The brain virtues of physical exercise

Dr. Adri­an Pre­da, our newest Expert Con­trib­u­tor, writes today the first in a series of thought-pro­vok­ing arti­cles,physical exercise for the brain chal­leng­ing us to think about phys­i­cal exer­cise as the best and most unap­pre­ci­at­ed form of “brain exer­cise”. A superb article.

And one thing is clear, he points out: “the brain real­ly likes it when it’s asked to be “active”. Pas­sive audi­ences, which are spoon fed infor­ma­tion, score less well when test­ed on reten­tion and under­stand­ing of the pre­sent­ed mate­r­i­al than audi­ences that were kept engaged through the process.”

So, will you write a com­ment below and con­tribute to an engag­ing con­ver­sa­tion? Thoughts? reac­tions? questions?
————————-

Don’t ignore plain old com­mon sense.

Brain Lessons Part 1

– By Adri­an Pre­da, M.D.

Let me start with a list of com­mon bias­es: expen­sive is bet­ter than cheap, free is of dubi­ous val­ue (why would then be free?), rare is like­ly to be valu­able, and while new is bet­ter than old, ancient is always best. Which explains a com­mon sce­nario that is reen­act­ed about twice a week in my office. It starts like this: a patient shows me a fan­cy look­ing bot­tle of the brain sup­ple­ment of the week: ancient roots with obscure names mixed togeth­er in anoth­er nov­el com­bi­na­tion which you can exclu­sive­ly find in that one and only store (rar­i­ty oblige!). And not to for­get: it ain’t cheap either! Of course, there it is, the per­fect the recipe for suc­cess: ancient yet new, rare and expen­sive. It got to be good! But is it, really?

The prob­lem with rec­om­mend­ing phys­i­cal exer­cise when it comes to brain fit­ness is that is doesn’t have any of the glam­our traits I have just men­tioned: it’s been around for a long time – so there is noth­ing new and excit­ing about it, there is no fan­cy name or exclu­sive label mar­ket­ing it and, worst of all, it is as cheap as cheap can be: not only free but also avail­able in unlim­it­ed supplies.

So when I tell my patients that the sin­gle most impor­tant thing they need to pay atten­tion to when it comes to keep­ing their brain in shape is exer­cise I invari­ably get a “really, and you need­ed to get an MD to tell me this?” look. Nowa­days every­body seems to know that phys­i­cal exer­cise is good for the brain. Big news they say. And they need­ed to study that? Duh?

For most it’s no big sur­prise to find out the peo­ple who have a phys­i­cal­ly active life style have a decreased risk of Alzheimer’s demen­tia or the num­ber of blocks one walks every­day appears to inverse­ly cor­re­late with the rate of cog­ni­tive decline lat­er in life. It sort of makes sense to assume that has to be the case. Here are a few well estab­lished facts.

First of all, reg­u­lar phys­i­cal exer­cise cor­re­lates with improved health – mean­ing less risk for high blood pres­sure, meta­bol­ic prob­lems (cho­les­terol, lipids and glu­cose dys­reg­u­la­tion) and weight gain, which is all good for the brain. A healthy brain needs a healthy envi­ron­ment, doesn’t it? Or to put it in a slight­ly dif­fer­ent way: an unhealthy envi­ron­ment would not be good for the brain, wouldn’t it? I think we would all agree on that one.

Now, would a healthy envi­ron­ment not only pro­tect but also improve the brain struc­ture and per­for­mance? Would it also pro­mote the growth (if pos­si­ble) of the brain? The answers to such ques­tions are less obvi­ous. For exam­ple we know that not all healthy peo­ple end up with “good brains”. Well, why is that? Specif­i­cal­ly, when it comes to phys­i­cal exer­cise then are there such things as a min­i­mal dose of exer­cise that can result in pos­i­tive brain effects? And is there a max­i­mal or “toxic” dose of phys­i­cal exer­cise which may in fact hurt the brain? Is all phys­i­cal exer­cise equal­ly good for the brain or do dif­fer­ent phys­i­cal exer­cise rou­tines dif­fer in terms of their brain effects? I put those ques­tions on the table and the chance is that I got the “duh” people’s attention.

