Sharp Brains: Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News

Neuroplasticity, Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health News


The Art of Changing the Brain: Interview with Dr. James Zull

Kolb on BrainLearn­ing through a vir­tu­ous Learn­ing Cycle. That’s the mes­sage from Dr. James Zull, Pro­fes­sor of Biol­o­gy and Bio­chem­istry at Case West­ern Uni­ver­si­ty, Direc­tor of UCITE (The Uni­ver­si­ty Cen­ter for Inno­va­tion in Teach­ing and Edu­ca­tion), and Pro­fes­sor of a Human Learn­ing and The Brain class.

Dr. Zull loves to learn. And to teach. And to build con­nec­tions. He has spent years build­ing bridges between neu­ro­bi­ol­o­gy and ped­a­gogy, as a result of which he wrote The Art of Chang­ing the Brain: Enrich­ing the Prac­tice of Teach­ing by Explor­ing the Biol­o­gy of Learn­ing, which shows how neu­ro­bi­o­log­i­cal research can inform and refine some of the best ideas in edu­ca­tion­al the­o­ry.

Jim ZullIn that book, Prof. Zull added bio­log­i­cal sub­strate to David Kolb’s Learn­ing Cycle frame­work. David Kolb’s Expe­ri­en­tial Learn­ing: Expe­ri­ence as the Source of Learn­ing and Devel­op­ment book refers to human learn­ing, but Pro­fes­sor Zull tells that today, in his desk, he has cog­ni­tive neu­ro­science papers and research that show that apes go through the same 4 stages when they are learn­ing a new activ­i­ty, acti­vat­ing exact­ly the same brain areas than we do.

AF: What is Learn­ing? Can apes real­ly learn in the same way we do?

JZ: Learn­ing is phys­i­cal. Learn­ing means the mod­i­fi­ca­tion, growth, and prun­ing of our neu­rons, connections–called synaps­es– and neu­ronal net­works, through expe­ri­ence. And, yes, we have seen that apes go through the same Learn­ing Cycle as we do, acti­vat­ing the same brain areas.

AF: How does Learn­ing hap­pen?

These are the 4 stages of the Learn­ing Cycle.
1) We have a Con­crete expe­ri­ence,
2) We devel­op Reflec­tive Obser­va­tion and Con­nec­tions,
3) We gen­er­ate Abstract hypoth­e­sis,
4) We then do Active test­ing of those hypothe­ses, and there­fore have a new Con­crete expe­ri­ence, and a new Learn­ing Cycle ensues.

In oth­er words, we 1) get infor­ma­tion (sen­so­ry cor­tex), 2) make mean­ing of that infor­ma­tion (back inte­gra­tive cor­tex), 3) cre­ate new ideas from these mean­ings (front inte­gra­tive cor­tex) and 4) act on those ideas (motor cor­tex). From this I pro­pose that there are four pil­lars of learn­ing: gath­er­ing, ana­lyz­ing, cre­at­ing, and act­ing.

This is how we learn. Now, learn­ing this way requires effort and get­ting out of our com­fort zones. A key con­di­tion for learn­ing is self-dri­ven moti­va­tion, a sense of own­er­ship. To feel in con­trol, to feel that one is mak­ing progress, is nec­es­sary for this Learn­ing Cycle to self-per­pet­u­ate. Anto­nio Dama­sio made a strong point on the role of emo­tions in his great Descartes’ Error book.

AF: can we, as learn­ers, moti­vate our­selves? How can we become bet­ter learn­ers?

JZ: Great ques­tion, because in fact that is a unique­ly human abil­i­ty, at least to the degree we can do so. We know that the Frontal Lobes, which are pro­por­tion­al­ly much larg­er in humans than in any oth­er mam­mal, are key for emo­tion­al self-reg­u­la­tion. We can be proac­tive and iden­ti­fy the areas that moti­vate us, and build on those. In oth­er words, the Art of the Learn­er may be the Art of Find­ing Con­nec­tions between the new infor­ma­tion and chal­lenges and what we already know and care about.

If I had to select one Men­tal Mus­cle that stu­dents should real­ly exer­cise, and grow, dur­ing the school­ing years, I’d say they need to build this Learn­ing Mus­cle. Learn­ing how to Learn. That might be even more valu­able than learn­ing what we stress in the cur­ricu­lum, i.e., the sub­jects we teach.

AF: Do you think this is hap­pen­ing today in our schools?

JZ: I don’t think so. First, of all, too many peo­ple still believe that Edu­ca­tion means the process by which stu­dents pas­sive­ly absorb infor­ma­tion. Even if many edu­ca­tors would like to ensure a more par­tic­i­pa­to­ry and active approach, we still use the struc­tures and pri­or­i­ties of anoth­er era. For exam­ple, we still pay too much atten­tion to cat­e­go­riz­ing some kids as intel­li­gent, some as not so, instead of focus­ing on how they could all learn more.

