Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News


Medicine 2.0: the impact of web 2.0 on healthcare?

Wel­come to the 30th edi­tion of Med­i­cine 2.0, the blog car­ni­val devot­ed to arti­cles that ana­lyze the cur­rent and poten­tial impact of web 2.0 tech­nolo­gies on med­i­cine and health­care.

Med­i­cine 2.0” 101

The first ques­tion is, of course, “What exact­ly is Med­i­cine 2.0?”. The sec­ond, “Who cares?”. The third, “Why?”

Anthro­pol­o­gists are here to help. Who bet­ter to help under­stand emerg­ing arti­facts of the health and med­ical tribe, as evi­denced by the fan­tas­tic lec­ture An Anthro­po­log­i­cal Intro­duc­tion To Youtube giv­en to the Library of Con­gress by Pro­fes­sor Michael Wesch. As Open Think­ing sug­gests, the video which is 55 min­utes long pro­vides an “excel­lent back­grounder on social media, user-gen­er­at­ed con­tent, and online com­mu­ni­ties through the lens of anthro­pol­o­gy.”

If you are more the Pow­er­Point type, you can access the great slide pre­sen­ta­tion and list of web­sites pro­vid­ed by eHealth: see Web 2.0 in Clin­i­cal Research.

The Future of Med­i­cine and Health 2.0

Admit­ted­ly, the Med­i­cine 2.0 field is still small and emerg­ing. But, how will it grow? What new health­care out­comes will it enable and sup­port? What may be the trade-offs to con­sid­er, if any?

The Health­care Blog offers a . “What makes these efforts par­tic­u­lar­ly inter­est­ing is that, through a col­lab­o­ra­tive Web-based process, they attempt to dis­till and doc­u­ment the cur­rent best knowl­edge about any top­ic. In health care, the goal is eas­i­ly acces­si­ble state-of-the-sci­ence infor­ma­tion, the equiv­a­lent of ongo­ing medical/scientific review arti­cles that detail what we know and don’t know about life and care process­es.”

For exam­ple, have you ever thought why, if sci­en­tif­ic knowl­edge is con­stant­ly evolv­ing, muse­ums of sci­ence and med­i­cine do not update their con­tent more often? Bio­med­i­cine on Dis­play out­lines visions for The par­tic­i­pa­to­ry muse­um what’s a med­ical muse­um 2.0 like?, includ­ing a superb ques­tions, “How can our exhi­bi­tions be per­pet­u­al beta rather than fin­ished?”

Now, par­tic­i­pat­ing in defin­ing and updat­ing exhi­bi­tions, vs. sim­ply act­ing as pas­sive spec­ta­tors, will trans­late into a neu­ronal impact on muse­um vis­i­tors’ brains, strength­en­ing some cog­ni­tive skills and weak­en­ing oth­ers. We can expect The Atlantic Month­ly to pub­lish an arti­cle in, say, 5 years, ask­ing Is Med­i­cine 2.0 Mak­ing Us Stu­pid? In sup­port of this pre­dic­tion, you may enjoy our Sharp­Brains post on Can Google Kill Neu­rons and Rewire Your Whole Brain?

Tools and more Tools

Med­i­cine 2.0 is pred­i­cat­ed on the emer­gence of tools that enable inter­ac­tion and com­mu­ni­ca­tion in ways that sim­ply were not pos­si­ble a few years ago.

Dig­i­tal Pathol­o­gy Blog asks pre­sent­ing this sce­nario: “For exam­ple, the iPhone shows a graph­ic of a slice of the human brain. It allows the med stu­dent to see 10 push pins on dif­fer­ent parts of the brain, click on each one, and attempt to cor­rect­ly name each fea­ture. If the answer is wrong, the cor­rect answer is dis­played so the med stu­dent can learn from that mis­take. A med­ical school stu­dent using this soft­ware on his iPhone approached one of the doc­tors involved in its devel­op­ment and said “I learned 10 new anatom­i­cal terms today while wait­ing for the bus.

Man­ag­ing and pro­cess­ing infor­ma­tion will become as crit­i­cal as breath­ing air. Effi­cient MD sug­gests ways to store, cat­e­go­rize and retrieve infor­ma­tion from a vari­ety of online and print­ed sources with How Doc­tors Can Use Ever­note, while Tomog­ra­phy Blog lists spe­cif­ic search engines for Diag­nos­tic Imag­ing.

There’s more. Allan’s Library points out tools for Mak­ing Aca­d­e­m­ic Web Sites Bet­ter, and David Roth­man intro­duces us to Seman­ticMED­LINE, a new tool from Cog­ni­tion Tech­nolo­gies.

How do all these tools change the day-to-day prac­tices of clin­i­cians and researchers? Dr. Mouse, a Peru­vian sur­geon, explains (in Span­ish) Como Uso Web 2.0 en Mi Prac­ti­ca Med­ica — how web 2.0 is already enhanc­ing his research and clin­i­cal prac­tice.

Chal­lenges, A Few

Don’t for­get, patients and your future employ­ers will find what you pub­lish about your­self and your life on the web. So use it wise­ly ” Wise words of advice in Web vs real life: Advice for med­ical stu­dents from Berta­lan at Sci­enceRoll.

Clin­i­cal Cas­es and Images pro­vides the con­text, cov­er­ing a recent neg­a­tive study, pub­lished in the Jour­nal of Gen­er­al Inter­nal Med­i­cine, that ques­tioned poten­tial patient pri­va­cy issues and con­flicts of inter­est. See Con­tent of Weblogs Writ­ten by Health Pro­fes­sion­als: More Bad than Good?

Sci­ence in the Open reports from Bio­Bar­Camp — Meet­ing friends old and new and vir­tu­al, how, while “many peo­ple expressed an inter­est in Open Sci­ence Open Data, or some oth­er open stuff,” it was clear that “many peo­ple meant many dif­fer­ent things by this”. Estab­lish­ing com­mon­ly-accept­ed def­i­n­i­tions, stan­dards and poli­cies will be a must.

Also a must will be upgrad­ing to exist­ing tech­nolo­gies. This is a not-so-easy task. Crossover Health explaisn in Dude! The $100M VistA Open Source Oppor­tu­ni­ty: “What the heck — $11B project with­out any of this stuff in place, no clear plan, no direc­tion, no peo­ple to do the work, and con­stant changes.”

Final­ly, in case you won­der whether Twit­ter is mature enough for wide pro­fes­sion­al adop­tion, Laika’s MedLi­bLog thinks per­haps not yet: Twit­ter Trau­mas: Twit­ter’s Janus Face.

Final Details

And that’s all for this edi­tion. Michelle vs the Med Stu­dent will host next one on August 24th. You can sub­mit your arti­cles through the offi­cial form.

In the mean­time, you can par­tic­i­pate in the Med­i­cine 2.0 Micro­car­ni­val Launch!, the lat­est exper­i­ment launched by Berta­lan on Friend­feed.

Enjoy the week!

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

Leave a Reply

Categories: Health & Wellness

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters,  SharpBrains is an independent market research firm tracking how brain science can improve our health and our lives.

Search in our archives

Follow us and Engage via…

RSS Feed

Watch All Recordings Now (40+ Speakers, 12+ Hours)