Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Icon

Maximize the Cognitive Value of Your Mental Workout

Phys­i­cal fit­ness. Cognitive/ brain fit­ness. Both require nov­el­ty, vari­ety and chal­lenge. Pro­fes­sor Schlo­mo Breznitz, a sci­en­tif­ic and busi­ness leader in the cog­ni­tive fit­ness field, explains why, elo­quent­ly, below. Per­haps “we want change” real­ly means “we need change”. Enjoy!

————————

Why are every­day life chal­lenges not suf­fi­cient to keep our brains fit?

– By Prof. Shlo­mo Breznitz

Often, when describ­ing the ben­e­fits of Mind­Fit to brain health, I am asked by peo­ple in the audi­ence whether this soft­ware is real­ly need­ed. After all, so they argue, life pro­vides con­tin­ues cog­ni­tive chal­lenges, which should suf­fice for ensur­ing brain fit­ness. From the moment we wake up until we go to sleep our brains have to attend to com­plex stim­uli, plan many activ­i­ties, some of them quite com­plex, and car­ry us through what­ev­er the day offers. These tasks should pro­vide suf­fi­cient “brain exer­cise” with­out the need to engage in spe­cif­ic men­tal work­out.

This line of argu­ment sounds odd­ly famil­iar, since it is an exact dupli­ca­tion of claims made in the recent past against the need for phys­i­cal exer­cise. One jumps into the car and from the car and per­haps even climbs a few stairs before sit­ting in the chair, which should be enough to burn the calo­ries and keep fit.

It took us a few long years to real­ize that the move­ments called for by ordi­nary every­day life tasks are far from suf­fi­cient to keep us phys­i­cal­ly fit and unless we engage in delib­er­ate work­out we are bound to gain weight and suf­fer the con­se­quences. The bal­ance sheet in this case is quite sim­ple; even a super­fi­cial com­par­i­son to the activ­i­ties of peo­ple with less seden­tary lifestyles indi­cates that we are not mov­ing enough. By con­trast to our fore­fa­thers who lived as hunters-gath­er­ers (and this is the most valid com­par­i­son since we are phys­i­cal­ly the same) we are prac­ti­cal­ly immo­bi­lized by com­forts.

Like in the case of phys­i­cal fit­ness, cog­ni­tive fit­ness requires delib­er­ate exer­cis­ing. The main rea­son for this rests on the fact that our brains are basi­cal­ly lazy. There are in prin­ci­ple two very dif­fer­ent modes of activ­i­ty that our brains engage in when­ev­er faced with a prob­lem:

a) Analy­sis of the sit­u­a­tion and of the pos­si­ble alter­na­tive actions and their con­se­quences. This mode requires sig­nif­i­cant resources of atten­tion, takes time and is men­tal­ly effort­ful.

b) Alter­na­tive­ly, we can search for sim­i­lar expe­ri­ences in the past and evoke a sim­i­lar solu­tion. This mode does not require atten­tion, is very fast and auto­mat­ic. Fur­ther­more, search­ing one’s data­base for pri­or expe­ri­ence is easy and there is lit­tle or no men­tal effort involved.

It should come as no sur­prise, there­fore, that the brain prefers by far the auto­mat­ic mode to the effort­ful one when­ev­er pos­si­ble. This has many obvi­ous advan­tages, as well as some dis­ad­van­tages. Chief among them is the dan­ger that the degree of sim­i­lar­i­ty between past expe­ri­ence and the present prob­lem would be sac­ri­ficed for rea­sons of con­ve­nience. This can lead to neglect of impor­tant sit­u­a­tion­al fea­tures that ren­der the old, famil­iar solu­tion, inad­e­quate.