First, let me say that to sci­en­tists the phys­i­cal exer­cise ques­tion is no dif­fer­ent that any oth­er sci­en­tif­ic ques­tion. Sci­en­tists tend to be a skep­ti­cal bunch and as such they like to always point out that cor­re­la­tion does not nec­es­sar­i­ly imply cau­sa­tion. Take the old active peo­ple who didn’t get Alzheimer’s exam­ple. One pos­si­bil­i­ty is that their con­sis­tent exer­cis­ing keeps them from get­ting Alzheimer’s. But what is it that got them to exer­cise more in the first place? Could it be that their brains were equipped with the sort of gear that gets one excit­ed about push­ing them­selves a bit, which would then result in these fel­lows being more prone towards doing phys­i­cal things to start with? Then they will be more active phys­i­cal­ly but that is because their brains were wired dif­fer­ent­ly from the gecko and that, in itself, might have decreased the risk of Alzheimer’s demen­tia. In a sit­u­a­tion like this phys­i­cal exer­cise is what sci­en­tists call a con­founder – i.e. a con­comi­tant but not nec­es­sar­i­ly casu­al event that can false­ly be seen as a cause result­ing in the final effect.

How can one fig­ure this one out? Over the next few columns we will look togeth­er at ways of answer­ing appar­ent­ly not so straight­for­ward ques­tions about phys­i­cal exer­cise and the brain.

Now, to begin I will like to make this col­umn, to what­ev­er extent pos­si­ble, an inter­ac­tive forum. And that is as it turns out that the brain real­ly likes it when it’s asked to be “active”. Pas­sive audi­ences, which are spoon fed infor­ma­tion, score less well when test­ed on reten­tion and under­stand­ing of the pre­sent­ed mate­r­i­al than audi­ences that were kept engaged through the process. So, in the spir­it of “engagement” I will start by ask­ing a few ques­tions about what is impor­tant when it comes to the effects of phys­i­cal exer­cise on the brain. Depend­ing on what your answers will be we will then take it to the next lev­el, i.e. crit­i­cal­ly exam­ine the research evi­dence about spe­cif­ic brain effects of dif­fer­ent types of phys­i­cal exercise.

So, con­sid­er which of the fol­low­ing pos­si­bil­i­ties will get you con­vinced that phys­i­cal exer­cise is good for the brain. Would you be con­vinced if exer­cise has been shown to:

1. Increase longevi­ty (as a bet­ter brain should make us live longer, shouldn’t it?)
2. Decrease the risk of Alzheimer and oth­er types of dementia
3. Decrease the risk of “normal” age relat­ed mem­o­ry loss or cog­ni­tive decline
4. Increase one’s abil­i­ty to prob­lem solve
5. Decrease one’s risk for depres­sion or anxiety.
6. Improve one’s mem­o­ry, con­cen­tra­tion and attention.
7. Improve one’s abil­i­ty to feel con­sis­tent­ly happy.
8. Increase the num­ber of nerve cells or nerve cells con­nec­tions in the brain?
9. Cor­re­late with high­er education
10. Cor­re­late with high­er social eco­nom­ic status?
11. Chem­i­cals released dur­ing exer­cise were shown to pro­mote nerve cell growth?
12. Exer­cise would “correct” chem­i­cal abnor­mal­i­ties report­ed in men­tal or brain illness?

I am look­ing for­ward to your answers. Please do not hes­i­tate to come up with oth­er ques­tions or hypothe­ses. We’ll make this into an exer­cise about how to think about phys­i­cal exer­cise. Anoth­er form of exer­cise that might be good for the brain.

Adri­an Pre­da, M.D. is an Assis­tant Pro­fes­sor of Psy­chi­a­try and Human Behav­ior in the UC Irvine School of Med­i­cine’s Depart­ment of Psy­chi­a­try and Human Behav­ior. His exper­tise in human behav­ior, psy­chol­o­gy and spir­i­tu­al­i­ty is based on years of expe­ri­ence work­ing as a psy­chi­a­trist, psy­chother­a­pist, teacher and researcher in a vari­ety of aca­d­e­m­ic clin­i­cal and non-clin­i­cal set­tings. He also teach­es the UC Irvine Exten­sion class The Mind that Changes the Brain: Well­ness in the Sec­ond Millennium.

