Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News


Peace Among Primates (Part 2)

(Edi­tor’s Note: A few days ago we pub­lished the first install­ment of this Peace Among Pri­mates series, by neu­ro­sci­en­tist Robert Sapol­sky. Today we pub­lish the sec­ond install­ment. Next Sat­ur­day, April 19th, you can come back and read the third and final part in the series.)

Peace Among Pri­mates (Part 2)

Any­one who says peace is not part of human nature knows too lit­tle about pri­mates, includ­ing our­selves.

–By Robert M. Sapol­sky

Left behind

In the ear­ly 1980s, “For­est Troop,” a group of savan­na baboons I had been studying—virtually liv­ing with—for years, was going about its busi­ness in a nation­al park in Kenya when a neigh­bor­ing baboon group had a stroke of luck: Its ter­ri­to­ry encom­passed a tourist lodge that expand­ed its oper­a­tions and, con­se­quent­ly, so did the amount of food tossed into its garbage dump. Baboons are omniv­o­rous, and this “Garbage Dump Troop” was delight­ed to feast on left­over drum­sticks, half-eat­en ham­burg­ers, rem­nants of choco­late cake, and any­thing else that wound up there. Soon they had shift­ed to sleep­ing in the trees imme­di­ate­ly above the pit, descend­ing each morn­ing just in time for the day’s dump­ing of garbage. (They soon got quite obese from the rich diet and lack of exer­cise, but that is anoth­er sto­ry.) The devel­op­ment pro­duced near­ly as dra­mat­ic a shift in the social behav­ior of For­est Troop. Each morn­ing, approx­i­mate­ly half of its adult males would infil­trate Garbage Dump Troop’s ter­ri­to­ry, descend­ing on the pit in time for the day’s dump­ing and bat­tling the res­i­dent males for access to the garbage. The par­tic­u­lar For­est Troop males who did this shared two traits: They were espe­cial­ly com­bat­ive (which was nec­es­sary to get the food away from the oth­er baboons), and they were not very inter­est­ed in social­iz­ing (the raids took place ear­ly in the morn­ing, dur­ing the hours when the bulk of a savan­na baboon’s dai­ly com­mu­nal groom­ing occurs).

Soon after­ward, tuber­cu­lo­sis, a dis­ease that moves with dev­as­tat­ing speed and sever­i­ty in non­hu­man pri­mates, broke out in Garbage Dump Troop. Over the next year, most of its mem­bers died, as did all of the males from For­est Troop who had for­aged at the dump. (Con­sid­er­able sleuthing ulti­mate­ly revealed that the dis­ease had come from taint­ed meat in the garbage dump. There was lit­tle ani­mal-to-ani­mal trans­mis­sion of the tuber­cu­lo­sis, and so the dis­ease did not spread in For­est Troop beyond the garbage eaters.) The results were that For­est Troop was left with males who were less aggres­sive and more social than aver­age, and the troop now had dou­ble its pre­vi­ous female-to-male ratio.

The social con­se­quences of these changes were dra­mat­ic. There remained a hier­ar­chy among the For­est Troop males, but it was far loos­er than before. Com­pared with oth­er, more typ­i­cal savan­na baboon groups, high-rank­ing males rarely harassed sub­or­di­nates and occa­sion­al­ly even relin­quished con­test­ed resources to them. Aggres­sion was less fre­quent, par­tic­u­lar­ly against third par­ties. And rates of affil­ia­tive behav­iors, such as males and females groom­ing each oth­er or sit­ting togeth­er, soared. There were even instances, now and then, of adult males groom­ing each other—a behav­ior near­ly as unprece­dent­ed as baboons sprout­ing wings.

This unique social milieu did not arise mere­ly as a func­tion of the skewed sex ratio (with half the males hav­ing died); oth­er pri­ma­tol­o­gists have occa­sion­al­ly report­ed on troops with sim­i­lar ratios but with­out a com­pa­ra­ble social atmos­phere. What was key was not just the pre­dom­i­nance of females but the type of male who remained. The demo­graph­ic disaster—what evo­lu­tion­ary biol­o­gists term a “selec­tive bottleneck”—had pro­duced a savan­na baboon troop quite dif­fer­ent from what most experts would have antic­i­pat­ed.

