Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Icon

Darwin’s adult neuroplasticity

Charles Darwin 1880Charles Dar­win (1809–1882)‘s auto­bi­og­ra­phy (full text free online) includes some very insight­ful refec­tions on the evo­lu­tion of his own mind dur­ing his mid­dle-age, show­cas­ing the pow­er of the brain to rewire itself through expe­ri­ence (neu­ro­plas­tic­i­ty) dur­ing our whole life­times-not just when we are youngest.

He wrote these paragraphs at the age of 72 (I have bold­ed some key sen­tences for empha­sis, the whole text makes great read­ing):

I have said that in one respect my mind has changed dur­ing the last twen­ty or thir­ty years. Up to the age of thir­ty, or beyond it, poet­ry of many kinds, such as the works of Mil­ton, Gray, Byron, Wordsworth, Coleridge, and Shel­ley, gave me great plea­sure, and even as a school­boy I took intense delight in Shake­speare, espe­cial­ly in the his­tor­i­cal plays. I have also said that for­mer­ly pic­tures gave me con­sid­er­able, and music very great delight. But now for many years I can­not endure to read a line of poet­ry: I have tried late­ly to read Shake­speare, and found it so intol­er­a­bly dull that it nau­se­at­ed me. I have also almost lost my taste for pic­tures or music. Music gen­er­al­ly sets me think­ing too ener­get­i­cal­ly on what I have been at work on, instead of giv­ing me plea­sure. I retain some taste for fine scenery, but it does not cause me the exquis­ite delight which it for­mer­ly did. On the oth­er hand, nov­els which are works of the imag­i­na­tion, though not of a very high order, have been for years a won­der­ful relief and plea­sure to me, and I often bless all nov­el­ists. A sur­pris­ing num­ber have been read aloud to me, and I like all if mod­er­ate­ly good, and if they do not end unhap­pi­ly– against which a law ought to be passed. A nov­el, accord­ing to my taste, does not come into the first class unless it con­tains some per­son whom one can thor­ough­ly love, and if a pret­ty woman all the bet­ter.

This curi­ous and lam­en­ta­ble loss of the high­er aes­thet­ic tastes is all the odd­er, as books on his­to­ry, biogra­phies, and trav­els (inde­pen­dent­ly of any sci­en­tif­ic facts which they may con­tain), and essays on all sorts of sub­jects inter­est me as much as ever they did. My mind seems to have become a kind of machine for grind­ing gen­er­al laws out of large col­lec­tions of facts, but why this should have caused the atro­phy of that part of the brain alone, on which the high­er tastes depend, I can­not con­ceive. A man with a mind more high­ly organ­ised or bet­ter con­sti­tut­ed than mine, would not, I sup­pose, have thus suf­fered; and if I had to live my life again, I would have made a rule to read some poet­ry and lis­ten to some music at least once every week; for per­haps the parts of my brain now atro­phied would thus have been kept active through use. The loss of these tastes is a loss of hap­pi­ness, and may pos­si­bly be inju­ri­ous to the intel­lect, and more prob­a­bly to the moral char­ac­ter, by enfee­bling the emo­tion­al part of our nature.”

 

 

We have already dis­cussed how “cells that fire togeth­er wire togeth­er”. The neu­rons and synaps­es that we use often grow over time; the ones we don’t use get weakened.  As it seems, Dar­win implic­it­ly trained him­self to devel­op a high­ly method­i­cal and ana­lyt­i­cal mindset, while, as he posits, not devot­ing enough time to oth­er inter­ests. Check out this para­graph (which pre­cedes the pre­vi­ous two in the orig­i­nal text):

Hav­ing said thus much about my man­ner of writ­ing, I will add that with my large books I spend a good deal of time over the gen­er­al arrange­ment of the mat­ter. I first make the rud­est out­line in two or three pages, and then a larg­er one in sev­er­al pages, a few words or one word stand­ing for a whole dis­cus­sion or series of facts. Each one of these head­ings is again enlarged and often trans­ferred before I begin to write in exten­so. As in sev­er­al of my books facts observed by oth­ers have been very exten­sive­ly used, and as I have always had sev­er­al quite dis­tinct sub­jects in hand at the same time, I may men­tion that I keep from thir­ty to forty large port­fo­lios, in cab­i­nets with labelled shelves, into which I can at once put a detached ref­er­ence or mem­o­ran­dum. I have bought many books, and at their ends I make an index of all the facts that con­cern my work; or, if the book is not my own, write out a sep­a­rate abstract, and of such abstracts I have a large draw­er full. Before begin­ning on any sub­ject I look to all the short index­es and make a gen­er­al and clas­si­fied index, and by tak­ing the one or more prop­er port­fo­lios I have all the infor­ma­tion col­lect­ed dur­ing my life ready for use.”

Lit­tle by lit­tle, he cre­at­ed his own, per­son­al­ized Yahoo direc­to­ry and pre­dic­tion algorithm…and his “mind seems to have become a kind of machine for grind­ing gen­er­al laws out of large col­lec­tions of facts”. 

Some final remarks by this amaz­ing sci­en­tist and man:

There­fore my suc­cess as a man of sci­ence, what­ev­er this may have amount­ed to, has been deter­mined, as far as I can judge, by com­plex and diver­si­fied men­tal qual­i­ties and con­di­tions. Of these, the most impor­tant have been–the love of sci­ence– unbound­ed patience in long reflect­ing over any subject–industry in observ­ing and col­lect­ing facts–and a fair share of inven­tion as well as of com­mon sense. With such mod­er­ate abil­i­ties as I pos­sess, it is tru­ly sur­pris­ing that I should have influ­enced to a con­sid­er­able extent the belief of sci­en­tif­ic men on some impor­tant points.”

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

6 Responses

  1. Adrian says:

    I just read up to the 4th line, where you wrote “evo­lu­tion of his own mind”. You should have cho­sen a bet­ter word than ‘evo­lu­tion’.

    cheers.

  2. Alvaro says:

    Hel­lo Adri­an,

    Peo­ple, ideas, species, and, yes, even minds evolve. I am sor­ry that you choose to stop read­ing a post based on one word-that is your free choice.

    Regards

Leave a Reply

Categories: Cognitive Neuroscience

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters,  SharpBrains is an independent market research firm tracking how brain science can improve our health and our lives.

Search in our archives

Follow us and Engage via…

twitter_logo_header
RSS Feed

Watch All Recordings Now (40+ Speakers, 12+ Hours)