32 Comments

  1. Richard on March 10, 2008 at 11:33

    This is inter­est­ing stuff, ‘a healthy mind in a healthy body’, and maybe the healthy mind comes from the healthy body. Per­haps they are both just aspects of a healthy lifestyle. As far as a vote, I would like a pos­i­tive ver­sion of num­ber 5, ‘increas­es pos­i­tive states and hap­pi­ness’. Thanks for an infor­ma­tive and thought pro­vok­ing article

    Richard



  2. Ivan on March 11, 2008 at 7:29

    I’m a big believ­er in using exer­cise as one more tool in our arse­nal to increase life bal­ance and cre­ativ­i­ty. In fact, I believe you’d be inter­est­ed in tak­ing a look at the post where I wrote about this top­ic: How Exer­cise Makes You More Creative



  3. Michelle B on March 11, 2008 at 9:51

    8 and 11, but then it would be imper­a­tive to demon­strate that such phys­i­cal brain changes result in ben­e­fi­cial behav­ior, like think­ing with more clar­i­ty, increased mem­o­ry, etc. So I see a pos­si­ble cor­re­lat­ed cir­cu­lar­i­ty con­nect­ing most of the items on the lost.



  4. FKS on March 11, 2008 at 12:18

    Fas­ci­nat­ing! All 12 points sound like attrac­tive research ideas and all may very well be true. If I have to choose, I must say 2, 5 and 6. I recall hav­ing read some­thing about the impor­tance of keep­ing the brain active to pre­vent Alzheimer and oth­er types of demen­tia, so num­ber 2 was an instant “of course”. And the oth­er two sound very con­vinc­ing. Hope to see more on this topic!



  5. Alvaro on March 11, 2008 at 2:24

    Hel­lo Adrian,

    I share with you the search for sim­ple solu­tions to prob­lems. Yet, humans are tool-mak­ers and tool-users, so learn­ing to use new tools as they appear may be, in prin­ci­ple, ben­e­fi­cial too. And some tools are prov­ing val­ue in spe­cif­ic con­texts for spe­cif­ic needs, either stress man­age­ment (low-priced biofeed­back-based devices) or men­tal stim­u­la­tion (the emerg­ing field of “brain fit­ness programs”).

    I find all those points very inter­est­ing, but I’d prob­a­bly choose 4,6,7 if I only could choose 3. What would con­vince me to do more phys­i­cal exer­cise (which I already do through jog­ging, play­ing ten­nis and ski­ing), would be its rel­a­tive val­ue com­pared with stress man­age­ment prac­tices and men­tal stim­u­la­tion ones.



  6. Adrian Preda on March 12, 2008 at 9:36

    Hel­lo Alvaro,

    Here is the way to think about it. If you don’t exer­cise, you’d bet­ter change that pron­to. If you are already exer­cis­ing the ques­tions are: is more bet­ter? That might be the case if you are not exer­cis­ing “enough” i.e. you are still bel­low the “most effec­tive dose”. But if you are at the most effec­tive dose already more exer­cise (fur­ther increas­ing the dose) is unlike­ly to result in fur­ther ben­e­fit — as you reached the plateau of the effect. What is the most effec­tive dose of phys­i­cal exer­cise? Well, that is the question…



  7. S on March 12, 2008 at 12:54

    Hi Alvaro,

    very infor­ma­tive and thought-pro­vok­ing col­umn! My opin­ion on this is that exer­cise is def­i­nite­ly good for the brain, and helps improve one’s alert­ness and prob­lem solv­ing skills. Maybe it has to do with chem­i­cals released dur­ing phys­i­cal exer­cise, or even due to the prob­lem-solv­ing skills of the exer­cise itself. I believe in the mind-body rela­tion­ship, which means any phys­i­cal exer­cise involves brain train­ing for it to be prop­er­ly undertaken.



  8. Alvaro on March 12, 2008 at 2:43

    Adri­an, thank you for the clar­i­fi­ca­tion. Then, I am very curi­ous about the mechan­ics behind points 4,6,7. Oth­er read­ers had oth­er ques­tions. And prob­a­bly we will get more com­ments tomor­row, since we are releas­ing our newslet­ter then. Maybe we can sum­ma­rize the ques­tions and com­ments by Fri­day and pre­pare a fol­low-up article?

    Dear “S”: great comment…but the kudos go to Adri­an, the author of the post, not me!



  9. Noel Lyons on March 13, 2008 at 6:34

    I wrote about this last Novem­ber. Please click on my link to see. It’s impor­tant to define exact­ly what we mean by exer­cise and to remem­ber it’s a 2‑way process: The body + brain influ­ence each other.



  10. Mary Kay Wagner on March 13, 2008 at 7:09

    You are miss­ing the rea­son that is most impor­tant to me; exer­cise helps me man­age the stress­es of my life more cre­ative­ly and with more grace and opti­mism. Maybe that is anoth­er way of say Improve one’s abil­i­ty to feel con­sis­tent­ly happy.



