Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News


New Neurons: Good News, Bad News

Over the last year we have glad­ly seen an avalanche of news on adult neu­ro­ge­n­e­sis (the cre­ation of new neu­rons in adult brains), fol­low­ing recent research reports. Fur­ther, we have seen how the news that phys­i­cal exer­cise can enhance neu­ro­ge­n­e­sis is becom­ing com­mon knowl­edge among many health sys­tems we work with.

Now, the obvi­ous ques­tion that does­n’t always get asked is, “What good are new neu­rons if they don’t sur­vive?”. And that’s where learn­ing, enrich­ment, men­tal exer­cise, are crit­i­cal.

We are glad to intro­duce a new Expert Con­trib­u­tor, Dr. Bill Klemm, a pro­fes­sor of Neu­ro­science at Texas A&M Uni­ver­si­ty, who sum­ma­rizes much research on how new neu­rons are born-and what they need to live long hap­py lives.

- Alvaro

New Neu­rons: Good News, Bad News

– By Dr. Bill Klemm

In the last few years, researchers have dis­cov­ered that new nerve cells (neu­rons) are born, pre­sum­ably from resid­ual stem cells that exist even in adults. That should be good news for all of us as we get old­er and fear men­tal decline. The bad news is that these new neu­rons die, unless our minds are active enough.

Ever since the neu­ron doc­trine was firm­ly estab­lished by the inde­pen­dent his­to­log­i­cal stud­ies of Gol­gi and Ramon y Cajal, the pre­vail­ing dog­ma was that the after birth, no new neu­rons appear. We now know that pre­vail­ing dog­ma was wrong. In 1965, Joseph Alt­man and Goapl Das doc­u­ment­ed neu­ro­ge­n­e­sis in adult rat hip­pocam­pus. Then, in 1977, Michael Kaplan and James Hinds used radioac­tive thymi­dine incor­po­ra­tion to show that neu­ro­ge­n­e­sis occurred in the olfac­to­ry bulb and hip­pocam­pal den­tate gyrus of the rat. In these areas, new neu­rons seem to appear through­out life.

Anoth­er appar­ent excep­tion is in a group of neu­rons asso­ci­at­ed with singing in song­birds. In 1983, Fer­nan­do Not­te­bohm doc­u­ment­ed neu­ro­ge­n­e­sis in the cor­tex of adult canaries. Here, birth and death of neu­rons seems to change with sea­sons of the weath­er. In Spring, when birds are court­ing with songs and mat­ing, the neu­rons in this nucle­us pro­lif­er­ate notice­ably, only to regress after the mat­ing sea­son.

In 1977, Eliz­a­beth Gould showed that new neu­rons appeared in adult tree shrews and that stress decreased the num­ber of neu­rons in the hip­pocam­pal den­tate gyrus. Ten in 1998, Rusty Gage used the divid­ing cell mark­er, bro­mod­eoxyuri­dine, to show that new neu­rons occur in adult humans.

There have been claims of adult neu­ro­ge­n­e­sis in sev­er­al regions of neo­cor­tex, but these fnd­ings are in dis­pute because of method­olog­i­cal issues. Orig­i­nal demon­stra­tions of adult neu­ro­ge­n­e­sis were based on the rea­son­able approach of inject­ing radi­o­la­beled cell-divi­sion mark­ers and then check­ing for incor­po­ra­tion in the nucle­us of cells, indica­tive of new­ly formed DNA. Advanced tech­nol­o­gy using car­bon-14 dat­ing shows that in the human cor­tex, new neu­rons do not seem to appear in the adult, though it is clear that they appear in the hip­pocam­pus.

Neu­ro­ge­n­e­sis in adults may be manip­u­la­ble, but research in this area is just begin­ning. Recent­ly, one study demon­strat­ed that new neu­rons could be trig­gered by direct injec­tion of a chem­i­cal that stim­u­lates neu­ro­ge­n­e­sis into the feed­ing cen­ter area of the hypo­thal­a­mus of rodents. Sur­vival of these new neu­rons in the adult depends on their abil­i­ty to make func­tion­al con­tacts with exist­ing neu­rons. Typ­i­cal­ly, about half of new neu­rons failed to inte­grate into exist­ing net­works, and they died.