This pref­er­ence and reliance on expe­ri­en­tial prece­dents feeds direct­ly into our ten­den­cy to devel­op rou­tines. After doing some­thing a few times the activ­i­ty, any activ­i­ty, becomes grad­u­al­ly a rou­tine one, requir­ing less atten­tion and less effort. There are many things we do well pre­cise­ly due to their becom­ing increas­ing­ly more auto­mat­ic in terms of the cog­ni­tive work involved. Dri­ving is a par­tic­u­lar­ly famil­iar exam­ple. Safe dri­ving requires on the aver­age two years of dri­ving expe­ri­ence, dur­ing which time the brain devel­ops help­ful rou­tines to deal with famil­iar chal­lenges on the road. How­ev­er, the ten­den­cy to devel­op rou­tines is by no means rel­e­vant exclu­sive­ly to motor activ­i­ties.

Thus, word recog­ni­tion in read­ing becomes auto­mat­ic and allows us to attend to mean­ing rather than the process of decod­ing each word from its con­stituent let­ters and syl­la­bles. As we gain expe­ri­ence, even high­ly com­plex intel­lec­tu­al activ­i­ties become rou­tine over time.

Rou­tines make things eas­i­er, but for that same rea­son they become less chal­leng­ing. Thus, as we go about the tasks of liv­ing we become more expe­ri­enced and those very tasks lose their abil­i­ty to chal­lenge our brains. More­over, old peo­ple have too much expe­ri­ence. They have seen almost every­thing, heard almost every­thing and faced most sit­u­a­tions in the past. It is for this rea­son that every­day life expe­ri­ences can­not ensure brain fit­ness any more than they can assure phys­i­cal fit­ness. The anal­o­gy does not stop here and just as we need phys­i­cal work­out we need cog­ni­tive work­outs as well.

The above analy­sis points to activ­i­ties hold­ing the great­est promise of healthy chal­lenge to the brain. Name­ly, they have to be nov­el. Read­ing a new book, vis­it­ing new places, try­ing new foods, learn­ing to play a musi­cal instru­ment, or best, learn­ing a new lan­guage, these are the activ­i­ties that brain fit­ness is made of. And on top of it, engage in qual­i­ty cog­ni­tive train­ing exer­cis­es that cov­er the broad spec­trum of cog­ni­tive skills and max­i­mize the cog­ni­tive val­ue per unit of time spent.

Schlomo Breznitz CogniFitProf. Schlo­mo Breznitz is the Founder and Pres­i­dent of Cog­niFit. Pre­vi­ous­ly, he served as the Lady Davis Pro­fes­sor of Psy­chol­o­gy and the found­ing direc­tor of the Cen­ter for Study of Psy­cho­log­i­cal Stress at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Haifa. He has also been vis­it­ing pro­fes­sor at the Lon­don School of Eco­nom­ics, Berke­ley, Stan­ford, and Nation­al Insti­tutes of Health.

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

4 Responses

  1. Mike says:

    Great post­ing. I am a firm believ­er in the val­ue of “men­tal exer­cise” and am thrilled to see arti­cles like this. I agree that men­tal train­ing is sim­i­lar to phys­i­cal train­ing. Tak­ing the anal­o­gy a step fur­ther, I con­sid­er med­i­ta­tion to be the refresh­ing “sleep” that the phys­i­cal body gets that the mind rarely gets. Again, well done and thanks.

  2. Alvaro says:

    Hel­lo Mike, well, I’d say med­i­ta­tion is a great men­tal exer­cise itself, and a source of stim­u­lat­ing nov­el­ty for most of us non-expert prac­ti­tion­ers.

  3. This is a con­cise and con­vinc­ing essay about the neces­si­ty for fit­ness in both mind and body. Thank you for shar­ing your exper­tise.

Leave a Reply

Categories: Cognitive Neuroscience, Health & Wellness, Technology

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters,  SharpBrains is an independent market research firm tracking how brain science can improve our health and our lives.

Search in our archives

Follow us and Engage via…

twitter_logo_header
RSS Feed

Watch All Recordings Now (40+ Speakers, 12+ Hours)