7 Responses

1. Alan Pritt says:

   October 26, 2006 at 5:32

   A pos­si­ble prob­lem with using the Stroop test as a train­ing method is that after a lit­tle prac­tice it becomes real­ly easy. I sug­gest that this is not because we have learnt to inhib­it the nat­ur­al response, but because we have learnt to make the asso­ci­a­tion between colour and name stronger than word and name (at least in this con­text).

   An inter­est­ing per­son­al obser­va­tion is that while I quick­ly became good at the Stoop test, after play­ing with it for an extend­ed peri­od it becomes dif­fi­cult again. I guess this is prob­a­bly some­thing to do with tir­ing out the neu­rons con­nect­ed with the new learnt asso­ci­a­tion. This prob­a­bly tests out my ‘inhi­bi­tion pow­er’ again.

   If incor­po­rat­ed into a dynam­ic train­ing pro­gram — i.e. the task fre­quent­ly changes so that it is impos­si­ble to learn a task specif­i­cal­ly — then I think this could be a viable train­ing method.

   Reply
2. Alvaro says:

   October 26, 2006 at 6:49

   Alan, thanks for your com­ment. Yes, the Stroop test is an assess­ment, not a train­ing method per se. There are more sys­tem­at­ic ways to train inhi­bi­tion.

   Your own expe­ri­ence indi­cates that train­ing is pos­si­ble. Now, no one here is talk­ing about “inhibit­ing nat­ur­al impuls­es” but about learn­ing how to man­age them. You do so by wiring new stronger asso­ci­a­tions, and learn­ing when to use them.

   Thanks also for link­ing to us-will pay a vis­it dur­ing the week­end

   Reply
3. Alan Pritt says:

   October 27, 2006 at 4:33

   But it’s dur­ing the process of wiring new asso­ci­a­tions that inhibit­ing becomes very impor­tant. For exam­ple, if you’re learn­ing a song on your gui­tar and you dis­cov­er you’ve learnt a sec­tion incor­rect­ly, you have to inhib­it what you’ve already learnt while you lay down new path­ways. If you can’t do that, you will con­tin­ue to make the same mis­takes and strug­gle to get the new asso­ci­a­tions down cor­rect­ly. Remem­ber­ing to inhib­it one’s response seems to be a key part here, which would trans­late to atten­tion when learn­ing a new inhi­bi­tion.

   Reply
4. armand l martin OD says:

   November 26, 2006 at 4:22

   I missed somthing here? or was I just too lit­er­al? alm

   Reply
5. Alvaro says:

   November 26, 2006 at 4:27

   Armand, have you tried all the words, or only the first few?

   Reply
6. Alvaro says:

   November 2, 2006 at 11:22

   Alan, true, you can learn how to inhib­it your behav­ior-play­ing that gui­tar sec­tion incor­rect­ly-, I just meant that what you can not inhib­it is the learned impulse to play it that way at first. You have that impulse, but you man­age your response, and suc­ceed in inhib­it the behav­ior (not the impulse). Over time, you will learn new impuls­es.

   Reply