  11. Alvaro on March 13, 2008 at 7:47

    Noel: please explain in this thread how you define exer­cise and how you react to Adri­an’s points. That will allow us to main­tain an engag­ing con­ver­sa­tion, which is what we are after. Thank you



  12. Alberto on March 13, 2008 at 1:36

    I have heard these stud­ies that show that exer­cise is very good for the brain.

    How­ev­er, since there are many kinds of exer­cise, I want to know what exer­cise pro­gram was used in the stud­ies. How much and for how long? Car­dio-vas­cu­lar? Iso­ton­ic? Spe­cif­ic sports? Iso­met­rics? Resis­tance? Tai chi? Yoga?



  13. Karen on March 13, 2008 at 7:27

    Hi Adri­an,
    What about Feldenkrais Aware­ness through move­ment? Not just run­ning on a tread­mill or walk­ing on a street, or lift­ing weights, but though provocked move­ment. How many new neu­ro­log­i­cal new con­nec­tions in the brain would that sup­ply. In a child it could be up to 1.8 mil­lion per sec­ond. How many in a 30 year old, a 40 year old, an 80 year old. Do we stop mov­ing because we age or do we age because we stop mov­ing. How would that affect the brain?
    How would that affect the learn­ing in the per­son about them­selves and their world? Lots of ques­tions for research.



  14. Yong Sohn on March 15, 2008 at 4:44

    I believe that human brain hs evolved to meet the con­trol­ling body move­ment for sur­vival, there­fore fine con­trolled body move­ments improve most effec­tive­ly brain cell activity,
    The sports that require high­er con­cen­tra­tion and fine adjust­ment stim­u­late most active­ly and improve brain bet­ter than oth­er exercise,



  15. Noel Lyons on March 17, 2008 at 12:01

    Exer­cise is best con­sid­ered by FITT — fre­quen­cy, inten­si­ty, time and type
    (as per Alber­to’s con­tri­bu­tion). One ques­tion then is there a
    dose-response (phys­i­o­log­i­cal) or is it psy­cho­log­i­cal (peo­ple who exercise
    live more healthy lives in gen­er­al or are more pos­i­tive in their outlook)
    which then con­tributes to some of the 12 out­lined ben­e­fits — or is there com­bined an even more pow­er­ful effect?



  16. Adrian Preda on March 17, 2008 at 12:53

    Yong Song,

    Very inter­est­ing point. Now, it turns out that the parts of the brain in charge of fine move­ment con­trol are the basal gan­glia and cere­bel­lum — parts that are quite old from an evo­lu­tion­ary per­spec­tive. Which explains why there are plen­ty of mam­mals who are more pre­cise and ele­gant when it comes to cer­tain move­ments than humans are. And what about a tiger or a cat con­cen­trat­ing on her pray – do they con­cen­trate less than a human?



  17. Mike Reeves-McMillan on March 17, 2008 at 2:21

    I would say that the only one of those that would­n’t (by itself) con­vince me that exer­cise ben­e­fit­ed the brain is #1. It’s still a com­pelling ben­e­fit, of course, but the link to the brain appears weak as it’s stated. 

    I find all of the twelve at least plau­si­ble, would be inter­est­ed to know if they are all true. I know that sev­er­al of them are.



  18. Matt on March 17, 2008 at 8:13

    Exer­cise is best con­sid­ered by FITT — fre­quen­cy, inten­si­ty, time and type
    (as per Alber­to’s con­tri­bu­tion). One ques­tion then is there a
    dose-response (phys­i­o­log­i­cal) or is it psy­cho­log­i­cal (peo­ple who exercise
    live more healthy lives in gen­er­al or are more pos­i­tive in their outlook)
    which then con­tributes to some of the 12 out­lined ben­e­fits — or is there com­bined an even more pow­er­ful effect?



  19. Shirah on March 19, 2008 at 12:59

    Can it the cause ever tru­ly be iso­lat­ed to exer­cise? What if those who exer­cise are lead longer, dis­ease-free lives because exer­cis­ers tend to have an over-all health­i­er lifestyle? Per­haps it’s because they don’t eat as many “emp­ty calo­ries” or because they eat enough routabaga.



