Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Icon

Philosophy as the Missing Link in Our School’s Curriculum

A read­er and writer sent us over the week­end the arti­cle below as “an OpEd sub­mis­sion”. We are not a news­pa­per, and don’t have a for­mal OpEd sec­tion, but are delight­ed to pub­lish thought­ful, research-based pieces on top­ics relat­ed to life­long cog­ni­tive devel­op­ment and health.

Here you are:

—-

Phi­los­o­phy as the Miss­ing Link An Eye-Open­ing Audit of Our School’s Cur­ricu­lum
By: Kim­ber­ly Wick­ham

The ques­tion might be asked, “Why would any­one want to teach phi­los­o­phy to pre-ado­les­cent chil­dren?” but there are very good rea­sons why one might want to take on such a lofty task. I am not sug­gest­ing that the his­to­ry of phi­los­o­phy would be par­tic­u­lar­ly per­ti­nent for a young child to learn, but there is sub­stan­tial evi­dence to sup­port the devel­op­ment of an already nat­ur­al ten­den­cy towards philo­soph­i­cal thought. Some may think that the pre-ado­les­cents haven’t got the cog­ni­tive devel­op­men­tal abil­i­ty to wrap their minds around such an elu­sive and sub­jec­tive study as phi­los­o­phy. How­ev­er, devel­op­ing this skill has shown long term pos­i­tive effects. These effects range from devel­op­ing crit­i­cal think­ing skills and cog­ni­tive abil­i­ty to rais­ing emo­tion­al matu­ri­ty and encour­ag­ing the child’s sense of secu­ri­ty with­in his or her world.

For years there has been an empha­sis on cog­ni­tive and phys­i­cal aspects of chil­drens devel­op­ment, but recent­ly more atten­tion is being placed on both the social and emo­tion­al aspects of a child’s devel­op­ment. It is becom­ing rec­og­nized that a child’s emo­tion­al matu­ri­ty has a big impact on their abil­i­ty to learn and process infor­ma­tion. While that, at first blush, may seem an obvi­ous con­clu­sion there is a lit­tle more to the sto­ry. A child’s emo­tion­al matu­ri­ty and self esteem has a sig­nif­i­cant impact on his or her behav­ior as well. An increas­ing num­ber of chil­dren are being iden­ti­fied as need­ing addi­tion­al learn­ing strate­gies and show­ing chal­leng­ing behav­iors. Edu­ca­tion sys­tems are strug­gling to find cre­ative meth­ods to address these needs before the prob­lems arise.

It is rec­og­nized that a child’s abil­i­ty to learn depends on how advanced they are at man­ag­ing per­son­al and social tasks. Their work suf­fers when they are inca­pable of cop­ing effec­tive­ly with impor­tant skills such as the abil­i­ty to be aware of oth­ers feel­ings, man­age rela­tion­ships and be part of a social com­mu­ni­ty. Encour­ag­ing philo­soph­i­cal thought and devel­op­ing crit­i­cal think­ing skills in pre-ado­les­cent chil­dren pro­vides a foun­da­tion for cog­ni­tive, social and emo­tion­al skills to flour­ish.

Chil­dren con­tin­u­al­ly ask philo­soph­i­cal ques­tions with­out prompt­ing, such as: “If I squeeze my eyes shut real­ly tight­ly and I can’t see where I am, does that make where I am become some­where else? As adults used to nav­i­gat­ing the world in our cur­rent under­stand­ing of real­i­ty we answer these types of ques­tions fol­low­ing the strict rules of our present view, but it might be far more use­ful to the child to encour­age exam­i­na­tion of the ques­tion. For exam­ple an appro­pri­ate response might be, “What do you think about that?” Fur­ther dis­cus­sion can take place when the child has had a chance to explore their own opin­ions and ideas about their phys­i­cal real­i­ty, for exam­ple.