But the largest sur­prise did not come until some years lat­er. Female savan­na baboons spend their lives in the troop into which they are born, where­as males leave their birth troop around puber­ty; a troop’s adult males have thus all grown up else­where and immi­grat­ed as ado­les­cents. By the ear­ly 1990s, none of the orig­i­nal low aggression/high affil­i­a­tion males of For­est Troop’s tuber­cu­lo­sis peri­od was still alive; all of the group’s adult males had joined after the epi­dem­ic. Despite this, the troop’s unique social milieu persisted—as it does to this day, some 20 years after the selec­tive bot­tle­neck. In oth­er words, ado­les­cent males that enter For­est Troop after hav­ing grown up else­where wind up adopt­ing the unique behav­ioral style of the res­i­dent males. As defined by both anthro­pol­o­gists and ani­mal behav­ior­ists, “cul­ture” con­sists of local behav­ioral vari­a­tions, occur­ring for non­genet­ic and none­co­log­i­cal rea­sons, that last beyond the time of their orig­i­na­tors. For­est Troop’s low aggression/high affil­i­a­tion soci­ety con­sti­tutes noth­ing less than a multi­gen­er­a­tional benign cul­ture.

Con­tin­u­ous study of the troop has yield­ed some insights into how its cul­ture is trans­mit­ted to new­com­ers. Genet­ics obvi­ous­ly plays no role, nor appar­ent­ly does self-selec­tion: Ado­les­cent males that trans­fer into the troop are no dif­fer­ent from those that trans­fer into oth­er troops, dis­play­ing on arrival sim­i­lar­ly high rates of aggres­sion and low rates of affil­i­a­tion. Nor is there evi­dence that new males are taught to act in benign ways by the res­i­dents. One can­not rule out the pos­si­bil­i­ty that some obser­va­tion­al learn­ing is occur­ring, but it is dif­fi­cult to detect, giv­en that the dis­tinc­tive fea­ture of this cul­ture is not the per­for­mance of a unique behav­ior but the per­for­mance of typ­i­cal behav­iors at atyp­i­cal­ly extreme rates.

To date, the most inter­est­ing hint about the mech­a­nism of trans­mis­sion is the way recent­ly trans­ferred males are treat­ed by For­est Troop’s res­i­dent females. In a typ­i­cal savan­na baboon troop, new­ly trans­ferred ado­les­cent males spend years slow­ly work­ing their way into the social fab­ric; they are extreme­ly low ranking—ignored by females and not­ed by adult males only as con­ve­nient tar­gets for aggres­sion. In For­est Troop, by con­trast, new male trans­fers are inun­dat­ed with female atten­tion soon after their arrival. Res­i­dent females first present them­selves sex­u­al­ly to new males an aver­age of 18 days after the males arrive, and they first groom the new males an aver­age of 20 days after they arrive, where­as nor­mal savan­na baboons intro­duce such behav­iors after 63 and 78 days, respec­tive­ly. Fur­ther­more, these wel­com­ing ges­tures occur more fre­quent­ly in For­est Troop dur­ing the ear­ly post-trans­fer peri­od, and there is four times as much groom­ing of males by females in For­est Troop as else­where. From almost the moment they arrive, in oth­er words, new males find out that in For­est Troop, things are done dif­fer­ent­ly.

At present, I think the most plau­si­ble expla­na­tion is that this troop’s spe­cial cul­ture is not passed on active­ly but sim­ply emerges, facil­i­tat­ed by the actions of the res­i­dent mem­bers. Liv­ing in a group with half the typ­i­cal num­ber of males, and with the males being nice guys to boot, For­est Troop’s females become more relaxed and less wary. (This is so, in part, because in a typ­i­cal baboon troop, a male who los­es a dom­i­nance inter­ac­tion with anoth­er male will often attack a female in frus­tra­tion.) As a result, they are more will­ing to take a chance and reach out social­ly to new arrivals, even if the new guys are typ­i­cal jerky ado­les­cents at first. The new males, in turn, find­ing them­selves treat­ed so well, even­tu­al­ly relax and adopt the behav­iors of the troop’s dis­tinc­tive social milieu.


(To be con­tin­ued, in a third and final install­ment, on Sat­ur­day April 19th).