Sec­ond, learn­ing and chang­ing are not that easy. They require effort, and also, by def­i­n­i­tion, get­ting out of our com­fort zones. We need to try new things, and to fail. The Active Test­ing phase is a crit­i­cal one, and some­times our hypoth­e­sis will be right, and some­times wrong. The fear of fail­ing, the fear of look­ing un-smart, is a key obsta­cle to learn­ing that I see too often, espe­cial­ly for peo­ple who want to pro­tect per­ceived rep­u­ta­tions to such an extent that they can’t try new gen­uine Learn­ing Cycles.

AF: Fas­ci­nat­ing. Giv­en what you just said, how do you help your stu­dents become bet­ter learn­ers?

JZ: Despite the fact that every brain is dif­fer­ent, let me sim­pli­fy and say that I usu­al­ly observe 2 types of stu­dents, with dif­fer­ent obsta­cles to learn­ing and there­fore ben­e­fit­ing from dif­fer­ent strate­gies.

A) Stu­dents who have an intro­ver­sion ten­den­cy can be very good at the Reflec­tion and Abstract hypoth­e­sis phas­es, but not so at the Active Test­ing one. In order to change that, I help cre­ate small groups where they feel safer and can take risks such as shar­ing their thoughts aloud and ask­ing more ques­tions.

B) More extro­vert­ed stu­dents can be very good at hav­ing con­stant Con­crete expe­ri­ences and Active Test­ing, but may ben­e­fit from increased Reflec­tion and Abstract hypoth­e­sis. Hav­ing them write papers, maybe pre­dict­ing the out­come of cer­tain exper­i­ments or even cur­rent polit­i­cal affairs, helps.

AF: Very use­ful. What oth­er tips would you offer to teach­ers and par­ents?

JZ: Always pro­voke an active reac­tion, ensur­ing the stu­dent is engaged and sees the con­nec­tion between the new infor­ma­tion and what he or she already knows. You can do so by ask­ing ques­tions such as “What does this make you think of? Is there some part of this new mate­r­i­al that rings a wild bell for you?” To ensure a safe learn­ing envi­ron­ment, you have to make sure to accept their answers, and build on them. We should view stu­dents as plants and flow­ers that need care­ful cul­ti­va­tion: grow­ing some areas, help­ing reduce oth­ers.

AF: Please give us an exam­ple.

JZ: Well, an exam­ple I use in my books is that mid­dle school stu­dents often have a hard time learn­ing about Mar­tin Luther and the Ref­or­ma­tion because they con­fuse him with Mar­tin Luther King Jr. We can choose to become frus­trat­ed about that. Or we can exploit this say­ing some­thing like, “Yes! Mar­tin Luther King was a lot like Mar­tin Luther. In fact, why do you think Mar­tin Luther King’s par­ents named him that? Why didn’t they name him Sam King?”

AF: Thanks. And what would you sug­gest for us who want to become bet­ter learn­ers?

JZ: Learn­ing is crit­i­cal at all ages, not only in the school envi­ron­ment. We have brains pre­cise­ly in order to be able to learn, to adapt to new envi­ron­ments. This is essen­tial through­out life, not just in school. We now know that every brain can change, at any age. There is real­ly no upper lim­it on learn­ing since the brain neu­rons seem to be capa­ble of grow­ing new con­nec­tions when­ev­er they are used repeat­ed­ly. I think all of us need to devel­op the capac­i­ty to self-moti­vate our­selves. One way to do that is to search for those mean­ing­ful con­tact points and bridges, between what we want to learn and what we already know. When we do so, we are cul­ti­vat­ing our own neu­ronal net­works. We become our own gar­den­ers.

AF: Prof. Zull, many thanks for shar­ing your thoughts through your book, and for your time today. You have changed my brain-and prob­a­bly will change the brains of a num­ber of read­ers.

JZ: My plea­sure!

For more infor­ma­tion on his Pro­fes­sor Zull’s thoughts and his book, vis­it the great
New Hori­zons for Learn­ing site.

A final reflec­tion: this Learn­ing Cycle is very sim­i­lar to what peo­ple at McK­in­sey & Com­pa­ny (my first job ever), and oth­er strate­gic con­sult­ing firms, need to devel­op very quick­ly, and con­sti­tutes the core for a very suc­cess­ful Per­for­mance Review sys­tem. Inter­est­ing to under­stand the neu­ro­bi­o­log­i­cal basis for it. Brain Fit­ness starts with Learn­ing. Brain and Mind Fit­ness means being able, and ready, to learn. Not just an Edu­ca­tion issue, but a Health and Well­ness and Fit­ness one.

Leave a Reply...

Loading Facebook Comments ...

21 Responses

  1. joann says:


Leave a Reply

Categories: Cognitive Neuroscience, Education & Lifelong Learning, Health & Wellness, Neuroscience Interview Series, Peak Performance, Professional Development

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

All Slidedecks & Recordings Available — click image below

Search for anything brain-related in our article archives

About SharpBrains

As seen in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, BBC News, CNN, Reuters, and more, SharpBrains is an independent market research firm and think tank tracking health and performance applications of brain science.