  20. J Bonifas on March 19, 2008 at 3:04

    Thank you for open­ing a con­ver­sa­tion about the pow­er of phys­i­cal engage­ment. The ques­tions most like­ly to con­vince me and my friends who hate to exer­cise because it’s bor­ing are 4, 5 and 7 – the “feel-good” ques­tions. After all, why invest in longevi­ty, mem­o­ry reten­tion and cog­ni­tive sta­bil­i­ty if we are depressed, anx­ious and unhap­py? Two sug­ges­tions: Con­sid­er re-phras­ing #4 as “Increase one’s abil­i­ty to cope with challenge”; Add #13 – “Increase one’s abil­i­ty to deflect stress”. I look for­ward to hear­ing more!



  21. Exercise is for the loathesome on March 22, 2008 at 2:19

    I have always felt there is a neg­a­tive con­no­ta­tion between brain and brawn — that is, those who are strong are not intel­li­gent and those who are not intel­li­gent are phys­i­cal­ly weak.

    Com­pul­so­ry phys­i­cal edu­ca­tion, where you can be taunt­ed and teased and treat­ed hor­ri­bly for being a “brain” has def­i­nite­ly hurt me enor­mous­ly by mak­ing me feel that exer­cise and phys­i­cal edu­ca­tion are for the cru­el and stupid.

    Based on my own per­son­al expe­ri­ences, I would want to ban phys­i­cal edu­ca­tion and for­bid exer­cise entire­ly, as a gen­uine evil.

    Now, in the mid­dle of my life I am sud­den­ly told exer­cise is good for my brain! That’s ridicu­lous! How could it be, when bul­lies are strong and vic­tims weak, with the smarter peo­ple in the class eter­nal victims?

    What would be your rec­om­men­da­tion for some­one who believes to his very soul that phys­i­cal exer­cise is pathet­ic and dumb and cru­el and trau­mat­ic — in fact, gen­uine­ly evil?

    Cer­tain­ly watch­ing peo­ple walk­ing the eter­nal stair­case or lift­ing weights does not make me feel that they are doing some­thing worth­while. Instead, they strug­gle like Sisy­phus, accom­plish­ing noth­ing but look­ing like fools.

    What would you rec­om­mend for some­one like me who loathes exer­cise with every brain cell in his body and every thought and dream in his soul?



  22. stimpy on March 22, 2008 at 6:39

    Dear “Loathes Exercise”–LOLOL! I know you are kidding–your “mid-life” cri­sis belies some­thing of fear of approach­ing years, per­haps requir­ing more depen­dence on oth­ers, that ever loom­ing con­va­les­cent home stay around the cor­ner. I sug­gest this: get a bicy­cle, a bike rack, strap the whole thing to your car, and find a new path to fol­low down a road with some­thing decent to see. Buy an inex­pen­sive dig­i­tal camera–you can prob­a­bly pick up one of those dig­i­tal pho­to frames to direct­ly down­load the pics to–go look for some nature. A more expen­sive cam­era with a bet­ter lens will cap­ture some tiny things that will cause you to be amazed with your “exper­tise” and the del­i­ca­cy of nature. Or it will show you things far in the dis­tance. Don’t want a cam­era? Just bike down a path near the ocean, or a state park, take a trip to the zoo–stroll around that for a few hours. Mid­dle aged, huh? Yeah, try being mid­dle aged, becom­ing ‘dis­abled’ after over 28 years at a pro­fes­sion which defined your very being, hav­ing noth­ing left but con­tem­pla­tion of the inevitable. So–literally take a new pic­ture with life: go back to school, take a class in ANYTHING dif­fer­ent. I did. Now a few years lat­er I am not at com­mu­ni­ty college–I’ve gone on to uni­ver­si­ty into a par­al­lel field from whence I came. I RIDE my bike to school daily–not far, only about 2.5 miles round trip. I find that if I ride very fast, the act of get­ting the heart rate up for even a short bit of time does make me feel more alert, bright. it stands to rea­son that bring­ing more oxy­gen to the brain is going to be help­ful. It does­n’t do much on a con­sis­tent basis for depres­sion, but it DOES help as long as it is tak­ing place to pre­vent depres­sive thoughts and actions. My thought with exer­cise is only that there are things in life that I want to do which I can­not tol­er­ate with­out the exer­cise to keep the mus­cles (heart includ­ed) toned. Things like Scu­ba div­ing when I save enough mon­ey.. things like vis­it­ing Yel­low­stone… things like hik­ing to the top of Yosemite Falls for a spec­tac­u­lar view of the val­ley below. Things like maybe get­ting to ski on more time in my life before I can’t due to oth­er prob­lems. Just ENJOY LIFE…and stop look­ing down. Get a dog, take it for a walk. Get a CAT and take it for a walk (yeah, that works too, though it takes more ingenuity,it’s a lot more excit­ing). What you “feel” regard­ing exer­cise is what you feel, no one else is respon­si­ble for that. Take it or leave it. We are all respon­si­ble for our own res­cue no mat­ter what the ulti­mate sit­u­a­tion. You decide. Good luck.



