-related in our article archives

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters, and more, SharpBrains is an independent market research firm and think tank tracking health and performance applications of brain science.