Robert SapolskyRobert M. Sapol­sky, Ph.D., is the John A. and Cyn­thia Fry Gunn Pro­fes­sor of Bio­log­i­cal Sci­ences and a pro­fes­sor of neu­rol­o­gy and neu­ro­log­i­cal sci­ences at Stan­ford Uni­ver­si­ty. He wrote the clas­sic Why Zebras Don’t Get Ulcers: An Updat­ed Guide to Stress, Stress Relat­ed Dis­eases and Cop­ing. His most recent book is Mon­key­luv: And Oth­er Essays on Our Lives as Ani­mals. A longer ver­sion of this essay appeared in For­eign Affairs. We bring you this post thanks to our col­lab­o­ra­tion with Greater Good Mag­a­zine, a UC-Berke­ley-based quar­ter­ly mag­a­zine that high­lights ground break­ing sci­en­tif­ic research into the roots of com­pas­sion and altru­ism.

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

9 Responses

  1. Michelle B says:

    Fas­ci­nat­ing post.

    How much can these obser­va­tions of pri­mate cul­ture be extrap­o­lat­ed to human?

  2. Michelle B says:

    Let me rephrase that ques­tion: How can one apply these obser­va­tions regard­ing baboon soci­ety to human? What exam­ple in human soci­ety can be used to show a sim­i­lar social mech­a­nism? Per­haps, the intro­duc­tion of women work­ers into once male-dom­i­nat­ed occu­pa­tions?

    (No won­der Charleston Hes­ton bemoaned the fate of the white tra­di­tion­al male role, geesh, it does­n’t stand a chance!)

  3. Robert says:

    I am great­ly sad­dened to recent­ly hear that “For­est Troop” was slaugh­tered by poach­ers and with the ille­gal help of a Park Ranger. I can only imag­ine the impact this might have on Dr. Sapol­sky. I am tru­ly sad­dened.

  4. Alvaro says:

    Robert, yes, I am sure that was a hard moment. Many lessons to be learned.

    Michelle: great ques­tion. There are many rel­e­vant impli­ca­tions. Let me pro­pose a few:
    1) The role of our envi­ron­ment in influ­enc­ing our behav­iors, vs. the usu­al­ly accept­ed more genet­ic-based “deter­min­ism”
    2) The impor­tance of ensur­ing vir­tu­ous, pos­i­tive feed­back loops.
    3) And, yes, this exam­ple sug­gests that expand­ing the role of females in a soci­ety may cre­ate a more har­mo­nious atmosphere…perhaps call­ing for more females in top busi­ness and polit­i­cal ranks?
    4) In terms of the ” intro­duc­tion of women work­ers into once male-dom­i­nat­ed occu­pa­tions”, it would be fas­ci­nat­ing to com­pare the cul­ture of three types of occu­pa­tions: a) most­ly male, b) bal­anced male/ female, c) most­ly female. What would you say?
    5) Final­ly, a pure­ly per­son­al spec­u­la­tion along the lines that genet­ics is not fate…: who is exhibit­ing more of those “female” traits in this US polit­i­cal cam­paign?

  5. Al Fin says:

    A more straight­for­ward com­par­i­son might sug­gest that human females should be more sex­u­al­ly recep­tive to the human males around them.

    This is the oppo­site of the trend insti­gat­ed by rad­i­cal feminism–which may explain the increase in aggres­sion in some mod­ern soci­eties. For exam­ple, the free­way sys­tems of Cal­i­for­nia.

    More avail­able sex might go a long way toward mit­i­gat­ing human vio­lence.

  6. Michelle B says:

    @Al Fin, Fem­i­nism encour­ages sex edu­ca­tion, birth con­trol, and choice, not reduc­tion of sex­u­al recep­tiv­i­ty. If a woman feels empow­ered and safe, she is more recep­tive to life, includ­ing hav­ing sex.

    Patri­archy prob­a­bly has more to do with why women may be so uptight about sex, as they are pun­ished both phys­i­cal­ly and emo­tion­al­ly if they act ‘slut­like.’

  7. Michelle B says:

    Alvaro, nice col­lec­tion of points. Are you say­ing that Oba­ma could teach a few things to Clin­ton about being a woman? (tee­hee)

    Regard­ing your point 4, if that research has not already been done, it needs to be.

  8. Alvaro says:

    Michelle: probably…and it seems Clin­ton could teach Oba­ma some hunt­ing tricks…

  9. Ben Hemmens says:

    I sus­pect the baboons got peace­ful because of Sapol­sky hang­ing around, spread­ing those laid back vibes 😉

Leave a Reply

Categories: Author Speaks Series

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters,  SharpBrains is an independent market research firm tracking how brain science can improve our health and our lives.

Search in our archives

Follow us and Engage via…

RSS Feed

Watch All Recordings Now (40+ Speakers, 12+ Hours)