A pre-ado­les­cent child may not move as fast and furi­ous­ly through this type of meta­phys­i­cal analy­sis as a col­lege stu­dent but they cer­tain­ly do have the cog­ni­tive abil­i­ty to use this type of crit­i­cal think­ing to expand their think­ing process­es. So what is meant by Ëœcrit­i­cal think­ing” exact­ly? The Amer­i­can Philo­soph­i­cal Asso­ci­a­tions Com­mit­tee on Pre-Col­lege Phi­los­o­phy describes it as pur­pose­ful, self-reg­u­la­to­ry judg­ment which results in inter­pre­ta­tion, analy­sis, eval­u­a­tion, and infer­ence, as well as expla­na­tion of the evi­den­tial, con­cep­tu­al, method­olog­i­cal, cri­te­ri­o­log­i­cal, or con­tex­tu­al con­sid­er­a­tions upon which that judg­ment is based (Facione 1989)

But for those of us look­ing for a sim­pler expla­na­tion it is essen­tial­ly the abil­i­ty to use rea­son­ably reflec­tive, focused think­ing to decide what to believe and do. Chil­dren need to be encour­aged to reflect care­ful­ly on their own beliefs and be encour­aged to explore oth­er points of view. Phi­los­o­phy encour­ages chil­dren to learn to think inde­pen­dent­ly as well as think and dis­cuss with oth­ers. In order to gain the most advan­tage chil­dren need to be able to engage in open class­room dis­cus­sions on an ongo­ing basis. By mas­ter­ing this type of think­ing the child devel­ops deep­er emo­tion­al lit­er­a­cy and learns to cre­ate a more thought­ful and pur­pose­ful life.

On anoth­er lev­el philo­soph­i­cal dis­cus­sion can be used to devel­op a deep­er under­stand­ing of ethics. Dr. Stephen Law, a senior lec­tur­er in Phi­los­o­phy at Heathrop Col­lege, Uni­ver­si­ty of Lon­don explains the skills that are cul­ti­vat­ed in such dis­cus­sions as the fol­low­ing:

* reveal and ques­tion under­ly­ing assump­tions
* fig­ure out the per­haps unfore­seen con­se­quences of a moral deci­sion or point of view
* spot and diag­nose faulty rea­son­ing
* weigh up evi­dence fair­ly and impar­tial­ly
* make a point clear­ly and con­cise­ly
* take turns in a debate, and lis­ten atten­tive­ly with­out inter­rupt­ing
* argue with­out per­son­al­iz­ing a dis­pute
* look at issues from the point of view of oth­ers
* ques­tion the appro­pri­ate­ness, or the appro­pri­ate­ness of act­ing on, one’s own feel­ings

He goes on to say, “Acquir­ing these skills involves devel­op­ing, not just a lev­el of intel­lec­tu­al matu­ri­ty, but a fair degree of emo­tion­al matu­ri­ty too. For exam­ple, turn-tak­ing requires patience and self-con­trol. Judg­ing impar­tial­ly involves iden­ti­fy­ing and tak­ing account of your own emo­tion­al bias­es. By think­ing crit­i­cal­ly and care­ful­ly about your own beliefs and atti­tudes, you may devel­op insights into your own char­ac­ter. By step­ping out­side of your own view­point and look­ing at issues from the stand­point of anoth­er, you can devel­op a greater empa­thy with and under­stand­ing of oth­ers. So by engag­ing in this kind of philo­soph­i­cal, crit­i­cal activ­i­ty, you are like­ly to devel­op, not only the abil­i­ty to rea­son cogent­ly, but also what now tends to be called “emo­tion­al intel­li­gence.” (Law 2007)

In order to gain the most advan­tage, chil­dren need to be able to engage in open class­room dis­cus­sions on an ongo­ing basis. As a teacher of pre-ado­les­cent chil­dren I have had the oppor­tu­ni­ty to wit­ness these dis­cus­sions tak­ing place spon­ta­neous­ly. In most instances I have been able to set aside the par­tic­u­lar les­son that might have been planned for the time and let the free-wheel­ing philo­soph­i­cal dis­cus­sion go on with min­i­mal but well-timed guid­ance. Although it would have been ide­al to have had time set aside on a dai­ly basis for such dis­cus­sion there is a fair amount of pres­sure from the already demand­ing cur­ricu­lum, there­by restrict­ing the fre­quen­cy of these crit­i­cal­ly impor­tant dis­cus­sions.