In anoth­er study, expos­ing mice to enriched envi­ron­ments (run­ning wheels, col­ored tun­nels, and play­mates) increased the sur­vival per­cent­age of new neu­rons up to about 80%. “Use it or lose it” seems to be the mot­to for new neu­rons.

Exer­cise has been found impor­tant for human brain. Researchers have stud­ied MRI images of exer­cis­ing humans and found that the blood vol­ume increased in the hip­pocam­pus in those sub­jects that under­went a three-month aer­o­bic exer­cise pro­gram. Those sub­jects also per­formed bet­ter than con­trols on mem­o­ry tasks. Such results indi­cat­ed that new blood ves­sels had grown into the brain area. The infer­ence is that this new blood sup­ply was need­ed to sup­port new neu­rons, and although there are oth­er expla­na­tions, this is a rea­son­able spec­u­la­tion.

The Hip­pocam­pus and Mem­o­ry.

The brain area known as the hip­pocam­pus is the one area where every­one agrees new neu­rons are born in the adult. The hip­pocam­pus is cru­cial for the for the con­ver­sion of cer­tain short-term, scratch pad, mem­o­ries into per­ma­nent form. Ani­mal exper­i­ments have shown that the pro­duc­tion of new neu­rons in the hip­pocam­pus is stim­u­lat­ed by enriched envi­ron­ments and by learn­ing expe­ri­ences. But do these new cells func­tion nor­mal­ly? Do they sup­port learn­ing? And do these new neu­rons sur­vive? Some ani­mal obser­va­tions indi­cate that new neu­rons in the hip­pocam­pus only live about one month.

An answer has come from some recent ani­mal exper­i­ments that exam­ined the role of new neu­rons in adults in learn­ing of a water maze and the effect of the maze learn­ing on sur­vival of these new cells. The water maze involved train­ing rats to find a sub­merged safe plat­form in a tub of water made opaque so that the plat­form could not be seen. Train­ing was per­formed under one of two con­di­tions: 1) loca­tion of the plat­form was cued by an over­head black and white striped rod, or 2) loca­tion was indi­cat­ed by the spa­tial rela­tion­ship of the plat­form to objects out­side the tub, such as objects on the room walls, that could be seen by the rat.

The exist­ing pop­u­la­tion of den­tate cells was killed by low-lev­el irra­di­a­tion. Rats so treat­ed could not form long-term mem­o­ries for the safe loca­tion in the spa­tial­ly cued task. How­ev­er, if they were trained after new neu­rons were born, then they learned the task. This effect was spe­cif­ic to spa­tial cues, because new cells were not need­ed to learn the task when the plat­form was indi­cat­ed by the ver­ti­cal rod point­er. By irra­di­at­ing cer­tain groups of rats at dif­fer­ent times before and after train­ing, the researchers found that new neu­rons 4–28 days old at the time of train­ing were impor­tant for the spa­tial learn­ing. Thus, these new neu­rons were func­tion­al. They knew what to do and how to do it.

So, it would seem that new neu­rons not only can be born in adult hip­pocam­pus, but that they per­form the learn­ing job that was done by their pre­de­ces­sors, at least as regard­ing learn­ing that involves spa­tial rela­tion­ships. A learn­ing-rich envi­ron­ment helps these new neu­rons live longer.

New Neu­rons. Use Them or Lose Them.

In rodents, the num­ber of new neu­rons in the hip­pocam­pus is on the order of thou­sands per day. These new neu­rons may not sur­vive and become use­ful in mem­o­ry for­ma­tion if they are not need­ed. Need seems to be estab­lished by ongo­ing require­ments to form more mem­o­ries. Learn­ing not only stim­u­lates new neu­rons to pro­lif­er­ate the mem­brane “sprouts” that make con­nec­tions with oth­er neu­rons but also increas­es the sur­vival of neu­rons born up to a week before the learn­ing. In oth­er words, use them or lose them..

A recent study of aged rodent learn­ing of spa­tial rela­tion­ships in a water maze has revealed that in “smart” rats that were good at learn­ing a water maze, maze learn­ing increased the sur­vival of new cells born before the learn­ing. An ear­li­er study had shown that in young rats, increased sur­vival of new neu­rons occurred in all rats, irre­spec­tive of their pre­vi­ous mem­o­ry abil­i­ties.