  23. Alvaro on March 23, 2008 at 2:41

    Stimpy: great comment!

    Pre­vi­ous com­menter: when you write things like “What would be your rec­om­men­da­tion for some­one who believes to his very soul that phys­i­cal exer­cise is pathet­ic and dumb and cru­el and trau­mat­ic — in fact, gen­uine­ly evil?”, you are answer­ing your ques­tion your­self. You seem to have an irra­tional fear of exer­cise, sim­i­lar to peo­ple to have extreme reac­tions to spi­ders or to fly­ing, prob­a­bly based on some intense neg­a­tive expe­ri­ences in your life, so the best next step is to man­age not your exer­cise pat­terns but your THOUGHT patterns. 

    Cog­ni­tive ther­a­py prin­ci­ples can be very help­ful here: any­time you become aware of a neg­a­tive thought in your mind, write it down in a note­book, and then write down a pos­i­tive com­ment next to it to bal­ance your thoughts and appre­ci­ate real­i­ty is its entire­ty: exer­cise is not evil. No object is evil. Exer­cise is a great tool at our dis­pos­al, to use as appro­pri­ate, to man­age. Once you man­age those fears, you will be more open mind­ed and able to give it a try. Per­haps by walk­ing in a beau­ti­ful park. Per­haps fol­low­ing Stimpy’s sug­ges­tions. No one can impose any­thing on you: you can CHOOSE your lifestyle, includ­ing the role of exer­cise in it.

    Good luck!



  24. Exercise is for the loathesome on March 23, 2008 at 4:57

    Stimpy, I actu­al­ly have an expen­sive dig­i­tal SLR and have tried exact­ly the idea you pro­pose, and it does work fair­ly well for me. I’ve tak­en some very good pic­tures thanks to that. 

    Good that you picked up on the fact that I like to think I’m accom­plish­ing some­thing pos­i­tive, like tak­ing pic­tures, instead of tak­ing the road to nowhere that is most exercise.

    But since I also loathe cold weath­er it does not help until the weath­er turns warm and pleas­ant again, which in my neck of the woods isn’t for months.

    My plan to move to an area with warmer weath­er will prob­a­bly do more good for me than any amount of com­plain­ing. Hope­ful­ly this will be the last year I suf­fer with the chill.



  25. Adrian Preda on March 26, 2008 at 1:49

    Does phys­i­cal sta­mi­na cor­re­late with men­tal sta­mi­na? Not nec­es­sar­i­ly. Does phys­i­cal prowess results in men­tal prowess? Not nec­es­sar­i­ly. Are ath­letes smarter than non-ath­letes? Not necessarily. 

    Does a lack of exer­cise cor­re­late with more accel­er­at­ed cog­ni­tive decline? Most times it does. Does exer­cise pre­vent age relat­ed mem­o­ry loss? The bulk of evi­dence sug­gests this is indeed the case.

    Now, we are not talk­ing about becom­ing a pro­fes­sion­al ath­lete or run­ning marathons. But we are talk­ing about a con­sis­tent aer­o­bic exer­cise rou­tine – a good car­dio work–up seems to be an equal­ly good brain work-up.

    Last but not least: you can’t force it on your­self. You need to find a way to enjoy and trea­sure what­ev­er it is that you choose to do. Forc­ing it would can­cel out all poten­tial ben­e­fits. Ani­ma data nice­ly illus­trate this point: a forced exer­cise rat group didn’t show any of the exer­cise ben­e­fits that a vol­un­tary exer­cise rat group showed in terms of improved cog­ni­tive per­for­mance and pro­duc­tion of new nerve cells.



About SharpBrains

SHARPBRAINS is an independent think-tank and consulting firm providing services at the frontier of applied neuroscience, health, leadership and innovation.
SHARPBRAINS es un think-tank y consultoría independiente proporcionando servicios para la neurociencia aplicada, salud, liderazgo e innovación.

Top Articles on Brain Health and Neuroplasticity

Top 10 Brain Teasers and Illusions

Newsletter

Subscribe to our e-newsletter

* indicates required

Got the book?