As a writer of phi­los­o­phy for chil­dren, I give exam­ples with­in my sto­ries of my char­ac­ters explor­ing deep philo­soph­i­cal ques­tions in an alter­nate school set­ting as well as in every day events. It is my hope that when chil­dren read my sto­ries they will have a sparked inter­est in explor­ing the deep­er ques­tions of life with their fam­i­lies and per­haps even insti­gate such dis­cus­sions with­in their class­rooms. I also have great hope that the edu­ca­tion­al sys­tems cur­rent­ly in place will take a clos­er look at the ben­e­fit of adding philo­soph­i­cal dis­cus­sions to their cur­ricu­lums. This would pro­vide an oppor­tu­ni­ty to advance the world’s devel­op­ment by pop­u­lat­ing it with emo­tion­al­ly intel­li­gent and crit­i­cal­ly inquis­i­tive minds.

– Kim­ber­ly Wick­ham is the author of Angels and Hors­es and Sum­mer of Mag­ic Hors­es.

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

8 Responses

  1. Tim says:

    Nice arti­cle, there is hope! How­ev­er a more inter­est­ing ques­tion would be ‘why’ isn’t phi­los­o­phy and espe­cial­ly crit­i­cal think­ing taught in school. I was born this way and it gave me no end of has­sle from par­tic­u­lar teach­ers in school as I read vora­cious­ly and con­stant­ly ques­tioned (still do!).
    I was even rec­om­mend­ed for ‘ther­a­py’ because of my per­ceived bad atti­tude…
    I can’t remem­ber who the quote is from but it goes along the lines of, “how can one be a well adjust­ed mem­ber of soci­ety when soci­ety is so mal-adjust­ed” — I kid you not, that got me deten­tion! It prob­a­bly didn’t help my moth­er storm­ing into school and going bal­lis­tic with the head­mas­ter though (UK school). I’m well over it now 😉
    The irony is now I get paid very well to ques­tion busi­ness people’s beliefs and ideas to help them see a big­ger pic­ture 🙂

  2. Hel­lo Tim,

    Thank you for your great com­ment.

    Let’s put that phi­los­o­phy to the test: how would you encour­age your clients to see the big pic­ture on why them­selves, and their orga­ni­za­tions, would ben­e­fit from pay­ing more atten­tion to emerg­ing appli­ca­tions (and impli­ca­tions) of brain research?

    Btw, I agree that crit­i­cal think­ing itself is a much-need­ed cog­ni­tive func­tion to suc­ceed in today’s and tomorrow’s world, and that school would ben­e­fit from inno­v­a­tive approach­es there (per­haps even for­mal phi­los­o­phy).

    Regards

  3. Young peo­ple are pro­found exam­ples of all of our strug­gles to cope with emo­tion.

    As teenagers, they are intro­duced to an array of com­plex emo­tions for the first time. Just as with adults, chil­dren need a strong cop­ing mech­a­nism, an ade­quate per­cep­tion of an ever-chang­ing world, and a foun­da­tion for know­ing how to act.

    Imag­ine a teenag­er, expe­ri­enc­ing com­plex and over­whelm­ing emo­tions for the first time, find­ing com­fort that their “feel­ings” are sim­ply part of the over­all human expe­ri­ence and, while their expe­ri­ence may be dif­fi­cult now, their feel­ings are nor­mal and they will pass with time. Phi­los­o­phy will have already giv­en the oth­er­wise trou­bled teen a fun­da­men­tal sense of self-acquain­tance that includes their own giv­en per­son­al skills and traits but also those of being human.

    Per­haps Doc­tors could “pre­scribe” a con­sis­tent dose of phi­los­o­phy rather than rital­in…

    Let no one delay the study of phi­los­o­phy when young nor weary of it when old.” Epi­cu­rus (341 — 270BC)

  4. Alvaro says:

    Kent, thank you for a beau­ti­ful com­ment, and quote!