Time Is Crit­i­cal

A crit­i­cal win­dow of time deter­mines whether or not the new neu­rons sur­vive. In an exper­i­men­tal test of this time win­dow, mice were housed for one week in an envi­ron­men­tal­ly rich envi­ron­ment (toys, activ­i­ty wheels, etc.), or for con­trols in reg­u­lar cages, begin­ning one week after injec­tion with a new-neu­ron DNA-syn­the­sis mark­er. Results showed that last­ing increase was restrict­ed to new neu­rons that appeared between one and three weeks before liv­ing in an enriched envi­ron­ment. This cor­re­sponds to the time when new neu­rons are extend­ing their neu­rons in search of tar­gets and their den­drites are devel­op­ing synap­tic con­tacts to the neu­ro­trans­mit­ters nor­mal­ly used in the hip­pocam­pus. The new neu­rons that devel­oped dur­ing this time win­dow sur­vived up to the four months of mon­i­tor­ing, even when removed the enriched envi­ron­ment. It would seem that the learn­ing expe­ri­ences encoun­tered in a rich envi­ron­ment pro­vide the stim­u­lus need­ed to help new neu­rons get estab­lished into mem­o­ry-form­ing cir­cuits, but there is a lim­it­ed crit­i­cal time when this effect occurs.

Bill Klemm— W. R. (Bill) Klemm, D.V.M., Ph.D. Sci­en­tist, pro­fes­sor, author, speak­er As a pro­fes­sor of Neu­ro­science at Texas A&M Uni­ver­si­ty, Bill has taught about the brain and behav­ior at all lev­els, from fresh­men, to seniors, to grad­u­ate stu­dents to post-docs. His recent books include Thank You Brain For All You Remem­ber and Core Ideas in Neu­ro­science.


- Dra­peau, E. et al. 2007. Learn­ing-induced sur­vival of new neu­rons depends on the cog­ni­tive sta­tus of aged rats. J. Neu­ro­science. 27 (22): 6037–6044.

- Fin­ger, S. et al. 1988. Brain Injury and Recov­ery. Plenum Press, N.Y.,N.Y.

- Good­man, C. S., and Spitzer, N. C. 1979. Embry­on­ic devel­op­men­to f iden­ti­fied neu­rons: difer­en­ti­a­tion from neu­rob­last to neu­ron. Nature. 280: 208–213.

- Gorio, Alfre­do, Ed. 1993. Neu­rore­gen­er­a­tion. Raven Press, N.Y., N.Y.

- Koko­e­va„ M. V., Yin, H., and Fli­er, J. S. 2005. Neu­ro­ge­n­e­sis in the hypo­thal­a­mus of adult mice: poten­tial role in ener­gy bal­ance. Sci­ence. 310: 679–683.

- Mack­lis, J. D., and Kem­per­mann, G. 2006. Adult neu­ro­ge­n­e­sis and neur­al pre­cur­sors, prog­en­i­tors, and stem cells in the adult CNS, p. 303–325. In Text­book of Neur­al Repair and Reha­bil­i­ta­tion, edit­ed by M. Selz­er et al. Cam­bridge Univ. Press, Cam­bridge, U.K.

- Pereira, A. C. et al. 2007. An in vivo cor­re­late of exer­cise-induced neu­ro­ge­n­e­sis in the adult den­tate gyrus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 104(13): 5638–5643.

- Sny­der, J. S. et al. 2005. A role for adult neu­ro­ge­n­e­sis in spa­tial long-term mem­o­ry. Neu­ro­science. 130: 843–852.

- Tashiro, A., Maki­no, H., and Gage, F. H. 2007. Expe­ri­ence-spe­cif­ic func­tion­al mod­i­fi­ca­tion of the den­tate gyrus through adult neu­ro­ge­n­e­sis: A crit­i­cal peri­od dur­ing an imma­ture stage. J. Neu­rosci. 27: 3252–3259.

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

Leave a Reply

Categories: Cognitive Neuroscience, Health & Wellness

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters,  SharpBrains is an independent market research firm tracking how brain science can improve our health and our lives.

Search in our archives

Follow us and Engage via…

RSS Feed

Watch All Recordings Now (40+ Speakers, 12+ Hours)