  5. Ray says:

    The basis of teach­ing chil­dren the process of phi­los­o­phy is to encour­age their innate curi­ousi­ty. Why is the sky blue?
    I have the belief that our first, intu­itive answer to a ques­tion is always more cor­rect than any sub­se­quent answer, acknowl­edg­ing fur­ther expla­na­tion of the sub­ject not with­stand­ing. I liken our intel­lect to that of paint­ing pic­tures. The more we know about some­thing the big­ger the areas of that sub­jects colour. Our task as par­ents and role mod­els is to allow the mind to be expand­ed by encour­ag­ing the curi­ousi­ty of our chil­dren to expand their pic­tures hori­zons. This is very eas­i­ly achieved by adults hav­ing the time to not just answer­ing in the prac­ti­cal, go away, man­ner we tend to, but to prac­tice reply­ing with anoth­er ques­tion. At the very least, “Why do you ask?”. I believe that when asked a ques­tion, every­thing we know about the sub­ject, ie: all the colour, comes togeth­er so that we not only answer that ques­tion but have all the infor­ma­tion (every­thing we know) avail­able attempt to answer what­ev­er the next ques­tion may be. I also believe that when the direc­tion of ques­tion­ing becomes appar­ent the bits of colour, our mind con­sid­ers we no longer need, drop away.
    The mod­ern pace of life has tak­en away the “whit­tling” time of fam­i­lies and replaced it with the tech­no­log­i­cal rush of facts and the, “what are you doing for the future?” demands for our chil­dren to have some eco­nom­ic pur­pose.
    Phi­los­o­phy! Think reflec­tive con­ver­sa­tions that qui­et­ly and with­out fuss expands the philo­soph­i­cal base of our children’s think­ing.

  6. Hel­lo Ray, let me put that “Why do you ask?” in prac­tice…

    1) why do you com­ment?
    2) Why do we think the sky is blue? 🙂

    I agree with the need to tru­ly inter­act with all minds (young and old alike), engag­ing with peo­ple in a mean­ing­ful, not patron­iz­ing man­ner. I also agree that ques­tions them­selves pro­vide much infor­ma­tion on questioner’s mind, and clues for how to answer.

    Hav­ing said that, the rea­son why we have frontal lobes is because it is not always the case that our first, auto­mat­ic, “intu­itive”, answer is the right one.

    Phi­los­o­phy may help us ques­tion and refine over time our “intu­itions”.

  7. L. Smith says:

    There is a dis­tinct and crit­i­cal dif­fer­ence between teach­ing and train­ing. In both cas­es the “stu­dent” learn but they learn under­stand­ing if they’re effec­tive­ly taught some­thing and they learn skills if they are effec­tive­ly trained on some­thing. The involve­ment of the fed­er­al, state, and munic­i­pal gov­ern­ments in over­see­ing fund­ing to schools had per­pe­trat­ed a need to mea­sure whether or not stu­dents are learn­ing any­thing. The sim­ple-mind­ed approach to per­form this mea­sure­ment (we are talk­ing about civ­il ser­vents here, are we not?) invari­ably has pre­cip­i­tat­ed to parochial and sub­jec­tive assess­ments caus­ing teach­ers whose liveli­hoods are at stake to be com­pelled to train their stu­dents to per­form bet­ter on these mea­sure­ment tests. The end result is that there is no time left over in the school day to teach and edu­cate the stu­dents. We need to address this prob­lem by back­ing away from stan­dards of learn­ing and from expect­ing the tra­di­tion­al school and teacher mod­el to sud­den­ly start work­ing. Take a look at the end-to-end treat­ment and action­able rec­om­men­da­tions in the recent­ly released com­mis­sion report, “Edu­ca­tion in Amer­i­ca — What’s to Be Done?” devel­oped by Trigon-Inter­na­tion­al to see how this prob­lem is best addressed.

  8. Ques­tions are the cen­tral fea­ture of phi­los­o­phy, and I’ve found that encour­ag­ing young peo­ple to ask and think about the big ques­tions of phi­los­o­phy real­ly affirms their nat­ur­al curios­i­ty and won­der about the world. I run a cen­ter that brings phi­los­o­phy into K-12 class­rooms in the Pacif­ic North­west (www.philosophyforchildren.org), and there are many resources on our site for intro­duc­ing phi­los­o­phy to young peo­ple.

    Best wish­es,
    Jana Mohr Lone

Leave a Reply

Categories: Education & Lifelong Learning

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Watch All Recordings Now (40+ Speakers, 12+ Hours)

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters and more, SharpBrains is an independent market research firm tracking health and performance applications of brain science.

Follow us and Engage via…

twitter_logo_header
RSS Feed

Search for anything brain-related in our article archives